In Greek it was the other way around: sweet-bitter.
Laura
What is the Greek word?
Chaucer59
γλυκόπικρος
glykópikros
“Sweet-bitter,” I think. My Greek’s a bit rusty.
Laura
Cool!
Laura
I can’t seem to find the Sapphic origin online, though. Can you point me to a source? Nothing in wiktionary or wikipedia (at least not written in English).
BarerMender
It appears in one of her poems, but I forget which one.
Laura
Thank you!
MK15
Interesting!
“Glyko” would then be a cognate of “Glucose,” or common sugar, and also adds meaning to the name of the Japanese company “Glico,” which makes Pocky among other sweets…
It’s not really resolved. This just shows they’re willing to work on eventually resolving it.
The Oracle
I don’t think it’s always so clear-cut. A short-term, immediate ceasefire between people who aren’t truly on opposite sides, is still a net positive. The longer-term, more difficult resolution can sometimes wait and happen as it comes, bit by bit.
What’s your thoughts on that smile? Think it comes from happiness, a desire to make an effort and do the socially appropriate thing by mirroring the other’s facial expression, something else? All of the above?
One thing I deal with in my job is sheer empathy burnout. Like, no more empathy. Zip. Zilch. None. So I often fall back on the “techniques” I’ve learned to *convey* empathy and make a person *feel* sympathized with, even though my mirror neurons aren’t firing painfully at them as they previously might have done. (Hence, being all burnt out.)
I’m never sure what comes across as fake or not. But mirroring the other is a big part of how to “fake it ’til you make it.” It doesn’t always come from cynicism. Sometimes it’s a genuine attempt to relate skillfully.
Honestly, I think the smile is one of mutual understanding and both of them seeing a path forward for the two of them. It’s a good thing for both of them, having some of that bad blood exorcised.
Aye, this reads as genuine as they come. Even more so than massive over the top smiles/excitement, because this seems a contented smile, and contentment indicates not just happiness, but also trust.
Yes. Some neurodivergents have to expend energy to make facial expressions, but that does not mean the emotions they intend to convey with them are any less genuine.
This is true. I’ve got Resting Surly Face and a very intense speaking cadence that’s easily mistaken for sarcasm, so people can’t always tell if I’m being entirely genuine with my positive reactions. I sometimes will consciously change my facial expression to something that’s (hopefully) more reflective of the internal emotion I’m trying to convey, and then go right back to deadpan the instant I think people are done scrutinising my face muscles.
You see my alien hoodie? I have GOT to eventually invent and popularize a version with a digital face that automatically makes eye contact and facial expressions for you. It would make life SO much easier.
StClair
That would be false, though. As fake as a mask with a static painted-on expression, or a completely blank one.
People seek eye contact and look for expressions because they want to interact with you.
Taffy
Sure, but a lot of the time, “you” isn’t enough. People want “you”, except actually “them” with your character model. A projection that matches their expected expression of your genuine response,which you do in fact mean but can’t necessarily convey to everyone’s personal standards, I don’t think it can be considered as fake as a static mask. And a standard product with easily-recognised, universal responses may lose some nuance, but people would know what you were trying to express far more often than they might with a “real” face.
Human adults tell their children that it doesn’t matter what a person looks like, that “it’s what’s inside that counts”.
In either case, they seldom live up to that value, so with the digital face idea, what do we really have to lose?
Re: interacting with me, my hoodie pretty much IS me, or rather an essential part of me, the same way Dina’s hat is an essential part of her, so there you go.
deliverything
Even without the digital face: you chose your hoodie, while your so-called “real appearance” is just whatever life happened to give you. Why should it be assumed that the latter would somehow represent you better than the former?
deliverything
Oops. Replied to the wrong one. Please read this as though in response to The Wellerman’s comment directly above.
247 thoughts on “Bullied”
Ana Chronistic
sympathy via mutual agreement
Yet_One_More_Idiot
This kinda feels like a mini end-of-storyline…surely it’s not that simple though?
But very sweet. 🙂
Ladymissfit
It’s the start to understanding
powerpowerpow
Well the alt-text usually indicates if we’re at the end of a storyline. I’d image there are a couple more threads that warrant being tied up.
Needfuldoer
Not yet. There’s a preview panel of Joyce in a life drawing class wearing this storyline’s outfit.
The Wellerman
I’m speechless.
This is just perfectly bitter-sweet.
?????? ???
*plays “Hanezeve Caradhina” from Made in Abyss OST on hacked muzak*
Bryy
SO FUCKING WHOLESOME.
The Wellerman
I guess, but considering this may come to mirror the relationship Dina has with Joe, I can’t help but think that phrasing will become rather ironic. ?
BarerMender
I’m sure I’m not the only one to know this, but did you know the term “bittersweet” was originally coined by Sappho?
Laura
Wow!
BarerMender
In Greek it was the other way around: sweet-bitter.
Laura
What is the Greek word?
Chaucer59
γλυκόπικρος
glykópikros
“Sweet-bitter,” I think. My Greek’s a bit rusty.
Laura
Cool!
Laura
I can’t seem to find the Sapphic origin online, though. Can you point me to a source? Nothing in wiktionary or wikipedia (at least not written in English).
BarerMender
It appears in one of her poems, but I forget which one.
Laura
Thank you!
MK15
Interesting!
“Glyko” would then be a cognate of “Glucose,” or common sugar, and also adds meaning to the name of the Japanese company “Glico,” which makes Pocky among other sweets…
Shadowsnail
Chocorooms > Pocky
jackiedu46k
Friends 🙂
The Wellerman
They might get there, but at least now they’re good neighbors, or whatever humans call it.
Basically, the kind of relationship Dina appears to have with Joe.
Grimey
….What if Dina helps launch the Joe/Joyce ship?
The Wellerman
Oh my, I have not even considered THAT line of possibilities.
Willis must have something HUGE in store for us! ?
drs
Joe approves of this message.
Segnosaur
Well she did suggest Joyce participate in various experiments involving Joe’s butt.
anon
baby steps at least
Needfuldoer
Not enemies 🙂
The Oracle
And sometimes, that’s good enough. Having an enemy is exhausting.
Schpoonman
That was nice. This is nice.
pope suburban
Yes. That’s the perfect way to say it.
Leorale
Yes. I like it. Yay.
Wraithy2773
Now kiss…
Airyu
Wraithy noooo
Sirksome
Becky has alluded to actually wanting that so this has a shot at working for everyone.
Wack'd
I would be very interested in seeing cited sources on that.
Wack'd
OH RIGHT
Wraithy2773
You need to be told that Becky would love to be with both Joyce and Dina at the same time? 😀
Sirksome
She also got a little defensive when Carla suggested they might be trying to make Joyce jealous or that she was dating one or both of them.
https://www.dumbingofage.com/2022/comic/book-12/04-dont-stop-billie-ving/personalsexualinfo/
Qube
aww 🙂
Doctor_Who
Reminding me why, even at their Dumbingest, I love these characters.
Sirksome
Ah, thank god! Forever neighbors was gonna be so awkward if they hadn’t reached an understanding.
Johan
Oh dang. It’s almost like we all jumped the gun lol!
Thag Simmons
Massive arguments about a conflict that gets resolved amicably two pages later. Classic.
Taffy
Honestly, I fucking love when this happens.
Otl1973
Although it seems very un-Willis-like. Were there other times when this happened?
Ladymissfit
It’s not really resolved. This just shows they’re willing to work on eventually resolving it.
The Oracle
I don’t think it’s always so clear-cut. A short-term, immediate ceasefire between people who aren’t truly on opposite sides, is still a net positive. The longer-term, more difficult resolution can sometimes wait and happen as it comes, bit by bit.
butts
they handled it more maturely than the comments section did. what a surprise
Bryy
I don’t think them becoming friends negates any of the comments anyone had about their prior behavior.
Needfuldoer
That’s not a high bar to clear on some days.
Sporky
Well that was fast
Leorale
It’s a good (re)start. 🙂
C.T. Phipps
The next panel will be Dina slicing open Joyce with her claw and eating her alive.
Smiling is right before the attack by a Utahraptor.
Which I believe fully Dina would argue were the actual Jurassic Park raptors.
Bryy
Dina would like a word about that assumption.
C.T. Phipps
I’m just saying that Joyce is still alive when she starts to eat her.
Becky: HEYO!
*neither Joyce or Dina get it*
Otl1973
Very doubtful – a utahraptor is way too big. Possibly deinonychus.
eh, whatever
Indeed Deinonychus was intended – because Greg Paul had lumped it into Velociraptor in a fairly popular book in 1988.
alongcameaspider
Theyre not always perfect (except Carla) but the cast is full of good people for the most part
Airyu
Ahhhh I’m not crying you’re crying
Now it’s Becky’s turn to reach some semblance of understanding let’s gooooo
Laura
What’s your thoughts on that smile? Think it comes from happiness, a desire to make an effort and do the socially appropriate thing by mirroring the other’s facial expression, something else? All of the above?
One thing I deal with in my job is sheer empathy burnout. Like, no more empathy. Zip. Zilch. None. So I often fall back on the “techniques” I’ve learned to *convey* empathy and make a person *feel* sympathized with, even though my mirror neurons aren’t firing painfully at them as they previously might have done. (Hence, being all burnt out.)
I’m never sure what comes across as fake or not. But mirroring the other is a big part of how to “fake it ’til you make it.” It doesn’t always come from cynicism. Sometimes it’s a genuine attempt to relate skillfully.
The Wellerman
Dina’s smile? Probably decided expending the brain energy to make the facial expression was worth it. On her behalf, a good idea as expected. 🙂
DailyBrad
Honestly, I think the smile is one of mutual understanding and both of them seeing a path forward for the two of them. It’s a good thing for both of them, having some of that bad blood exorcised.
Mano308gts
Aye, this reads as genuine as they come. Even more so than massive over the top smiles/excitement, because this seems a contented smile, and contentment indicates not just happiness, but also trust.
The Wellerman
Yes. Some neurodivergents have to expend energy to make facial expressions, but that does not mean the emotions they intend to convey with them are any less genuine.
The Wellerman
*automatically any less genuine.
brain is getting melted by code as we speak….
Taffy
This is true. I’ve got Resting Surly Face and a very intense speaking cadence that’s easily mistaken for sarcasm, so people can’t always tell if I’m being entirely genuine with my positive reactions. I sometimes will consciously change my facial expression to something that’s (hopefully) more reflective of the internal emotion I’m trying to convey, and then go right back to deadpan the instant I think people are done scrutinising my face muscles.
The Wellerman
You see my alien hoodie? I have GOT to eventually invent and popularize a version with a digital face that automatically makes eye contact and facial expressions for you. It would make life SO much easier.
StClair
That would be false, though. As fake as a mask with a static painted-on expression, or a completely blank one.
People seek eye contact and look for expressions because they want to interact with you.
Taffy
Sure, but a lot of the time, “you” isn’t enough. People want “you”, except actually “them” with your character model. A projection that matches their expected expression of your genuine response,which you do in fact mean but can’t necessarily convey to everyone’s personal standards, I don’t think it can be considered as fake as a static mask. And a standard product with easily-recognised, universal responses may lose some nuance, but people would know what you were trying to express far more often than they might with a “real” face.
The Wellerman
Yeah, this.
Human adults tell their children that it doesn’t matter what a person looks like, that “it’s what’s inside that counts”.
In either case, they seldom live up to that value, so with the digital face idea, what do we really have to lose?
Re: interacting with me, my hoodie pretty much IS me, or rather an essential part of me, the same way Dina’s hat is an essential part of her, so there you go.
deliverything
Even without the digital face: you chose your hoodie, while your so-called “real appearance” is just whatever life happened to give you. Why should it be assumed that the latter would somehow represent you better than the former?
deliverything
Oops. Replied to the wrong one. Please read this as though in response to The Wellerman’s comment directly above.