Hot on the heels of my Bloomington appearance, I'm gonna be in public a second weekend in a row (oh jeez), this time in my hometown of Columbus, Ohio. Cartoon Crossroads Columbus (CXC) is this week, and The Laughing Ogre has asked me to be their table artist guy this Saturday, September 30, from 2:30-6pm. This is at the downtown Columbus Metropolitan Library, and there's no entry fee or badges or nothing. It's just a library, albeit one that's gonna be jampacked with otherĀ artist folks (who are all sweet-ass hot shots far above my station). So head on down to the library this weekend in Columbus! Deep breaths
Hot on the heels of my Bloomington appearance, I'm gonna be in public a second weekend in a row (oh jeez), this time in my hometown of Columbus, Ohio. Cartoon Crossroads Columbus (CXC) is this week, and The Laughing Ogre has asked me to be their table artist guy this Saturday, September 30, from 2:30-6pm. This is at the downtown Columbus Metropolitan Library, and there's no entry fee or badges or nothing. It's just a library, albeit one that's gonna be jampacked with otherĀ artist folks (who are all sweet-ass hot shots far above my station). So head on down to the library this weekend in Columbus!
615 thoughts on “Deep breaths”
Ana Chronistic
looks like time to add a frame to the collection
Doctor_Who
May have to flip this one left to right to get the right effect, but otherwise it will be a great addition.
chris2315
Don’t you mean a fine addition?
Doctor_Who
It’s very late, but I tried.
Koms
It’s very nice
Undrave
Do you have the one from the Slipshine story? :3
Ana Chronistic
(I woulda done this sooner but I was asleep)
Jamie
Holy god almighty well done.
Nobody
The shock is palpable
Needfuldoer
Nice! Reminds me of Squigglevision, or that old “[x] never changes facial expressions” YTMND meme.
Chronos
That’s…oddly hypnotic. Poor Joyce looks like she’s about to have an aneurism.
N0083rp00F
I did notice that with each proceeding iteration there is more teeth and then gums being revealed.
In the end we will end up with http://media.omaketheater.com/4koma/2012-07-08.jpg
BeatleJWOL
starwarsemperorgoodgood.jpg
AnvilPro
I don’t know enough about the different kinds of Christianity to get this joke. I only know Catholic and this looks decently normal
bejouled
Same, I’m Jewish/atheist and I have no idea what’s going on in this comic. I know that Catholic is different from Protestant because Catholics have the Pope… and that’s pretty much all I know.
C.T Phipps
American fundamentalist Christianity has a strong anti-Catholic streak which rivals it’s hatred for Mormonism. If you want to understand the joke, it’s basically, “The people American fundamentalist Christians dislike most are not atheists or Muslims but other Christians.” It can get surprisingly vicious despite two centuries of peace in America.
bejouled
Thanks for explaining! I guess it sort of makes sense. I went to a wedding once and someone asked me if being a Jew was like being a Jehova’s Witness. I said no, Witnesses are Christian. And the guy was like “ARE they, though?” Which completely baffled me. From a Jewish perspective, anyone who believes Jesus is the Messiah is Christian. That’s like… the defining trait.
C.T Phipps
One thing to note is certain branches of Christianity in America are people which define Christianity narrowly. They don’t believe in salvation by works but by faith. I.e. You are saved because you’re a Christian, everyone goes to hell. Which is based on a VERY ambiguous line of Jesus’ which people have twisted all to hell in order to justify the cult-like control and exclusion of outsiders. They are generally smug bastards and kind of assholes which I can say because I used to be one of them and know the attitude behind it–the very un-Christian Christian attitude it’s better to be righteous than good.
Solenoid
say it with me, everyone: P-H-A-R…
Yumi
Pharmacist?
Dave M
Pharlap?
Kamino Neko
-I-S-E-E, find out what it means to me.
Br44n5m
…A-O-E
Jamie
Here’s the thing about a definition. The thing that’s being defined is a LINE. The line marks a BOUNDARY. The boundary divides US from THEM.
To an American fundamentalist Christian, that distinction is really important because that’s how they know who they are. That’s not true in your case. Frankly, it’s probably not that different in orthodox Judaism, but I don’t know enough to give a useful example.
For liberal Christians, they basically agree with you.
C.T Phipps
Oh, I used to be a fundamentalist with all the nasty homophobic monstrous beliefs that it was important to hate on other people. I had an honest-to-God miracle happen to me, though, when I had a vision of God outside a church and the Lord said unto me, “Stop being an asshole, Charles.”
I’m not making a joke here either. That actually happened and has defined my life since then and why I identify now as a Christian-Jedi since I clearly need to stop taking things so seriously.
SalmonMax
Man, can God do a cc to…like…everyone on that? Stat?
I mean, no pressure or anything, God…ineffable plans and all that…but still.
Arianod
Yeah, that’d be a really cool thing of him to do.
Jaime
@C.T Phipps: I love you. That is all. *virtual hugs if you want them*
Mephron
We need more miracles like yours.
Maybe you need to write it as an article.
Sudden Clarity Clarence
Matthew 22:37-40 Jesus replied: āāLove the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.ā This is the first commandment. And the second is: āStop being an asshole, Charles.ā All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.ā
Deanatay
So, God believes in Wheaton’s Law? NIICE.
KingoHrts
As another Charles, I certainly hope to God this is true. I try and live that way, anyway, hoping someone is noticing.
SeanR
At least he didn’t strike you with hysterical blindness. Or make you mute.
Still. Cool.
Bruceski
The only lines I know for Judaism is that Orthodox pretty much follows all the old laws (aside from things negated by the destruction of the Temple, we’re talking Rabbinic/Talmudic Judaism here which is already more than most goys are aware of), Reform says “we don’t need all those things to be Jewish” and Conservative says “maybe, but we kinda like some of them”. Then in those large groups there are sects like the Hassidim (ultra-Orthodox) or Chabad (actively seek to convert “lapsed Jews” back to Orthodoxy). Maybe folks in more heavily populated areas have enough Jews to draw lines more defined than that, but I grew up in a small town where we all had to get along anyway or we’d lose a minyan. Led to a very “this is what works for me, it doesn’t have to be what you do” philosophy that I found a big jarring when I got into the real world and found out it wasn’t universal.
vacantVisionary
In my experience, it depends on the Orthodox Jew – there isn’t a party line on whether the less observant sects are “really” Jews, and often an individual’s answer won’t be clear-cut.
Beef
Yeah coming from a muslim background that really baffled me. Especially seeing people from both sides saying Catholics aren’t Christians
Creatrix Tiara
You know the whole Sunni vs Shia thing in Islam? And then how even in say Sunni Islam there’s all these mazhabs and people thinking one mazhab is better than the other?
It’s like that.
Beef
Yeah but even hearing people from the various groups say other groups are doing Islam wrong I’ve never heard them say that the other groups aren’t Muslim, and I’ve *certainly* never heard somebody say something like “No I’m a Shia not a Muslim”
Whereas I have heard a few catholics say “I’m Catholic, not Christian”.
Galdan
A Catholic would never say that. They probably were pulling your leg, or are people from a Catholic family but who are de facto non-religious and know nothing about Catholicism.
Tim
Actually Galdan, if I were still Catholic I would say that. I was born and raised Catholic in St. Louis (went to Catholic grade school and high school and it was–aside from the Pro-Life thing– a fairly modern/liberal version of Catholicism. I was taught that evolution happened (though God set it all in motion, I guess that was a precursor to Intelligent Design?) and the Bible, particularly the OT was not to be taken literally (but we do believe in transubstantiation!). When I went to Tulsa for college I was quickly introduced to Christians that believed in Young Earth, literal interpretations of the Bible, and even had an anthropology class with a girl that believed the entire class was fictional. They considered my beliefs heretical that I was not a Christian. I embraced it, not wanting to be confused with such small minded people. So yeah, I was _Catholic_. Not Christian.
Sudden Clarity Clarence
The Catholics-are-not-Christians thing seems to be an American thing. I’ve met Christians of many flavors in my travels and the only ones who do not include Catholicism as a subset of Christianity are Americans.
Galdan
That’s messed up. Catholics everywhere else in the world consider themselves the “true” Christians, and that other denominations are deviations…
Actually, I’m quite sure NOT considering the Catholic Church Christian goes against Catholic dogma…
thathat
I have a tendency to say that I try to be a good Christian, but I’m a lousy Catholic. But yeah, Catholics tend to consider Protestants “not real Christians” (although that has loosened up a bit over the years, depending on where you are), and there are Protestants who think Catholics are Not Christians, usually because of all the saint-praying and statuary and what-not.
And then there’s Pentecostals…hoo boy…
Wright
Well, I think it boils down to the fact that each group thinks that the other group has got God completely backwards.
Say, Group A thinks that Jesus came to save everyone, despite what that person believes.
Group B thinks that Jesus came just to save the people who believe in him.
Group C thinks that Jesus came just to save around 100,000 people, so you better REALLY believe in him.
Group D thinks that Jesus came to save only the people who go through extreme sacraments and continuously get their sins wiped away by a priest.
Group E thinks that Jesus came to America and worked with an advanced civilization several thousands of years old and will one day give their followers their own planet.
Group F thinks that Jesus is a state of being, that God is the God within us all, and that Hell and Heaven are metaphors.
… you can start seeing where one group might think that the other group doesn’t share the same religion.
Sudden Clarity Clarence
> Group A thinks that Jesus came
> Group B thinks that Jesus came
> Group C thinks that Jesus came
Group Z thinks that Jesus faked it.
a/snow mous/e
with mayonnaise
Krystallkitty
I grew up Mormon, so o couldn’t tell you which one is any one else, but the second I read E I knew. That one probably seems like the craziest on the list to anyone unfamiliar with Mormonism.
BigDogLittleCat
But you see, JWs aren’t True Christians ™.
You were lucky to be talking to a True Christian ™ who could have told you that Mormons, Catholics, Episcopalians, and every other Protestant church in town are not True Christians ™. The great thing about a lot of Christian sects (40,000+) is that only they are True Christians ™, so they can warn you against all the Not True Christians ™ who worship demons and make Baby Jesus cry.
The Episcopal Church is one of the most inclusive, openminded branch of Christianity. On the other hand, Joyce’s family church probably preached that the Pope has Satan on speed-dial.
So yeah, you understand what a “Christian” is far better than the T.C. ™ you were talking to.
CJ
I don’t know about how they practice their faith. But their church, its trappings and the clothes it’s officials wear look very close to catholic to the uninitiated (I wouldn’t be able to spot the differences).
So poor Joyce will be busy with breathing for fear of the Antichrist being near and won’t be endearing herself or Sarah to Jacob.
Concerning all the “who’s the real whatever faith”: it seems to be a common trait of literal interpretations of any religion (with all this “each word it total and unchanging truth” idea attached – at least to the words that someone wants to promote). I don’t see any difference between Christians, Muslims and Jews there.
Sunny
While I generally agree with you, I must vehemently dispute one of your points. Joyce WILL be endearing, that is one of her most defining traits.
FairyGothMama
Episcopal churches have been called “Catholic lite.” A lot if the same ceremony, traditions, and trappings, but a lot more liberal. I attended one a few times because Mother Kathleen was awesome.
Deanatay
Considering that Episcopal churches are offshoots of the Anglican church, and that the Anglicans are basically Catholics that allow divorce, this should not surprise anyone.
Arquinsiel
This is one of those weird things where Anglicans believe they are Catholics and while the Pope disagrees nobody really wants to murder anyone over the argument anymore.
And let us not forget that to me, an Irishman raised in the Catholic tradition, American Catholics are batshit crazy conservative about it all.
thejeff
My understanding is that American Catholic bishops are batshit crazy conservative, while their congregations are much less so.
bucket
I grew up Catholic, and was in a Boy Scout Troop sponsored by an Episcopalian church. At one camping trip the pastor from the Episcopalian church did a Sunday service for the troop. Through my 12 year old eyes at the time, I couldn’t tell the difference. So when my father asked about it (since if it wasn’t a Catholic mass it meant that I missed Mass, therefore I would need to go to confession before I could get Communion again), I said yes, yes it was. Seemed the same to me at the time.
Philturn
Episcopalians and Roman Catholics are really similar, but they aren’t in full communion, so technically it wouldn’t count. I don’t think God particularly cares though.
I’m Roman Catholic, but I’ve been considering the Episcopal church on account of the whole bisexual thing.
Gesc
As a former Jesuit, I’m fairly certain those are among the most inclusive.
But they all are subjected by dogma in one way or another and I just can’t stand that shit.
Solarn
Basically, all christians believe that their religion is based upon two core tenets( that there is only one God who either literally or symbolically did all the things attributed to him in the Bible, and that Christ was his son, the Messiah and the ultimate authority on Christian teachings), but there are some disagreements as to whether certain beliefs mean the person holding them disagrees with one of those tenets. The major ones are:
– whether the existence of saints makes a church polytheistic,
– whether the existence of an authority figure who can influence dogma (the Pope for Catholicism, Joseph Smith for the LDS) constitutes an attempt to usurp Christ’s position as ultimate authority,
– and whether you can attain salvation through works or faith.
That last one is also tied to a bunch of dogmatic disagreements that date back to the beginning of Christianity and were in some form behind almost all of its schisms, and could be (really imprecisely) be summed up as “is God indivisible or not?”
If God is indivisible, then:
– the Holy Trinity are just him in different forms,
– which means that Christ was just a manifestation of God born through a human woman,
– which means that all of his tribulations were essentially performative and part of his teaching of how to attain salvation,
– which means that to attain salvation through works, one must be exactly like Christ,
– which is impossible for a regular human, and being short of Christ by a little is the same as being short by a lot, so there is no way to attain salvation through works.
On the other hand, if God is divisible, then:
– the Holy Trinity are literally God split into three,
– which means that Christ was a human born with the spirit of God,
– which means that his tribulations were preparing him to be suitable for his role as a sacrifice for all of humanity, and thus not part of his teaching,
– which means that you don’t need to be exactly like Christ to attain salvation through works, you just need to follow what he said (which involved a lot of “just do your best”),
– which is possible for a human to do, so there’s a way to attain salvation through works.
Again, super simplified.
So yeah, anyway, people on either side of those three disagreements think that people on the other side are violating one of Christianity’s base tenets.
Jamie
There was that time JFK was elected… and then shot…
Marsh Maryrose
Over the last decade or so, there have been a lot of public figures (both in and out of politics) who have talked about America being “a Christian nation.” It totally cracks me up every time.
In early America (say, early 1600s to mid 1700s), you have the Pilgrims, who believe that the Anglicans are hell-bound heretics, never mind the Catholics.
You have the Puritans/Congregationalists, who believe that the Anglicans are maybe salvageable, but are probably hell-bound heretics.
You have the Anglicans, who believe that the Pilgrims/Puritans/Congregationalists are hell-bound heretics.
You have the Quakers, who everyone else believes are hell-bound heretics and they return the favor (in their very peaceable and generally tolerant way).
And you have the Catholics, who everyone else believes are hell-bound heretics and they too return the favor.
The notion that the founders of the US conceived of themselves as all being part of some larger Christian community is…let’s just say, ahistorical.
Rheinman
Episcopal’s are usually as close to Catholic as Protestantism gets.
Ferdinand Rosenthal
What about Anglicanism
Ferdinand Rosenthal
O, apparently they’re the same thing.
Luzahn
Episcopals are the Anglicans when not in areas affiliated with Britain. Can’t have Revolutionary-era Americans with the British monarch as head of the religion.
tim gueguen
The Episcopal Church is the American branch of the Anglican Church.
Dana
Episcopalianism is part of the Anglican Convention. Couldn’t exactly call it the Church of England anymore after the states broke from the UK though, hence the difference in name.
C.T Phipps
Mind you, Espiscopals are also incredibly liberal too which makes the irony all the more intense. Mind you, I take special pride the Presbyterian church would cause John Knox to rise from his grave like the Crow and try to kill us all if we hadn’t bound him with ancient sorcery taught to us by Solomon.
Sionyx
Episcopals are essentially liberal Catholics. That’s one of the reasons my grandmother converted when she married my grandfather. Having been to services for both Catholics and and Episcopals, there is very little difference between the two. Gotta say, I don’t remember seeing a crucifer at the Catholic services, though that might just be the church.
Anglicans are rather diverse. There’s a brand new schism brewing due to the views on women ministers and homosexuals.
Positron
As someone with a hyper conservative Anglican grandmother I can confirm that not all Anglicans are left wing
ewx
In the UK, the Church of England is sometimes referred to as ‘the Conservative Party at prayer’, with good reason…
BP
More liberal Catholics? FINALLY, a religion I can call myself!
BP
(note: raised Catholic, too lazy to actually convert or care, still identify as Christian but if I were hard-pressed to pick a faith other than that I’d probably go Unitarian or Buddhist)
Tim
As a Catholic Altar Boy, I can tell you yes, we carried a Crucifer. Usually only on Sunday Mass (or Saturday Evening). The daily church goers don’t care for that kind of pomp, they want to get in and out quickly. We would process from the rear of the church. One altar boy (the tallest) would carry the crucifer, two others would flank it with large pedestal candlesticks. The priest would follow.
We would process the same way out after Mass.
GLaDOS
To me (a high-church Anglican) the crucifix is what you carry, and the crucifer is the one who carries it.
Janu
To go one step further
Crucifix is from Latin cruci fixus (affixed to the cross) and designates crosses with an image of Jesus.
Crucifer has the -fer ending from Latin ferre, to carry. So the crucifer is the person carrying the cross.
Smiling acolyte is just holding a (quite ceremonial) cross.
Zakrael
Episcopal is a branch off of the Church of England, which was basically just Henry VIII saying “just keep doing whatever the fuck it is you’re doing, but I’m in charge and not the pope. Also give me your land.”
We then alternated between extreme Protestant and extreme Catholic kings and queens until the C of E ended up somewhere in the middle of the two. Technically it identifies as both (“both Catholic and Reformed” is a big part of the ideology that causes debate between parishes as to which side it should lean more towards)
Freemage
The key difference between the Anglican/Episcopal Church and virtually every other Protestant Church is that it was purely political break (rather than the theological differences that sprang up on the main continent of Europe). As a consequence, they felt no need to abandon most of the trappings of the Catholic faith–and, in fact, felt that keeping those trappings would help make them retain legitimacy in the eyes of the populace.
Episcopalians specifically note that the Anglican Church sought to sustain the line of Apostolic Succession. (For those not briefed in the terminology: The doctrine of Apostolic Succession states that Christ anointed Peter as the first leader of the Church [Peter means “rock”, so the line in the Gospel, “Though art Peter, and upon this Rock I build my Church,” is essentially a pun.]. Furthermore, it claims that he then ordained all the other Apostles, who then ordained their successors, and so forth. Thus, according to the claim, there should be an unbroken chain of the Sacrament of Ordination that goes from the most recently anointed priest all the way back to Christ himself.
Henry just suggested that there was no reason for a specific individual to be the sole leader of the church (though, of course, he sought to bring it under his rule, he was not ordained in the normal sense).
That break has, on the other hand, caused doctrinal differences to spring up over the centuries since, as there were no Papal decrees that were deemed ‘infallible’ as in Catholicism. (Popes are actually restricted in what they can do by the canonical law established by their predecessors, since declaring that a prior Papal decree was mistaken would also undermine their own claim of infallibility. This is why the RCC remains so conservative, even in the face of pressures to moderate some of its views on a wide swath of issues.) Lacking such an anchor, the Anglican and Episcopal Church is able to allow for the idea that God might allow his followers to come to a better understanding of his will over time.
Needfuldoer
So they’re basically Diet Catholic?