Yeah, Joyce was against Catholicism, I assume that’s because everyone in her church is too
Ana Chronistic
…I don’t even remember what I was going for with that
time for bed I guess
*goes to see if Patreon decides to load or not*
Ana Chronistic
CHURCH OF ST. BASTARD
efes
I think you’ll find it’s a boarding schoo (specifically, England’s most vicious one).
evilmidnightlurker
St. Trinians has that distinction sewn up.
TheEighthShader
RAINBOWSSSS
David
St Trinians <3
TheEighthShader
Tru tru
The Biggest Tom
I’m Catholic. You would be…surprised. You may be thinking, “Wouldn’t Christians like other Christians?” And you’d be right! However, to many Protestants, Catholics aren’t Christian. Apparently we worship the Pope, not Jesus, like good normal folks should.
Freemage
In fairness, it’s only relatively recently that Catholics have admitted that non-Catholic Christians might qualify for heaven, too.
AdmiralChucK
Honestly, I think the bitterness between the different sects of Christianity stems from the awful 30 years war that took place during the Reformation. Still hasn’t healed properly.
Jerden
And, you know, everything since then mostly made it worse.
And some are bitter for the Catholic Church changing the day of worship from Saturday to Sunday.
drnuncheon
Hell, some of the Catholics hate the Catholics. One of the protesters outside of our local Planned Parenthood is still upset that the Mass is no longer in Latin.
Nerd Patrol
Just wait’ll you discover the world of sedevacantism.
according to the about page, Willis was and Joyce is “nondenominational fundamentalist (nonaligned Protestant)”
Jenny Islander
“Non-denominational” all too often means “One preacher + N people he’s buffaloed into thinking that he’s All That + zero oversight = reality-divergent super-sheltered bubble at best and destructive cult at worst.”
Willinwoods
That just got me thinking ‘Buffalo preachers buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo…’
Yeah I’m pretty sure Toedad’s version of Christianity thinks Catholicism in general and the Pope in particular are agents of the antiChrist.
WeirderThanWeird
But this pope is so awesome. I love this pope and I’m agnostic-very-much-not-Christian.
gwalla
Yeah, and they think this pope is extra antichristy for the same reasons you like him.
murderbridd
He really isn’t, though. Just the same old shit with a new veneer.
stevecharb
Francis came in and made drastic reforms, in policy and in attitude, to a powerful and rigid institution over a short period of time.
The Catholic Church is no longer the active crusader against same-sex marriage and abortion it was just a few years ago. The social conservatism has been put on the back burner; the roar reduced to grumbles.
Instead Francis has pivoted the Church for its original purposes: to teach love and tolerance and to fight global poverty. He has spoken in favor of evolution.
If you’re dissatisfied with Francis for not making enough changes, you have unrealistic expectations.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh so this is how Willis will break becky. not through romantic subplot, but through the trauma of seeing her father killed in front of her. well played willis. I Approve~
Toedad, just went full “You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.”
Jimmy
Except he’s already the villan
BL
w-wait when was he ever considered a hero in this story
podian
He considered himself a hero all the time.
Darwin
Before he went all Toedad, it might have been possible that he was Becky’s hero. We’re seeing him at his absolute worst, but it’s possible he was not always a religion-crazed abusive a-hole. Well… he was probably religion-crazed, but Becky’s basically a good kid. The two of ’em might have been very close before he flipped out.
Deanatay
Even abused kids love their parents, and look up to them. As a child, Becky may have seen Ross as her hero. Ross definitely sees himself as a champion of Becky’s soul.
Shake and Bake
Way back before college when he drove them to Six Flags. That was his hero moment.
evilmidnightlurker
I’m thinking more Falling Down.
“I’m the bad guy?”
Halloween Jack
Yeah, very definitely a D-FENS thing going on here, I think.
DarkVeghetta
Indeed.
We’re sadly missing the retirement-day cop that learns to stand up to his wife though.
Hell, I’m a pagan lesbian (well, bi leaning lesbian, but I digress) and one of my best friends is a very devout Catholic. She has zero problem with me or my wife.
Myth
To be fair, that has nothing to do with being Catholic, and everything to do with “not being a horrible person.” Plenty of Catholics might take issue with a pagan lesbian (plenty of Catholics DO take issue).
Yu'Karaya
From what I can tell, fundamentalists and evangelist churches are much more likely to preach intolerance for specific groups of people. They try to make visible enemies out of actual groups in society, and have a weird psuedo militant way of teaching kids that they actually have enemies out to get them in the form of gays or whatever
stormbeta
Sure, but Catholicism seems to push the love and tolerance angle a lot more strongly than protestants in my experience, and the result is that even though *officially* the Church has some pretty ugly ideas about gay people, a lot of actual Catholics are pretty open-minded and tolerant.
No Name
Especially since Pope Francis took the throne.
masterofbones
Francis really isnt teaching anything new. He is just focusing on the positive
LiamAldam
Dude, Pope Francis took the throne and put it in a museum. The guy now sits on just a white chair.
DarkVeghetta
^ He does? Very humble of him. Still not quite as badass as John Paul II was, but he’s getting there.
No Name
At master of bones: Yes, but being Pope has its privileges and one of them is being able to steer the church however you please.
At LiamAldam: Really? I can’t say I’m surprised. Good on him! Has he given up absolute power over the Vatican?
murderbridd
That really isn’t true. The Pope is only the head of an entire college of cardinals and without the adjudication of the whole magisterium he can’t change doctrine willy-nilly, and he hasn’t. Girls like me are as dangerous as nuclear bombs to him and that’s not acceptable.
And he can’t give up absolute power over the Vatican.
Parkrndl
< open-minded and tolerant Catholic
Spiny Creature
Yu’Karaya wasn’t talking about the Catholic Church, she’s not disagreeing with you. “Fundamentalist and evangelical churches” refers to (some types of) Protestant churches, not the Catholic Church. The Church is not fundamentalist.
Oh, look how open-minded and tolerant the vatican has become: A senior priest at the Vatican has revealed he is gay, on the eve of a major meeting that will define the Catholic Church’s teaching on family.
(…)
The Vatican called his actions “very serious and irresponsible” and stripped him of doctrinal responsibilities.
Gand
Being gay is not the reason he got stripped of responsibilities.
The main reason is that he had a partner, breaking the rules of celibacy for priests. And the fact that he did the announcement the day prior of the meeting, trying to put pressure on the discussions.
Weyland
@Gand – True though that may be, it still doesn’t make the fact that they continue to maintain the celibacy rules any less silly. And the fact that breaking celibacy was likely only the given reason.
TessHM
“Breaking News — Pope is Actually Catholic!!”
Myth
Again I wholeheartedly disagree that love-and-tolerance level has anything to do with what sect of Christianity is being practiced. My best friend is a devout Latter-Day Saint (Mormon). Her husband-to-be is openly atheist, genderqueer (prefers male nouns and pronouns though) and way into BDSM. Another of my friends is a Baptist from the Deep South and he is a strong activist against sexism in comic books (comic books are his passion, he has written some indie ones).
Any person from any religion, or any branch of a religion, can be open-minded and tolerant. The frequency of openmindedness and tolerance among specific religions/sects is a pointless debate. Decent people are decent, and bigots are bigots, regardless of what their religion may be. No religion can truly be said to have a greater number of decent people/bigots.
Bruceski
I’ve found it really depends on the community mix/size. My synagogue was small enough that our denomination was “if anybody gets mad we lose a minyan” and so taught general Jewish spirituality while leaving it up to the people to choose their own flavor of how observant they wanted to be. The town was small as well so we all knew folks of different faiths, heck most of my friends were Mormon and it wasn’t until I left town that I learned those guys had a bad rep elsewhere, they were just people.
Meanwhile if you get an isolated town of all one faith, or a city big enough for people to segregate themselves, that’s when it can start getting ugly. Up in Chicago, my grandma’s family disowned my grandpa when the “wrong” rabbi oversaw her funeral.
murderbridd
Wrong. Go stand guard for a Planned Parenthood. Maybe deal with a rally sometime. See how lax and tolerant Catholics can be.
de Combys
Just saying, my nation is 80-90% catholic and we have gay marriage since 2006. We also have laws to protect laicism, and we accomodate religious minorities.
This may or may not be directly linked.
JonRich
What is laicism?
Dandi Andi
The short version: French secularism.
Deanatay
It looks like a misspelling of ‘racism’, but it’s apparently derived from ‘laity’, a word used in Catholicism to refer to secular authorities. Laicism is a principle of government that specifically excludes religious authority. It’s a simpler way of saying ‘separation of church and state’.
No Name
I don’t know about “simpler”. Shorter, yes, but not simpler.
Spiny Creature
How is it not simpler? It’s a general concept shared and understood among all Catholic European countries (and Latin America), and it’s the same in a bunch of languages (laicism, laicismo, laïcisme, laicità). Separation of church and state is a specifically American concept based on specific wording in the US Constitution.
Swissaboo
Having been raised catholic, the joke I like to make is that everyone who felt like they needed a church they actually agreed with left during the reformation, leaving catholicism as 90% people who don’t give a single shit what the catholic church actually says. And that includes the catholic fundamentalists, who have a surprising tendency towards literal heresy.
Ashflake
I think that is basically true.
The thing about catholicism is that while doctrine can be strict, it also has a long history of “off course you don’t practice what you preach”. I mean, you think most of our priests (yeah, i was raised catholic in the sense described below) really live celibate? Right. In fact, celibacy has been described as a sort of funtional medieval “safe harbor” for male homosexuals, because they didn’t have to explain why they weren’t married.
Catholicism has many adherents over the world, most of them don’t really know what’s in the bible either. In parts of europe, catholicism is really more about rituals and, “well, we’ve always been catholic” than about “giving yourself to jesus”. Which to me, also goes a long way to explain why catholics are often about as liberal as the general society they live in .
This is also why catholicism is despised as next to satanic by evangelicals. It may also be what triggered the reformation.
That is not to say that “don’t practice what you preach” isn’t a big problem in and of itself, especially if you are an actual gay catholic believer if e.g.:
a) You want/need official recognition by the church
b) Against all odds, you are a DEVOUT catholic and question yourself because of doctrine
And that can be a big problem, because doctrine changes really slowly in catholic church, if at all.
So, basically, the way i see catholicism is that it’s basic mode has traditionally been hypocrisy. I admit i have a sofft spot for catholicism because to me it’s ultimately human, i prefer hypocrisy over religious fervor. But then again, i’m not directly concerned by a) or b)
murderbridd
Don’t describe the priesthood as a safe haven. It wasn’t.
Ashflake
Ok. It’s just i’ve heard this before, and thought it was an interesting twist, but i don’t have any sources to back it up. Do you know where the notion comes from?
The roman catholic church turning the franchise into a money source was what triggered the reformation.
Martin Luther could have been a character straight from Shortpacked!
Luther, Martin
Martin Luther had 93 points that he made about the Catholic Church to trigger the Reformation. Only like four of them were about the blatant greed of the church at the time. It’s like saying “Rosa Parks caused the civil rights movement!” when it was actually the rallying cry to vent decades or centuries of frustrations about a broken system.
Lasenna
If you’re a bi-leaning lesbian, it’s probably clearer to just say you’re sexually fluid.
DarkVeghetta
Actually, I find it clearer the way she sed it.
timemonkey
In my experience, it’s best not to tell people how to identify themselves unless specifically asked for advice on the matter.
de Combys
This ^
ranthog
It makes perfect sense, since bisexuality doesn’t mean equal levels attraction to all genders, but that one is attracted to genders besides the opposite sex. (Trying to keep this as gender inclusive as possible.) This may mean that someone is often attracted to men, but occasionally women as well.
I’m not surehow sexually fluid would fit in there.
That and its kindof rude to tell someone they’re identifying wrong. I personally don’t find there to be any significant difference between bisexual and pansexual (besides being explicit instead of implicit about other gender expressions), but I’m not going to substitute one label for the other if one gives a preference
956 thoughts on “Troopers”
Ana Chronistic
well, you can’t be like Fox News and call him a killer without a cause
(he just has a completely shitty one, like all of those fuckers)
alt: “WE’RE CATHOLIC! DON’T YOU KNOW THAT BEING HAPPY IS A SIN???”
(idk if they’re actually Catholic or just Puritan)
DarkoNeko
Aren’t they protestant ?
Twilightomens
Yeah, Joyce was against Catholicism, I assume that’s because everyone in her church is too
Ana Chronistic
…I don’t even remember what I was going for with that
time for bed I guess
*goes to see if Patreon decides to load or not*
Ana Chronistic
CHURCH OF ST. BASTARD
efes
I think you’ll find it’s a boarding schoo (specifically, England’s most vicious one).
evilmidnightlurker
St. Trinians has that distinction sewn up.
TheEighthShader
RAINBOWSSSS
David
St Trinians <3
TheEighthShader
Tru tru
The Biggest Tom
I’m Catholic. You would be…surprised. You may be thinking, “Wouldn’t Christians like other Christians?” And you’d be right! However, to many Protestants, Catholics aren’t Christian. Apparently we worship the Pope, not Jesus, like good normal folks should.
Freemage
In fairness, it’s only relatively recently that Catholics have admitted that non-Catholic Christians might qualify for heaven, too.
AdmiralChucK
Honestly, I think the bitterness between the different sects of Christianity stems from the awful 30 years war that took place during the Reformation. Still hasn’t healed properly.
Jerden
And, you know, everything since then mostly made it worse.
Joseph Cartwright
And some are bitter for the Catholic Church changing the day of worship from Saturday to Sunday.
drnuncheon
Hell, some of the Catholics hate the Catholics. One of the protesters outside of our local Planned Parenthood is still upset that the Mass is no longer in Latin.
Nerd Patrol
Just wait’ll you discover the world of sedevacantism.
EmbraceEvil
according to the about page, Willis was and Joyce is “nondenominational fundamentalist (nonaligned Protestant)”
Jenny Islander
“Non-denominational” all too often means “One preacher + N people he’s buffaloed into thinking that he’s All That + zero oversight = reality-divergent super-sheltered bubble at best and destructive cult at worst.”
Willinwoods
That just got me thinking ‘Buffalo preachers buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo…’
QD
Yeah I’m pretty sure Toedad’s version of Christianity thinks Catholicism in general and the Pope in particular are agents of the antiChrist.
WeirderThanWeird
But this pope is so awesome. I love this pope and I’m agnostic-very-much-not-Christian.
gwalla
Yeah, and they think this pope is extra antichristy for the same reasons you like him.
murderbridd
He really isn’t, though. Just the same old shit with a new veneer.
stevecharb
Francis came in and made drastic reforms, in policy and in attitude, to a powerful and rigid institution over a short period of time.
The Catholic Church is no longer the active crusader against same-sex marriage and abortion it was just a few years ago. The social conservatism has been put on the back burner; the roar reduced to grumbles.
Instead Francis has pivoted the Church for its original purposes: to teach love and tolerance and to fight global poverty. He has spoken in favor of evolution.
If you’re dissatisfied with Francis for not making enough changes, you have unrealistic expectations.
Justin
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh so this is how Willis will break becky. not through romantic subplot, but through the trauma of seeing her father killed in front of her. well played willis. I Approve~
Inkblot
Toedad why
This is a bad idea on all fronts
EdHead
Toedad, just went full “You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.”
Jimmy
Except he’s already the villan
BL
w-wait when was he ever considered a hero in this story
podian
He considered himself a hero all the time.
Darwin
Before he went all Toedad, it might have been possible that he was Becky’s hero. We’re seeing him at his absolute worst, but it’s possible he was not always a religion-crazed abusive a-hole. Well… he was probably religion-crazed, but Becky’s basically a good kid. The two of ’em might have been very close before he flipped out.
Deanatay
Even abused kids love their parents, and look up to them. As a child, Becky may have seen Ross as her hero. Ross definitely sees himself as a champion of Becky’s soul.
Shake and Bake
Way back before college when he drove them to Six Flags. That was his hero moment.
evilmidnightlurker
I’m thinking more Falling Down.
“I’m the bad guy?”
Halloween Jack
Yeah, very definitely a D-FENS thing going on here, I think.
DarkVeghetta
Indeed.
We’re sadly missing the retirement-day cop that learns to stand up to his wife though.
Screwball
It’s official, Toedad is now emulating this guy…
LeslieBean4Shizzle
They are fundamentalist – that way WAY different than Catholics.
John
Yeah, they probably teach that Catholics are the pawns of Satan.
Magoo Comma Mister
Shrimp are the prawns of Satan.
LeslieBean4Shizzle
Hell, I’m a pagan lesbian (well, bi leaning lesbian, but I digress) and one of my best friends is a very devout Catholic. She has zero problem with me or my wife.
Myth
To be fair, that has nothing to do with being Catholic, and everything to do with “not being a horrible person.” Plenty of Catholics might take issue with a pagan lesbian (plenty of Catholics DO take issue).
Yu'Karaya
From what I can tell, fundamentalists and evangelist churches are much more likely to preach intolerance for specific groups of people. They try to make visible enemies out of actual groups in society, and have a weird psuedo militant way of teaching kids that they actually have enemies out to get them in the form of gays or whatever
stormbeta
Sure, but Catholicism seems to push the love and tolerance angle a lot more strongly than protestants in my experience, and the result is that even though *officially* the Church has some pretty ugly ideas about gay people, a lot of actual Catholics are pretty open-minded and tolerant.
No Name
Especially since Pope Francis took the throne.
masterofbones
Francis really isnt teaching anything new. He is just focusing on the positive
LiamAldam
Dude, Pope Francis took the throne and put it in a museum. The guy now sits on just a white chair.
DarkVeghetta
^ He does? Very humble of him. Still not quite as badass as John Paul II was, but he’s getting there.
No Name
At master of bones: Yes, but being Pope has its privileges and one of them is being able to steer the church however you please.
At LiamAldam: Really? I can’t say I’m surprised. Good on him! Has he given up absolute power over the Vatican?
murderbridd
That really isn’t true. The Pope is only the head of an entire college of cardinals and without the adjudication of the whole magisterium he can’t change doctrine willy-nilly, and he hasn’t. Girls like me are as dangerous as nuclear bombs to him and that’s not acceptable.
And he can’t give up absolute power over the Vatican.
Parkrndl
< open-minded and tolerant Catholic
Spiny Creature
Yu’Karaya wasn’t talking about the Catholic Church, she’s not disagreeing with you. “Fundamentalist and evangelical churches” refers to (some types of) Protestant churches, not the Catholic Church. The Church is not fundamentalist.
Amazi-Stool
Oh, look how open-minded and tolerant the vatican has become:
A senior priest at the Vatican has revealed he is gay, on the eve of a major meeting that will define the Catholic Church’s teaching on family.
(…)
The Vatican called his actions “very serious and irresponsible” and stripped him of doctrinal responsibilities.
Gand
Being gay is not the reason he got stripped of responsibilities.
The main reason is that he had a partner, breaking the rules of celibacy for priests. And the fact that he did the announcement the day prior of the meeting, trying to put pressure on the discussions.
Weyland
@Gand – True though that may be, it still doesn’t make the fact that they continue to maintain the celibacy rules any less silly. And the fact that breaking celibacy was likely only the given reason.
TessHM
“Breaking News — Pope is Actually Catholic!!”
Myth
Again I wholeheartedly disagree that love-and-tolerance level has anything to do with what sect of Christianity is being practiced. My best friend is a devout Latter-Day Saint (Mormon). Her husband-to-be is openly atheist, genderqueer (prefers male nouns and pronouns though) and way into BDSM. Another of my friends is a Baptist from the Deep South and he is a strong activist against sexism in comic books (comic books are his passion, he has written some indie ones).
Any person from any religion, or any branch of a religion, can be open-minded and tolerant. The frequency of openmindedness and tolerance among specific religions/sects is a pointless debate. Decent people are decent, and bigots are bigots, regardless of what their religion may be. No religion can truly be said to have a greater number of decent people/bigots.
Bruceski
I’ve found it really depends on the community mix/size. My synagogue was small enough that our denomination was “if anybody gets mad we lose a minyan” and so taught general Jewish spirituality while leaving it up to the people to choose their own flavor of how observant they wanted to be. The town was small as well so we all knew folks of different faiths, heck most of my friends were Mormon and it wasn’t until I left town that I learned those guys had a bad rep elsewhere, they were just people.
Meanwhile if you get an isolated town of all one faith, or a city big enough for people to segregate themselves, that’s when it can start getting ugly. Up in Chicago, my grandma’s family disowned my grandpa when the “wrong” rabbi oversaw her funeral.
murderbridd
Wrong. Go stand guard for a Planned Parenthood. Maybe deal with a rally sometime. See how lax and tolerant Catholics can be.
de Combys
Just saying, my nation is 80-90% catholic and we have gay marriage since 2006. We also have laws to protect laicism, and we accomodate religious minorities.
This may or may not be directly linked.
JonRich
What is laicism?
Dandi Andi
The short version: French secularism.
Deanatay
It looks like a misspelling of ‘racism’, but it’s apparently derived from ‘laity’, a word used in Catholicism to refer to secular authorities. Laicism is a principle of government that specifically excludes religious authority. It’s a simpler way of saying ‘separation of church and state’.
No Name
I don’t know about “simpler”. Shorter, yes, but not simpler.
Spiny Creature
How is it not simpler? It’s a general concept shared and understood among all Catholic European countries (and Latin America), and it’s the same in a bunch of languages (laicism, laicismo, laïcisme, laicità). Separation of church and state is a specifically American concept based on specific wording in the US Constitution.
Swissaboo
Having been raised catholic, the joke I like to make is that everyone who felt like they needed a church they actually agreed with left during the reformation, leaving catholicism as 90% people who don’t give a single shit what the catholic church actually says. And that includes the catholic fundamentalists, who have a surprising tendency towards literal heresy.
Ashflake
I think that is basically true.
The thing about catholicism is that while doctrine can be strict, it also has a long history of “off course you don’t practice what you preach”. I mean, you think most of our priests (yeah, i was raised catholic in the sense described below) really live celibate? Right. In fact, celibacy has been described as a sort of funtional medieval “safe harbor” for male homosexuals, because they didn’t have to explain why they weren’t married.
Catholicism has many adherents over the world, most of them don’t really know what’s in the bible either. In parts of europe, catholicism is really more about rituals and, “well, we’ve always been catholic” than about “giving yourself to jesus”. Which to me, also goes a long way to explain why catholics are often about as liberal as the general society they live in .
This is also why catholicism is despised as next to satanic by evangelicals. It may also be what triggered the reformation.
That is not to say that “don’t practice what you preach” isn’t a big problem in and of itself, especially if you are an actual gay catholic believer if e.g.:
a) You want/need official recognition by the church
b) Against all odds, you are a DEVOUT catholic and question yourself because of doctrine
And that can be a big problem, because doctrine changes really slowly in catholic church, if at all.
So, basically, the way i see catholicism is that it’s basic mode has traditionally been hypocrisy. I admit i have a sofft spot for catholicism because to me it’s ultimately human, i prefer hypocrisy over religious fervor. But then again, i’m not directly concerned by a) or b)
murderbridd
Don’t describe the priesthood as a safe haven. It wasn’t.
Ashflake
Ok. It’s just i’ve heard this before, and thought it was an interesting twist, but i don’t have any sources to back it up. Do you know where the notion comes from?
Amazi-Stool
No that was not what triggered the reformation.
The roman catholic church turning the franchise into a money source was what triggered the reformation.
Martin Luther could have been a character straight from Shortpacked!
Luther, Martin
Martin Luther had 93 points that he made about the Catholic Church to trigger the Reformation. Only like four of them were about the blatant greed of the church at the time. It’s like saying “Rosa Parks caused the civil rights movement!” when it was actually the rallying cry to vent decades or centuries of frustrations about a broken system.
Lasenna
If you’re a bi-leaning lesbian, it’s probably clearer to just say you’re sexually fluid.
DarkVeghetta
Actually, I find it clearer the way she sed it.
timemonkey
In my experience, it’s best not to tell people how to identify themselves unless specifically asked for advice on the matter.
de Combys
This ^
ranthog
It makes perfect sense, since bisexuality doesn’t mean equal levels attraction to all genders, but that one is attracted to genders besides the opposite sex. (Trying to keep this as gender inclusive as possible.) This may mean that someone is often attracted to men, but occasionally women as well.
I’m not surehow sexually fluid would fit in there.
That and its kindof rude to tell someone they’re identifying wrong. I personally don’t find there to be any significant difference between bisexual and pansexual (besides being explicit instead of implicit about other gender expressions), but I’m not going to substitute one label for the other if one gives a preference