Doasaurus siegalensis: a newly described species within the genus Doasaurus. This is the second species described, after the recently discovered Doasaurus saruyamensis. D. siegalensis is a much larger species than the D. saruyamensis, a smaller species, whose demeanor has been predicted to be relatively docile. More research is being done on this genus.
PS, Willis, take not that otusasio451 never said D-Siegalensis or D-Saruyamensis. Don’t get me wrong, Willis. You’re a smart person. This strip proves it quite well. However, that just makes your flagrant abuse of scientific terms all the more disappointing.
Scientifically speaking, that is absolutely incorrect. The phrasing “T-rex” is a colloquialism adopted by layman speakers, but is not seen as valid in the scientific community. It’s actually T. rex. Trust me on this, I’m a biologist…in-training. I’m also a dinosaur nut. Guess who my favorite character is!
otusasio451, perhaps we should start a campaign announcing to everyone that David M. Willis is a science denier. This Tucker person, too.
These two would also be good people to ask to find out why science deniers blatantly refuse to accept science when the facts are laid out in front of them. This would be a very important thing to find out, before science deniers like David M. Willis and Tucker destroy the world.
David M Willis
t-rex
Brady Kj
When global warming puts Indiana under the ocean and everyone is dead from not getting vaccines, it shall be the fault of Willis, the science denier.
Tucker
t
–
r
e
x
jpic89
…I have no idea what is happening right now…
Brady Kj
T. rex
Not “t-rex”
jpic89, what’s happening right now is that Tucker and Willis are on the wrong side of history.
Alyssa and Soundwave, I’d like to meet Rex. t and R. tex. Clearly these are animals from some cool alternate universe. Perhaps R. stands for Ryrannosaurus, or Rannotysaurus, or Raaarr!!!
Tucker, your refusal to acknowledge the scientific fact of the animal’s name is not going to get you into heaven.
I figured out well down the line that I was demi, and nobody knows what the hell that means. I was faintly relieved to know I was ace, but my life is still more complicated than a hedonist’s life should be.
Hedonism isn’t all it’s cracked up to be either. You should see my monthly bills for chocolate sauce and bullwhips.
David Alexander McDonald
With me it was the strawberries and high-grade honey girl dip that nearly did me in. Although, some to think of it the St. Stephens Cross Quadrocopter might have factored in.
“…most people have no clue what asexuality is…”
Huh. Really?
Am I biased by my generation or my location? I hear stuff like that a lot around here [DoA] but I’ve never really seen it reflected in people. Not that the topic comes up much, but still.
Yeah, hence the “except on Tumblr” caveat. Out in meatspace my attempts at coming out tend to be met by confused stares and trailing sentences.
Disloyal Subject
Allow me to clarify.
Online, and in DoA comments in particular, I often hear about meatfolk being confused and ignorant of such things, but my own experience shows that the people I interact with in person have generally at least heard of the concept of nonbinary gender, and while the idea of someone being asexual may seem strange to them, they know what it means.
Going to college in California might have something to do with it, but I’m wondering if it’s more a matter of generation or geography.
MM
Little of Column A, little of Column B, I’d wager.
madock345
I’m at college in mississippi, and I really think it’s a generation thing. Everybody around here knows what that kind of thing is.
Leorale
Mainly generational. Internet!
It’s also helpful to have a critical mass of curious and progressive people, whether that’s by geography, career path, personal preference, or whatever.
Mindlink
Probably a lot geographical too. It took me awhile figuring out American media, and also online culture, as it always seemed to me to be set in a bizarro-world, more akin’ to Norway in the ’60s than present day.
I grew up in a small Norwegian town (5000 inhabitants, half of them farmers) in the eighties (am 36 today), and we learned about most of this stuff at school, before I was 12! Bi, a, trans, etc., and I can’t even remember a time when it was “OK” to discriminate against anyone because of their sexual preferences or identities, that’s the kind of thing we only read about. (Not that it doesn’t happen, but when it does the general response is shock and anger, not complacency)
Yotomoe
Even before I knew it was a thing I just assumed asexual people were people who don’t get all hot and bothered by sex. It never really…confuses or perplexes me unless someone goes into graphic detail. But hey, same thing if I try to explain my sexuality.
CrashCash
Or as I say… “I’m not gay, I’m not straight, I’m just not interested”
jesslin
Apparently there are a plethora of people who are sexually attracted to people who do not possess the empathy to understand how it is possible to *not* be sexually attracted to people, at least in the US (the only place I’m remotely qualified to comment on). I’m told by my (late forties) husband that it was harder to be ace as a male, even a geeky one, because peer pressure conversations were all about doing “it”, and he couldn’t have cared less about “it”, so he just thought he was broken, which is pretty common for teenagers who don’t match up with their peers. As a female geek who was already asocial, being ace was only a problem when I was asked out by a friend and we didn’t have the same idea of what ‘dating’ entailed, because I already knew I wasn’t like my peers for other reasons and didn’t care. Thankfully he’s still a good friend, but still…
I didn’t know asexuals needed a support group until I met several others who had all felt like outsiders, but they’ve all been early ’80s babies or earlier. I think with the recent hubbub over the breadth of the sexual spectrum, asexuals are probably the least of most people’s worries any more 😀
Fish
my coming out as ace has had … a lot of variety in responses.
On the bad side, its someone seeming supportive and then trashing me behind my back to a mutual friend, to “you just haven’t met the right person” or “that’s such a waste” or concerns for my partner’s well being.
But, the vast majority of responses have been “what does that mean? huh, okay.” Which I think is a really good response. 🙂
I’m a little Dina like though in personality, and a little child like at times. Its possible a ton of people are just relieved that my sexuality doesn’t involve wanting to have sex with anyone.
(for context, I’m in my 30s, in a very nerdy, queer friendly community. I only recently got on tumblr because it seemed like a nice place. I don’t feel like I need to come out there, I can just be, whereas in meatspace I still feel like I do).
Also, hi Wack’d! haven’t seen you around in a long time!
Yeah, sorry, I have been trying to participate more around here as I realize I’ve fallen off the map a bit.
Fish
Nothing to be sorry for! Spend your time as you see fit!
I am glad to see you though. 🙂 After the carla & aceness debate on shortpacked, it always gives me warm fuzzies to see you around. (I am the author of that “thank you very much for fighting the good fight” anon tumblr ask followed by the “you are free to stop at any time, take care of yourself” anon tumblr ask)
It all depends on how we assume people are distributed on the Kinsey scale. If we assign 10% to K=1 (completely hetero), and she enjoyed that particular instance, and we assume 100% of people who like women would enjoy kissing Becky (obviously true), then the probability that Dina is gay, using Bayes theorem, is about 80%.
Of course, we need Willis to conduct more experiments to lower the uncertainty. Its what Dina would want, statistically :p
Poskie
I’m getting some Faz vibes here with all this here talk of Kinsey scales and statistics…
Gordon
Well, we do have a lot of charts.
Oddball
I see your avatar screaming this and it made me giggle.
Deathjavu
I was studying for the FE when I posted last night and I’d just finished the chapter on stats.
Comparing me to faz seems kind of harsh 🙁
Deanatay
That’s statistics, not science. Dina is a scientist. She only does fresh, hot empirical data, raw and quivering.
Deathjavu
…statistics is used extensively in science to analyze empirical data. In fact, proper scientific analysis requires statistics because nothing is 100% accurate.
316 thoughts on “Ceremonial”
Jen Aside
Ethanosaur YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Dina …abandoned mission =/
otusasio451
Doasaurus siegalensis: a newly described species within the genus Doasaurus. This is the second species described, after the recently discovered Doasaurus saruyamensis. D. siegalensis is a much larger species than the D. saruyamensis, a smaller species, whose demeanor has been predicted to be relatively docile. More research is being done on this genus.
Brady Kj
Awesome!
PS, Willis, take not that otusasio451 never said D-Siegalensis or D-Saruyamensis. Don’t get me wrong, Willis. You’re a smart person. This strip proves it quite well. However, that just makes your flagrant abuse of scientific terms all the more disappointing.
David M Willis
t-rex
otusasio451
…Sorry about this.
Scientifically speaking, that is absolutely incorrect. The phrasing “T-rex” is a colloquialism adopted by layman speakers, but is not seen as valid in the scientific community. It’s actually T. rex. Trust me on this, I’m a biologist…in-training. I’m also a dinosaur nut. Guess who my favorite character is!
David M Willis
t-rex
otusasio451
B-Bu…yeah, all right.
Tucker
t-rex
Brady Kj
David M. Willis, why are you a science denier?
otusasio451, perhaps we should start a campaign announcing to everyone that David M. Willis is a science denier. This Tucker person, too.
These two would also be good people to ask to find out why science deniers blatantly refuse to accept science when the facts are laid out in front of them. This would be a very important thing to find out, before science deniers like David M. Willis and Tucker destroy the world.
David M Willis
t-rex
Brady Kj
When global warming puts Indiana under the ocean and everyone is dead from not getting vaccines, it shall be the fault of Willis, the science denier.
Tucker
t
–
r
e
x
jpic89
…I have no idea what is happening right now…
Brady Kj
T. rex
Not “t-rex”
jpic89, what’s happening right now is that Tucker and Willis are on the wrong side of history.
David M Willis
t-rex
Alyssa
Rex. t
Soundwave the Superior
R. tex
Tucker
t – r e x
Brady Kj
Alyssa and Soundwave, I’d like to meet Rex. t and R. tex. Clearly these are animals from some cool alternate universe. Perhaps R. stands for Ryrannosaurus, or Rannotysaurus, or Raaarr!!!
Tucker, your refusal to acknowledge the scientific fact of the animal’s name is not going to get you into heaven.
Tucker
t||||
|-|||
||r||
|||e|
||||x
Tan
Welp, looks like we’re gonna need YET ANOTHER besties-riding-dinosaur pic. Internet, you’re up.
Wire Segal
Dina smiled
this is the best thing
Atomix26
it’s the cutest thing ever. <3
Bagge
Dina’s smile is the best. It’s almost… smug. “Yeah, I nailed this whole identity thing. Go me.”
gkheyf
She is gleeful and happy and awesome and I wish to be her at that exact moment
maarvarq
The combination of the darling smile and her realisation that she’s outmaneuvered those who look down on her as socially incompetent … I’m in love!
Tandel
She’s just so thrilled to be dinosaur chick. It’s the best she can aspire to be.
Plasma Mongoose
While dinosaurs are the ancestors of birds, I believe the correct word for a young dinosaur is hatchling not chick.
Wire Segal
While that all may be true, she’s certainly dinosaur chic.
Tandel
At this moment I am sad I cannot click a single button to indicate ‘like’.
Wire Segal
It’s a sad feeling, isn’t it.
Jen Aside
You have to do the essay version of clicking “Like” =p
gkheyf
she’s really making sure, though, with that hoodie.
ozzi
That’s not a hoodie it is a triecertop
maarvarq
Dinosaur chick or dude is the best anyone can aspire to be 😛
Wack'd
I know that feel, Ethan.
Fortunately most people have no clue what asexuality is so my concerns that I’d become “that asexual guy” were mostly unfounded.
Except on Tumblr. There, at least, I’ve grown used to it.
David Alexander McDonald
I figured out well down the line that I was demi, and nobody knows what the hell that means. I was faintly relieved to know I was ace, but my life is still more complicated than a hedonist’s life should be.
David Alexander McDonald
Er, WASN’T ace.
Doctor_Who
Hedonism isn’t all it’s cracked up to be either. You should see my monthly bills for chocolate sauce and bullwhips.
David Alexander McDonald
With me it was the strawberries and high-grade honey girl dip that nearly did me in. Although, some to think of it the St. Stephens Cross Quadrocopter might have factored in.
Disloyal Subject
“…most people have no clue what asexuality is…”
Huh. Really?
Am I biased by my generation or my location? I hear stuff like that a lot around here [DoA] but I’ve never really seen it reflected in people. Not that the topic comes up much, but still.
Wack'd
Yeah, hence the “except on Tumblr” caveat. Out in meatspace my attempts at coming out tend to be met by confused stares and trailing sentences.
Disloyal Subject
Allow me to clarify.
Online, and in DoA comments in particular, I often hear about meatfolk being confused and ignorant of such things, but my own experience shows that the people I interact with in person have generally at least heard of the concept of nonbinary gender, and while the idea of someone being asexual may seem strange to them, they know what it means.
Going to college in California might have something to do with it, but I’m wondering if it’s more a matter of generation or geography.
MM
Little of Column A, little of Column B, I’d wager.
madock345
I’m at college in mississippi, and I really think it’s a generation thing. Everybody around here knows what that kind of thing is.
Leorale
Mainly generational. Internet!
It’s also helpful to have a critical mass of curious and progressive people, whether that’s by geography, career path, personal preference, or whatever.
Mindlink
Probably a lot geographical too. It took me awhile figuring out American media, and also online culture, as it always seemed to me to be set in a bizarro-world, more akin’ to Norway in the ’60s than present day.
I grew up in a small Norwegian town (5000 inhabitants, half of them farmers) in the eighties (am 36 today), and we learned about most of this stuff at school, before I was 12! Bi, a, trans, etc., and I can’t even remember a time when it was “OK” to discriminate against anyone because of their sexual preferences or identities, that’s the kind of thing we only read about. (Not that it doesn’t happen, but when it does the general response is shock and anger, not complacency)
Yotomoe
Even before I knew it was a thing I just assumed asexual people were people who don’t get all hot and bothered by sex. It never really…confuses or perplexes me unless someone goes into graphic detail. But hey, same thing if I try to explain my sexuality.
CrashCash
Or as I say… “I’m not gay, I’m not straight, I’m just not interested”
jesslin
Apparently there are a plethora of people who are sexually attracted to people who do not possess the empathy to understand how it is possible to *not* be sexually attracted to people, at least in the US (the only place I’m remotely qualified to comment on). I’m told by my (late forties) husband that it was harder to be ace as a male, even a geeky one, because peer pressure conversations were all about doing “it”, and he couldn’t have cared less about “it”, so he just thought he was broken, which is pretty common for teenagers who don’t match up with their peers. As a female geek who was already asocial, being ace was only a problem when I was asked out by a friend and we didn’t have the same idea of what ‘dating’ entailed, because I already knew I wasn’t like my peers for other reasons and didn’t care. Thankfully he’s still a good friend, but still…
I didn’t know asexuals needed a support group until I met several others who had all felt like outsiders, but they’ve all been early ’80s babies or earlier. I think with the recent hubbub over the breadth of the sexual spectrum, asexuals are probably the least of most people’s worries any more 😀
Fish
my coming out as ace has had … a lot of variety in responses.
On the bad side, its someone seeming supportive and then trashing me behind my back to a mutual friend, to “you just haven’t met the right person” or “that’s such a waste” or concerns for my partner’s well being.
But, the vast majority of responses have been “what does that mean? huh, okay.” Which I think is a really good response. 🙂
I’m a little Dina like though in personality, and a little child like at times. Its possible a ton of people are just relieved that my sexuality doesn’t involve wanting to have sex with anyone.
(for context, I’m in my 30s, in a very nerdy, queer friendly community. I only recently got on tumblr because it seemed like a nice place. I don’t feel like I need to come out there, I can just be, whereas in meatspace I still feel like I do).
Also, hi Wack’d! haven’t seen you around in a long time!
Wack'd
Yeah, sorry, I have been trying to participate more around here as I realize I’ve fallen off the map a bit.
Fish
Nothing to be sorry for! Spend your time as you see fit!
I am glad to see you though. 🙂 After the carla & aceness debate on shortpacked, it always gives me warm fuzzies to see you around. (I am the author of that “thank you very much for fighting the good fight” anon tumblr ask followed by the “you are free to stop at any time, take care of yourself” anon tumblr ask)
Wack'd
Thank you!
AgentKeen
It’s ok, we still think of you as ‘that guy that knows all that Walkyverse trivia, and also Doctor Who’.
Opus the Poet
Yes she kissed the girl, but did she like it?
Jen Aside
Uncertain, multiple tests required
Agemegos
And controls. And statistical significant samples of boys, girls, transboys, transgirls, interkids…
Agemegos
… subs, doms, and assorted kinksters.
setsun
And a pineapple…… for good measure.
ClaudeWicked
As long as she doesnt try the pineapple trick
Disloyal Subject
If that’s anything like the Grapefruit Technique, I don’t want to know.
fogel
South Park: Paris Hilton + pineapple; draw your own conclusions.
Warfoki
Well, that’s a new one, so I learned something today. I’m not sure if that’s a good thing or not…
Opus the Poet
Recorded on video, of course. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-Zb-QiGslo
Robbzilla
Better than the Paris Hilton Trick… Oh, SouthPark Stick of Truth… Why did you have to make Mr. Slave a guest attacker? 😀
insomniac
Are you saying she needs to kiss a girl just to try it?
Deathjavu
It all depends on how we assume people are distributed on the Kinsey scale. If we assign 10% to K=1 (completely hetero), and she enjoyed that particular instance, and we assume 100% of people who like women would enjoy kissing Becky (obviously true), then the probability that Dina is gay, using Bayes theorem, is about 80%.
Of course, we need Willis to conduct more experiments to lower the uncertainty. Its what Dina would want, statistically :p
Poskie
I’m getting some Faz vibes here with all this here talk of Kinsey scales and statistics…
Gordon
Well, we do have a lot of charts.
Oddball
I see your avatar screaming this and it made me giggle.
Deathjavu
I was studying for the FE when I posted last night and I’d just finished the chapter on stats.
Comparing me to faz seems kind of harsh 🙁
Deanatay
That’s statistics, not science. Dina is a scientist. She only does fresh, hot empirical data, raw and quivering.
Deathjavu
…statistics is used extensively in science to analyze empirical data. In fact, proper scientific analysis requires statistics because nothing is 100% accurate.
Doctor_Who