TODAY I'm gonna be back in Bloomington, Indiana! I'll be doing a signing event at Vintage Phoenix Comics from 5-7pm. I'll have books and magnets and maybe some prints! Come say hello! Confirmed
TODAY I'm gonna be back in Bloomington, Indiana! I'll be doing a signing event at Vintage Phoenix Comics from 5-7pm. I'll have books and magnets and maybe some prints! Come say hello!
163 thoughts on “Confirmed”
Ana Chronistic
Walky, stop trying to take credit for shit you haven’t done
Stu
Nah, that’s firmly in the “Wants a Prize for Basic Decency” trope.
stoodmuffin
It’s walky. It’s kinda both
JA
He’s just being a regular American.
Delicious Taffy
Hey, that’s not fair.
We also sometimes give credit to a random Spaniard so we can get an extra Monday off from work.
BrokenEye, the True False Prophet
I hope historians eventually find out what day the Norsemen landed in America on so we can take that day off work too.
Azrael
Columbus was Italian, by the way. /pedantry
Samuel
Nope, Genoese. If you want to be pedantic, go the full length. Italy did not exist at this time.
wwwhhattt
People called the area* Italy, referred to themselves as Italians**, and some people (e.g. Machiavelli) thought it should be a single country.
*Maybe just the north?
**Form what I’ve read from that time it’s less common than saying Genoese/Florentine etc., but that might just be because they were writing in Italian for Italians.
keithcurtis
I was gonna say…
Sigh
Actually, Columbus Day was created so Italian and other Catholic immigants could feel like they contributed something to the history of America, which was otherwise pretty steeped in Puritanism/Protestantism.
Sunny
Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say he’s trying to take credit for not having done shit?
SailorCakes
Wow her hair with thru a dramatic change since the last comic
Regalli
Her clothes did too. Either someone gave her that jacket or it’s some later point. (For all we know it could even be after the first robbery. Pretty sure we’ll get to see that decision made, though.)
jeffepp
You can’t “the Fonz” without a jacket.
KtBear
Is it just me or is that Asher’s jacket?
BBCC
Might be.
Regalli
*Double checks* Yeah once I remembered what I thought were striped cuffs were his arms and wristbands, it could be the same. There looks like just enough of an arm length difference she would roll the cuffs up where he wouldn’t need to to be the same length.
Still not the same day unless she lost the blouse and had a tank top on underneath, but good catch, it really could be.
Needfuldoer
Her hair’s longer, too. We must have skipped at least a few months ahead.
Regalli
Huh, yeah, especially since it’s longer while curly.
thejeff
I suspect the “few months” since she’s done choir practice indicates how long she’s been hanging with Asher doing bad things.
BBCC
I figured the few months was since Marcie lost her voice. “Wouldn’t be fair.”
thejeff
Probably both.
Since she’s still been out of the house during the old choir time, using it as an excuse.
And that previous scene was soon after Marcie was out of the hospital.
BBCC
That would make sense.
BrokenEye, the True False Prophet
Not anymore it isn’t.
Sunny
I don’t think it’s the exact same jacket. It fits her too well for that. But it does look like it’s of the same type.
KtBear
Here’s why I think it’s the same jacket. It’s only likely to have come from three sources. Linda….who am I kidding? I can’t see her buying Sal a denim jacket, hints way too much of rebellion. Sal, but considering she couldn’t justify buying herself a treat I very much doubt she’d waste money on a jacket. Asher…. he doesn’t seem like the kind of guy to buy Sal a jacket, shoplifting is way more his style and Sal has already shown she wont accept the proceeds of crime. I could be wrong, but the jacket actually being Asher’s seems to be the most likely scenario.
Doctor_Who
Walky was basically me as a kid, when it comes to my younger siblings.
Yes, I was an insufferable little shit, why do you ask?
Alan
I’m with Walky here. Cookies. Mmm cookies.
Marsh Maryrose
“Stay me with cookies, comfort me with nachitos, for I am behaviorally compliant.”
Stephen Bierce
*cues the cricket from the previous storyline*
Bagge
TIME TRAVELING CRICKETS!!!
Needfuldoer
So that’s where Tag went!
Bagge
Walky is such a little shit…
…but in this instance, I think he’s trying to derail the confrontation. It’s exactly the same “I’m such a goofball, pay attention to MEEEEEEE” he uses to derail uncomfortable situations in college (very similar to Becky’s strategy).
Is it a good thing? I’m not sure it’s not. I sincerely doubt Linda has anything positive to offer her daughter in this instance.
Nono
Pushing the ‘reward me with cookies!’ suggests it leans more towards ‘see I’m not as bad’ stance.
Bagge
Possibly. My reading of him is that he uses his “Walky is an idiot” persona to remove attention from FEELS (or in this case, confrontation).
Similar to here
http://www.dumbingofage.com/2016/comic/book-6/04-it-all-returns/spaceship/
Axel
I think it’s both. I don’t think it’s all that altruistic, but yeah generally kids/teens don’t want to see their parents and/or siblings fighting.
Bagge
Not as much altruistic as conflict averse.
…and possibly trying to help his sister in his own incredibly inept way
abysswatcher1993
Yeah, Walky is such a goofball that he can get away with only a little reprimand. Jegus, Walkerton mom has favoritism issues.
Conuly
I agree.
DailyBrad
Snrrk. That was a bit of needed levity.
I hadn’t quite realized just how tense these last few strips have been since I got a laugh here. It’s like taking a big breath after a dive.
Regalli
Gee, Linda, I wonder why your daughter doesn’t trust you to tell you where she’s been or respect you enough to obey curfews. What a mystery.
*Insert UC flipping three birds at the same time.*
stoodmuffin
Oh, Sal. I just. I. Mannnnn. <3 hugs.
Nono
Linda’s stance is… not completely unreasonable here? If my kid was gone til morning with no clues as to what she’s doing… yeah I’d be concerned too.
Sure, kids grow up and need independence and all that, and we know Linda is kind of… bad. But I’m withholding judgement on this til we see what her follow-up is gonna be.
Axel
Does she sound particularly concerned for -Sal-, though?
BBCC
Pfft, no, Linda cares more about being SEEN as a good mom than BEING a good mom.
Reltzik
In this case? Her only audience is Walky and Sal and she called up Marge (whoever that is) and revealed that she’d lost track of Sal. So no, I don’t think this right here is performative momming.
I see Linda’s momming strategy as less a performative thing and more of a dominance thing. Her children will be the way she wants them to be because she’s in charge.
But in this moment? There’s not a thing she’s saying which is inappropriate to circumstances. Pretty much EVERY kid has the “where were you and why are you sneaking back in at this hour?” confrontation at some point.
BBCC
I think performative is the wrong word in this case, but I do think this is more a case of her doing what she thinks good moms do (and what’s ‘for the kids own good – according to her’) rather than actually caring about Sal at all. No where does she express any concern for Sal or ask if something happened. And I never had that conversation because I generally listened to my parents because my parents weren’t shitheads like the Walkertons.
Needfuldoer
She’s probably caught Sal sneaking in a few times, but hasn’t confronted her about it until now.
+1 to the “never got the ‘why are you sneaking in so late’ talk” list, but I sure got the “why are you still awake and on the Internet so late just go to bed” talk plenty of times. More than ten years later, I post on the Internet at 2 AM because I get up that early for work so who’s laughing now?
Unusually Angry Hippie
This….is pretty much everything I hate about the peanut gallery we’ve got going on in this comment section. You said it yourself, you’ve never been in a situation that even remotely resembles the one your looking down from your high-horse at.
I WAS the Sal, in my household, and it takes two to tango. You can’t just sum it up with Walkertons=Evil, Sal=Perfect. I know it’s what ‘troubled'(usually upper-middle class, like the walkertons) kids on the internet want to hear, but you can drop the pretense when your talking about fictional characters.
not someone else
I think you’re going a little overboard with the insinuations, especially since it’s not like the comment section doesn’t overanalyze everything. Analysis, predictions, and overattachment to the characters are kinda what most of us are down here for.
BBCC
Sure. I’m on a high horse because I don’t think people should be shitheads to their kids. Okay. I also really like your implication upper-middle class families can’t be toxic and cause trouble. Very nice. I never claimed Sal was perfect. I have said the Walkertons being shit heads does cause her to lash out at them and that they’re probably not going to reconcile any time soon.
BBCC
Also, FYI, you don’t have to read my comments.
Emily
“It takes two to tango” really really doesn’t apply to a literal child and their parent. There is not an equal share of responsibility for conflict that arises between them because one is the adult with literally all of the power and the other is a kid who is being raised by that adult.
thejeff
OTOH, parents can fail to raise perfect kids and conflicts can arise despite them doing basically alright. I know I had plenty of conflicts with my parents and they were mostly me screwing up and them trying to correct me.
Now, we know from the larger context that there are big problems with the way the Walkertons are treating their kids, but ignoring that context – any parent is going to be upset when their 12 year old kid comes sneaking in late, lying about where they’ve been and apparently been doing so for months. Perhaps not so late, but using choir practice as an excuse long after she quit going.
ischemgeek
Yeah, this. The parent has the advantage of: total control over the child’s freedom of movement, belongings, and physical integrity, decades of life experience, financial and social resources, and societal benefit of the doubt.
The kid doesn’t have the option of walking away, of getting help, drawing on life experience, etc.
Also: It takes two to tango is one that always makes me nervous. It’s such a thought-terminating cliche. In some cases, it’s true that both parties to a disagreement are contributing more-or-less equally. In other cases, it’s an excuse to not look deeper into an abusive situation.
TW Explicit and detailed description of bullying for the rest of the comment.
I was bullied really fucking bad in school. Like Carrie level shit. Like all the kids in the class ganging up to urge me to kill myself. Like a group of a dozen kids ambushing me in a bathroom to strip me nude and steal my clothing in middle school. Like to this day, at 31, I can’t use a locker when people are behind me or dig in a crate if others are in the same room because as a kid if I did that, I’d get physically attacked. I could go on.
And people wrote it off as “It takes two to tango” and “What did you do to MAKE them strip you nude/slam a steel crate lid on your head/slam your locker shut on your head/sucker punch you at the locker/knock your lunch out of your hands/spit on you/throw a drink over your head/sit on you and smash your face into the ice/etc?”
And they’d never believe the answer was: I existed. With glasses and an overbite. While autistic and queer. That was fucking it. They attacked me because I was weird and queer and I looked funny. And they got away with it because everyone fell for the fallacy of the golden mean and insisted it takes two to tango. They always insisted I had to have done something to deserve it.
I didn’t deserve it. I didn’t deserve any of it.
But “it takes two to tango” sure as fuck meant I was treated like I did.
BBCC
Oh thank god, someone else tackled that nonsense so I didn’t have to.
Inahc
Yeah. I excused a lot of my mum’s behaviour with “well I was pretty difficult at that age”. But then I found out she’d said similar things to my sister (who she didn’t raise), and I was like – holy fuck that is inexcusable, that is abuse. And then the penny dropped :p
Kyrik Michalowski
Her stance would be more reasonable if she was worried about Sal, but she isn’t. She is worried about how Sal reflects on her and the family. This isn’t parental concern, love and support, this is about control and public image.
Unusually Angry Hippie
How the hell do you get that from one strip of conversation?
I know for sure that my mom yells THE MOST when she’s worried. Linda’s in a difficult place and has no idea how to deal with it, so she’s falling back to the ‘mom voice’ negative reinforcement that seems to have worked fine on Walky.
BBCC
I’m the kid of one of those people who yells when they’re worried too. A) Linda’s track record isn’t good enough she gets the benefit of the doubt on her motives. B) She’s missing the thing that, in my experience, usually follows immediately after ‘where were you’ – ‘why are you so late’?
BBCC
Before anyone asks – my experience is overhearing my mom asking those same questions to my sister.
ischemgeek
For me i am still open to Linda acting from worry. The tell will be if she starts asking Sal if she WANTS to make the family/her mother/ her father a laughing stock /look bad. My folks loved pulling that one
BBCC
Maybe I’m just a cynic when it comes to Linda and Charles. I don’t have that kind of generosity to give them the benefit of the doubt.
ischemgeek
Getcha. Worried and godawful parent aren’t exclusive. Linda is an emotionally abusive sack of shit. But she can be that and simultaneously be worried for her kid. My folks very often were genuinely worried about my sibs’ and my mh issues. At the same time they were emotionally and physically abusive.
Inahc
It’s not like the reasons make it any less wrong.
BBCC
That’s true, but my cynical pill side is still suggesting that she’s more worked up because having your kid come home at god knows when in the morning is a spot on her reputation as a mom than actual worry about Sal, even if there is some of that (though, frankly, my cynical pill side often doubts that too).
thejeff
You don’t get it from one strip of conversation. You get it from the entire comics worth of context.
Conuly
We get it from the fact that Sal outright said her mother favored Walky. We get it from the corroboration of this statement that came when we saw a. the flashback of their mother choosing Walky to be the child with the short acting gig b. the box of treats she sent to Walky and Billie compared to the tiny box she sent to Sal c. all other scenes and flashbacks with Sal and her mother where the woman has not a single nice thing to say to her daughter d. the way Walky completely and utterly shut down at the thought of failure, complete with fears that nobody would love him if he failed a single math class e. wasn’t there even a flashback of the twins as babies with their mother complaining already that Sal “cried more”?
BBCC
That last one hasn’t happened, to be fair, but the rest is all true.
Regalli
I would consider being more sympathetic if
1) Linda’s record didn’t speak for itself. The immediate dismissal of Marcie and failure to speak up for Sal during the Leland debacle, her telling Dorothy’s mom that Walky’s going to be premed (‘I thought he was a telecommunications major?’ ‘So does he, until he changes his mind.’)* and clearly seeing the Dorothy relationship as something to bring Walky’s reputation and drive up rather than the business of the kids, completely ignoring Sal showing up in favor of needling Walky to meet his new girlfriend – and this is just the stuff we’ve seen on panel, in her tag.
2) I’m just gonna note – chronologically speaking, I’m pretty sure we haven’t seen Sal swear by this point in the timeline. This is the second time we’ve seen Linda swear AT Sal – the first time was in the first Marcie flashback, when Sal was around five. I’m not gonna say swearing around your young children is never a healthy dynamic, or that it doesn’t happen sometimes after serious concern (especially around this age,) but given what we already know of this relationship and the fact that both times we’ve seen it have been at Sal, in anger… It’s not a good look.
* Another reason there’s a difference between Dorothy’s family and Charles and Linda: In that strip, Deborah is clearly supportive of Walky and Dorothy not necessarily being serious and equally clearly uncomfortable with Linda’s ‘oh he just doesn’t KNOW he’s going to be a doctor’ lines.
Diner Kinetic
Not to mention how there’s _definitely_ a double standard here. If I didn’t know better I’d say Walky was actually trying to draw attention to how Sal was being treated worse than him with sarcasm, instead of being a dick. But it’s Walky, so being a dick is pretty much the only way he _can_ point things out a lot of the time… wait, this is why he’s rooming with mike
Emily
Yeah, Walky made it pretty clear that best case scenario he was completely oblivious to the favouritism going on in their family so I’m not buying these “he’s just trying to act normal/distract Linda.”
Sunny
He’s also very averse to confrontations (with the one exception of discussing cartoons). I can from experience say that it’s extremely uncomfortable for a child to have to listen to one of your parents arguing with your sibling, and I imagine doubly so if it’s your twin. Walky falling back on his goofball behaviour to try and derail it, or at least to make it a little more bearable, is perfectly understandable and not something that should be held against him.