Either he’s doomed to be a useless background character, or there’s a good reason Willis isn’t telling us his name. There are several background characters that have only appeared in one or two strips, and not even had a speaking role, so I’m guessing it’s the latter.
Wandering meme
What I wanna know is why he looks like danny’s big brother…
Valdrax
Who?
Despite Rage
I don’t think he meant an actual character, just that “christian party-goer” looks like an older version of Danny.
Valdrax
Who? I can’t recall a character by that name playing a part in the comic. 🙂
Jetstream
Is this a joke or do you really not remember that Danny is Joe’s roommate right now?
Because if it’s a joke, you really do need to explain it to us.
Valdrax
It’s a joke about the fact that Danny has been demoted to an extra.
Oh craps, you’re right! She’s been Christ-acid-roofied!!!
Rodrigo
Maybe he is the new arch-vilain
lokitsu
The street term for that is “Touched by an angel”
zarathustra00
I thought “Touched by an angel” was the street term for what happens after the roofie
METC
And we can say this because we’ve only seen him in two strips? Too soon, my friend.
Rognik
Absolutely not! Anyone with a speaking role in more than one comic is bound to become recurring, if not a major character.
Plus, he’s been tagged.
thomas0comer
Speaking of useless background characters, there seems to be a Shortpa-I mean Galasso’s Pizza employee getting owned by somebody in an orange long-sleeve shirt.
Not a new character, in the walkyverse he was some asshole who had sex with Ruth while she was babysitting Billie and Walky, the latter of which got abducted by aliens
For some reason that reminds me of a time when I went to a really large christian store and asked to see their nativity scenes, and then clarified saying I was hoping to find some more historically accurate ones that weren’t all white but better reflected his “actual ethnic heritage”.
That was a laugh and a half watching them run around looking for ones that weren’t white washed.
Mel Gibson went to so much trouble to have them speaking Aramaic in Passion of the Christ, all for the ‘authenticity’ and ‘accuracy’, but Jesus was STILL white.
CP
Jews are white. Jews have always been white. Have you ever been to Israel? Three wise men may not have been white, but the Jews in the nativity scene should have been.
Kaci
finally. Thank you.
Blob Marley
Israel now is whitewashed because a bunch of European Jews moved there around 1947. Original Jews would have probably looked a lot more like Egyptians (think how long they lived in Egypt, per examplar) – not Sub-Saharan dark, but olive-to-tan skin, dark hair, dark eyes. Not sandy brown hair and “three inches south of Iceland” white.
JesseJanitect
Not to mention, 40 days in the damn desert, he would have had a deep, deep tan.
Jetstream
No, Jews are middle eastern. However they’ve interbred with gentiles for so long that they’ve taken on a lighter skin tone.
GinzaMary
There is never much description of what anybody looks like in the bible. In the Apocrypha there are some depictions though. According to them all of the assorted Marys are basically described as gingers, and Jesus is said to have had ashy skin and auburn hair (a combination that left me thinking the first time I read it that Morgan Freeman is good casting for God). Jesus was apparently not a good looking guy – he was supposed to have been short, stocky, and with bad facial scars- it’s actually mentioned in the bible that after the resurrection no one could recognize him at first glace because while he looked the same he was suddenly beautiful. The idea of Jesus being black comes from Revelations where he is described as having “skin like coal and hair like wool”.
I’m not sure his motives are particularly ulterior. This could be as simple as, “hey, you’re the only other person at this party not getting wasted. We’re not even sure he’s all that straight-laced; maybe he just doesn’t like alcohol (I know I don’t, personally). Maybe he’s the son of a pastor who’s a bit on the extreme side, and as children often do, he’s swung in the opposite direction.
Also, young men are in fact capable of approaching an attractive woman without sleazing their way into her pants. Especially if they’re gay, but even if not.
When I went to Uni, the kids that went the wildest were from the super religious families. It seemed like very pastor’s daughter was discovering the joys of alcohol and sex by thanksgiving break.
And with this comic, Joyce has shown that she knows more than what she lets on. Also, good to see Joyce not being extremely religious like some people have theorized.
…what she lets on to knowing is pretty much anything to do with religion, and she justifies her nonchalance toward the party with an example from the Old Testament. I’m kind of confused by this statement.
Just because she’s not being obnoxious doesn’t mean she’s not being religious.
I think mercs meant that Joyce doesn’t take the rules to unnecessarily extreme levels, theres a difference between an extremist and someone who just strongly believes in christianity.
JK9000
“Parties are okay because King David did it and God approved” is an extreme viewpoint, IMO. That is not a normal outlook on life. It’s also not very harmful or judgmental, which is what people normally expect from extreme religious dedication, but not actually required.
Ghost
Actually, I’m pretty sure mercs had been talking about Joyce saying “drinking alcohol in the abstract doesn’t bother me.” There are a great amount of religious extremists that think drinking alcohol in and of itself is a sin. -shrugs-
AletheiaAgape
Which originated from the Wild West days (or any frontier, really) when drinking was destroying any chance of a peaceful society. First, the temperance movements sprung up. And then, later, prohibitionists.
Reading church history, you’d be amazed how many “rules” were never a sin issue, but eventually people assumed they were.
Last Templar
I wouldn’t call that so much an extreme view. (particularly since normalcy is a term that seems in flux in philosophical spheres). it is A view, and while few people need to justify the desire to party, it’s not uncommon to get the one person who will say “i thought you were a (place faith here. Usually christian), they don’t do (activity).
On that case, having an answer for them like the above one, after having thought about it is a good move, and merely thoughtful, not extreme.
G.S.Mercs
I was basically referring to the fact that she’s not going something along the lines of “Oh these people are partying and drinking, meaning they are sinful and shall burneth in Hell for all eternity!”
Scotty Van – I was referring to the fact that most people were theorizing that Joyce knew nothing about parties, and I saw she’ not being an extremist (An extremist Christian would not be found at a party like this. Never claimed she wasn’t being religious though)
JK9000 – How does her pulling from a Biblical story make her an extremist? I could understand that if you she only ever talks about Biblical verses, but in this case she wasn’t even the one who brought it up. Also, if having an opinion of something based on the Bible is being an extremist, then label me and extremist I guess. (If this last part is not entirely what you meant, please feel free to let me know so I may reply properly)
Yup and Jesus turned the water into NON-fermented wine. All the people at that party were wondering why they saved the good wine for last.
But yeah, I still have an odd time understanding why David did that. I mean I know he was celebrating for bringing the Arc of the Covenant back to Israel and he was doing it for the Lord, just not something I’d of done, in my underwear, in the streets, as a king. Probably the only part of any story in the Bible that makes the least amount of sense to me. Even the story of Rahab makes far more sense.
isitsevenyet
David did that to show humility. Basically, “I’m going to lower myself to give glory to God.” He put away his right as a king to wear fine clothes and humbled himself, basically. Michal got angry because she was embarrassed at what he was doing.
Blob Marley
King Canute did it better.
Soundman006
I don’t think it was non fermented wine. Just because of the time period, fermented drinks are less likely to make you sick.
Zuche
Hey, if public nudity is good enough for mathematicians, loincloths are good enough for monarchs.
David
I find it really odd that you are able to say with certainty that Jesus turned water into non-fermented wine when the word used in the original text was a generic word for all wine, fermented or not.
AletheiaAgape
Yeah, I was wondering this as well.
Wandering meme
Worship has the unique quality oftentimes of being euphoric. Consider people who do the wave and paint themselves at football games.
there’s a song that i like that was inspired by that passage or a passage refering to that one that goes “I’ll become even more undignified than this. Some may think it’s foolishness…” it’s about giving everything dignity and pride included up to the Lord.
Valdrax
WTH is “non-fermented” wine and what makes you think people in the first century AD would think it was the “good” stuff?
Valdrax
Alright. I’ve done some Googling and found the controversy over the meanings of the word oinos. I’m going to have to do more research, but I take back that comment for now.
Jetstream
No, he didn’t turn it into non-fermented wine. They ran OUT of wine, and when Jesus made water into wine, they bongoed at the host that they’d saved the good wine until later, which is supposed to be rude. BEHOLD, John 2:8-11 –
6 Now there were set there six waterpots of stone, according to the manner of purification of the Jews, containing twenty or thirty gallons apiece. 7 Jesus said to them, “Fill the waterpots with water.” And they filled them up to the brim. 8 And He said to them, “Draw some out now, and take it to the master of the feast.” And they took it. 9 When the master of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and did not know where it came from (but the servants who had drawn the water knew), the master of the feast called the bridegroom. 10 And he said to him, “Every man at the beginning sets out the good wine, and when the guests have well drunk, then the inferior. You have kept the good wine until now!”
11 This beginning of signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory; and His disciples believed in Him.
there are some religions who do not party, and some religions (like mine) who believe that God WANTS us to party, and dance, and otherwise celebrate and be a happy people.
begbert2
Are you christian? If not, I don’t think the statements of your religion apply to the God in question, because despite having similar names and (possibly) similar roles, they’re not the same character/person, in my opinion. For example, if you don’t believe your god engineered a flood, then your opinions about your god don’t speak to the properties of any god that did such a thing.
I dunno. I honestly don’t know a terrible amount about the Bible. While I’ve read the asunadulteredasIcouldfind King James version in its entirety, I haven’t picked up one since I was like…12, maybe? It’s been a while. This story does ring a bell, though.
I have read other versions, but like I said, it was a long time ago and I didn’t read the other versions that thuroughly, since they didn’t belong to me.
272 thoughts on “Of course”
Kide
Holy crap, new characters?
Please be permanent.
Steven
He doesn’t even have a tag! Sure he’s not named, but he doesn’t even have a tag like “Christian party-goer.” Face it. He’s going to die. Very soon.
Boringamus
Either he’s doomed to be a useless background character, or there’s a good reason Willis isn’t telling us his name. There are several background characters that have only appeared in one or two strips, and not even had a speaking role, so I’m guessing it’s the latter.
Wandering meme
What I wanna know is why he looks like danny’s big brother…
Valdrax
Who?
Despite Rage
I don’t think he meant an actual character, just that “christian party-goer” looks like an older version of Danny.
Valdrax
Who? I can’t recall a character by that name playing a part in the comic. 🙂
Jetstream
Is this a joke or do you really not remember that Danny is Joe’s roommate right now?
Because if it’s a joke, you really do need to explain it to us.
Valdrax
It’s a joke about the fact that Danny has been demoted to an extra.
dchorror
That’s if he’s not a hallucination.
Mancuso
Oh craps, you’re right! She’s been Christ-acid-roofied!!!
Rodrigo
Maybe he is the new arch-vilain
lokitsu
The street term for that is “Touched by an angel”
zarathustra00
I thought “Touched by an angel” was the street term for what happens after the roofie
METC
And we can say this because we’ve only seen him in two strips? Too soon, my friend.
Rognik
Absolutely not! Anyone with a speaking role in more than one comic is bound to become recurring, if not a major character.
Plus, he’s been tagged.
thomas0comer
Speaking of useless background characters, there seems to be a Shortpa-I mean Galasso’s Pizza employee getting owned by somebody in an orange long-sleeve shirt.
TPmanW
Or perhaps the tag is to be added at a later date retroactively? You know George Lucas style?
aaron_bourque
What are you talking about? He’s Pastorson. He said it right there.
Wandering meme
So…like that guy from I still know what you did last summer?
Wandering meme
Lemme help you with that though….
MELVIN Pastorson.
Isn’t that right, MELVIN?!?
turkishproverb
Hallucination.
Wandering meme
“here comes a new challenger!”
SgtNumnum
Not a new character, in the walkyverse he was some asshole who had sex with Ruth while she was babysitting Billie and Walky, the latter of which got abducted by aliens
Deuecebag
That dude wants to show Joyce his Bible, if you know what I mean.
Rikushadow5
Yes, his hollowed-out bible with a nickel inside.
And then Joyce’s kids will hear about it from their dad 15 years later.
Owait, nevermind, he’s not Mike.
phildog
For some reason that reminds me of a time when I went to a really large christian store and asked to see their nativity scenes, and then clarified saying I was hoping to find some more historically accurate ones that weren’t all white but better reflected his “actual ethnic heritage”.
That was a laugh and a half watching them run around looking for ones that weren’t white washed.
GinzaMary
Classy.
There is just nothing more witty than poking the faithful.
Last templar
I for one, am waiting to see how long our beloved author allows this interaction to stay (relatively) clean.
I hope for a reasonably long time.
JesseJanitect
Mel Gibson went to so much trouble to have them speaking Aramaic in Passion of the Christ, all for the ‘authenticity’ and ‘accuracy’, but Jesus was STILL white.
CP
Jews are white. Jews have always been white. Have you ever been to Israel? Three wise men may not have been white, but the Jews in the nativity scene should have been.
Kaci
finally. Thank you.
Blob Marley
Israel now is whitewashed because a bunch of European Jews moved there around 1947. Original Jews would have probably looked a lot more like Egyptians (think how long they lived in Egypt, per examplar) – not Sub-Saharan dark, but olive-to-tan skin, dark hair, dark eyes. Not sandy brown hair and “three inches south of Iceland” white.
JesseJanitect
Not to mention, 40 days in the damn desert, he would have had a deep, deep tan.
Jetstream
No, Jews are middle eastern. However they’ve interbred with gentiles for so long that they’ve taken on a lighter skin tone.
GinzaMary
There is never much description of what anybody looks like in the bible. In the Apocrypha there are some depictions though. According to them all of the assorted Marys are basically described as gingers, and Jesus is said to have had ashy skin and auburn hair (a combination that left me thinking the first time I read it that Morgan Freeman is good casting for God). Jesus was apparently not a good looking guy – he was supposed to have been short, stocky, and with bad facial scars- it’s actually mentioned in the bible that after the resurrection no one could recognize him at first glace because while he looked the same he was suddenly beautiful. The idea of Jesus being black comes from Revelations where he is described as having “skin like coal and hair like wool”.
johannhowitzer
I’m not sure his motives are particularly ulterior. This could be as simple as, “hey, you’re the only other person at this party not getting wasted. We’re not even sure he’s all that straight-laced; maybe he just doesn’t like alcohol (I know I don’t, personally). Maybe he’s the son of a pastor who’s a bit on the extreme side, and as children often do, he’s swung in the opposite direction.
Also, young men are in fact capable of approaching an attractive woman without sleazing their way into her pants. Especially if they’re gay, but even if not.
Wandering meme
Yeah, what he said! All yall need to leave MELVIN alone. He’s sensitive.
And he’s busy wonderin’ how ta kill all dese peeps so I can get mah bonus!
Roborat
When I went to Uni, the kids that went the wildest were from the super religious families. It seemed like very pastor’s daughter was discovering the joys of alcohol and sex by thanksgiving break.
G.S.Mercs
And with this comic, Joyce has shown that she knows more than what she lets on. Also, good to see Joyce not being extremely religious like some people have theorized.
Scotty Van
…what she lets on to knowing is pretty much anything to do with religion, and she justifies her nonchalance toward the party with an example from the Old Testament. I’m kind of confused by this statement.
Just because she’s not being obnoxious doesn’t mean she’s not being religious.
JK9000
Wait, a chick cites a little known Biblical story to justify her opinions, and what you pull away from that is that she’s NOT extremely religious?
Prior Semblance
I think mercs meant that Joyce doesn’t take the rules to unnecessarily extreme levels, theres a difference between an extremist and someone who just strongly believes in christianity.
JK9000
“Parties are okay because King David did it and God approved” is an extreme viewpoint, IMO. That is not a normal outlook on life. It’s also not very harmful or judgmental, which is what people normally expect from extreme religious dedication, but not actually required.
Ghost
Actually, I’m pretty sure mercs had been talking about Joyce saying “drinking alcohol in the abstract doesn’t bother me.” There are a great amount of religious extremists that think drinking alcohol in and of itself is a sin. -shrugs-
AletheiaAgape
Which originated from the Wild West days (or any frontier, really) when drinking was destroying any chance of a peaceful society. First, the temperance movements sprung up. And then, later, prohibitionists.
Reading church history, you’d be amazed how many “rules” were never a sin issue, but eventually people assumed they were.
Last Templar
I wouldn’t call that so much an extreme view. (particularly since normalcy is a term that seems in flux in philosophical spheres). it is A view, and while few people need to justify the desire to party, it’s not uncommon to get the one person who will say “i thought you were a (place faith here. Usually christian), they don’t do (activity).
On that case, having an answer for them like the above one, after having thought about it is a good move, and merely thoughtful, not extreme.
G.S.Mercs
I was basically referring to the fact that she’s not going something along the lines of “Oh these people are partying and drinking, meaning they are sinful and shall burneth in Hell for all eternity!”
Scotty Van – I was referring to the fact that most people were theorizing that Joyce knew nothing about parties, and I saw she’ not being an extremist (An extremist Christian would not be found at a party like this. Never claimed she wasn’t being religious though)
JK9000 – How does her pulling from a Biblical story make her an extremist? I could understand that if you she only ever talks about Biblical verses, but in this case she wasn’t even the one who brought it up. Also, if having an opinion of something based on the Bible is being an extremist, then label me and extremist I guess. (If this last part is not entirely what you meant, please feel free to let me know so I may reply properly)
iSaidCandleja-
Are you suggesting religious people don’t party? I remember a biblical story about one party that ran out of wine…
Digidestined of Trust (Tim)
Yup and Jesus turned the water into NON-fermented wine. All the people at that party were wondering why they saved the good wine for last.
But yeah, I still have an odd time understanding why David did that. I mean I know he was celebrating for bringing the Arc of the Covenant back to Israel and he was doing it for the Lord, just not something I’d of done, in my underwear, in the streets, as a king. Probably the only part of any story in the Bible that makes the least amount of sense to me. Even the story of Rahab makes far more sense.
isitsevenyet
David did that to show humility. Basically, “I’m going to lower myself to give glory to God.” He put away his right as a king to wear fine clothes and humbled himself, basically. Michal got angry because she was embarrassed at what he was doing.
Blob Marley
King Canute did it better.
Soundman006
I don’t think it was non fermented wine. Just because of the time period, fermented drinks are less likely to make you sick.
Zuche
Hey, if public nudity is good enough for mathematicians, loincloths are good enough for monarchs.
David
I find it really odd that you are able to say with certainty that Jesus turned water into non-fermented wine when the word used in the original text was a generic word for all wine, fermented or not.
AletheiaAgape
Yeah, I was wondering this as well.
Wandering meme
Worship has the unique quality oftentimes of being euphoric. Consider people who do the wave and paint themselves at football games.
Izzy
there’s a song that i like that was inspired by that passage or a passage refering to that one that goes “I’ll become even more undignified than this. Some may think it’s foolishness…” it’s about giving everything dignity and pride included up to the Lord.
Valdrax
WTH is “non-fermented” wine and what makes you think people in the first century AD would think it was the “good” stuff?
Valdrax
Alright. I’ve done some Googling and found the controversy over the meanings of the word oinos. I’m going to have to do more research, but I take back that comment for now.
Jetstream
No, he didn’t turn it into non-fermented wine. They ran OUT of wine, and when Jesus made water into wine, they bongoed at the host that they’d saved the good wine until later, which is supposed to be rude. BEHOLD, John 2:8-11 –
6 Now there were set there six waterpots of stone, according to the manner of purification of the Jews, containing twenty or thirty gallons apiece. 7 Jesus said to them, “Fill the waterpots with water.” And they filled them up to the brim. 8 And He said to them, “Draw some out now, and take it to the master of the feast.” And they took it. 9 When the master of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and did not know where it came from (but the servants who had drawn the water knew), the master of the feast called the bridegroom. 10 And he said to him, “Every man at the beginning sets out the good wine, and when the guests have well drunk, then the inferior. You have kept the good wine until now!”
11 This beginning of signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory; and His disciples believed in Him.
Jetstream
I meant John 2:6-11
JesseJanitect
Catholics party like crazy, but many of the protestant sects discourage drinking and gambling.
Kaci
there are some religions who do not party, and some religions (like mine) who believe that God WANTS us to party, and dance, and otherwise celebrate and be a happy people.
begbert2
Are you christian? If not, I don’t think the statements of your religion apply to the God in question, because despite having similar names and (possibly) similar roles, they’re not the same character/person, in my opinion. For example, if you don’t believe your god engineered a flood, then your opinions about your god don’t speak to the properties of any god that did such a thing.
Izzy
Technically from what I understand Jews, Christians, and Muslims all share the same God.
Mkvenner
I don’t remember king david doing that.
Rikushadow5
It’s one of those things you learn if you read the original texts (or as close as you can to them via translations and the like).
Mkvenner
Cannon or Apocrypha?
Rikushadow5
I dunno. I honestly don’t know a terrible amount about the Bible. While I’ve read the asunadulteredasIcouldfind King James version in its entirety, I haven’t picked up one since I was like…12, maybe? It’s been a while. This story does ring a bell, though.
Mkvenner
KJV does not count as a bible. It’s propaganda.
Rikushadow5
I have read other versions, but like I said, it was a long time ago and I didn’t read the other versions that thuroughly, since they didn’t belong to me.
GirlyQ
2 Samuel, if you’re looking.
Janette
It’s Canon. I think it’s in King James Version, but I can’t remember what book.
It’s a very popular story at my church.
Mkvenner
If it’s KJV it’s not Canon.