It’s from the Lady Gaga song ‘Bad Romance’. There’s a line that says ‘I want your everything as long as its free.’
Frankly, it’s not the ‘I want your love’ half I’m worried about, it’s the ‘And I want your revenge’.
milu
same, it’s the fact that until a few days before it aired (so when it was most likely fully written and drawn) this storyline was titled “I want your revenge”.
I know right? She looked so happy about having a couple of flowers in a cup (poor girl REALLY isn’t used to being given nice things because people think she’s special and want her to be happy) and Malaya’s taking the shine off the experience…
And I suspect it’s because Malaya’s “You’re a poser” dealio comes from her “if I even am a girl” questioning, via a bit of projection and angst in the form of “You’re pretty and clearly somewhat invested in being cool, so you must be a poser because I am these things and they cause intenal conflict, so clearly if you don’t admit this about yourself it must be because you’re shallower than a mirror”… But I just want Sal to catch a break and feel loved, respected and supported.
Marcie’s not so bad, and I mean, there’s Danny, but yeah, everyone’s got their damage. “Everyone’s Got Their Damage” almost could be a DoA tagline, really.
Seems more like toxic feminity as opposed to toxic masculinity is all
Devin
As with so many things, there aren’t just two options.
The thing that Sal’s friend group has is more of a toxic rejection of femininity, and as such, it would be much more accurate to describe it as toxic masculinity than toxic femininity if you had to choose one of the two (which again, you don’t). Just because most of them identify as female and have a toxic trait doesn’t make it toxic femininity.
MrSmith
I don’t actually believe in the terms toxic masculinity or femininity, I think its a term someone made up that has no meaning and can legitimize behaviour that is, at best boorish and at worst illegal, and should be punished as such
That being said if the term is going to be used then I would think the identity of the person being toxic would be the deciding factor
Or is it just easier to decide that all toxic behaviour is masculine irregardless of the genders involved
Delicious Taffy
How would a negative descriptor legitimise the behaviors it was made to condemn?
Devin
I’ve got big news for you about language, buddy: it’s all made up. That being said, these terms do have meanings, whether you believe in them or not, and they’re not tied to the gender of the person being toxic, but rather the nature of the behavior.
Toxic masculinity is an enforcement of masculine behaviors and a rejection of performance of femininity or feminine behaviors to an unhealthy and harmful degree. We see something akin to this here in this strip with Malaya’s mocking of Sal embracing display of flowers, which is typically seen as a feminine trait.
Toxic femininity is an enforcement of feminine behaviors and a rejection of performance of masculinity or masculine behaviors to an unhealthy and harmful degree. We don’t see this in this strip at all.
BBCC
I don’t see either in this strip at all. Malaya’s teasing their roommate about having flowers because flowers are often seen as cheesy and not fitting the biker stereotype. At no point does she deride flowers or Sal for being girly or feminine
Devin
@BBCC In panel 4 Malaya is invoking multiple tropes associated with feminine roles. At this point I really don’t understand how you don’t see it.
someone
It would be more like toxic tomboyinity since neither Malaya nor Sal are concerned with looking like manly men of manly manlitude.
BBCC
Ah, okay, you meant the fairytale stuff. Yeah, I can see that.
Devin
@someone Yeah, I was oversimplifying a bit, that would be a better label, which goes into what I was saying earlier about there being more than two options. But given that I was getting pushback on the two of them being a thing at all, I was just starting from first principles.
Wagstaff
Well personally, I see the mind as having no need for gender, and by extension toxicity has no need for gender either.
Devin
You…get that Toxic is a modifier for Masculinity/Femininity here and not the other way around, right? You’ve said absolutely nothing here.
Wagstaff
Well that’s the point — it’s the toxicity that matters, not the masculinity/femininity.
It’s like a virus not caring what food it laches onto when it enters your body.
Devin
I’m sorry, but your point is nonsensical, because what exactly is toxic matters. Whether one is dealing with toxic masculinity, toxic femininity, toxic controlling behaviors, and so on, these are all different things that don’t have the same solutions. It’s like saying all viruses are the same and get the exact same treatment.
Wagstaff
Well fairy tales have their positive uses, but if one wants to they can surely turn them into provocative weapons.
Literally anything can be repurposed for toxicity’s sake, just like how someone if they really wanted to could turn just about any object into a weapon.
Devin
Aaaaaaaaaaaand when that happens, being able to recognize it for what it is is important and useful. That way it can be addressed in its specific way.
Like in your very own example, a virus that needs its own specific treatment can get it because it has its own name and is individually recognized, categorized, and understood.
Wagstaff
My example really emphasized that the particular food on which the virus enters the body doesn’t matter.
If Malaya wasn’t gonna turn Feminism into some kind of provocative weapon, she’d just find something else to piss off Sal.
Leorale
Yes, Malaya is going to use whatever is handy to try and annoy Sal.
In this case, toxic masculinity is handy, because flowers are seen as girly.
Malaya is using toxic masculinity to annoy Sal.
That’s kinda all folks are saying about it so far.
Demoted Oblivious
Hey Wagstaff. I’m still interested in this perspective. Like, I feel like I can understand the perspective that a mind does not need gender. Also, gender is not a prerequisite for companionship. However I think it’s also worth noting (and please correct my armchair evolutionary biology here) that social grouping and cooperation is seems to be an outcome of sexual reproduction. (sexual -> shared protection of offspring -> combining efforts/ resources -> social protocol to enhance cooperation -> partaking of social benefits without requiring reproductive benefits) [yeah there’s a lot of leaps there, I’m spitballing over here.]
So, I see your point that we could move past that, in theory. However, a lot of sentiences derive pleasure and satisfaction from the companionship of a shared pairing (or moreing) that includes a strong association with a gender identity and it’s interplay with their prefered bonding psyche.
Intelligent conversation and mutual respect are a fantastic foundation for a social connection, but for many, they are not the only thing, and removing gender from the mental world reduces the colour palette of our interactions.
Out of a fascination with your perspective on this, and our earlier conversations I would like to ask more about you personally, but I don’t want to give offense by prying after an identity aspect that it appears you wish you didn’t have. And hopefully I didn’t over step in saying that much. Your dispute over the importance of physical contact to an animal (either has a fetus/newborn) or as a sexual being, is intriguing to me, though I do hope this isn’t coming across as a ” hmm this sample is interesting” so much as a curiosity about you as a person.
Wagstaff
I very much do appreciate your interest.
One’s anatomy is one thing. But gender roles, gender identity, are really shaped by surrounding culture more than anything else. What a “man” is supposed to do and look like, what a “woman” is supposed to do and look like, varies tremendously from culture to culture, and so gender really doesn’t make sense unless you define that essential context.
For instance, for the longest time in American culture, “men” were, and in many states still are, expected to earn the majority of the family’s income, whereas within the Haredim in Judaism, it’s “women” who are expected to be the primary breadwinners.
Not to mention the fact that in America, pink used to be the “boy color” and blue used to be the “girl color”, and only switched because of corporate decisions.
Devin
I also want to note that the notion that the mind has no need for gender is going a bit too far. Gender is absolutely a social construct, but it’s one that has been constructed over and over and over again. I’m unaware of any societies that have no concept of gender. Several have constructed it differently, and it’s important to understand that no society’s concept of gender is any kind of essential or “right”, but the idea that “the mind” in general has no need for gender is too narrow in scope (like saying the mind has no need for language) and is also not borne out by observation. Not everyone has a gender, and each person’s experience of gender can be different, but those are very different than the mind having no need of it at all.
Sometimes it feels like you make overly broad statements like this looking for fights.
thejeff
This also seems to be drifting off into gender critical territory. If gender is nothing more than cultural constructs of what colors we like and what roles we fill socially, then we can get rid of those social constructs and let everyone wear what they want and do what they want.
Which in one direction leads to lots of non-binary acceptance, but in the other leads to claims there’s nothing deeper going on with trans people and therefore there’s no need for any kind of transition.
Wagstaff
Language is really nothing like gender. The mind having no need for gender doesn’t mean that one can certainly choose a gender if they want to.
What seems like a “man” in one culture can very well fit the role of a “woman” in another, and vice versa.
I definitely wasn’t trying to deny people’s rights to having a gender. If someone says there’s no need for VHS tapes, are they denying people’s rights to owning VHS tapes?
I definitely welcome feedback on what I write, but attacking a straw man doesn’t help productive discussion. But don’t sweat it; we all make mistakes sometimes!
Wagstaff
*doesn’t mean that one can’t choose a gender if they want to.
thejeff
From what I can tell, people don’t “choose” gender. At least in the vast majority of cases. They just are a gender. Even if that flies in the face of what they were told they were and how society attempted to socialize them. Or, as in most cases, if it does match up.
But, more importantly, I think you’re missing a critical distinction between gender roles and gender identity. Gender roles are socially constructed – they vary broadly across time and different cultures. Gender identity isn’t socially constructed and doesn’t vary between societies – other than at the edges of how to handle those who don’t fit the gender binary.
Wagstaff
Are people necessarily born with a gender identity, before being exposed to any cultural concept of gender?
To me at least, it’s kind of like assuming that religious faith is a natural state, that every child intrinsically has a religious identity before they even know what a “god” is.
thejeff
Given that no one is unexposed to cultural concepts of gender long before they’re capable of expressing what their own is in words, it’s not easy to tell.
But that’s not really all that relevant and I don’t think the comparison to faith is at all analogous. Though if all cultures came up with the same couple of religious identities independently, then it would certainly make me wonder.
We can at least agree that gender identity and gender role are not the same thing, right? And that however gender identity is established it’s not a conscious choice in most cases and that it can be in strong conflict with societal pressure?
It’s not clear to me what in gender identity can even be considered a social construct once separated from gender role.
Wagstaff
Exactly what definition of gender identity are you using? And under that definition, how is that distinct from “sexual identity”?
And by the way, up there, when I refer to boy/girl colors and such, I wasn’t necessarily trying to refer to gender roles as much as I was trying to refer to gender expression.
thejeff
Gender identity: Personal, internal sense of what gender you are. For most this correlates to the sex they were assigned at birth, based on their genitals. For trans people of various sorts, it doesn’t.
I’m not entirely sure what you mean by “sexual identity”. Usually that refers to who you’re attracted to, similar to sexual orientation, so it’s entirely distinct from gender identity.
287 thoughts on “Reputation”
Ana Chronistic
“–OFFA A WINGED PRINCE BEING RIDDEN BY THE PRETTIEST HORSE AT THE BALL”
Doctor_Who
Did you get that backwards, or does Sal go to some really wild balls?
Josh Spicer
They were in such a rush they totally did the thing.
Wizard
Some balls are held for charity, and some for fancy dress
But the ones held just for pleasure are the balls that I like best
Cholma
Love that song!
brionl
How about the Prettiest Cop on the Block?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtUAIHxqX-E
Imp
Even the prettiest cop on the block is still a bastard.
Demoted Oblivious
Go Sal go!
Yumi
Amazing they’ve both survived this long.
Wagstaff
Hmm…. wonder how well she’d get along with Lupin the 3rd….
Doctor_Who
Probably about like this.
Wagstaff
What if it were Carmen Sandiego?
Ana Chronistic
Carmen Sandiego now steals only from V.I.L.E. so prob not as well as you’d think
Joe Moose
Heeeeyyyy! Forgot that existed!
RassilonTDavros
…I feel stupid for not getting the meaning of “As Long As It’s Free” until just now.
Proto_Eevee
…what is the meaning?
BBCC
It’s from the Lady Gaga song ‘Bad Romance’. There’s a line that says ‘I want your everything as long as its free.’
Frankly, it’s not the ‘I want your love’ half I’m worried about, it’s the ‘And I want your revenge’.
milu
same, it’s the fact that until a few days before it aired (so when it was most likely fully written and drawn) this storyline was titled “I want your revenge”.
Josh Spicer
She isn’t WRONG.
Tan
Technically correct. The best kind of correct
He Who Abides
♬When I was born there was a hurricane in Kingston Bay, with a foot and a half of water . . .
Slartibeast Button, BIA
[Requisitions HWA a beat.]
Demoted Oblivious
That’s some good abidin’ there He.
Reltzik
Well, Danny did explicitly say she was free to take them, so… I think she IS wrong…
… except she did it stealthy… and it was a bargain….
DAMN YOU AND YOUR AMBIGUITIES, ENGLISH!
Sirksome
It’s not technically a lie right?
Thag Simmons
It’s technically correct. Which is of course, the best kind of correct
Clif
Technically, I don’t disagree.
chuckroast
Whatever makes you feel better, Sal.
Nayann Martinelli
Ah can steal flowers from dorks whenever ah like, Malaya.
Jenn
Man, I just want Sal to be able to have nice things without people giving her a hard time about it. 🙁
Miri
I know right? She looked so happy about having a couple of flowers in a cup (poor girl REALLY isn’t used to being given nice things because people think she’s special and want her to be happy) and Malaya’s taking the shine off the experience…
And I suspect it’s because Malaya’s “You’re a poser” dealio comes from her “if I even am a girl” questioning, via a bit of projection and angst in the form of “You’re pretty and clearly somewhat invested in being cool, so you must be a poser because I am these things and they cause intenal conflict, so clearly if you don’t admit this about yourself it must be because you’re shallower than a mirror”… But I just want Sal to catch a break and feel loved, respected and supported.
RowenMorland
Malaya: Why do you have to pretend like you are too cool to have any vulnerabilities.
AlsoMalaya: Oh sweet a crack in the armour!
Brumagem
Oh yeah forgot Sal’s friend group ALL have this weird equivalent of toxic masculinity
DailyBrad
Marcie’s not so bad, and I mean, there’s Danny, but yeah, everyone’s got their damage. “Everyone’s Got Their Damage” almost could be a DoA tagline, really.
Doctor_Who
Unfortunately “Damaged of Age” doesn’t rhyme with anything.
Spencer
Damaged of Age is the spinoff where entire cast has been Jokerized.
Indiana University has become Indiana Society.
SuperZero
Also: Real life.
Needfuldoer
The Deans are doing alright though? Mae’s even been updating the comic more-or-less regularly for over a year!
Nono
I mean, we don’t really know a lot about Marcie’s stances. Presumably she’s cool unless proven otherwise.
Thag Simmons
She likes Malaya, so she’s at the very least got questionable taste.
BBCC
She’s also agreed AG deserved a medal for tossing Malaya around so she’s not TOTALLY immune to Malaya’s….charm.
Nono
Maybe Marcie just really wants to see women tossing women. Which… yeah, I can buy.
MrSmith
Why not just say toxic feminity
Thag Simmons
Because that isn’t what they’re talking about?
MrSmith
Seems more like toxic feminity as opposed to toxic masculinity is all
Devin
As with so many things, there aren’t just two options.
The thing that Sal’s friend group has is more of a toxic rejection of femininity, and as such, it would be much more accurate to describe it as toxic masculinity than toxic femininity if you had to choose one of the two (which again, you don’t). Just because most of them identify as female and have a toxic trait doesn’t make it toxic femininity.
MrSmith
I don’t actually believe in the terms toxic masculinity or femininity, I think its a term someone made up that has no meaning and can legitimize behaviour that is, at best boorish and at worst illegal, and should be punished as such
That being said if the term is going to be used then I would think the identity of the person being toxic would be the deciding factor
Or is it just easier to decide that all toxic behaviour is masculine irregardless of the genders involved
Delicious Taffy
How would a negative descriptor legitimise the behaviors it was made to condemn?
Devin
I’ve got big news for you about language, buddy: it’s all made up. That being said, these terms do have meanings, whether you believe in them or not, and they’re not tied to the gender of the person being toxic, but rather the nature of the behavior.
Toxic masculinity is an enforcement of masculine behaviors and a rejection of performance of femininity or feminine behaviors to an unhealthy and harmful degree. We see something akin to this here in this strip with Malaya’s mocking of Sal embracing display of flowers, which is typically seen as a feminine trait.
Toxic femininity is an enforcement of feminine behaviors and a rejection of performance of masculinity or masculine behaviors to an unhealthy and harmful degree. We don’t see this in this strip at all.
BBCC
I don’t see either in this strip at all. Malaya’s teasing their roommate about having flowers because flowers are often seen as cheesy and not fitting the biker stereotype. At no point does she deride flowers or Sal for being girly or feminine
Devin
@BBCC In panel 4 Malaya is invoking multiple tropes associated with feminine roles. At this point I really don’t understand how you don’t see it.
someone
It would be more like toxic tomboyinity since neither Malaya nor Sal are concerned with looking like manly men of manly manlitude.
BBCC
Ah, okay, you meant the fairytale stuff. Yeah, I can see that.
Devin
@someone Yeah, I was oversimplifying a bit, that would be a better label, which goes into what I was saying earlier about there being more than two options. But given that I was getting pushback on the two of them being a thing at all, I was just starting from first principles.
Wagstaff
Well personally, I see the mind as having no need for gender, and by extension toxicity has no need for gender either.
Devin
You…get that Toxic is a modifier for Masculinity/Femininity here and not the other way around, right? You’ve said absolutely nothing here.
Wagstaff
Well that’s the point — it’s the toxicity that matters, not the masculinity/femininity.
It’s like a virus not caring what food it laches onto when it enters your body.
Devin
I’m sorry, but your point is nonsensical, because what exactly is toxic matters. Whether one is dealing with toxic masculinity, toxic femininity, toxic controlling behaviors, and so on, these are all different things that don’t have the same solutions. It’s like saying all viruses are the same and get the exact same treatment.
Wagstaff
Well fairy tales have their positive uses, but if one wants to they can surely turn them into provocative weapons.
Literally anything can be repurposed for toxicity’s sake, just like how someone if they really wanted to could turn just about any object into a weapon.
Devin
Aaaaaaaaaaaand when that happens, being able to recognize it for what it is is important and useful. That way it can be addressed in its specific way.
Like in your very own example, a virus that needs its own specific treatment can get it because it has its own name and is individually recognized, categorized, and understood.
Wagstaff
My example really emphasized that the particular food on which the virus enters the body doesn’t matter.
If Malaya wasn’t gonna turn Feminism into some kind of provocative weapon, she’d just find something else to piss off Sal.
Leorale
Yes, Malaya is going to use whatever is handy to try and annoy Sal.
In this case, toxic masculinity is handy, because flowers are seen as girly.
Malaya is using toxic masculinity to annoy Sal.
That’s kinda all folks are saying about it so far.
Demoted Oblivious
Hey Wagstaff. I’m still interested in this perspective. Like, I feel like I can understand the perspective that a mind does not need gender. Also, gender is not a prerequisite for companionship. However I think it’s also worth noting (and please correct my armchair evolutionary biology here) that social grouping and cooperation is seems to be an outcome of sexual reproduction. (sexual -> shared protection of offspring -> combining efforts/ resources -> social protocol to enhance cooperation -> partaking of social benefits without requiring reproductive benefits) [yeah there’s a lot of leaps there, I’m spitballing over here.]
So, I see your point that we could move past that, in theory. However, a lot of sentiences derive pleasure and satisfaction from the companionship of a shared pairing (or moreing) that includes a strong association with a gender identity and it’s interplay with their prefered bonding psyche.
Intelligent conversation and mutual respect are a fantastic foundation for a social connection, but for many, they are not the only thing, and removing gender from the mental world reduces the colour palette of our interactions.
Out of a fascination with your perspective on this, and our earlier conversations I would like to ask more about you personally, but I don’t want to give offense by prying after an identity aspect that it appears you wish you didn’t have. And hopefully I didn’t over step in saying that much. Your dispute over the importance of physical contact to an animal (either has a fetus/newborn) or as a sexual being, is intriguing to me, though I do hope this isn’t coming across as a ” hmm this sample is interesting” so much as a curiosity about you as a person.
Wagstaff
I very much do appreciate your interest.
One’s anatomy is one thing. But gender roles, gender identity, are really shaped by surrounding culture more than anything else. What a “man” is supposed to do and look like, what a “woman” is supposed to do and look like, varies tremendously from culture to culture, and so gender really doesn’t make sense unless you define that essential context.
For instance, for the longest time in American culture, “men” were, and in many states still are, expected to earn the majority of the family’s income, whereas within the Haredim in Judaism, it’s “women” who are expected to be the primary breadwinners.
Not to mention the fact that in America, pink used to be the “boy color” and blue used to be the “girl color”, and only switched because of corporate decisions.
Devin
I also want to note that the notion that the mind has no need for gender is going a bit too far. Gender is absolutely a social construct, but it’s one that has been constructed over and over and over again. I’m unaware of any societies that have no concept of gender. Several have constructed it differently, and it’s important to understand that no society’s concept of gender is any kind of essential or “right”, but the idea that “the mind” in general has no need for gender is too narrow in scope (like saying the mind has no need for language) and is also not borne out by observation. Not everyone has a gender, and each person’s experience of gender can be different, but those are very different than the mind having no need of it at all.
Sometimes it feels like you make overly broad statements like this looking for fights.
thejeff
This also seems to be drifting off into gender critical territory. If gender is nothing more than cultural constructs of what colors we like and what roles we fill socially, then we can get rid of those social constructs and let everyone wear what they want and do what they want.
Which in one direction leads to lots of non-binary acceptance, but in the other leads to claims there’s nothing deeper going on with trans people and therefore there’s no need for any kind of transition.
Wagstaff
Language is really nothing like gender. The mind having no need for gender doesn’t mean that one can certainly choose a gender if they want to.
What seems like a “man” in one culture can very well fit the role of a “woman” in another, and vice versa.
I definitely wasn’t trying to deny people’s rights to having a gender. If someone says there’s no need for VHS tapes, are they denying people’s rights to owning VHS tapes?
I definitely welcome feedback on what I write, but attacking a straw man doesn’t help productive discussion. But don’t sweat it; we all make mistakes sometimes!
Wagstaff
*doesn’t mean that one can’t choose a gender if they want to.
thejeff
From what I can tell, people don’t “choose” gender. At least in the vast majority of cases. They just are a gender. Even if that flies in the face of what they were told they were and how society attempted to socialize them. Or, as in most cases, if it does match up.
But, more importantly, I think you’re missing a critical distinction between gender roles and gender identity. Gender roles are socially constructed – they vary broadly across time and different cultures. Gender identity isn’t socially constructed and doesn’t vary between societies – other than at the edges of how to handle those who don’t fit the gender binary.
Wagstaff
Are people necessarily born with a gender identity, before being exposed to any cultural concept of gender?
To me at least, it’s kind of like assuming that religious faith is a natural state, that every child intrinsically has a religious identity before they even know what a “god” is.
thejeff
Given that no one is unexposed to cultural concepts of gender long before they’re capable of expressing what their own is in words, it’s not easy to tell.
But that’s not really all that relevant and I don’t think the comparison to faith is at all analogous. Though if all cultures came up with the same couple of religious identities independently, then it would certainly make me wonder.
We can at least agree that gender identity and gender role are not the same thing, right? And that however gender identity is established it’s not a conscious choice in most cases and that it can be in strong conflict with societal pressure?
It’s not clear to me what in gender identity can even be considered a social construct once separated from gender role.
Wagstaff
Exactly what definition of gender identity are you using? And under that definition, how is that distinct from “sexual identity”?
And by the way, up there, when I refer to boy/girl colors and such, I wasn’t necessarily trying to refer to gender roles as much as I was trying to refer to gender expression.
thejeff
Gender identity: Personal, internal sense of what gender you are. For most this correlates to the sex they were assigned at birth, based on their genitals. For trans people of various sorts, it doesn’t.
I’m not entirely sure what you mean by “sexual identity”. Usually that refers to who you’re attracted to, similar to sexual orientation, so it’s entirely distinct from gender identity.