Now that I have your attention with all hullabaloo that up there, this weekend I'll be in Austin, Texas, for the seventh Webcomic Rampage! Here's a list of other folks who'll be there with me:
Alex Woolfson: Artifice, The Young Protectors, R.K. Milholland: Something Positive, E.K. Weaver: The Less Than Epic Adventures of TJ and Amal, Michael Terracciano: Star Power, Dominic , Deegan: Oracle For Hire, Garth Cameron Graham: Star Power, Finder’s Keepers, Dax Tran-Caffee: Failing Sky, Ngozi Ukazu: Check, Please!, Amanda Lafrenais: Love Me Nice, David McGuire: Gastrophobia, Lar deSouza: Looking For Group, Least I Could Do, GABO: Albert the Alien, Melanie Gillman: As the Crow Flies, Joel Watson: Hijinks Ensue, David Malki !: Wondermark, Nikki Ward: Life in Limboland
LOTS OF PEOPLE! You should try to make it if you're in the area! It's always a lot of fun, which is why I always make sure to come back. Hopefully I'll see you there! Clever
Now that I have your attention with all hullabaloo that up there, this weekend I'll be in Austin, Texas, for the seventh Webcomic Rampage! Here's a list of other folks who'll be there with me:
Alex Woolfson: Artifice, The Young Protectors, R.K. Milholland: Something Positive, E.K. Weaver: The Less Than Epic Adventures of TJ and Amal, Michael Terracciano: Star Power, Dominic , Deegan: Oracle For Hire, Garth Cameron Graham: Star Power, Finder’s Keepers, Dax Tran-Caffee: Failing Sky, Ngozi Ukazu: Check, Please!, Amanda Lafrenais: Love Me Nice, David McGuire: Gastrophobia, Lar deSouza: Looking For Group, Least I Could Do, GABO: Albert the Alien, Melanie Gillman: As the Crow Flies, Joel Watson: Hijinks Ensue, David Malki !: Wondermark, Nikki Ward: Life in Limboland
LOTS OF PEOPLE! You should try to make it if you're in the area! It's always a lot of fun, which is why I always make sure to come back. Hopefully I'll see you there!
722 thoughts on “Clever”
Nightsbridge
ABORT, DO NOT PASS GO, RELOAD LAST SAVE
Can I just say how fucked up it is that Toedad is POINTING HIS GUN where he thinks Becky is? His finger isn’t ON the trigger but one finger is extended toward it, ready to fall on top of it whenever he wants to fire, and he is POINTING a presumably LOADED WEAPON at where he thinks she is. Some of us thought he would use it to go after Dina. I don’t know that this is better
Ana Chronistic
well, that IS good gun practice, regardless of my feelings on the matter
Inkblot
Good gun practice yes
Good father practice no
Inkblot
Oh look, he’s wearing cameo pants. Did he come fuckin’ prepared to hunt?
Arianod
What if he always does?
Cedric Y. Berman
I remember seeing those cameo pants once in the background of a shot. Must have been a cameo appearance.
Yet_One_More_Idiot
What’s the point of wearing camo trousers to go hunting if you’re gonna pair them with a fucking brilliant-white t-shirt? 😛
Chris
Perhaps he forgot his jacket in the car?
Yet_One_More_Idiot
Or he just wanted to show off how great his washing powder is at getting his whites 3 shades whiter than the other leading brands. I dunno. 😛
TheEighthShader
Hey Im the new guy :3
fogel
Wearing camo in the city if you aren’t in the military and in uniform is … well, something to wonder about?
Damned Scholar
Not if you live in the Midwest.
Nightsbridge
Hearing that toedad knows how to handle a weapon, surprisingly enough, does not make me feel better.
Plasma Mongoose
“Don’t spare the bullets, shoot the child.” – NRA Bible.
Ana Chronistic
“The shootings were a senseless tragedy, but still none so tragic as the failure for armed white dudes to live out their John McClane fantasies and save the day” – also the NRA
Caleb A
yeah lets paint a few psychos, toe dad included, as gun carrying maniacs and blame the guns. no one ever uses a gun to legitimately protect themselves. learn to think critically we don’t blame the car for a drunk driver killing someone in a car crash. guns are a tool a useful tool that deserves respect and knowledge to use but a tool none the less
Androiddreams
a drunk driver wouldn’t have killed the person if they’d been, say running down the street shouting “beep-beep!” and not actually in the car though. funnily enough it’s the car that does the killing. and honestly enough I don’t know what they’re defending themselves from. I have never been in a situation where I thought “A gun would make this better.” Is it defense from other people with guns? Because that’s a bit backwards. we should really all carry around Nuclear weapons, just to be extra safe.
Kryss LaBryn
I lived in a rural area with cougars, bears, and coyotes* and two small kids. You’d better believe I have a gun to protect my family; a cougar chewing on your kid or a pack of coyotes bent on tearing them apart do not respond at all to threats to call the police. Or Fish & Wildlife.
If a human is threatening me or mine and I need a weapon I will use the first thing to hand which in all honestly is more likely to be a knife, sword, spear, or axe than a gun. The gun is a useful tool that is used for hunting for food, and chasing off the odd bear or coyote (you don’t see the cougars until it’s too late). I don’t have it to protect ourselves from home invaders but taking away all guns indiscriminately does threaten the safety of people sharing an environment with dangerous wild animals.
You will never see me supporting concealed carry, though; even pistols make me nervous. Luckily I’m Canadian so only the police, Brinks guards, and the odd person who is working in the bush and got a special permit have them–and the latter can’t wear them in town.
*Also wolves and bobcats but it’s those first three that are the biggest danger to kids. If I listed everything I had to protect the chickens from as well we’d be here all day.
Rowen Morland
Like how all world super powers feel the need to have nukes to be safe from other nuclear nations?
kelticat
My nephew once noted that the majority of gun violence occurs in urban and suburban areas. Not much occurs in the rural areas, probably because people in rural areas actually know what guns are supposed to be for. i.e not shooting people.
Wait What
A spear?
extremist343
@ Wait What Yep, primitive as you might think the weapon sounds it can actually be made using more modern materials and be quite effective at catching people off guard, not to mention: How many people do you know, who know how to defend against a spear?
Gareth
Hey now, while it is the psychopaths that ruin it for everyone, it’s the ease with which they can get ahold of guns that harms the most people. If you limit them to knives, they can hurt a lot less people, and allows the police to have a stronger weapon than them (gun v knives rather than gun v gun) meaning more of those people would survive their attacks, to be placed into a mental hospital or jail.
Androiddreams
I believe we have control laws and penalties put in place for the prevention of drunk driving. I approve of your suggestion that these should be applied to guns, and that they should take your gun license away (I hope you guys have to have gun licenses and it’s not a case of walk in off the street) if you’ve committed a series of fouls which show that you’re probably a dangerous person
Li
^^^
People who try to make this argument are comically unaware of how well-regulated the automobile industry is by comparison.
Kryss LaBryn
Well, in the States, apparently, anyways. Canada has more heavy regulations; it is far tougher to get a firearm’s license than a driver’s license. Which is definitely the way to go, I think.
No Name
It’s still a good idea, Li. It just needs a lot of work to make it viable.
No Name
And yes, I am aware that that is the pinnacle of understatement in the USA.
qman
In the US, you can get a car just as easily as you can get a gun. Which is to say, you find someone selling and hand over some cash. You don’t need a license to buy a car, and you don’t need a license to buy a gun. How you choose to use it, legally or illegally, is up to you, just like anything else.
The idea that more laws will prevent people who are already breaking the law from doing anything is asinine.
Rutee
Yeah, schlub, people aren’t ‘deterred’ by their illegality – the illegality drastically drives up the price of the item. This makes them harder to get, and leads to few of them being used in crimes. Look at a country like Poland – rampant crime, but very little gun deaths, because they actually do a good job of keeping guns unavailable outside of the strict areas where they ARE legal (Such as for hunting). The mafia has guns, but the bulk of criminals? Nope. And most people who do something illegal with a gun WEREN’T planning that when they got it anyway.
Christ.
Androiddreams
it won’t let me reply to kryss so I’ll reply to myself. there is a concession on the part of wild animals, but how many cougars and stuff do you find in heavy populated areas? I feel like people who want to do stupid shit normally find a way, but we should still make it harder for them by putting down stricter measures. then again I live in urban london, where I’ve never seen a gun (apart in the new forest in sussex where my dad’s friend was a forest ranger) I’ve fired air rifles and have never heard of a local shooting. in fact, the last time the police wrongly shot a black kid (they’re not as racist over here) we had the london riots, where most policemen then worked 16 hour shifts in riot gear and non lethal weapons. (2-3 years ago)
Damned Scholar
qman: Every car comes with a title that establishes its legal ownership. In order to drive a car, you have to have a license that you have to take a test to earn (and is renewed every few years). You also have to have insurance in case you happen to hurt someone with the car.
Clif
Hey. I NEED nukes to protect me from the government.
qman
Ruthee: Implying that “gun deaths” are somehow worse than regular deaths? That’s a loaded statistic. It’s also completely unrealistic to suggest that the US could “get rid” of guns like that. There are more guns than people in the US today. Only a very small fraction are ever used illegally. Guns are not the problem, violent criminals are. They’d injure and kill people regardless of their access to guns. The way address that is to fix the criminal justice system and the way we treat mental health issues.
Damned Scholar: Sure, that’s what you need to do to drive on public roads legally, but it isn’t what you need to do to obtain a car legally, and use it illegally. You also don’t need a license to have legal title to a car. It’s very, very easy to go on craigslist, pay cash for a car with signed title, and drive it illegally. People do it all the time.
Cait
Statistically? Practically no one uses a gun to legitimately protect themselves.
de Combys
Then you should read what Kryss LaBryn said.
Disloyal Subject
Statistically? Practically no publicized gun use is legitimate defense.
Fixed that for you.
Ana Chronistic
just to be clear, I’m actually kind of agnostic on gun control, since I do understand and know responsible gun owners are not a threat, it’s more that the NRA could totes be doing SOMETHING in the wake of mass shootings, like
– promoting gun safety
– sponsoring training courses
– donating to mental health support
– basically ANYTHING other than knee-jerking “guns are a RIGHT and for protection against BAD GUYZ”
qman
Mental health support is a big one, and the most overlooked in these cases. Getting help with a mental issue today is social suicide, and could prevent you from ever owning a gun, having a job, having a driver’s license, or get you forced to be on pills against your will for the rest of your life. It’s insane. Intelligent people will forego getting help because they know this.
That said, keep in mind that these mass shootings all happen in “gun free zones” – schools, federal government property, etc. It’s much easier to shoot a bunch of people when they can’t shoot back.
Daniel Taylor
We make car drivers buy insurance to cover the possibility of their recklessly injuring someone else.
If US gun owners – and sellers – followed the same rules as car owners, the US would have *much* less of a problem.
As Kryss points out, Canada has a damn good reason for high gun ownership… but Canadians don’t have a mass shooting problem. That’s because they’re not dealing with the toxic fake-masculinity entitlement cultural baggage of the US.
Pat
The fact itself is surprising, though.
Falen-Desu
except that with the way he’s holding the gun, he’s probably going to miss his intended target, and even if he doesn’t miss, he’s probably going to have broken fingers, possibly broken shoulder, and his gun will launch 10 feet behind him.
Opus the Poet
That rifle is a .22 caliber, you could absorb the recoil by pinching it between two fingers.
thejeff
It’s a .223, I believe. Assuming it’s the Ruger Varminter people have pointed out.
More kick than a .22.
Screwball
If he HAD of fired it, holding it like that, I can see it turning out more or less like this…
Arianod
And it shouldn’t.
Rartorata
Good gun practice would be to point it at the ground. Better gun practice would be NOT TO BRING A HUNTING RIFLE TO RETRIEVE YOUR DAUGHTER.
Twinkle Toes the Berserker
Geez, it’s like you want him to be reasonable or some shit.
The Other Mike
Want him to? Yes. Expect him to? No.
Lin
I was raised around guns (Montana – for non-USians, a very rural state, nearly all families have multiple guns). And the very first thing that we were taught was that you NEVER POINT A GUN AT SOMETHING THAT YOU’RE NOT WILLING TO KILL. My brother once got grounded for a month for jokingly pointing a bb gun at me (which was unloaded). If you’re trained in how to use a gun, the only way that you could do what ToeDad was doing is if you actually wanted to kill your child.
de Combys
That seems like a “reassuring gun culture”.
Joolie
THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS
I was raised in a gun-loving family.
The first rule, EVER, is you damn well be intending to KILL whatever it is you are pointing that gun at. If you’re not intending to kill something, point that gun at the freaking GROUND.
So that dude? Either he is not, in fact, handling a gun correctly, or he is really intending to kill his daughter. >:(
fogel
Are we sure that that isn’t what he intends?
No0ne
I wouldn’t bet either way
Mr. Mendo
Someone with experience with rifles *would* know to never place their finger on the trigger unless they were about to fire, so he’s not gone completely ’round the twist, yet.
…which actually makes his actions worse!
Ana Chronistic
Well, realistically, were we supposed to expect it to get better?
Toe: “…what the fuck am I doing? BECKY, I GIVE UP, I’ve come to my senses, you and your little beast girly can be yourselves and I’ll spring for the wedding!”
yeaaaaaaah
Nightsbridge
Hearing he was probably trained just tells me that not only is he willing to shoot, but that his aim is probably pretty good too.
Lumpy Frogsnuggler
He has no sights mounted on his rifle. He probably won’t hit much past 50 feet.
Nightsbridge
Is awful in a way that I was not necessarily expecting, they say, finishing their thought ten minutes after the original post.
Lumino
The Three Rules of Gun Control:
1) Treat every weapon as if it were loaded.
2) Do not point at anything you do not intend to shoot.
3) Keep your finger off the trigger until ready to fire.
Depending on how crazy he is, he might be following all three.
piratepenguin
4. Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.
There’s no such thing as a miss, there’s just hitting something you’re not aiming at.
Jenny Islander
…as the local kid learned when he “borrowed” his dad’s new bear rifle out of the locked gun cabinet, “borrowed” the ammo from the locked drawer, and went up the mountain to plink at cans with it. First anybody knew was when a hole appeared in a wall a foot from somebody’s head in a furniture store about half a mile away. Nobody got hurt–luckily.
Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.
Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.
Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.
Bullets go until they stop in something.
Damned Scholar
Newton, who?
No0ne
SIR ISSAC NEWTON IS THE DEADLIEST SUN OF A bongo IN SPACE
No0ne
Ohhhh there’s an auto-censor. Bongo is a much better word than what I was intending there totally.
hof1991
You forgot: treat every hunter as if be were loaded. Good advice when deer hunting.
coolhandluke
Well. Good gun practice would be having it pointed at the ground until you’re ready to start shooting.
Abdomino
No, it is absolutely not. Never point your gun at something you don’t intend to shoot is one of the four rules of firearm safety. So is keeping your finger off the trigger until you’re ready to fire, yes, but any violation of those rules is unacceptable.
The alternative is that he DOES intend to shoot his own daughter if she doesn’t go home with him. That’s a thought I don’t really want to entertain.
Ana Chronistic
I said good gun practice, I didn’t say a brilliant fucking idea
(read: this fucker’s posture is 100% intent to kill SOMETHING)
Riku
His gun safety discipline is 100% spot on when what the gun is pointing at is a home intruder and not your own fucking daughter.
desolation0
I thought the problem was that she isn’t fucking.
Opus the Poet
AFAWK she did but the wrong gender, which makes it worse.
John
Willis has said that Becky and Kaitlin didn’t actually get much farther than kissing before they were interrupted. I don’t think she’s gotten past first base with Dina, either, despite Dina’s Joyce-breaking allegations.
Thor
To be technical, if you are using a firearm for home security, it should be a shotgun loaded with birdshot. Even if you are highly trained with firearms, there is a very good chance (over 50% for almost all people) that you will miss, due to the non-standardness of the situation. Unless you are at point-blank range, a direct hit with birdshot will probably not kill your target, which is good, especially if you are pumped full of adrenaline with a twitchy trigger finger, ready to fire at anything that startles you. Chances are most likely that the “intruder” is a teenager sneaking back into the house, or a family member getting a midnight snack.
And even if you are dealing with a bone fide interloper, you still do not want to miss with anything larger than birdshot, as the wayward projectile will plow through sheetrock like tissue paper, with a much-too-high chance of striking someone in another room, in a neighboring house, or a car passing by on the street.
If you are serious about home protection, get a dog–any kind. They are much better at distinguishing friend from foe in the middle of the night than you are, and 99% of would-be intruders will abort their mission if a dog starts barking. Also the chances of one child using the dog to kill another child are practically nil.
Jenny Islander
ALL. OF. THIS.
I grew up in pre-video-game gun culture (get off my lawn). Guns were tools, like chainsaws: only stupid people in movies used them as weapons. The only people who kept actual kill-with-bullets guns for home protection had known bear trails near their homes. Burglar deterrents involved buckshot, rock salt, or loud dogs.
Strangeshapes
rock salt? For the really monstrous slugs?
(Sorry to reveal my ignorance, but what do you do with salt?)
Liokae
Shotgun shells loaded with rock salt, like in Kill Bill. Salt in wounds hurts; large chunks of rough salt CAUSING wounds and then being lodged tightly in them is even worse. It’s (usually) non-lethal, but it’ll put someone down HARD.