DOA11: Why’s Everyone Trying to Sniff Up My Ass This Semester?
Clif
And after not seeing Sal’s face for a while, it suddenly comes up in grav roulette. Does that mean I win?
HeySo
Knowing Willis and his “Chronic Butt-itis” [or as you may better know it, “Butts Syndrome”], that seems all-too-likely as the actual title. I’m not saying it should be. I’m just saying it likely will be.
I mean, what’s a day of DoA without a Damn You Willis and a butt-related eyeroll?
[I meant that figuratively. Please stop rolling your eyes while face-planting someone’s ass. I mean, at least stop it in public. Besides, I hear that’s how you get pink-eye. Or is it stink-eye? Anyway; To put it in the phrasing of Jennifer: “Promise me you won’t. It’ll fuck with my anti-eyeinbuttcrescents.”]
If only I had the choice. But when you breed with the crazy, you have to choose between being a present parent or being at peace. I choose (well try to) responsibility.
“Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon… No matter how good you are, the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.”
–Earliest atrribution, S. D. Weitzenhoffer
The best I’ve achieved is to just breathe and be. Put a smile on my face (for the endorphins it gives me) and wait for it to end. I’ve failed a lot.
Is it?
I think I may have had a terrible revelation.
Jennifer… is sober Billie. Or rather Billie named the person she became when sober “Jennifer.”
Which may imply that Jennifer has attached all of her budding bisexual identity to her “Billie” personality, hence the idea that she’s “over” it. That is not healthy.
Future strips may prove me wrong, but that’s my current theory.
Has ‘Jennifer’ denied being bisexual? Just because she’s currently dating a guy doesn’t mean anything.
Kyrik Michalowski
She hasn’t denied it but she did put extra emphasis on “boyfriend” when she was talking about being in a healthy relationship.
Amias
And when Becky said Jennifer still had the hots for Ruth, Jennifer said “that was just some weird phase I was going through.” You can read that as being specifically about Ruth, and not about girls in general, but it seems pretty clear to me that she doesn’t want to be bi.
C.T Phipps
Jennifer said that “bisexuality is a thing” and that she wasn’t ready to make that acknowledgement about herself.
I will admit, the same woman who said ‘bisexuality only exists in porn’ immediately figuring out ‘they’ and then busting out ‘agender’ and ‘gender boundaries’ is interesting.
Somewhere in the time gap she clearly got an education in this stuff.
Except they/them pronouns don’t imply agender. Nonbinary people can identify as *many* different gender identities, only one of which is “agender”. The choices aren’t “boy”, “girl”, or “none” — it’s a spectrum. Which implies to me that Jennifer doesn’t know nearly as much about these things as she thinks she does.
Also I’m kind of pissed off now because that floor meeting seemed to really bother Ruth and I hope she’s not backsliding. Don’t prove a horrible person like Rachel right, Ruth!
Ruth has always been a horrible person, with a brother for morality pet. What, was subjecting her charges to physical and psychological abuse not enough of a hint for you?
Spencer
We’re biased towards protagonists. That’s why Rachel is a compelling addition to the cast and Ruth’s dynamic.
JBento
Rachel and Roz are two of the best people in the comic, and everybody has failed to convince me otherwise.
Spencer
Roz is kind of performatively woke but I’d like to see her mature and develop that into a more sincere effort to do good.
Rachel we don’t know enough about yet, but the mechanical story purpose of a character who won’t let a fan favourite get a pass for her abuse is pretty fucking groovy, ngl.
Sirksome
This is my problem with Rachel. Roz at least has shown some other sides of her personality and some development. Rachel on the other hand only shows up to do one thing, badger Ruth for her previous actions. That’s the only thing she’s done besides once yelling at Joe for being creepily objectified by him. I wish she’d do something else so I can sympathize with her more. Otherwise she’s just become the bully Ruth used to be.
Ruth was a horrible person. Maybe she even still is, but at least she’s trying to change which is more than Rachel is doing. Mostly because Rachel’s a side character.
Spencer
Yeah that’s basically the rub of why Rachel’s so unsympathetic to us so far despite being Completely Right; she’s a bit character who yells at Ruth.
We’ve gotten a flashback indicating shared history and Booster pulling out of her that she feels guilty for not stepping up beforehand. Where we gonna from here?
thejeff
Completely right is a lot farther than I’d go and I’m usually a Rachel defender.
That rant of hers: “redemption is not real” “You will always be the thing you were before”.
Her anger is understandable. She’s not required to forgive Ruth. But she’s also not Completely Right.
JBento
Roz is literally the only one of the cast that volunteers her time for no personal gain (like the condom thing), and when she got an inkling of what Ryan had done to Joyce she approached her and, with exactly zero prying, queestions, accusations or recriminations, offered her information on helpful resources, even though her only interactio with Joyce had involved Joyce calling her “a hellbound slut.” If it’s performative you’re after, look at Dorothy and her volunteering at the soup kitchen because it’ll look good on her resume.
Spencer
I think you’re confusing “performatively woke” with “incapable of ever doing anything with an altruistic motive.”
Both things you mentioned were in, what, Year 2 of the comic? We’re on Year 11 now and since her big freakout on Joyce she’s acted a lot more like a glad handling sleaze who huffs her own farts and parades her sister’s outing to her dorm to curry their favour, and lately only ever seems to say anything so Becky can shut her down.
Roz isn’t a bad person, she’s not malicious, she’s not the Liberal Equivalent of Mary, she’s a kid who believes in the right thing, so she decides that makes her right to act how she sees it.
JBento
Lifehack: if you’re trying ot convince me of your position,then “Becky agrees with me” should not only not be one of your first arguments, it shouldn’t be one of your arguments at all. With the exceptions of something related to her specific life experience (e.g., how difficult it is to acquire the required documentation for basically everything while growing under a super-cintrolling parent) or something I find so self-evident you don’t need to defend it to me at all (e.g., LGBT+ folk deserve the same rghts as non-), Becky’s opinion has actual negative value.
You saying that Roz is wrong becuse Becky shuts her down is the equivalent of you saying that science is wrong and fundies are right because Joyce had a countter for everything Dina said as they walked into Biology class.
(as an aside, one of us misread the situation with Roz upon Robin getting outed – I feel like if it had been an attempt to garner favour, she wouldn’t have had categorically and dismissively denied being the one who’d done it)
thejeff
How about nuance? We can acknowledge Ruth’s problems and emphasize with her struggles at the same time, without writing her off as a terrible person. Just like most of the rest of these characters.
And I’ve no idea what you by Howard as a morality pet.
JBento
We can also acknowledge that the story has shown us that Ruth continues to threaten people, suggesting that Ruth isn’t a bully BECAUSE she has depression, but in fact a bully AND has depression. Depression is an illness, not Mirror-Universe Santa Claus, it happens to bad people too.
Spencer
I won’t argue Ruth *has* done those things, and thus forgiveness is in the eye of the beholder, but I will say she does not anymore. Her return to Big Bad Ruthless is transparently performative and instantly defanged by the slightest resistance as shown by Becky and Dorothy, the only person she’s gone Ruthless at.
There is maybe a question about the appropriateness of calling back to Ruth at her worst for a joke, but for now she is very clearly not who she was at the start of the comic.
BBCC
Ruth’s also friendly enough with Becky she was going to take Gender Studies with her, so there’s that too. Joking about Ruthless with someone she’s friendly with and joking with, say, Rachel, are not the same thing.
It just ocurred to me while re-reading your comment that you might have meant it in a way I feel the need to correct: being a alcoholic isn’t what makes Ruth a terrible person. Neither would backsliding be. These aren’t personality flaws. They’re character flaws in the sense that the character isn’t perfect, not in the sense of the character having a flawed, er, character.
Honestly, I have no idea what Booster’s deal is, so I will withhold opinions since we know more.
But from Ruth’s point of view she might as well entertain the possibility. Then what she does with it is up to her.
Clif
Sentence 1: Same.
And Ruth just snagged Jennifer’s need to be needed.
Galdan
My theory is, Booster is somebody with an all-consuming need to be the center of attention:
1.-Their show at the meeting served no other purpose besides becoming the center of attention, and trying to convince everybody that they are SOOOO SMART!
2.-Nobody could analyze people the way they did just by looking at them; they have obviously been cyber-stalking the students, gathering information about them, a task ridiculously easy nowadays, with everybody uploading everything the do, say or think to the net. They did that in order to become able to play the role of the genius psychoanalyst detective.
3.-Taking into account 2 and 3, I think they chose this college after reading all the news about Amazi-girl, Robin and Roz shenanigans and about the shootings and kidnappings and drama… they want to insert themselves into that drama-filled community in order to reach all of America!.
Booster would probably be more annoying in-universe, simply because their analyses tend to force people to confront the things people don’t want to confront about themselves.
In all seriousness, though, I cannot wait to see them meet Jennifer. It probably won’t go well, or at least not initially, but I want to see it happen anyway.
@milu Sorry? I am not sure what part you are referring to?
milu
I mean i’m hoping i misunderstood somehow!! But if you told me “to be fair, you need to be a certain level of drunk to get over Milu’s personality” i would be seriously offended. It sounds just about as mean to me as if you’d said the same thing with “face” instead of “personality”. Does this make sense? Did I get you awfully wrong?
Yumi
But in this case it’s a joke about a fictional character, so I really don’t think it’s that bad.
milu
Yeah, I’m not exactly sure why I got such an icky feeling from OP’s comment. Some jokes are not funny to some people for reasons of their own, maybe this is one of those for me.
Their relationship was toxic, but apparently since it was a Mutually Agreed Destruction sorta thing, it escalated into nuclear one way or another either right before the end or after it. The geiger counter is to navigate the scorched, salted (salty?) ground that was left.
Geiger counters measure radioactive decay right? Isnt radioactivity toxic? Is that the wrong word for it? Cos that being my understanding means gauging environmental toxicity based on a radioactivity reading is sensible.
milu
However– now that I’m committed to overthinking this– I think I agree that radioactivity is a bad metaphor for hostility, because its this regular, mineral, slow sort of process. Again, as I understand it. Radioactivity feels acausal and uncaring, not well suited to describing the sparks flying in a highly charged interaction. (My own metaphor is a bit confused, nyeh).
milu
(Sorry for being a metaphor nerd Octopus Ink, actualy ty for your comment lol, love your pseudonym btw, peace)
Thag Simmons
Looking it up Radiation might be considered a sort of Toxin. And I misspelled scientifically….
269 thoughts on “Sniff up”
Ana Chronistic
hey why don’t I interact with MY exes more often heyoo
Ana Chronistic
“Drug interactions of unusual size”? I don’t think they exist.
Slartibeast Button, BIA
Side effects may include dizziness, fatigue, hilarity, or tracheal meercats colonies.
FriskyJacket
Whelp Ana’s dead. Killed by a DIOUS in a swamp.
Meagan
So timely, just watched TPB the other night.
Yet_One_More_Idiot
DoA Book 10: You Don’t Get To Tell Me What To Do Anymore!
Clif
DOA11: Why’s Everyone Trying to Sniff Up My Ass This Semester?
Clif
And after not seeing Sal’s face for a while, it suddenly comes up in grav roulette. Does that mean I win?
HeySo
Knowing Willis and his “Chronic Butt-itis” [or as you may better know it, “Butts Syndrome”], that seems all-too-likely as the actual title. I’m not saying it should be. I’m just saying it likely will be.
I mean, what’s a day of DoA without a Damn You Willis and a butt-related eyeroll?
[I meant that figuratively. Please stop rolling your eyes while face-planting someone’s ass. I mean, at least stop it in public. Besides, I hear that’s how you get pink-eye. Or is it stink-eye? Anyway; To put it in the phrasing of Jennifer: “Promise me you won’t. It’ll fuck with my anti-eyeinbuttcrescents.”]
Demoted Oblivious
If only I had the choice. But when you breed with the crazy, you have to choose between being a present parent or being at peace. I choose (well try to) responsibility.
“Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon… No matter how good you are, the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.”
–Earliest atrribution, S. D. Weitzenhoffer
The best I’ve achieved is to just breathe and be. Put a smile on my face (for the endorphins it gives me) and wait for it to end. I’ve failed a lot.
Thag Simmons
Well, this is progress, I think
Rose by Any Other Name
Is it?
I think I may have had a terrible revelation.
Jennifer… is sober Billie. Or rather Billie named the person she became when sober “Jennifer.”
Which may imply that Jennifer has attached all of her budding bisexual identity to her “Billie” personality, hence the idea that she’s “over” it. That is not healthy.
Future strips may prove me wrong, but that’s my current theory.
Undrave
Has ‘Jennifer’ denied being bisexual? Just because she’s currently dating a guy doesn’t mean anything.
Kyrik Michalowski
She hasn’t denied it but she did put extra emphasis on “boyfriend” when she was talking about being in a healthy relationship.
Amias
And when Becky said Jennifer still had the hots for Ruth, Jennifer said “that was just some weird phase I was going through.” You can read that as being specifically about Ruth, and not about girls in general, but it seems pretty clear to me that she doesn’t want to be bi.
C.T Phipps
Jennifer said that “bisexuality is a thing” and that she wasn’t ready to make that acknowledgement about herself.
King Daniel
…pretty sure she actually said “bisexuality is only a thing in porn,” unless you know of a more recent strip?
King Daniel
fitting grav is fitting
Nono
She called dating Ruth a phase a few strips ago.
It may not have been in regards to her bisexuality but it’s not great phrasing.
Rose by Any Other Name
That, what Nono said, is what I was referring to.
Rose by Any Other Name
(Also Zor, but I neglected to read that far before posting).
Alaric
I got the sense that she said that at least partially to hurt Ruth, though.
Zor
She’s flat-out referred to their relationship as “just a phase she was going through,” so I wouldn’t be surprised if that were the case
BarerMender
Rose, I like your theory.
Rose by Any Other Name
Thanks!
I am Nothing
The Billie you used to know is dead.
Long live Jennifer.
foamy
I will admit, the same woman who said ‘bisexuality only exists in porn’ immediately figuring out ‘they’ and then busting out ‘agender’ and ‘gender boundaries’ is interesting.
Somewhere in the time gap she clearly got an education in this stuff.
Pimellon
Except they/them pronouns don’t imply agender. Nonbinary people can identify as *many* different gender identities, only one of which is “agender”. The choices aren’t “boy”, “girl”, or “none” — it’s a spectrum. Which implies to me that Jennifer doesn’t know nearly as much about these things as she thinks she does.
Sirksome
Hrrmmm. Now I’m not sure who is responsible for the breakup? Lets just say both and move on.
Sirksome
Also I’m kind of pissed off now because that floor meeting seemed to really bother Ruth and I hope she’s not backsliding. Don’t prove a horrible person like Rachel right, Ruth!
JBento
Ruth has always been a horrible person, with a brother for morality pet. What, was subjecting her charges to physical and psychological abuse not enough of a hint for you?
Spencer
We’re biased towards protagonists. That’s why Rachel is a compelling addition to the cast and Ruth’s dynamic.
JBento
Rachel and Roz are two of the best people in the comic, and everybody has failed to convince me otherwise.
Spencer
Roz is kind of performatively woke but I’d like to see her mature and develop that into a more sincere effort to do good.
Rachel we don’t know enough about yet, but the mechanical story purpose of a character who won’t let a fan favourite get a pass for her abuse is pretty fucking groovy, ngl.
Sirksome
This is my problem with Rachel. Roz at least has shown some other sides of her personality and some development. Rachel on the other hand only shows up to do one thing, badger Ruth for her previous actions. That’s the only thing she’s done besides once yelling at Joe for being creepily objectified by him. I wish she’d do something else so I can sympathize with her more. Otherwise she’s just become the bully Ruth used to be.
Ruth was a horrible person. Maybe she even still is, but at least she’s trying to change which is more than Rachel is doing. Mostly because Rachel’s a side character.
Spencer
Yeah that’s basically the rub of why Rachel’s so unsympathetic to us so far despite being Completely Right; she’s a bit character who yells at Ruth.
We’ve gotten a flashback indicating shared history and Booster pulling out of her that she feels guilty for not stepping up beforehand. Where we gonna from here?
thejeff
Completely right is a lot farther than I’d go and I’m usually a Rachel defender.
That rant of hers: “redemption is not real” “You will always be the thing you were before”.
Her anger is understandable. She’s not required to forgive Ruth. But she’s also not Completely Right.
JBento
Roz is literally the only one of the cast that volunteers her time for no personal gain (like the condom thing), and when she got an inkling of what Ryan had done to Joyce she approached her and, with exactly zero prying, queestions, accusations or recriminations, offered her information on helpful resources, even though her only interactio with Joyce had involved Joyce calling her “a hellbound slut.” If it’s performative you’re after, look at Dorothy and her volunteering at the soup kitchen because it’ll look good on her resume.
Spencer
I think you’re confusing “performatively woke” with “incapable of ever doing anything with an altruistic motive.”
Both things you mentioned were in, what, Year 2 of the comic? We’re on Year 11 now and since her big freakout on Joyce she’s acted a lot more like a glad handling sleaze who huffs her own farts and parades her sister’s outing to her dorm to curry their favour, and lately only ever seems to say anything so Becky can shut her down.
Roz isn’t a bad person, she’s not malicious, she’s not the Liberal Equivalent of Mary, she’s a kid who believes in the right thing, so she decides that makes her right to act how she sees it.
JBento
Lifehack: if you’re trying ot convince me of your position,then “Becky agrees with me” should not only not be one of your first arguments, it shouldn’t be one of your arguments at all. With the exceptions of something related to her specific life experience (e.g., how difficult it is to acquire the required documentation for basically everything while growing under a super-cintrolling parent) or something I find so self-evident you don’t need to defend it to me at all (e.g., LGBT+ folk deserve the same rghts as non-), Becky’s opinion has actual negative value.
You saying that Roz is wrong becuse Becky shuts her down is the equivalent of you saying that science is wrong and fundies are right because Joyce had a countter for everything Dina said as they walked into Biology class.
(as an aside, one of us misread the situation with Roz upon Robin getting outed – I feel like if it had been an attempt to garner favour, she wouldn’t have had categorically and dismissively denied being the one who’d done it)
thejeff
How about nuance? We can acknowledge Ruth’s problems and emphasize with her struggles at the same time, without writing her off as a terrible person. Just like most of the rest of these characters.
And I’ve no idea what you by Howard as a morality pet.
JBento
We can also acknowledge that the story has shown us that Ruth continues to threaten people, suggesting that Ruth isn’t a bully BECAUSE she has depression, but in fact a bully AND has depression. Depression is an illness, not Mirror-Universe Santa Claus, it happens to bad people too.
Spencer
I won’t argue Ruth *has* done those things, and thus forgiveness is in the eye of the beholder, but I will say she does not anymore. Her return to Big Bad Ruthless is transparently performative and instantly defanged by the slightest resistance as shown by Becky and Dorothy, the only person she’s gone Ruthless at.
There is maybe a question about the appropriateness of calling back to Ruth at her worst for a joke, but for now she is very clearly not who she was at the start of the comic.
BBCC
Ruth’s also friendly enough with Becky she was going to take Gender Studies with her, so there’s that too. Joking about Ruthless with someone she’s friendly with and joking with, say, Rachel, are not the same thing.
zee
Backsliding tends to happen with addiction though, it’s not like recovery is a linear path. I just hope she’s going to be okay
JBento
It just ocurred to me while re-reading your comment that you might have meant it in a way I feel the need to correct: being a alcoholic isn’t what makes Ruth a terrible person. Neither would backsliding be. These aren’t personality flaws. They’re character flaws in the sense that the character isn’t perfect, not in the sense of the character having a flawed, er, character.
C.T Phipps
Ruth puts undue pressure on Jennifer to be her rock.
Jennifer is an alcoholic.
So yes, terrible couple.
justin8448
The co-dependency is strong in these two.
Golden Yak
Happy almost birthday Ruth.
Bagge
It’s because they think you are attractive and want to date you, Ruth.
Needfuldoer
She has to see past her own self-loathing first before she can acknowledge that, though.
GreyICE
That’d make what Booster was doing negging.
Please I’m not even a Booster fan but I don’t want them to fall that far.
Bagge
Honestly, I have no idea what Booster’s deal is, so I will withhold opinions since we know more.
But from Ruth’s point of view she might as well entertain the possibility. Then what she does with it is up to her.
Clif
Sentence 1: Same.
And Ruth just snagged Jennifer’s need to be needed.
Galdan
My theory is, Booster is somebody with an all-consuming need to be the center of attention:
1.-Their show at the meeting served no other purpose besides becoming the center of attention, and trying to convince everybody that they are SOOOO SMART!
2.-Nobody could analyze people the way they did just by looking at them; they have obviously been cyber-stalking the students, gathering information about them, a task ridiculously easy nowadays, with everybody uploading everything the do, say or think to the net. They did that in order to become able to play the role of the genius psychoanalyst detective.
3.-Taking into account 2 and 3, I think they chose this college after reading all the news about Amazi-girl, Robin and Roz shenanigans and about the shootings and kidnappings and drama… they want to insert themselves into that drama-filled community in order to reach all of America!.
happyblinker
“I’m gonna care but not to your face”
wiki
Look, to be fair, you need to be a certain level of drunk to get over Booster’s personality
(no hate, I actually like them, but I know others find them terrible)
RassilonTDavros
Booster would probably be more annoying in-universe, simply because their analyses tend to force people to confront the things people don’t want to confront about themselves.
RassilonTDavros
In all seriousness, though, I cannot wait to see them meet Jennifer. It probably won’t go well, or at least not initially, but I want to see it happen anyway.
zee
Oooooh i cannot wait for that to happen
milu
@wiki: oh no, that’s a kinda gross and unnecessary thing to say =/
wiki
@milu Sorry? I am not sure what part you are referring to?
milu
I mean i’m hoping i misunderstood somehow!! But if you told me “to be fair, you need to be a certain level of drunk to get over Milu’s personality” i would be seriously offended. It sounds just about as mean to me as if you’d said the same thing with “face” instead of “personality”. Does this make sense? Did I get you awfully wrong?
Yumi
But in this case it’s a joke about a fictional character, so I really don’t think it’s that bad.
milu
Yeah, I’m not exactly sure why I got such an icky feeling from OP’s comment. Some jokes are not funny to some people for reasons of their own, maybe this is one of those for me.
Octopus Ink
Wow, One needs a Geiger Counter to gauge this level of toxic frenemy-ship.
Slartibeast Button, BIA
Be sure to get a log scale one, less likely to burn out or fade away.
Thag Simmons
Geiger counters don’t measure toxicity. Scientificallh accurate metaphors are important
WanderingLynx
Their relationship was toxic, but apparently since it was a Mutually Agreed Destruction sorta thing, it escalated into nuclear one way or another either right before the end or after it. The geiger counter is to navigate the scorched, salted (salty?) ground that was left.
milu
Geiger counters measure radioactive decay right? Isnt radioactivity toxic? Is that the wrong word for it? Cos that being my understanding means gauging environmental toxicity based on a radioactivity reading is sensible.
milu
However– now that I’m committed to overthinking this– I think I agree that radioactivity is a bad metaphor for hostility, because its this regular, mineral, slow sort of process. Again, as I understand it. Radioactivity feels acausal and uncaring, not well suited to describing the sparks flying in a highly charged interaction. (My own metaphor is a bit confused, nyeh).
milu
(Sorry for being a metaphor nerd Octopus Ink, actualy ty for your comment lol, love your pseudonym btw, peace)
Thag Simmons
Looking it up Radiation might be considered a sort of Toxin. And I misspelled scientifically….
May have jumped the gun here