This month's Patreon bonus strip is CARLA! Carla carla carla carla carla carla CARLA carla carla carla! .... carla. All patrons can go check it out!
And remember, you can always up your pledge to always read tomorrow's strip today! Sneaking
This month's Patreon bonus strip is CARLA! Carla carla carla carla carla carla CARLA carla carla carla! .... carla. All patrons can go check it out!
And remember, you can always up your pledge to always read tomorrow's strip today!
143 thoughts on “Sneaking”
Ana Chronistic
“it is convenient when God finds the same things wonderful that I find wonderful”
“yeah… convenient”
Demoted Oblivious
Certainly doesn’t seem convenient to chop the tip of my johnson off.
Harmony
Maybe you can get your priest/rabbi/whatevs to give you a refund?
Ana Chronistic
so, uh, this is actually a thing that is sort of possible
http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/
inespie
chopping part of the dick off is a jew/american things. Not every christians, or even protestants do that.
ktbear
Oh, you’re back! Thank god, we were all freaking out.
Ana Chronistic
https://www.dumbingofage.com/2020/comic/book-11/02-look-straight-ahead/pasttime/#comment-1509883
Savail
Huzzah! You did not succumb to the evils of 2020!
Seriously, I find myself jumping at every little disappearance this year…
DarkoNeko
No, no. That’s titty
Sunny
Funny you should say that, Dina.
Nono
Dina’s using contractions a lot more casually now, huh.
Undrave
Becky’s rubbing off, since she can’t rub in another way…
Beef
Wait I swear I saw something where it turns out a character’s tell when they’re lying is that they start using contractions, I can only think it’s Dina now though I’m certain that’s not it
Beef
Ah fuck it was Captain Holt
Needfuldoer
Wasn’t that Data’s tell in one episode where Picard was held captive? (I think the one where he was replaced by a doppelganger.)
Uniquitous
It was Data’s brother, Lore.
BBCC
That’s the Catholic guilt talking, Amber.
Undrave
Good ol’ Catholic guilt…
Kyrik Michalowski
Question, does it ever go away?
BBCC
From what I’ve heard it is possible to find light at the end of the tunnel! A lot of people struggle with it though, sometimes for a very very long time, so be gentle with yourself if you’re not there yet.
Bicycle Bill
No, but if you’re fortunate you eventually learn to accept it and put up with it. Kinda the same way women get used to their monthly visitor.
Lumino
OK, I always feel like I missed a meeting somewhere whenever the meme of Catholic Guilt gets brought up.
I was raised Catholic (still am) and went to a Catholic Jr/Sr High School (By choice. Only one of my siblings that took the opportunity).
I will fully admit that a large portion of Catholic mass and Dogma pushes the “We are all sinners and are only saved by the grace of God,” but that was never pushed as ‘Guilt’ to me.
My Priest always said that it was a reminder of us not to judge other people for their sins. “We’re all sinful in the eyes of God, so how can we cast judgment on others in His name?” Is Homosexuality a sin? Maybe, but why does that matter to me? If it’s a sin, that’s between the person it effects and God when their time comes. Why should I treat them any differently for it?
Jesus hung out with lepers and prostitutes and the dredges of society to prove this point. Do not judge others for their sins.
If the message you all got from it was “Feel shame because you’re not perfect” then you had a really bad priest and I feel sorry that you had such a poor religious experience.
Screwball
Daniel here. Yeah, many Churches go with the “feel shame because you are not perfect” angle, and if the Church itself doesn’t do that there are usually members who have the “feel shame because you are not as perfect as I am” attitude -_-. Gotta love the “Holier than thou” people… -_-
While I still back the Big Guy, I am far from the bible-basher type. However, I have noticed too many variations of the Church essentially use their version, for lack of a better description, as a control mechanism. “Behave in this specific manner! Deviate from our specified behaviors in any way and you are going to HELL!! No ifs, buts or maybes…” kinda doctrines. These are the ones who scream loudest in homophobic ways. In hindsight, the Church & Roman Catholic primary school I grew up in was probably a bit like that, but thankfully I got out when I did… 😛
Hilen
I find it funny that a dozen (definitely more) people experienced church as an insulting/guilt-tripping thing, but since *you* didn’t then “sorry for you, you got it all wrong”. Although it is a bit understandable whem you get to the “homosexuality is a sin” part. Clearly you got the message “I’m above all sinners” (“I’m better than everyone” for short) instead of the “everything wrong with the world is the Atheists fault”, or Shame on You message.
Arian
Did you really read what those two guys just said and get those messages out of it? Because I’m certain that’s not what either of them were saying.
Lumino
It’s alright. Anger and hate are common reactions when people feel like they are being attacked and their experiences are being invalidated. I don’t begrudge them for it.
Christianity is simple. Love one another. Don’t judge others for their sins. Help others, because we’re all equal in God’s eyes. It’s the most basic rules you could possibly get.
When people pervert the teachings to justify their hate, innocent people suffer. I’m just doing what I can to try and set the message straight.
I don’t care if you are gay or straight. If you had an abortion or not. If you’re Christian, Jewish, Hindu or Atheist. Those are all things for God to judge, and I’m not God. I’m just here trying to do the best I can.
thejeff
Christianity is far more complicated than that and comes in many different flavors, even before you get to teachings perverted by hate.
Which isn’t to say yours isn’t a good approach, it’s just not a good representation of Christianity as a whole. Or even as a basic concept.
Hilen
I see. Wether because of my own experiences or because of the flaws of indirect communication, I seem to have missunderstood your intentions with your prior comment. If this is the way you move in the world (through a constant attempt to understand and love your fellow living) then even if I don’t believe in any kind of higher arbitrator/etc I can certainly commend your attitude. I apologize, Lumino. My takes about what you commented prior were mistaken, and while I have met plenty of people with the “you’re guilty, I’m better” attitude, that doesn’t seem to be your case.
Sombrero
Maybe we should have paid more attention to our Latin lessons.
drs
My father was taught by priest or nuns that every dirty thought was driving another nail into Christ.
I also have this mental image of a nun with a ruler going “DOWN you naughty thing” but I don’t know if that was an actual thing from his life.
Anyway, when traumatic Catholic guilt is a really common experience, seems arrogant of you to dismiss it as just a bad priest.
Lumino
I wouldn’t say I’m dismissing that it happens. I’m saying that it’s a perversion of the very simple point of Christianity.
Love one another. Don’t cast judgement upon others. Don’t look down on others, regardless of your reason.
I’m not looking down on people for having a different experience, I’m trying to say that’s not the way things should have been.
When you have to spend hours tying yourself into pretzels to defend your religion, there’s something wrong. Christianity is about loving each other, regardless of our individual failings.
FacelessDeviant
It can turn into protestantism, I’ve read.
Sombrero
Nope.
Bogeywoman
I too am sexually intimidated by Dina.
Doctor_Who
Hmmm, fictional characters who sorta remind me of Dina…
Chiyo-chan
Nermal
Yuki Nagato
Barney Rubble (cereal-obsessed version only)
That kid in Jurassic Park who talks about dinosaurs so much that a paleontologist flees to another car
Nope, none of them do her justice, Dina is a true original.
JessWitt
Re: Chiyo-chan
And in lieu of a Great Pyrenees, Dina owns a ridiculously big stuffed dinosaur.
Kintrex
In what way is Dina like Nermal, Nermal’s an asshole.
Doctor_Who
Adorable and small enough that it wouldn’t take much postage to send her to Abu Dhabi.
Shiro
Dina, you’re gonna spill all that cereal right on the ground, those bowls are BRIMMING
Deanatay
Panel 5 is the least realistic thing I have ever seen portrayed in comics. Yes, less realistic than the giant frosted honey bun monster. Dina’s powers must indeed violate all laws of physics, that she can fuse two heaping bowls of cereal in this way, without making a mess.
Bathymetheus
Well, that just shows she’s truly a member of the cast. Violating the laws of physics is a thing with this group.
OR . . . maybe the granules of one cereal are smaller than those of the other and she intends to fit the small ones into the spaces between the large ones.
MacareuxMoine
That still wouldn’t fit all of the smaller ones in the other bowl
Kyrik Michalowski
Why can’t Becky justify God being ok with “premarital hanky-panky” the same way she justifies his ok with her being lesbian?
clif
If premarital hanky-panky isn’t wrong,then you’re not doing it right.
tim gueguen
Give her time.
Amelie Wikström
One just involves believing God is pleased when you deny yourself something you want, while the other involves believing God doesn’t hate you for existing.
Andy
Because there’s large amounts of scientific evidence that homosexuality is genetic and an inborn trait rather than a choice, making it a situation where God is either creating souls he knows he will condemn or where what the Bible says may not be entirely correct? It helps that the basis of Christianity is, despite what a lot of people seem to think, that a single sacrifice redeemed all sin. If God is merciful enough to sacrifice a part of himself so he wouldn’t have to damn all humanity, it seems a bit odd to think he’d damn people for something they have no choice over.
Daniel M Ball
They call themselves ‘Fundamentalist’ yet they grab from the pre-sacrifice old testament or the addendums added after the crucifiction, rather than from the text of their savior’s message. (kinda like designing your car around the spinny rim hubcaps and bolt on spoilers instead of the engine and powertrain or suspension components.) Thus, you have one of the major problems and contradictions in organized “Christianity”. Jesus didn’t die for the sins of a few people, he didn’t do it just for the Jews, or the residents of Judea, or for any single group within that ethnicity, he didn’t die for the various popular factions, the sacrifice wasn’t just for the people of Nazareth, nor for the subfactions of the temple.
He died for EVERYBODY’S sins, including the people who never heard the word. That’s the first thing Fundies often get wrong by only reading the add-ons to the text.
The second, is his message itself, the life he promoted, to forgive others, and accept that you are not without sin, so stop judging other people and be good to one another. “Let who is without sin cast the first stone” too often you get people reaching for those stones, because they forget that the only grace they have, is loaned out. Becky is right, well, mostly. If one is to believe in an all-knowing, all merciful god, whose creation of man includes the concept of free will, and who is also all-powerful and the creator, then it must follow that he would not make people simply to condemn them arbitrarily for being the creations he has made.
I mean, god would have to be a real dick for that, and probably unworthy of worship regardless of power, to deliberately create failure like that, and for a Believer, I don’t think the idea of an unworthy god is acceptable.
Unworthy translators, maybe. Unworthy preachers, certainly. but not an unworthy god.
regina phalange
I actually would like to rephrase your question.
People have responded to you so essentially saying that sexuality is NOT in any way a choice, which is correct, while having sex before marriage is an active choice you make. My confusion with this is that, while sexuality is not a choice, acting on it is. I think, then, the proper comparison is why it’s not okay for people to act on their premarital horniness (I would argue physical arousal is not a choice while engaging in intercourse is), but it IS okay for Becky to act on her “improper” sexuality by dating a woman.
All that said–it’s really no one’s business. If Dina is happy to not be engaging physically, there’s NO reason for Amber to be picking at this. Most people, including Amber, would respect it if Becky’s rationale was personal discomfort instead of God. It’s a bit of an asshole move for her to pick at it when Dina is clearly unbothered.
BarerMender
Amber isn’t “picking on.” She’s making fun of Becky’s half-assed rationalizations.
Mel Drake
Isn’t that the same thing phrased differently?
temperaryobsessor
Because Becky is a person as such she’s not always going to be consistent.
When I was first figuring this stuff out I logiced that Homosexual sex was only a sin because homosexual marriage didn’t exist.
And there are legitimate reason to avoid premarital sex.
She might have felt differently if premarital sex and homosexual sex were both presented as things to avoid on an equal level.
But her father wasn’t going to be happy with her as an awesome spinster career woman.
He’s the type who sees being gay not even just the choice part as a sin and not just any sin but an ultra sin worse than lying, worse than murder.
Illjwamh
Because she herself is not comfortable with pre-marital hanky-panky (which is a valid feeling), and she’s used to God being the reasoning behind her important life choices. The god a person believes in is by its very nature reflective of that person’s own values.
When/if Becky decides she’s cool with PMHP, she’d discover a reason why God is, too.
Illjwamh
*she’ll
thejeff
Except she’s most likely not comfortable with it because of a childhood of conditioning to believe it wrong. She’s been able to break that about being a lesbian, but not about pre-marital sex. Which isn’t necessarily strange, but it is difficult to tell rationally what the difference is.
I wonder if her take on it would have been different a decade or more back when same sex marriage still wasn’t legal. Would she have found it easier to give up on the idea of pre-marital sex being a sin when there seemed no chance of there ever being a marriage?
C.T Phipps
Probably because Becky actually believes that marriage is a good thing.
Becky isn’t changing her religion. She believes her religion was changed and she’s got better arguments than her psychotic cult.
C.T Phipps
It’s like that one bit of TWILIGHT’s asinine romance that I liked when Edward said that in his day, marriage was a way of saying you loved someone.
While certainly no one should get married without certain, uh, training–Becky’s motivations are that she considers sex important.
Her choice.
StClair
… what day was that?
For most of the history of … well, history, marriage was/has been as much of a property transaction as selling land or livestock.
Keulen
I’m assuming eventually Becky will decide that there’s nothing wrong with “premarital hanky-panky”, and when she does she’ll also conveniently realize that her god is fine with that too.
C.T Phipps
That’s a weird idea that religion for Becky is only when it’s convenient. I think she’s better than her church in that respect. Mind you, anyone who takes their religion that loosely kind of sucks.
thejeff
I wouldn’t phrase it as “convenient”, but I wouldn’t be surprised at roughly the same events.
Why should her church’s teachings on homosexuality be discarded, but the same church’s teachings on pre-marital sex clung to? Or their teachings on evolution, for that matter?
Is she not already taking them loosely?
Geneseepaws
Becky DID involve herself in PMHP back at Anderson, I wonder if that had an effect toward the “PMHP is bad,” idea?
Thoughts?
thejeff
I don’t think she did any more than she’s done with Dina. They got kissing, I believe.
C.T Phipps
I suppose my view is that Becky views the homosexuality part as contradicting the teachings of “Jesus says love people” and PMHP is about “holding onto chastity to make love more special.”
Hate versus love.
thejeff
Possibly. That’s a way to rationalize it.
The emphasis on marriage, rather than just love, seems like it moves it into the sin/guilt category rather than just “It’s more special to wait.”
Kelibath
Because there’s no direct reference in Christian texts decrying lesbianism, at all, and the majority of those referencing m/m homosexuality are at the very least arguable, but marriage is clearly and repeatedly defined. (Admittedly it is defined as between one man and one woman as equal mutually-supportive God-fearing partners – in contrast to several exploitative practices of the time including harem-keeping and dominion over your wives as a ruler more than a partner in life.)
Buli-Buli
What the hell kind of experience does Amber have with religion?
The only religion and denomination I know of that used Latin is Roman Catholic. And while I myself am Lutheran, most of my extended family is Catholic and I grew up in a Catholic neighborhood.
Roman Catholics are the most laid back, functionally agnostic religious group I’ve ever met.
The only time I’ve ever seen any of them get emotional about religion is when someone else says Roman Catholics are not real Christians.
clif
Try praising abortion and let us know how that works.
Romanticide
there is this phenomena of “popular religiosity” vs “official religiosity” and how no matter how much the clergy hierarchy will try to uphold ortodoxy (or to be exact what they have decided it’s the orthodoxy) most of their believers specially the ones not connected or bennefited by the hierarchy might live their religiosity with different ideas of their priorities. Still the same religion, yet quite different ideas on how to live it.
Of course the religious elites hate the shit of it, and the clergy that works directly with these people might just let slide and limit themselves to remind of orthodoxy once in a while, because they would exhaust themselves for nothing.
My point is…. you can find catholic people on catholic majority places voting in favor of protecting the right to abortion and not just because, and their opinion on the bishops and cardinals not liking it is that while their can talk all they want it’s irrelevant to the matter.
misanthropope
it would be a good ol’ world if every major political leader took as much shit from his or her constituency as the Pope does.
Yumi
There’s definitely a wide range of Catholics– my experience differs from yours, I’d say. But there’s also a difference between what the average lay person is like vs the church and religious figures in it.
Nono