(It’s way too easy to hit them flag button while scrolling with this system. I know nothing bad will happen probably but I still feel obliged to say it was a mistake, bleh ^ ^’)
It looks like she also got the Car since she was able to bring stuff up to joyce. The Courts probably sided with her since the Husband was the one who sought the divorce and it wasn’t because of Marital Infidelity or Abuse, and they live probably live in the Bible Belt.
Also if she’s been a housewife for a long time, and he’s a dentist, he has more earning potential than she does. Which he in part owes to her managing the unpaid parts of their livelihood.
Just cos she’s AWFUL doesn’t mean it’s just that she should suffer disproportionately from a divorce.
on a cosmic level maybe, but not on a judicial one.
Angel
i’d imagine she could’ve met with a realtor or gotten a direct check from someone but idk if hank would think it’s worth it to go to court over it, or have enough saved to give joyce an apartment to stay at after graduation if she doesn’t move in with him
She did not participate in any of those acts, just tacitly approved of them. Legally, she bears no responsibility.
Bryy
Yeah, but I also have got to wonder what the fuck Carol would have said at court.
Tan
She participated in her church’s perfectly legal fundraiser to raise bail for a member of her community who she has known for the better part of two decades, who is innocent until proven guilty.
All states, including Indiana, now have no-fault divorce as an option. Indiana is not, however, a community property state, so when it comes time to divide property in a divorce, the courts will do so “fairly”. Assuming Joyce’s mother was a stay-at-home mom, because super religious, the courts would probably award her the home because her ability to earn a living after 20+ years of not being employed outside the home is limited. It doesn’t really have anything to do with the courts taking her side because it’s in the Bible Belt. It’s more about not wanting to leave a spouse homeless and poor just because their contribution to the marriage was through taking care of the household.
Joy
Yeah I don’t think that the ruling is unfair per se just that Carol is a very fucked up person.
Joy
Well, character. This scene feels a lot more… Real? Than most scenes in this story?
Comic.phile
It’s based off something that really happened to the author, unfortunately, with his own mom.
thejeff
We also know nothing about how the division was reached. What other assets they had or how they might have been divided. Whether any alimony will be paid, etc.
It was a quick divorce apparently, which suggests that Hank might not have fought very hard.
From my experience as an old person, people often work this stuff out between themselves and courts don’t always get involved to divvy everything up. I’d venture a guess that Hank may have just not fought for these things knowing he could rebuild more easily
Hank may have just signed whatever they handed him just to expedite the process. And since he’s the one who’s employed for monetary gain, he has the resources to get his own living arrangements and another car.
The value of the house and car probably also came into play when the court decided on alimony.
The financial/asset side of a divorce is actually really simple (except where places enjoy the needless drama of arguing over numbers). First subtract everyone’s assets from before the marriage, that shit remains the property of whoever it came with. Then add up everything accrued during the marriage. Divide by two. That’s how much each party gets. The calculations for alimony and child-support (if applicable) are also pretty solidly laid out. So it’s not “Carol got the whole house” so much as “the house represents part of Carol’s share of the division of assets.” She could very well owe Hank money to buy out his share of the asset. If the parties can’t agree on how to divide up the material assets to ensure the division of wealth proceeds, the court orders the assets under dispute sold, and the profit (if any) divided. Hank likely didn’t see the point of haggling over a house he didn’t want to live in anymore, and/or wanted to be decent and try and make sure, despite needing to seperate, that Carol would be ok. At least he can sleep well knowing *he* didn’t make her homeless.
Anyways, yeah. Don’t fight over assets in family court. It’s a solved problem, and it’s dumb. Fight tooth and nail for your kids though, if you’re stuck dealing with a toxic as all get out other parent. Or you’ll never have a decent sleep again, knowing your kids are being abused and you’re helpless to do anything about it.
I honestly am getting nervous that this is the incoming dark twist. Is Joyce’s mom gonna be the next villain? Eeeek! (Dang it sorry I hit flag. Didn’t mean to.)
I’d say such people aren’t really Religious so much as ‘Virtue signaling assholes’. (*yes, I know, the term’s been abused.) They ‘signal’ their ‘virtue’ by rationalizing the Word to whatever they want it to mean, in order to justify whatever it is they want to do, while appearing virtuous to gullible people around them. (and to themselves, since that level of delusion REQUIRES a certain level of Narcissism.)
In the process, giving people who actually KNOW what they believe and have actual faith a bad name.
Laura
I dunno about that. One could say the same of Universalists. Or liberal and open-minded folks of any faith. It’s about finding the faith practice that one can live with, that works practically for one’s own life, and figuring out a way to nestle it within cultural and literary tradition. I don’t see anything particularly wrong with that. It doesn’t change what’s bigotry and what’s inclusion — just because it happens to be faith based.
381 thoughts on “Sell”
Ana Chronistic
IMAGINE, not knowing things after NOT BEING TOLD
Joyce getting better at one-handed typing? :u
Ana Chronistic
alt: Joyce chat icon should now be Joyce-aghast face lolololol
Maveric1984
she doesn’t wear the brace any more, so it’s bound to get better
Laura
Maybe that’s what Jocelyne was calling Joyce about. If the timeline checks out.
RassilonTDavros
Preeeetty sure that timeline checks out perfectly.
Needfuldoer
Yup. That was just about a week ago, DoA time.
Lumino
“Hey mom, meet my Jewish boyfriend!”
*Carol explodes*
GholaHalleck
Just like Jesus!
Yotomoe
And he does rise every 3 days.
Florens
Pretty sure Joe’s refractory period is shorter than that.
Casi
well he’s never had joyce, so who knows. He may actually die from their first encounter and then rise again in 3 days
Psychie
I’d hope he’d have at least a *little* death
Proxiehunter
Joe rises several times a day.
NGPZ
And he just wants to spead his love!
He like Jesus only better! XD
Matthew Davis
That’s what I keep thinking. Poor Joe. That said, if he steps up for Joyce that’ll hopefully stop some of the self-loathing he has.
Reltzik
“Don’t worry, I’m only ETHNICALLY Jewish. Not religiously Jewish.”
“Oh, okay.”
“I’m an atheist.”
Needfuldoer
We’d finally see the Carol Shocked Face!
(Hey, Joyce had to get it from somewhere!)
JasonAW3
As long as it happens before the house sale is finalized, Joyce inherits the house!
DailyBrad
Joe came to Joyce in a dream once. Had to wash the sheets.
shrub
Whose dream?
AeromechanicalAce
Yes
RassilonTDavros
Strangely enough, it was actually Blowjob Cat’s.
GholaHalleck
Joe HAS shown up in one of joyce’s shame dreams, as a shadowy figure.
AKP
Did she just get the entire house in the divorce?
Thag Simmons
I guess so?
Amaya/Polaris
(It’s way too easy to hit them flag button while scrolling with this system. I know nothing bad will happen probably but I still feel obliged to say it was a mistake, bleh ^ ^’)
Switchchris
It looks like she also got the Car since she was able to bring stuff up to joyce. The Courts probably sided with her since the Husband was the one who sought the divorce and it wasn’t because of Marital Infidelity or Abuse, and they live probably live in the Bible Belt.
Carms
Also if she’s been a housewife for a long time, and he’s a dentist, he has more earning potential than she does. Which he in part owes to her managing the unpaid parts of their livelihood.
Just cos she’s AWFUL doesn’t mean it’s just that she should suffer disproportionately from a divorce.
on a cosmic level maybe, but not on a judicial one.
Angel
i’d imagine she could’ve met with a realtor or gotten a direct check from someone but idk if hank would think it’s worth it to go to court over it, or have enough saved to give joyce an apartment to stay at after graduation if she doesn’t move in with him
Bryy
Yes, but KIDNAPPING and MURDER.
Tan
She did not participate in any of those acts, just tacitly approved of them. Legally, she bears no responsibility.
Bryy
Yeah, but I also have got to wonder what the fuck Carol would have said at court.
Tan
She participated in her church’s perfectly legal fundraiser to raise bail for a member of her community who she has known for the better part of two decades, who is innocent until proven guilty.
Ed Callahan
Darn that Bill of Rights.
DailyBrad
It’s possible, though she also could be borrowing the car from someone in the congregation.
danimagoo
All states, including Indiana, now have no-fault divorce as an option. Indiana is not, however, a community property state, so when it comes time to divide property in a divorce, the courts will do so “fairly”. Assuming Joyce’s mother was a stay-at-home mom, because super religious, the courts would probably award her the home because her ability to earn a living after 20+ years of not being employed outside the home is limited. It doesn’t really have anything to do with the courts taking her side because it’s in the Bible Belt. It’s more about not wanting to leave a spouse homeless and poor just because their contribution to the marriage was through taking care of the household.
Joy
Yeah I don’t think that the ruling is unfair per se just that Carol is a very fucked up person.
Joy
Well, character. This scene feels a lot more… Real? Than most scenes in this story?
Comic.phile
It’s based off something that really happened to the author, unfortunately, with his own mom.
thejeff
We also know nothing about how the division was reached. What other assets they had or how they might have been divided. Whether any alimony will be paid, etc.
It was a quick divorce apparently, which suggests that Hank might not have fought very hard.
tunasammich
From my experience as an old person, people often work this stuff out between themselves and courts don’t always get involved to divvy everything up. I’d venture a guess that Hank may have just not fought for these things knowing he could rebuild more easily
Vanessa
Or she thinks she does! Because Jesus told her so.
Slartibeast Button, BIA
I’m just going to assume that giving her the house and the car was in exchange for her not claiming an interest in his dental practice or something.
Needfuldoer
Hank may have just signed whatever they handed him just to expedite the process. And since he’s the one who’s employed for monetary gain, he has the resources to get his own living arrangements and another car.
The value of the house and car probably also came into play when the court decided on alimony.
Bryy
I didn’t even think of that, either. His look of pure horror when hugging Joyce as it all hit him spoke volumes.
Decidedly Orthogonal
The financial/asset side of a divorce is actually really simple (except where places enjoy the needless drama of arguing over numbers). First subtract everyone’s assets from before the marriage, that shit remains the property of whoever it came with. Then add up everything accrued during the marriage. Divide by two. That’s how much each party gets. The calculations for alimony and child-support (if applicable) are also pretty solidly laid out. So it’s not “Carol got the whole house” so much as “the house represents part of Carol’s share of the division of assets.” She could very well owe Hank money to buy out his share of the asset. If the parties can’t agree on how to divide up the material assets to ensure the division of wealth proceeds, the court orders the assets under dispute sold, and the profit (if any) divided. Hank likely didn’t see the point of haggling over a house he didn’t want to live in anymore, and/or wanted to be decent and try and make sure, despite needing to seperate, that Carol would be ok. At least he can sleep well knowing *he* didn’t make her homeless.
Anyways, yeah. Don’t fight over assets in family court. It’s a solved problem, and it’s dumb. Fight tooth and nail for your kids though, if you’re stuck dealing with a toxic as all get out other parent. Or you’ll never have a decent sleep again, knowing your kids are being abused and you’re helpless to do anything about it.
Decidedly Orthogonal
Damn. Sorry for the wall o’ text folks.
AKP
No, thank you for the wall of text. I appreciated the wall of text.
Kyle Voltti
It’s also possible that Joyce’s dad didn’t contest the house.
DarkoNeko
oh you gotta be f*cking kidding me
Bryy
That “I think” IS DOING A LOT OF HEAVY LIFTING.
butts
knowing that this is more or less a true story doesn’t make it feel any less whackadoo
DarkoNeko
yeeeep
Azhrei Vep
Quite the contrary, in fact. Jeebus Crimmus.
nicoleandmaggie
Word.
MoreWLessG
I honestly am getting nervous that this is the incoming dark twist. Is Joyce’s mom gonna be the next villain? Eeeek! (Dang it sorry I hit flag. Didn’t mean to.)
NGPZ
Wherever you are JoJo, you better hurry!!!! ?
*plays “Tension” from JoJo StarDust Crusaders OST on Joe’s phone*
Mr. Random
…yeah.
She’s looking for any excuse to not be in her current situation.
Laura
True. Kind of like how Becky was OK with letting the bank take her father’s house. Too many memories and associations.
Arawn
It’s funny how God always seems to say what some religious people want him to say.
Needfuldoer
Their magic book does, too.
Isn’t that convenient!
Laura
It’s like a Rorschach inkblot. Or a scrying bowl. Or a deck of Tarot cards.
Daniel M Ball
I’d say such people aren’t really Religious so much as ‘Virtue signaling assholes’. (*yes, I know, the term’s been abused.) They ‘signal’ their ‘virtue’ by rationalizing the Word to whatever they want it to mean, in order to justify whatever it is they want to do, while appearing virtuous to gullible people around them. (and to themselves, since that level of delusion REQUIRES a certain level of Narcissism.)
In the process, giving people who actually KNOW what they believe and have actual faith a bad name.
Laura
I dunno about that. One could say the same of Universalists. Or liberal and open-minded folks of any faith. It’s about finding the faith practice that one can live with, that works practically for one’s own life, and figuring out a way to nestle it within cultural and literary tradition. I don’t see anything particularly wrong with that. It doesn’t change what’s bigotry and what’s inclusion — just because it happens to be faith based.
Stephen Bierce
—So when you’re near me, darling can’t you hear me? S.O.S.!
The love you gave me, nothing else can save me! S.O.S.!
TulipKitten
… Is Carol going nuts?
Yotomoe
Going?
Laura
Hmm. Maybe. Lots of people make drastic changes to their lives based on words heard in dreams, though. It happens.
Warcodered
If she thinks God specifically spoke to her to tell her to sell her house that is not good.
Though I do wonder how he phrased it. “Carol sell the house, it’s a great time now it’s a sellers market.”
Vanessa
She’s always been an extreme cultist though. Maybe she is doubling down without Hank to exert a moderating influence.
Clif
Hey, the church has legal bills on account of being sued by a crazy lady.
Needfuldoer
Who also just so happens to be in Bloomington today!
This could get interesting…