I mean, I went around half a semester without keycard access to the dorm I was living in at one point. Of course, I looked college age, so I guess people were less suspicious, but it’s not that hard to get into dorm halls, is my point.
Also, if the dorm building has other things, like classrooms or a campus store in it, it may be general access to the part with that stuff, which might be where Stacy is.
I don’t know about the comic’s campus, but the college close to me lets anyone go to the dining hall and pay for food, not just students, staff, and faculty.
It was the same at my college. That’s kind of what I was getting at with “a bit more open”. Meanwhile, the residence halls required an ID swipe, although the scanner was honestly sensitive enough that I rarely even had to take my wallet out. Just stand close to it with your ID nearby and it’d unlock.
Meanwhile my mind is blown by the revelation that dorms and dining halls are in the same building at some schools. There were multiple dining locations on my campus, but they were all separate buildings separate from the dorms.
So yeah, the dining halls were more or less open to anyone. If you had a friend or family member visiting, they could eat by just paying for their meal rather than using a student meal plan.
BBCC
I mean, like, we have other dining halls in like the student centre and some of the buildings that also have classrooms, but we also have some in the dorms. Both of the ones I’ve visited to see my friends had somewhere to eat.
HeySo
I’ve been to maybe a dozen universities, never seen dorms with food services of any sort (other than occasional vending machines) within the same building.
Of course, all the ones I’ve been to have been in southern and central states, so perhaps it’s more a regional affectation by specific parts of the northern, mountainous, or western regions.
Dorms in all the places I visited tended to have both an outer and a room lock, unless they were outdoor access, in which case they only had the latter. Dining halls and libraries were always open to the public, though you could only check books out as a student, with the exception of any dining areas within student centers. This of course makes sense, since you generally get a lot of guests visiting campus, and tethering them to students for dining purpose is generally more a waste of security funding than it is beneficial to anyone.
In the end, though, I imagine a lot has to do with not just the region and local habits, but the specific safety concerns of that school- extra security measures and easier access to dining may be of higher importance to schools with higher crime rates both on and off campus.
BBCC
I’m in Canada. Maybe that’s it?
Yumi
Well, I’m in the US and my experience was more like what you described.
thejeff
When I was in school, lo these many years ago, dorms had locks, but no other security. Those doors were usually propped open for the convenience of visitors.
Dorms came in clusters – some each had their own dining area, others had one big one for the whole area.
Where I went to college, anyone could enter the dorms, just not the specific rooms. The dining halls, however, required either a meal plan or for you to pay for your visit.
Our doors were always locked and we were forbidden from letting people in after us instead of making them swipe their cards.
Of course, we tended to ignore that rule.
BBCC
Oh, yeah, I’m sure it’s different everywhere. My friend has to buzz me in to her dorm. But word of willis has been that this dorm only locks at night, iirc.
Word of Willis was that these scenes take place in the Landes Dining Hall. It existed in 2014 but appears to have been renovated out of existence by August 2016 if not sooner.
IU seems to have moved to a mostly cafe/food court model. I can’t tell from casual mousing around, but the food courts at least seem to be mostly open to the public.
Of course, in the modified-Brigadoon world of DoA, it could well be that Amber and Richard are in some sort of closed-access cafeteria, and Dr. Rosenthal has managed to waltz in by acting confident. Who knows?
In my experience, dining halls are almost always open to the public. The I don’t think the comments are about Richard being in the dining hall but about Stacy being in the dorms.
Richard explains that his presence is due to ‘Chutzpah’, pure salesmanship and brazen self-confidence. He probably waited until some older students were going in and inserted himself into their group, ignoring their questions or throwing up a smokescreen of irrelevant observations and small-talk until he was in.
I’m not sure if that was a response to her initial sass (yo, old Joe isn’t particularly polite) or he would say that kind of stuff anyway. Still seriously inappropriate possibly not unprovoked.
I think you’re right. I was trying to think of a non-female sexual aggressor in this comic that hasn’t become a villain, and the only I can think of is maybe-sorta-kinda Joe because he’s getting an arc. As much as I’d hate to see it, I think the “What could have been” juxtaposition between Joe and Richard would be the only reason Richard is really in the story at all.
Gaia
Sarah would fit the bill. (Female, sexually aggressive, and trying to break a couple up out of spite…villain)
Havtorn
Didn’t mean to say that the women of the comic were all depicted as saints. Just that, as far as I can tell, among the cast the division between sexual initiators is something like:
Dorothy, Amazi-Amber, Sal, Ruth, Billy, Roz (assumed) and Penny(assumed)
vs.
Joe, Mike (assumed), Richard
Havtorn
And of course Ryan
CJ
@Gaia:
From a story perspective she can’t be the villain, because Raihda definitely isn’t the hero.
Definition of villain
1 :a character in a story or play who opposes the hero
2 :a deliberate scoundrel or criminal
3 :one blamed for a particular evil or difficulty
automation as the villain in job … displacement —M. H. Goldberg
4 :villein
5 :an uncouth person :boor
So 1 is out, 2 no, nothing criminal here, 3, well that’s the role she has in Raihda eyes concerning Dana, 5, hm, Raidah would probably agree with that one, but it’s a rather outdated usage.
@Havtorn: maybe you need to clarify which definition of aggressor you are using when and if sexual modifies to motive or method?
I still think that where sexual assault is concerned, the aim is power not sex.
There’s definitely room here for an archetype that goes so far to prove that someone else is evil that they become just as bad themselves.
the final pam
“non-female”
BBCC
What’s wrong with that phrase? There’s more than one non-female gender.
the final pam
I’m aware.
I was pointing out that Havtorn specified “non-female sexual aggressor” in their original comment, that was promptly ignored in the reply that I commented on.
I’m not sure about that. He seems intent to be as much of an asshole as humanly possible here.
Reltzik
Not really. All we’ve seen Dick do is sleep around and be crass and insensitive. Blaine was and is actively abusive, to the point of kidnapping Amber’s friend just to force her to talk to him.
TemperaryObsessor
The issue with Richard appears to be he wants one thing but will pretend to be different. I don’t see this not hurting Stacey since she said they were getting serious but I also don’t see this as potentially killing her.
Blane most likely didn’t want one thing but all of her. As in he wanted her entire life to be about keeping him happy, and has been showed to be willing to use violence to get what he wants.
I believe the bar for massive improvement from Blame is underground. I don’t think Richard is about to dig it up. I don’t see him clearing any bar above his knee any time soon either.
thejeff
Exactly. Richard will cheat on her, but it won’t be a deliberate campaign of abuse.
Yay for Richard?
I do not like this man. I think, in fact, I hate him a lot. Everything from “doing your mom on the regs” to “yes but I barged in anyway” to feeling like he has the right to lecture Amber about her mom after THAT fucking shitshow of a conversation.
I think I would like to release the raptor on his face.
234 thoughts on “Rich”
Doctor_Who
Are parents just allowed to walk into dorms? No keycard access or anything?
Yumi
I mean, I went around half a semester without keycard access to the dorm I was living in at one point. Of course, I looked college age, so I guess people were less suspicious, but it’s not that hard to get into dorm halls, is my point.
Also, if the dorm building has other things, like classrooms or a campus store in it, it may be general access to the part with that stuff, which might be where Stacy is.
DrWattson
In my experience, dorms and residence halls require an ID or key; however this appears to be a dining hall, which are a bit more open.
NotPiffany
I don’t know about the comic’s campus, but the college close to me lets anyone go to the dining hall and pay for food, not just students, staff, and faculty.
DrWattson
It was the same at my college. That’s kind of what I was getting at with “a bit more open”. Meanwhile, the residence halls required an ID swipe, although the scanner was honestly sensitive enough that I rarely even had to take my wallet out. Just stand close to it with your ID nearby and it’d unlock.
Amazi-Stool
“the scanner was honestly sensitive enough”
It was a sensitive scanner?
ValdVin
Your flippant remark has not gone unappreciated.
dn3s
i regularly make use of a nearby university’s library. they have comfy chairs, outlets, and wifi.
dn3s
oh um, and i’m not a student. if that wasn’t clear from context
BBCC
Wait, wait, wait, do dining halls not exist in the same building as dorms at your school?
I think my mind was blown.
Benwhoski
Meanwhile my mind is blown by the revelation that dorms and dining halls are in the same building at some schools. There were multiple dining locations on my campus, but they were all separate buildings separate from the dorms.
So yeah, the dining halls were more or less open to anyone. If you had a friend or family member visiting, they could eat by just paying for their meal rather than using a student meal plan.
BBCC
I mean, like, we have other dining halls in like the student centre and some of the buildings that also have classrooms, but we also have some in the dorms. Both of the ones I’ve visited to see my friends had somewhere to eat.
HeySo
I’ve been to maybe a dozen universities, never seen dorms with food services of any sort (other than occasional vending machines) within the same building.
Of course, all the ones I’ve been to have been in southern and central states, so perhaps it’s more a regional affectation by specific parts of the northern, mountainous, or western regions.
Dorms in all the places I visited tended to have both an outer and a room lock, unless they were outdoor access, in which case they only had the latter. Dining halls and libraries were always open to the public, though you could only check books out as a student, with the exception of any dining areas within student centers. This of course makes sense, since you generally get a lot of guests visiting campus, and tethering them to students for dining purpose is generally more a waste of security funding than it is beneficial to anyone.
In the end, though, I imagine a lot has to do with not just the region and local habits, but the specific safety concerns of that school- extra security measures and easier access to dining may be of higher importance to schools with higher crime rates both on and off campus.
BBCC
I’m in Canada. Maybe that’s it?
Yumi
Well, I’m in the US and my experience was more like what you described.
thejeff
When I was in school, lo these many years ago, dorms had locks, but no other security. Those doors were usually propped open for the convenience of visitors.
Dorms came in clusters – some each had their own dining area, others had one big one for the whole area.
The One Guy
Where I went to college, anyone could enter the dorms, just not the specific rooms. The dining halls, however, required either a meal plan or for you to pay for your visit.
BBCC
Yes? The door only locks at night.
Egg
Our doors were always locked and we were forbidden from letting people in after us instead of making them swipe their cards.
Of course, we tended to ignore that rule.
BBCC
Oh, yeah, I’m sure it’s different everywhere. My friend has to buzz me in to her dorm. But word of willis has been that this dorm only locks at night, iirc.
Marsh Maryrose
Word of Willis was that these scenes take place in the Landes Dining Hall. It existed in 2014 but appears to have been renovated out of existence by August 2016 if not sooner.
IU seems to have moved to a mostly cafe/food court model. I can’t tell from casual mousing around, but the food courts at least seem to be mostly open to the public.
Of course, in the modified-Brigadoon world of DoA, it could well be that Amber and Richard are in some sort of closed-access cafeteria, and Dr. Rosenthal has managed to waltz in by acting confident. Who knows?
Yumi
In my experience, dining halls are almost always open to the public. The I don’t think the comments are about Richard being in the dining hall but about Stacy being in the dorms.
BenRG
Richard explains that his presence is due to ‘Chutzpah’, pure salesmanship and brazen self-confidence. He probably waited until some older students were going in and inserted himself into their group, ignoring their questions or throwing up a smokescreen of irrelevant observations and small-talk until he was in.
Bagge
They might walk in…
They might not walk out…
http://www.dumbingofage.com/2013/comic/book-3/04-just-hangin-out-with-my-family/approved/
Diner Kinetic
he’s so… benign
Gwen
Aside from just having said “doing your mom on the regs.” Because that is in no way creepy. Nope.
JessWitt
Good god, turn on your filter, Dr. Richard.
StClair
“filter”?
JessWitt
Cerebral filter for suppressing inappropriate statements, actions, and the like, especially in public.
Yumi
I’m pretty sure the joke was that he’s lacking in such a filter.
JohnF
Where can I get one?
monkyvirus
I’m not sure if that was a response to her initial sass (yo, old Joe isn’t particularly polite) or he would say that kind of stuff anyway. Still seriously inappropriate possibly not unprovoked.
Cheshrin
Huh. That was not the reason for Richard’s appearance I was expecting.
I don’t know what I was expecting, but “I’m here with your mom because she’s worried about you” wasn’t it.
Badgermole
It’s Willis lulling us into a false sense of security to magnify the inevitable assholery of Dad Rosenthal when the other shoe drops.
Havtorn
I think you’re right. I was trying to think of a non-female sexual aggressor in this comic that hasn’t become a villain, and the only I can think of is maybe-sorta-kinda Joe because he’s getting an arc. As much as I’d hate to see it, I think the “What could have been” juxtaposition between Joe and Richard would be the only reason Richard is really in the story at all.
Gaia
Sarah would fit the bill. (Female, sexually aggressive, and trying to break a couple up out of spite…villain)
Havtorn
Didn’t mean to say that the women of the comic were all depicted as saints. Just that, as far as I can tell, among the cast the division between sexual initiators is something like:
Dorothy, Amazi-Amber, Sal, Ruth, Billy, Roz (assumed) and Penny(assumed)
vs.
Joe, Mike (assumed), Richard
Havtorn
And of course Ryan
CJ
@Gaia:
From a story perspective she can’t be the villain, because Raihda definitely isn’t the hero.
Definition of villain
1 :a character in a story or play who opposes the hero
2 :a deliberate scoundrel or criminal
3 :one blamed for a particular evil or difficulty
automation as the villain in job … displacement —M. H. Goldberg
4 :villein
5 :an uncouth person :boor
So 1 is out, 2 no, nothing criminal here, 3, well that’s the role she has in Raihda eyes concerning Dana, 5, hm, Raidah would probably agree with that one, but it’s a rather outdated usage.
@Havtorn: maybe you need to clarify which definition of aggressor you are using when and if sexual modifies to motive or method?
I still think that where sexual assault is concerned, the aim is power not sex.
Frederic Garber
Raihda’s not the hero she’s opposing, it’s Jacob.
Jothki
There’s definitely room here for an archetype that goes so far to prove that someone else is evil that they become just as bad themselves.
the final pam
“non-female”
BBCC
What’s wrong with that phrase? There’s more than one non-female gender.
the final pam
I’m aware.
I was pointing out that Havtorn specified “non-female sexual aggressor” in their original comment, that was promptly ignored in the reply that I commented on.
Dean
Note that this is Doctor Dick at minimum creepiness.
King Daniel
So I guess nothing came of Stacy’s cameo in the bar with Leslie last we saw her…unless we’re just about to find out that something did.
JessWitt
Dang, I forgot about that cameo. And regarding that last sentence, maybe Leslie and Stacy had a chat that somehow got Richard involved here?
Cattleprod
“I’m here to help because I remember the conversation we just had when I was younger.”
Doctor_Who
Is he gonna tell her that Tailgate turns out okay? Because I need to hear that too.
SgtWadeyWilson
Actually, can I say it instead? I’ve always wanted to lie to the Doctor! *Coughs.* I mean… Tailgate will be fine.
Derek
what scene on youtube?
Doctor_Who
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, when the guy drinks from the grail.
huttj509
“He chose poorly”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA7J0KkanzM
GLaDOS
Boy, do you have a gift for understatement.
Tacos
Well I didn’t expect him to meet Amber for that reason.
AnvilPro
Is that some actual emotion on Joe’s Dad’s face in the last panel?
ozzi
It’s also his sex face.
Marsh Maryrose
Stacy chose…poorly.
Gaia
Compared to her last guy, this is a massive improvement!
Lingo
I’m not sure about that. He seems intent to be as much of an asshole as humanly possible here.
Reltzik
Not really. All we’ve seen Dick do is sleep around and be crass and insensitive. Blaine was and is actively abusive, to the point of kidnapping Amber’s friend just to force her to talk to him.
TemperaryObsessor
The issue with Richard appears to be he wants one thing but will pretend to be different. I don’t see this not hurting Stacey since she said they were getting serious but I also don’t see this as potentially killing her.
Blane most likely didn’t want one thing but all of her. As in he wanted her entire life to be about keeping him happy, and has been showed to be willing to use violence to get what he wants.
I believe the bar for massive improvement from Blame is underground. I don’t think Richard is about to dig it up. I don’t see him clearing any bar above his knee any time soon either.
thejeff
Exactly. Richard will cheat on her, but it won’t be a deliberate campaign of abuse.
Yay for Richard?
Nono
I don’t know how, but Joe’s dad seems a bit… paunchier? than his son?
Leorale
He is. It’s almost a Dad Bod, but not quite.
JessWitt
We never did see Richard from a sideview before so interesting difference.
Needfuldoer
He’s also at least twenty-something years older; that happens.
Shiro
squints
I do not like this man. I think, in fact, I hate him a lot. Everything from “doing your mom on the regs” to “yes but I barged in anyway” to feeling like he has the right to lecture Amber about her mom after THAT fucking shitshow of a conversation.
I think I would like to release the raptor on his face.
MatthewTheLucky
Well someone needs to lecture Amber.
Shiro
How about he does it WITHOUT being an arrogant shitface first?
Averien
The irony here is overwhelming.
Yumi
Wow, that seems incredibly uncalled for.