After what she said yesterday, I think it is sinking in post party that the out loud part of “I’m risking my scholarship for you” was a super double red flag.
Risking the future she wants for a shot at pretty decent dude for a while is dubious, but also the fact that pursuing her education goal has been strangling her happiness.
thejeff
Maybe, but while she may be thinking that’s a real risk, it seems an incredibly minor one to me.
I don’t know, maybe things have changed or maybe IU cracks down really hard on drinking, but the risk of being caught drinking in a small dorm room party by someone who’d actually escalate to where the school had to take action seems miniscule.
Rowen Morland
Eh, it seemed to hit her like a horrible revelation that she was behaving like a fool.
thejeff
It did. Maybe she’s right and it’s really common to get caught drinking and
face real consequences basically every time, despite that not happening with any of the other people we’ve seen drinking.
Or maybe she’s more worried about than is really justifiable. Or maybe she’s using that worry to cover up her real social embarrassment.
The comments below you are proof that your interpretation is correct — Joyce is hearing the whispers of the dozens of screaming Joyorthy shippers through the fourth wall. 😀
Fortunately, she’s choosing the correct course (that is, stirring the pot while also maintaining the JoeJoyce ship, which is obviously correct).
Whatever she’s projecting to, keep in mind to calculate that Joyce’s “poly solution” is meant to end up with “oh but they realized they weren’t poly and just went with My Preferred Pairing” latched on.
Carla is dating Charlie, in an adorably awkward manner.
We have no information on Mary’s dating life since Halloween. She may or may not still be dating Peter. There was some speculation that she is recently broken up with him, but it remains speculation so far.
Depending on one’s viewpoint, Carla is not single. She is dating Charlie. Though, Charlie may or may not be dating Carla. (Exactly how Charlie perceives it all is still a bit murky.)
Nymph
Charlie called Carla her girlfriend. How is that murky?
For me, Joyce’s case for a polycule is a situation where “I learned about this weird thing, and until I get greater nuance, I’m gonna see it as a solution to all problems.” Also, Joyce describes a dysfunctional polycule, wherein one member gets marginalized out, and I find it funny that Lucy is giving Joyce a dirty look.
shouldn’t she be over it by now? I’m sure joyce is fine but after having sex with dina idk if if she’d be disillusioned if joyce was suddenly attracted to/willing to to be in some kinda polycule (or relationship ouroboros like walky mentioned XD)
Becky is over her general hangup about sex. However, the notion of being in a sexual relationship with her First Major Crush, while getting to continue boinking her current One True Love?
That explosion would be picked up by seismic sensors in Hawaii.
Needfuldoer
The entire midwest would be left a smoldering crater.
Seriously though, I think that’s possibly it. From experience, there are few things more liberating than a dumb crush being definitely over. You rarely get closure and a chance to just carry on with your life:)
You can peep preview images on the dumbing of age tumblr. Not sure how okay it is to talk about them here cause it might be spoilery, but there is one of Sarah smiling. I don’t know why but I would like to believe it’s at least partially because she embraced the enlightened, happy Sarah inside her.
anon
feb 19’s panel does make it seem like she’s pretty happy or possible having her eye on another crush (i mean not that there’s any text/context to hint at it but who knows)
She said not a solution to ALL relationship conflict, rather than not a solution to ANY relationship conflict. In other words, not EVERY relationship conflict WILL have polyamory as a solution, but any PARTICULAR relationship conflict COULD have polyamory as a solution.
I mean, it’s still a blow, but it could have been worse.
Nymph
And I, for one, am not listening. x2
Clif
Eh?
Michael Steamweed
You can polycule some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t polycule all of the people all of the time.
(but joyce and amber sure dangit gonna try anyway)
Mono-amory isn’t a magical solution to all relationship conflicts either, but chances are you probably don’t hear very many people pointing that out, if any at all.
Monoamory is a majorly unquestioned norm in this society, alongside the established need to have lavish weddings, give birth to and raise kids, buy a house, and other “essential” life milestones which just so happen to come with convenient tax breaks.
How kind of The Divine to arrange matters such that, no matter where on this planet you happen to be born, the culture closest to you just so happens to be the one to be able to herd guide you towards The One True Path To Happiness™️.
THANK YOU! I’m aro/ace and happily single, so there’s a lot about relationships I don’t really get and can only comment on as an outside observer, but I can’t help but feel like polyamory is a more normal/healthy default than monoamory. If you like two people, why not just be with both? I get that it’s not always that simple, but I don’t get why that’s seen as a radical idea. (I mean, I do know why – patriarchy – but I don’t have to like it.)
AK
I mean why is also that people get jealous, people like feeling special, resource guarding, wanting to ensure your partner has YOUR offspring and not someone else’s… Monogamous marriage wasn’t invented by patriarchy.
But yeah. I think being ace and thus a already little outside of alignment with “the way things work” lends itself to being confused about other elements of that stuff even if it could work. Why do I care if my partners have sex with other people? Sex isn’t special to ME, it’s another possible bonding activity. It’s not even the best one! It’s normal for them to do a lot of the best ones with other people, no point in guarding the rest of it. I already know they love me. But also not all ace folks are like that either. A lot of them DO do that kind of intimacy guarding and jealousy about what other folks are getting (rather than what they’re not getting) and stuff, and it starts feeling a lot more… Orientation adjacent, the fact that I can’t imagine caring about that shit.
Some people like their pair bonding exclusive, be it romantic or deep platonic. Some people don’t care at all or are (as would be in my case) harmed by certain expectations of exclusivity around certain kinds of intimacy. I think most people sit somewhere between those things, both in terms of what they want to give and what they can emotionally handle from a partner. It would be nice if all positions on that spectrum stopped getting the weird shit anything other than “completely successful monogamy where no one ever fails to be monogamous in any way” gets.
Lilith
In reference to jealousy, feeling special, resource guarding, *YOUR* offspring – that could be largely societal. Not only do we have a society that currently reinforces such things as part of its standard, we have a long history of humanity to reflect on, in which relationships have been much more varied in structure – the structure becoming more and less rigid depending on exact time period and culture you’re looking at, often fluctuating through the ages.
thejeff
When you get down to stuff like resource guarding and mechanisms for supporting *YOUR* offspring, we’re reaching a level that’s not necessarily just societal, but instinctual. Evolutionary.
Other animals have their own mating patterns and so do we. Then we layer society on top of of those basic instincts.
Bash
I’ve never been in a poly relationship, but it sounds like they can be pretty complicated. A relationship requires you to know yourself well, to communicate your wants and needs, and to be ready to listen and change. Every additional person you add to that relationship requires more of those same skills. I want people to have the relationship that feels right to them, but I see how a relationship with one person it simpler.
AK
That is definitely for sure true. Especially if your partners are not committed to each other in any meaningful way. Then you become the funny hinge between the life decisions people want to make. And if they also have other partners you’re not committed to the dance gets more complicated. As much as I would love for my QPP to meet a romantic partner, I kind of dread the day that I have to worry about the logistics of that.
thejeff
I agree. I’m not opposed to polyamory and have even kind of skirted around the edges of it in the past, but for the long term, I have enough trouble maintaining even one close relationship. There’s a lot of risk in adding more.
Big Z
I HAVE been in a poly relationship — there’s a definite tradeoff between the benefits and the extra work you have to put in.
monkyvirus
I have dated someone poly in the past and I think it’s an orientation however many people default to monogamy due to societal pressure (being het is the same, it’s an orientation AND enforced by society which damages gay, bi, etc people and can lead to people thinking they’re hetero for a long time).
Basically I’m monogamous because I can’t be romantically in love with two or more people at once (of course this is a different experience entirely if you’re aro, but I can’t speak on that). However I’m perfectly comfortable dating poly people (I’m just monogamous on my side as an orientation).
So basically I mono/poly are orientations, in my opinion, and shouldn’t really be considered as better or worse by society. I will say I’ve seen as many relationship issues in poly relationships as in mono ones, and also wonderful relationships of both types.
smolgrlboi
Thank you, really don’t get why we have to justify polyamorism by saying it’s “better”. It’s just different, no better or worse. Some people are poly, some aren’t, and whether or not they are is not a value judgement against them or how they see relationships.
327 thoughts on “Envisioned”
Switchchris
I am getting increasingly more worried about sarah lol.
jflb96
I’m now thinking that this is Saarah, and the real Sarah has been kidnapped again
GreyICE
1) Bodysnatchers
2) all the drugs, all of them
NGPZ
“Get out!!! GET OUT!!!! GET OUT!!! GET OOOOOUUUUTTT!!!”
T_T
anon
sarah’s mood is so unsettling to ppl that they aren’t freaking out that joyce of all ppl is suggesting a ‘polycule’ as a solution lol
Feathers
After what she said yesterday, I’m convinced she’s just happy because she’s looking forward to the fireworks when Walky shows up.
Rowen Morland
After what she said yesterday, I think it is sinking in post party that the out loud part of “I’m risking my scholarship for you” was a super double red flag.
Risking the future she wants for a shot at pretty decent dude for a while is dubious, but also the fact that pursuing her education goal has been strangling her happiness.
thejeff
Maybe, but while she may be thinking that’s a real risk, it seems an incredibly minor one to me.
I don’t know, maybe things have changed or maybe IU cracks down really hard on drinking, but the risk of being caught drinking in a small dorm room party by someone who’d actually escalate to where the school had to take action seems miniscule.
Rowen Morland
Eh, it seemed to hit her like a horrible revelation that she was behaving like a fool.
thejeff
It did. Maybe she’s right and it’s really common to get caught drinking and
face real consequences basically every time, despite that not happening with any of the other people we’ve seen drinking.
Or maybe she’s more worried about than is really justifiable. Or maybe she’s using that worry to cover up her real social embarrassment.
Doctor_Who
So, who here thinks Joyce trying to solve this drama by proposing a polycule is pure projection?
Watch, I bet she uses that on everything now. “Mary, I realize you and Carla don’t get along, have you considered a polycule?”
Sajuuk-Khar
Joyce is projecting in fuckin’ IMAX
butting
… and using the moon as a screen.
heh heh moon heh
staszu13
Kinda calls back to that time in Shortpacked doesn’t it?
Jamie
Oh, I thought you meant she was projecting the comments.
Sajuuk-Khar
Oh no. No, she is projecting her d e s i r e s
Big Z
The comments below you are proof that your interpretation is correct — Joyce is hearing the whispers of the dozens of screaming Joyorthy shippers through the fourth wall. 😀
Fortunately, she’s choosing the correct course (that is, stirring the pot while also maintaining the JoeJoyce ship, which is obviously correct).
RocketRelm
Whatever she’s projecting to, keep in mind to calculate that Joyce’s “poly solution” is meant to end up with “oh but they realized they weren’t poly and just went with My Preferred Pairing” latched on.
Rose by Any other Name
… which is either an indication that she still has growing left to do or that she secretly hopes that she ends up marrying Dorothy someday.
Yarrr
Joyce could be like the Monster Prom protagonist, pretty transparently just wants to date everyone.
FlamestAndLight
I’m the monster prom protagonist >.<
Dante
So hear me out this is how Dorojoyce can still win
Random832
a polycule with whom?
I mean, disregarding all the other problems with the idea, Carla and Mary are both single.
Tan
Carla is dating Charlie, in an adorably awkward manner.
We have no information on Mary’s dating life since Halloween. She may or may not still be dating Peter. There was some speculation that she is recently broken up with him, but it remains speculation so far.
Plonker
Nooo? Mary had a fundie bf around, not that long ago, I’m pretty sure?
Can’t remember seeing anything to suggest they’ve broken up?
Michael Steamweed
Depending on one’s viewpoint, Carla is not single. She is dating Charlie. Though, Charlie may or may not be dating Carla. (Exactly how Charlie perceives it all is still a bit murky.)
Nymph
Charlie called Carla her girlfriend. How is that murky?
Akane
Dorothy, and Joe, and I guess Walky and Amber (assuming Dorothy hasn’t dumped him by then).
Opus the Poet
Whoever Amber dates is also in a polycule with AG by default as they share a body. I don’t make the rules, I just point them out.
Allison Branford
For me, Joyce’s case for a polycule is a situation where “I learned about this weird thing, and until I get greater nuance, I’m gonna see it as a solution to all problems.” Also, Joyce describes a dysfunctional polycule, wherein one member gets marginalized out, and I find it funny that Lucy is giving Joyce a dirty look.
Decidedly Orthogonal
Not just projection. I’d bet Joyce is dying to ask the Lucy-Sarah-Jacob’cule if, “poly want a cracker?”
Thag Simmons
Oh, is it going to be a while before the other shoe drops?
Nymph
And you were all worried “fuck” would be the word Joyce would overuse
Vukodlak
Wow a concussion Joyce came up with a more probable explanation.
Sajuuk-Khar
I really love that Joe immediately takes it at least playfully seriously lmao
Doctor’s son, and it shows
Matthew Davis
Also determined to be a good boyfriend and back her play. Her ridiculous, weird fantasy polycule play.
Mark
Joyce says what we’re all thinking.
Nono
Becky: Joyce I have a problem!
Joyce: have you ever considered a polycyle?
Becky explodes
Risky
Spoilers!
anon
shouldn’t she be over it by now? I’m sure joyce is fine but after having sex with dina idk if if she’d be disillusioned if joyce was suddenly attracted to/willing to to be in some kinda polycule (or relationship ouroboros like walky mentioned XD)
Freemage
Becky is over her general hangup about sex. However, the notion of being in a sexual relationship with her First Major Crush, while getting to continue boinking her current One True Love?
That explosion would be picked up by seismic sensors in Hawaii.
Needfuldoer
The entire midwest would be left a smoldering crater.
Michael Steamweed
The dinosaurs would go extinct all over again.
Opus the Poet
I’m just thinking of the Joe/Dina relationship, how would that go?
Sirksome
Sarah has evolved past the need for a Jacob. It was never meant to be because she ascended to a level he can’t reach.
StClair
This isn’t even her final form!
anon
i mean if you become a successful enough lawyer, you don’t have to worry about getting laid /would probably have more opportunities lol
Emil
Seriously though, I think that’s possibly it. From experience, there are few things more liberating than a dumb crush being definitely over. You rarely get closure and a chance to just carry on with your life:)
Sirksome
You can peep preview images on the dumbing of age tumblr. Not sure how okay it is to talk about them here cause it might be spoilery, but there is one of Sarah smiling. I don’t know why but I would like to believe it’s at least partially because she embraced the enlightened, happy Sarah inside her.
anon
feb 19’s panel does make it seem like she’s pretty happy or possible having her eye on another crush (i mean not that there’s any text/context to hint at it but who knows)
Yarrr
Same, I’d love for this to be the case. Then we get to see if there’s more to Sarah than ‘Cranky, and likes Jacob’
mindbleach
She’s so done, she underflowed. Like Ghandi in Civ games.
Sajuuk-Khar
Love Dares You to Change, But Not Like This, Never Like This
HueSatLight
Sarah talking to the comment section in panel 3.
Nymph
And I, for one, am not listening.
Reltzik
She said not a solution to ALL relationship conflict, rather than not a solution to ANY relationship conflict. In other words, not EVERY relationship conflict WILL have polyamory as a solution, but any PARTICULAR relationship conflict COULD have polyamory as a solution.
I mean, it’s still a blow, but it could have been worse.
Nymph
And I, for one, am not listening. x2
Clif
Eh?
Michael Steamweed
You can polycule some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t polycule all of the people all of the time.
(but joyce and amber sure dangit gonna try anyway)
Dara
Right here not listening along with you xD
NGPZ
Re: polyamory
Mono-amory isn’t a magical solution to all relationship conflicts either, but chances are you probably don’t hear very many people pointing that out, if any at all.
Monoamory is a majorly unquestioned norm in this society, alongside the established need to have lavish weddings, give birth to and raise kids, buy a house, and other “essential” life milestones which just so happen to come with convenient tax breaks.
How kind of The Divine to arrange matters such that, no matter where on this planet you happen to be born, the culture closest to you just so happens to be the one to be able to
herdguide you towards The One True Path To Happiness™️.thakoru
THANK YOU! I’m aro/ace and happily single, so there’s a lot about relationships I don’t really get and can only comment on as an outside observer, but I can’t help but feel like polyamory is a more normal/healthy default than monoamory. If you like two people, why not just be with both? I get that it’s not always that simple, but I don’t get why that’s seen as a radical idea. (I mean, I do know why – patriarchy – but I don’t have to like it.)
AK
I mean why is also that people get jealous, people like feeling special, resource guarding, wanting to ensure your partner has YOUR offspring and not someone else’s… Monogamous marriage wasn’t invented by patriarchy.
But yeah. I think being ace and thus a already little outside of alignment with “the way things work” lends itself to being confused about other elements of that stuff even if it could work. Why do I care if my partners have sex with other people? Sex isn’t special to ME, it’s another possible bonding activity. It’s not even the best one! It’s normal for them to do a lot of the best ones with other people, no point in guarding the rest of it. I already know they love me. But also not all ace folks are like that either. A lot of them DO do that kind of intimacy guarding and jealousy about what other folks are getting (rather than what they’re not getting) and stuff, and it starts feeling a lot more… Orientation adjacent, the fact that I can’t imagine caring about that shit.
Some people like their pair bonding exclusive, be it romantic or deep platonic. Some people don’t care at all or are (as would be in my case) harmed by certain expectations of exclusivity around certain kinds of intimacy. I think most people sit somewhere between those things, both in terms of what they want to give and what they can emotionally handle from a partner. It would be nice if all positions on that spectrum stopped getting the weird shit anything other than “completely successful monogamy where no one ever fails to be monogamous in any way” gets.
Lilith
In reference to jealousy, feeling special, resource guarding, *YOUR* offspring – that could be largely societal. Not only do we have a society that currently reinforces such things as part of its standard, we have a long history of humanity to reflect on, in which relationships have been much more varied in structure – the structure becoming more and less rigid depending on exact time period and culture you’re looking at, often fluctuating through the ages.
thejeff
When you get down to stuff like resource guarding and mechanisms for supporting *YOUR* offspring, we’re reaching a level that’s not necessarily just societal, but instinctual. Evolutionary.
Other animals have their own mating patterns and so do we. Then we layer society on top of of those basic instincts.
Bash
I’ve never been in a poly relationship, but it sounds like they can be pretty complicated. A relationship requires you to know yourself well, to communicate your wants and needs, and to be ready to listen and change. Every additional person you add to that relationship requires more of those same skills. I want people to have the relationship that feels right to them, but I see how a relationship with one person it simpler.
AK
That is definitely for sure true. Especially if your partners are not committed to each other in any meaningful way. Then you become the funny hinge between the life decisions people want to make. And if they also have other partners you’re not committed to the dance gets more complicated. As much as I would love for my QPP to meet a romantic partner, I kind of dread the day that I have to worry about the logistics of that.
thejeff
I agree. I’m not opposed to polyamory and have even kind of skirted around the edges of it in the past, but for the long term, I have enough trouble maintaining even one close relationship. There’s a lot of risk in adding more.
Big Z
I HAVE been in a poly relationship — there’s a definite tradeoff between the benefits and the extra work you have to put in.
monkyvirus
I have dated someone poly in the past and I think it’s an orientation however many people default to monogamy due to societal pressure (being het is the same, it’s an orientation AND enforced by society which damages gay, bi, etc people and can lead to people thinking they’re hetero for a long time).
Basically I’m monogamous because I can’t be romantically in love with two or more people at once (of course this is a different experience entirely if you’re aro, but I can’t speak on that). However I’m perfectly comfortable dating poly people (I’m just monogamous on my side as an orientation).
So basically I mono/poly are orientations, in my opinion, and shouldn’t really be considered as better or worse by society. I will say I’ve seen as many relationship issues in poly relationships as in mono ones, and also wonderful relationships of both types.
smolgrlboi
Thank you, really don’t get why we have to justify polyamorism by saying it’s “better”. It’s just different, no better or worse. Some people are poly, some aren’t, and whether or not they are is not a value judgement against them or how they see relationships.
smolgrlboi
polyamory* bleh can’t type