Some things!:
1) On Tuesday, the Kickstarter for Dumbing of Age book 5 starts up! That's tomorrow!
2) This month's first bonus strip for the Dumbing of Age Patreon features Carla and Galasso!
3) All my socks have holes in them. Squeezing
Some things!:
1) On Tuesday, the Kickstarter for Dumbing of Age book 5 starts up! That's tomorrow!
2) This month's first bonus strip for the Dumbing of Age Patreon features Carla and Galasso!
3) All my socks have holes in them.
771 thoughts on “Squeezing”
Ana Chronistic
Joyce: “damn it, now I have to run away, too”
…
yeah, Carol would die for Joyce, but God forbid Joyce grow up into an independent adult with a mind of her own
Tabitha Desanto
Maybe she does think that God forbids it.
Luzahn
Remember, terrifying children’s shows taught Joyce that people are God’s etch-a-sketches.
Lordess of madness
Shake them really hard and they’ll go poof and be a clean slate! Or end up with a broken neck..
Plasma Mongoose
God could have avoided this if he wasn’t so hung up on the concept of free will.
Rowen Morland
That’s just what he wants you to think.
weirderthanweird
I’ve never understood how anyone could say anything about God giving people free will while also saying anything on how people should live their lives based off of what He says. I mean, if we have to do what He says, what was the point of the free will?
Rusty
Picture this.
You’ve been kidnapped. Your kidnapper sits near the door and says you are free to leave whenever you want. You have free will to do that. But if ya do, he’s gonna shoot you. But he feels he’s a benevolent kidnapper because he allows you to leave whenever you want.
StClair
On topic, now that I’ve put my foot in it:
Yeah, there’s a perspective that goes, essentially, “I want you to love and worship and serve Me of your own choice, even though I’m an abusive dick. It’s even sweeter that way.”
Mishyana
God as presented in Garth Ennis’ Preacher, basically. Even Mike Carey’s Lucifer comic presented God more sympathetically…
Deanatay
The perspective’s a little unfair. I mean, the doctrine of free will allows a person to act as they wish, but that doesn’t mean that all possible actions will be beneficial. The point of the doctrine isn’t to encourage people to act arbitrarily, it’s to encourage them to think critically, and come up with their own answers to problems, rather than simply regurgitate a solution that worked for one’s great-great grandparent, but has no relevance to today’s world. If God exists, than that has to be what he wants. Why else establish such a doctrine?
why do i even bother
That’s all well and good if God didn’t have a hand in what actions are possible and what their consequences are. However, people that believe in the Abrahamic God usually believe that he created the universe out of nothing. He made all the rules. He set up the game, the possible actions, and the consequences of actions. And to top it all off, he set up the game in way that punishes a species that tends to go against his will (i.e. humans).
You don’t get to rig the game against people and then claim to be benevolent.
weirderthanweird
I can agree with you to a point, but it doesn’t seem like critical thinking is particularly encouraged. A lot of Christians seem to only regurgitate what they’re told without thinking about it or double-checking. Also, I have heard quite a few people argue about how the Bible is God’s word and therefore we must follow what it says. And I’m rather disturbed by the existence of apologetics classes.
TheBiggestTom
The original doctrine was simply that of reward. I’m catholic and in my studies of the early Church, reincarnation was a huge point of contention – what happens if you aren’t going to go to heaven? what happens if you aren’t redeemed? Hell didn’t show up later. I don’t actually know the current Catholic holding on Hell and Purgatory, but the theory that makes the most sense to me is that it’s rehabilitation. If you’re bad, you go to Hell until you have atoned for your sins. Depending on how awful you are on a scale of mother theresa to Lucifer (literally omniscient, would know and understand perfectly that God is the good guy, but decided not to follow God because he’s a bad boy baby) you spend more or less time in a better or worse part of hell until you’ve figured out your hangups and are ready to go to heaven. Makes sense to me and sort of fits with Dante’s philosophy which I believe is a huge part of what Catholics believe about Hell.
So in essence, it’s less “you can leave this room but I’ll shoot you” and more “Here’s a big-ass loan. You can use it for whatever you want. But if you use it on bad stuff like drugs and prostitutes, I’m going to have you forcibly rehabilitated and we’re not going to be friends until you demonstrate that you’ve recovered, and if you use it on good stuff like an education and helping the poor, we’re totally gonna be BFFs and I’ll let you live in my mansion.
Ana Chronistic
My favourite take on religion is from the Rose of the Prophet trilogy, in which there are numerous god(desse)s, and the most fanatical not only praise their god(dess) as the best BUT ALSO curse him/her when s/he is fickle and unduly punishes them.
Anyway, I hate the idea of eternal segregation. If anything, I’m more inclined to believe that Hell is simply the absence of God than a literal lake of fire. Also, I feel like if I were a deity, I’d only “punish” my creations because that’s more interesting than if everything was all hunky-dory all the time.
FennelFox
What is Rose of the Prophet? It sounds really interesting!
JCfromNC
Well, except for that pesky bit where the Bibble says you can’t be saved by works alone, but only by the blood of Jay-sus.
In reference to the first part of your post, have you ever read Larry Niven’s Inferno? Because what you said is pretty much the plotline for that novel.
weirderthanweird
That take makes a little more sense though I do have to correct you on something: Mother Theresa probably isn’t the best person to hold up as the ultimate good for Christianity as by the end of her life she no longer believed in God.
Mishyana
Not to mention actually kind of being an awful person.
das-g
So, you’re saying religions postulating a benevolent deity are basically Stockholm syndrome?
Crumplepunch
The deity illustrated by this analogy is not benevolent.
StClair
After reading through the comments, I just want to ask if everyone sitting up here in the bleachers is always 100% honest with your significant others, co-workers, and acquaintances, always standing up for what you yourselves believe is morally right, regardless of the possible personal consequences, when the conversation turns to such things and others express opinions that you disagree with.
StClair
(frak. that should NOT be up here, I started and then stopped a comment. Please ignore this one and see the one (far) below on its own thread.)
DSL
Good question, though.
SonicBlueRanger
I never got that either. I’d always hear “God Gave us free will” but there’d always be talk about converting people to Christianity. It always came off as contradictory to me.
fugacity
How about this…
You go to your doctor. He/she tells you what you should do if you want to be healthy. You are free to listen to him/her, take the medicines prescribed, eat what’s recommended, get the exercise, sometimes get medical procedures – or you can ignore the doctor. If you do though, you will probably be subject to negative consequences, not because the doctor reached out and slapped you or poisoned you, but because – them’s the consequences. You also cut yourself off from the help they could give you – not because they won’t help, but because they won’t force you to let them help. You have your free will and can cooperate to get good results or can rebel and reap the negative consequences – your choice. The idea of “free will” is freedom to choose your actions, not freedom to choose the consequences. You are free to jump of a cliff but you can’t choose not to be subject to the force of gravity once you do.
thejeff
Except the “consequences” aren’t simply beyond anyone’s control, but the way God set things up. His choice, that he could change.
As I understand it, theologically the entire point of free will is to allow us to make the choice between serving God and not serving God. All the rest is details.
why do i even bother
^^^ this
You don’t get to set up a rigged game and then claim that people are to blame for inevitably failing
Fugacity
You’re talking a different theology than the one I subscribe to then. In the one I subscribe to, it’s more a matter of God serving us – the way good parents serve their children: teaching them, helping them out when appropriate, giving them work to help them develop talents and character, occasionally disciplining them to help motivate them to do what will ultimately help them become better people or avoid bad things, other times holding back and letting them fail when that is best for them and their growth. What should be a natural consequence of what has been provided and recognizing the love and sacrifice that goes into that service, we ought to be grateful. We reverence our parents – honor them, if you will – for what they have done for us. When that includes things like providing a world and a body – and (talking Christian theology here) a way to come back from failure to do what we know we should do (to literally be changed into the person we could have been) through an atonement, we not only reverence, but worship that being. The consequences of being a good person is growth and increased happiness and the opportunity to return to be with the ultimate manifestation of a perfect person. The consequences of being a bad person is to not belong there. In fact to go sit in the presence of such a being knowing we don’t belong because we chose not to would be excruciating. Rather than subject his children to that, he prepares “many mansions” – including not being with him. The “lake of fire and brimstone” hell that some subscribe to is, to my belief, a description of the anguish of facing the knowledge of utter failure when offered the option to change and be a better person; of disappointing a father who loved us and did everything possible to allow us to come back to him (while preserving our free will to chose our path). That’s the punishment we impose on ourselves. That’s the nature of things. God didn’t create the consequences – but he is omniscient in understanding all the consequences and omnipotent in his mastery of obtaining all the good consequences and helping us to do the same.
[climbing down off the soapbox and wandering off into the crowd now]
Paradox
The thing that’s always bugged me about the free will thing is that I often see God depicted as a being that sees everything that is happening, knows everything that has happened and knows all that will happen in the future. That combined with a lot of mention of His plan makes me wonder how it’s possible to have free will if in reality He knows what you’re going to do in the first place. If the plan only applies to believers and followers of God’s will then that’s one thing, but if nothing we do goes against the plan and everything occurs for a reason beyond our understanding, including the decision to follow the rules depicted in the bible or not, then what is the punishment for?
(Also on a side note I just caught up with the comic a couple days ago. Funny reading the conversations in this comment section. Pleasure to actually meet all of you.)
Ana Chronistic
Welcome aboard! =D You’ll see/have seen a lot of me…
weirderthanweird
I like the non-religious argument that free will isn’t really a thing because all of our actions are a result of our physical world which was determined by the initial conditions of the universe.
Vine409
Yeah, God knowing everything that’s to come already just seems off and messes with a lot. Interestingly, in the bible it says God is omnipresent and has plans; never claims he is omnipotent. Which I think makes a lot more sense. Cause if you know all the current variables, you can make a decent prediction of what’s to come. Plans would actually be plans and not predetermined paths.
I’ve always imagined God as like a concerned parent type figure… though with these recent comics let’s use a concerned best friend. “Dude, you should really stop procrastinating on your project, it’s due soon.” Basically trying to offer helpful advice, and help us to avoid pitfalls; but sometimes the only way we learn is by doing and failing. Also it not being God punishing us, so much as our own actions causing harm. “Don’t touch the stove when it’s on, it’s hot and you’ll get burned”
I believe punishment only really comes into play when your actions intentionally harm others. Similarly, I believe that believing in Jesus means believing in what he stood for and not just that he existed.
I feel like much of the modern day church has fallen into the same trap as the pharisees of old. Holding to tradition, restrictions, and rules to gain power and elevate themselves; rather than looking to the meaning and intent of the original. Not to mention the nitpicking of what they actually follow…
Ok, that started to get off topic. Anyway, welcome to the comments.
Dinny(DinaXDanny)
I don’t think that it is so much as what we have to do, its more that he just showed us the way to do the right thing and the rewards that come with doing so.
It’s not so much that he’s forcing our free will, but that our capacity to MAKE that decision creates a good that would not be there if we did not have that capacity.
think of it like a lion. God COULD have created a lion that did not need to hunt to eat, (like a big steak just appears in front of him when he is hungry) but doing so would not create something that is a lion. Part of the good of a lion is THAT it hunts, so if it was created it without the need to hunt, we would be deprived of the good that is a lion.
Heilige Donkeykong
But as it stands we’re deprived of the good that is a lion that conjures steak out of thin air, what kind of nonsense tradeoff is this?
weirderthanweird
The problem really comes in when you introduce punishment. It’s one thing to create something, give it the ability to do wrong, and then reward it for doing good and another to create something, give it the ability to do wrong, and then punish it for doing something you gave it the ability to do.
Jhon
I was starting to worry about you — your gravatar has been static for so long…
zoelogical
yup, if they believe anything other than what you did you didn’t work hard enough.
Wolf
But it’ll be another repeat of Becky’s incident! We can’t let Amazi-Girl go through that again!
Amazi-Girl impersonator
I heard there were some criminals that said my name?
Wolf
Amazi-Girl! You’re here! You haven’t replied to my text on our meeting time.
Hoxton
Dammit Wolf, THIS IS WHY WE DON’T LET YOU HAVE A PHONE.
Wolf
Hoxton, don’t worry! She’s a friend. Opposites Attract, you know.
Chains
…Vlad has been calling me a lazy bum these past few days in broken English because you guys were too busy doing THIS these past few days?
Amazi-Girl impersonator
That’s right! I’ve been to the Safe House and everything. Quite a mess you have there. Need to fix the holes in the walls, the virtually non-existent ceiling, etc.
Aeron
This thread is literally Amazi-Girl vs the Insane Clown Posse.
Wolf
INSANE CLOWN POSSE!!?
Amazi-Girl impersonator
I’ll have you note it’s Amazi-Girl meets the Insane Clown Posse. Unless you want to crossover some more…
Dallas
I’ll have note a few things:
1. That insane clown posse has me, a hitman, and a surfer to the group.
2. Wolf and Amazi-Girl, to the best of my knowledge, have been going out for THE PAST 4 MONTHS. I know, I can’t make this up.
Hoxton
Dallas, I cannot BEGIN to express to you how sad that last comment makes me.
Why?
Because knowing Wolf, it’s almost definitely true.
Amazi-Girl impersonator
Someone said my name?
Durandal_1707
… you’re Heisenberg.
Amazi-Girl impersonator
You… STOLE my costume!
Durandal_1707
You were supposed to say “You’re goddamn right.”
Amazi-Girl impersonator
But you guys STOLE my costume!
Durandal_1707
You’re a lot of fun, you know that?
Kris
Blasphemy Ana Chronistic! We all know what happened to Jordan!….and by that I mean nothing at all.
Shiro
The implications are that Jordan is the rebellious offspring who grew some opinions not in line with the family conditioning and is now Living In Sin.
Bicycle Bill
Just wait until they find out about Jocelyne.
Ana Chronistic
They won’t, if she has anything to say about it
Harvey Janus
Didn’t Jocelyne say he was “too married” to come to freshman family weekend?
begbert
That was John. Jordan was “too Jordan” to come, which implies that Jordan’s sin was a disinclination to visit colleges.
Betty Anne
I’d guess less a disinclination to visit colleges and more a disinclination to do anything with abusive family members.
Dean
Joyce’s parents are terrified that she’ll become a Green Lantern.
SundaesChild
And not a clean-cut, Hal Jordan one, more an artsy, Kyle Rayner one.
Elielh
Both world be better than an assholish Guy Gardner on.
EvilWriter
But… but he’s the Guy!
kt00
Oh no.
Ctrl+C D@
I’m watching you, you fucking rock.
inqntrol
Haven’t you figured it out? It’s a Soviet spy, duh.
AnvilPro
Joyce picks up the rock, and out pops the truck that killed Ruth!!
Ctrl+C D@
Hold up…has Transformers ever done a robot that’s disguised as a rock before? Cause to be honest, that makes more sense than cars and trucks.
Mr K
I know one was disguised as a human chick.
EvilMidnightLurker
Transformers, probably not. But! GoBots versus the Rock Lords was a thing.
EvilMidnightLurker
(I had one of those as a kid. Seriously, it was a humanoid robot that folded up into an irregular rock. Do not know what anyone including me was thinking.)
Lan
He-Man did.