Tomorrow, on Monday, there's gonna be a new Slipshine comic from me, wherein two characters do sexings to each other! Hey, remember when Danny told Dorothy he and Amazi-Girl once did it upside-down from a grappling hook? Apparently most of you do, 'cuz I kept on getting all these ... requests. (from both outside and inside my home) So, well, here we go.
This grope on a rope is a very NSFW seventeen pages. Subscription up!
Fuzzy
Tomorrow, on Monday, there's gonna be a new Slipshine comic from me, wherein two characters do sexings to each other! Hey, remember when Danny told Dorothy he and Amazi-Girl once did it upside-down from a grappling hook? Apparently most of you do, 'cuz I kept on getting all these ... requests. (from both outside and inside my home) So, well, here we go.
This grope on a rope is a very NSFW seventeen pages. Subscription up!
232 thoughts on “Fuzzy”
Ana Chronistic
WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT
WHY DO YOU HATE YOURSELF SO MUCH
Mr k
Well, she willingly goes and attacks criminals, a dangerous job. So I guess she has some masochist tendencies.
Doctor_Who
“You have been found guilty of murder. I sentence you to ten years reading Youtube comments.”
“No!”
“On videos made by female gamers”
“NOOOO!”
Ana Chronistic
“Women POCs”
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Durandal_1707
But *only Presidents* should be allowed on the currency! Especially Presidents Hamilton and Franklin, they were the best!
a snow mous e
They were going to take Hamilton off the ten, but then they made that musical and everyone realized what a great president he was! Sure, he may have shot that Reynolds guy in a duel, but as his defense lawyer Aaron Burr pointed out, “is it wrong to be jealous of a poor man’s wife if she begins to live a whore’s life? When a woman cheats, do you leave her life beneath the sheets alone when she comes home with someone on the side? This homicide is justified, so take your time and just decide: Would you let it slide? You should know how to say no to this: No! No!”
Anyway, Hamilton isn’t in theaters around here, so I haven’t seen the movie yet. I hear it’s only playing in the Greatest Little City in the World, which I think is Reno? So I might have gotten some facts mixed up
#culturalilliteracy
(This was pretty fun to write XD)
Rukduk
Hey, some (admittedly smaller) YouTube channels run by female gamers have a non-hateful fan base. But for larger channels run by female gamers, I’m pretty sure being forced to read the comments section is against the Geneva Convention.
Leorale
If you ever need to know why feminism has to exist, just read the comments on absolutely any article/video about feminism.
SmilingNid
I once knew a guy who used you tube comments to help advertise his pepper spray.
Dean
“After reading these comments, you probably feel like being blinded by some kind of chemical spray! Well, good news!”
SgtWadeyWilson
“Now available in Jalapeño and Ghost Pepper flavors!”
Rukduk
Yeah. Not gonna lie, seeing some of that shit that gets posted in those comments make me a little ashamed to be a guy. I just don’t understand where that level of misogynistic hate comes from.
jeffepp
And, that’s on a video about wood joints.
Doom Shepherd
Used to be saying stuff like that about a woman – or even in general could get a guy challenged to a duel, with the stabbing and the shooting and the glayvin! Nowadays we let them live, to pass on their beliefs like mutated DNA. That’s what I blame it on, anyway.
Siyajkak
Yeah, but that largely stemmed from women being seen as property to be defended, rather than people to be respected. A proper solution would be allowing the women today to challenge said men to a duel. And before attempting to fire, the offender must take a shot of liquor for every misogynistic comment, so that their figurative blindness can be somewhat more literal.
Annie
I get confused by the guys that read those horrible comments, call the commenter out on being way out of line, but then later in the discussion can’t understand (and often get really mad about it) when some women say that they’re leery of and cautious around all men that they don’t know well.
I’ve seen that dynamic many times.
Always something like:
Nice guy (NG): But I’m a nice guy. If you ran in to me on the street you’d have no reason to be scared of me.
Every Woman in the Comments (EWC): Okay, but if I run in to you on the street, I have absolutely no way of knowing if you’re a threat or not. So I have to treat every stranger, or even acquaintance, as if they have the potential to be a threat to me.
NG: But it’s obvious that I’m a nice guy. I hold doors open for women and shit. Predators don’t do that.
EWC: You just saw first hand how some men react if we don’t conform to their idea of perfect femininity and/or if they feel like we’re attacking or challenging their masculinity. If they react with threats of violence or rape online, we have to be even more careful if we’re face-to-face with someone who might be like that.
NG: but I’m not like that. You can’t paint us all with the same brush just because a few guys are rude.
EWC: *collective facepalm*
Doomington
It’s a case of not seeing it, mainly.
When you work with a more professional/mostly already married crowd and spend your free time with the same crowd, you see relatively few people act out of line. If that sort of thing makes up a majority of your interactions with other people, it’s natural to think “Oh, most people are good people”, and think of the occasional asshole showing up as an odd occurrence that is quickly shut down by the ever-present crowd of mostly good people.
So if you see people acting out of line as a rare occurrence, you’d look at someone who treats everyone as a threat a bit odd. “I’ve seen one bad person in the last hundred people I’ve had to deal with, why is this person so worried?”.
I admit, I think this on occasion. Then I think back to when I worked a customer service job, and remember that the small segment of the population I interact with nowadays is in no way indicative of the majority of people.
So yeah. When you spend all your time in environments where everyone trusts each other, it’s easy to forget that not everywhere is that safe.
zoomer296
?⛪
Somebody Else
I’ve yet to see any. I know one that’s run by a transgender woman who gets almost nothing but hate.
StClair
Pretty sure that crosses the “cruel and unusual” line.
Cholma
This is the same thing I did when I first got glasses in High School. The 2d run theater by my house was showing Star Wars:ANH and I went to go see it. That opening scene when the Star Destroyer glides across the screen? I suddenly remembered my new glasses and put them on.
WOW. The detail that popped out at me! I spent the next minute doing what Amber’s doing here!
Skizz
Star Wars:ANH? Just say “Star Wars”
Cholma
This was way back in… 1979? 1980? Didn’t want someone to think I was referring to a more recent movie. Although, I don’t even remember if it was called “A New Hope” yet; might’ve still just been “Star Wars” at that time. I know it came out in 1977, but don’t remember when Empire came out. 1980? 82? Seems too long between movies, but… *shrug* (don’t care enough to look it up)
Kamino Neko
By 1980, it certainly was, since Empire was out/about to come out. Before that…I’m 99% sure it was added in the 1978 rerelease.
Deanatay
I don’t think so – the original release of ‘Star Wars’ was entitled simply that. The only place the ‘A New Hope’ was mentioned was in the scrolling text at the beginning of the movie. The movie only officially started being called ‘A New Hope’ was after the first digital re-master was done – 90’s, I think?
Kamino Neko
No, it was simply Star Wars in 1977.
The addition of ‘A New Hope’ to the scroll was, in fact, adding that as the subtitle. Thus being in the exact same place that the subtitles of Empire and Return are.
Znayx
That’s entirely subjective. Many people weren’t from that generation. I know about it (from my dad), but due to my generation, from hearing someone say “Star Wars” my mind goes to the entire movie franchise, not A New Hope (despite being the actual first Star Wars movie produced). People need to speak to convey information to their audience, no to subject them to their own historical biases.
Charlie Spencer
Speaking to the audience is the best approach, but it’s difficult if there are cultural differences you’re unaware of. I’m from Lucas’s generation, one of those who didn’t grow up using the phrase as you describe. To me, ‘Star Wars’ has always meant the first movie produced, and only the subsequent ones require individual identification. (Same deal with ‘Star Trek’; to me that phrase with no modifiers means Shatner, Nimoy, Kelley, etc.) Until your post, it never occurred to me others would use it to refer to the entire series.
You can’t compensate for differences if you don’t know they exist.
DarkVeghetta
I’ve grown up watching Star Trek: The New Generation, so to me “Star Trek” has two meanings: one being TGN and two being the entire series. However, for years I had no idea TGN was named anything else besides ‘Star Trek’ – mostly because I watched it dubbed in German or subbed in Romanian, both of which either didn’t bother using the full name or I was just too small to notice it… somehow. I found out much later, after watching Deep Space 9 that the first series I watched was actually named TGN – heck, I didn’t realize there was an even older series until mid-way into watching TGN. I even assumed it was a prequel of sorts and for years still considered TGN as ‘the original’ Star Trek – this was all before the spread of the Internet and none of my friends really knew more about the subject then I did.
It’s interesting how these biases are built, eh?
Amazi-Stool
TGN? I have no idea what you are talking about!
A google search only comes up with “the next generation” and TNG as an abbreviation.
Durandal_1707
Give him a break, he wasn’t watching it in English. The acronym could well be different in other countries/languages.
No Name
For example: Most Romance tongues, including Romanian (at least according to Google Translate, so don’t quote me on that), put the adjective after the noun. I was planning on commenting on that very thing earlier, but decided against it.
StClair
My assumption also. (“El Generacion Novo”, or whatever.)
Roborat
Or he is a Yoda fan.
Ed Rhodes
I am old enough that I remember when “Star Wars – ANH” was just “Star Wars!” I actually saw a slide show a year earlier when I went to a “Star Trek” convention! Yes, I am that old.
Annie
I first got glasses in 3rd grade and it was quickly apparent that I’d needed them a long time before that (SO many fights with my mother over her telling me to pick up x, y, z and me saying I didn’t see an x, y, or z anywhere. Then her yelling at me for lying and being lazy.).
When my dad and I got home, dad parked on the street in front of the house, and I put on my glasses as soon as he stopped.
Then I screamed so loud it was a miracle I hadn’t given dad a heart attack. I started freaking out and doing the glasses on, glasses off thing.
I started yelling that I could see each individual brick on the front of the house.
Then realized I could see the individual plants in the flower bed rather than just a mass of green with bits of blue or yellow here and there.
Then I freaked out because I could see the individual leaves and branches in our ash tree.
I kept asking dad if it was normal to see those things from so far away. And if he was *sure* it was normal. I’d never seen those things without being a couple of inches away.
It was actually hard to get used to.
Though, now I feel naked without my glasses. Along with feeling very… how do I describe it? Helpless? Vulnerable? I hate not having them for even a couple of minutes.
Ana Chronistic
I legit got glasses when it started to feel like I needed them BECAUSE my face felt naked without them.
I started cosplaying (with full head covering) for a similar reason.
(haha almost typoed naked as baked… funny thing is cosplaying can make you feel baked)
StClair
That’s the dehydration!
Christine
There was a book – I think it was The Glass Castle (good book, but a traumatic read, and I didn’t even grow up with abusive parents) – where one of the girls gets a much-needed pair of glasses, and is raving to her sister about how awesome they are “I can see the leaves on the tree!” Her sister is unimpressed. “No, the actual individual leaves, not just the mass of green.” It is at this point that the sister with the vision problems realises just how crappy her eyesight is, and how much she missed out on because her parents didn’t get her glasses sooner.
LeRoyEstMort
I’m gonna check out that book, traumatic read or not. My first mind-blowing glasses-wearing experience was exactly that of “Holy Shite! The trees are made of millions of tiny leaves; they’re not just big green blobs!” Also, I survived a very abusive childhood and youth and after years of denying it, I’ve found that now I benefit from reading the experiences of others.
tl:dr Thank you for the book recommendation. And, yeah, trees ARE a trip for someone who is first experiencing the magic of glasses.
Annie
I’m going to check it out too.
I grew up with one abusive parent. Never physically abusive, but quite a bit of emotional abuse. Lots of insults, telling me I’m worthless, so very much gas lighting.
Even with the glasses, I found out later that the school had been telling my mother that I needed glasses since kindergarten. She would tell them they were full of it and hang up on them.
The reason I got glasses when I did was because my dad had lived out-of-state (my parents divorced when I was a toddler) up until the tail end of that year. Apparently my teacher and the principal jumped on the chance that my dad might care more than my mother did.
Once I got the glasses mom yelled at dad, telling him he was an idiot and wasted a lot of time and money. She was convinced that I faked having bad eyesight because I thought glasses looked cool, and because I enjoyed wasting her money.
She also couldn’t understand why dad hadn’t taken me to the drug store and gotten me a pair of those $5 reading glasses off the rack. Even though I’m near-sighted.
Lan
I like to think she’s taken to that scene from Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back. The one where thy get the list of haters’ addresses then begin a beatdown on EVERY single one of them. “You trashed my fanfiction. I liked writing it. Enjoy the boot of justice.”
Ana Chronistic
“I READ IT
I CAN’T UNREAD IT”
rectilinearpropagation
That would have been a good line for the alt text too.
Rex Vivat
It does say website comments. Like, say, this one.
nothri
Why does she hate herself? She’s the kind of bongo that will make herself wear glasses and then look at internet websites.
cesium133
*takes off glasses*
All better!
Wheelpath
Why is every fan but me an idiot
cesium133
The average person is an idiot. Fifty percent of people are Youtube commenters.
Dean
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” – George Carlin.
Reltzik
So stupid that a lot of them don’t know the difference between an average and a median!
SgtWadeyWilson
That’s just mean! Or is it mode…
rectilinearpropagation
How has no one high fived you for this?
*high five “
SgtWadeyWilson
See, now you’re one of the outliers.
cesium133
If intelligence follows a Gaussian distribution (IQ does, but it is not equivalent to intelligence…), then the average and median are equal.
Charlie Spencer
People get them confused? The differences is, averages aren’t used to separate lanes of traffic.
Jim
That’s a very cynical statement that assholes like to make in order to feel superior to others.
butts
Doesn’t make it any less objectively true.
Disloyal Subject
It also tends to be supported by practical evidence.
Hurray, cynicism!
RIP12081990
“The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it.” George Bernard Shaw seems to sum it up quite nicely
Minotaur
It also helps to keep facts like that in mind when you’re in a job that requires you to explain complicated stuff to everybody. In that context, George Carlin’s remark is equivalent to: “Keep it simple, stupid!”
DSL
Context? No! A pedantic insistence on literalism (and literal pedanticism) is the order of the day!
Minotaur
I wish the only way to read that was as a joke.
On the other hand: the insistence on literalism is part of the context.
Now to find a way to work with that.
Needfuldoer
Things have only gotten worse with the widespread adoption of smartphones. Now every other idiot is either talking, texting, or watching something on their perpetual entertainment machine while they go about their day, oblivious as to where they’re going and who they’re crashing into.
StClair
hence the phrase, “smartphones make you dumb.”
then again, we’ve been offloading portions of our memory, cognition, etc onto objects since the invention of writing, the abacus, et al.
Leorale
Someone on the internet is wrong!!
Beware. When you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.
Tacos
Well the only reason we’re staring into the abyss is because we forgot our glasses and are trying to figure out what the hell it is that we’re staring at >.>
DarkVeghetta
The abyss was not prepared for less then perfect vision.
Silly abyss, you can’t gaze into me if I don’t wear my glasses!
miados
webcomic comments are still……. (insert word here)
Reltzik
Meta.
saltchocolate
Beta.
DarkVeghetta
Alpha?
cesium133
Centauri.
Mr. Mendo
Bed goes up, bed goes down! Bed goes up, bed goes down! #AmberIsHomer
Too Old To Be Cool
“Criticisms are legible!”