Y’know, Amber is right; praising her for gutting someone is odd. I mean, the guy was an evil creep and that’s beyond doubt. He raped or attempted to rape and psychologically traumatize what appears to be multiple women. If we were all removed from society and set up as a judge most of us would condemn him if not to death then severe punishment.
But, Amber enjoyed it and that’s dangerous. She’s dealing with sadistic urges and a desire to resort to violence. She’s so disturbed by this and how it relates to her father that she’s compartmentalizing herself. She indulges in violence but she only does it as her alter-ego, a ‘superhero.’ In this sense, maybe Willis is using the societal stereotype that ‘heroes’ are allowed to be violent and they’re justified to hide the struggle with Amber. Sal noticed that she doesn’t seem to value her own safety but I don’t think Sal realizes that part of this is to preserve a sense of her self. I think that she may have had to become a hero so she could deal with her violence.
Of course, this is all my opinion. With all that aside, it’s probably one of the deepest psychological profiles I’ve seen in a comic character. I love it.
Needfuldoer
She’s not articulating that she enjoyed it, though. All everyone else sees is her selflessly fighting a sexual predator.
Today is about as close to telling someone “I’m afraid of becoming my abusive father because I didn’t hate doing what I did” as Amber’s gotten so far.
David
I got reminded of Friedrich Dürrenmatt’s “Der Verdacht”, a weak reprise of his Kommissär Bärlach from “Der Richter und sein Henker”. Bärlach suspects that a doctor doing vivisection on KZ inhabitants has not committed suicide but changed identity after the war.
A friend of his tells him a story from his youth as MD student (I think) where one of them fell from a ladder injuring his larynx such that without a rather immediate tracheal incision he would have suffocated, and said suspect is the only one with the guts to perform that operation with a knife.
Due to the swift and decisive operation, their costudent survives but never speaks a word again with the person rescuing him because he notices that his rescuer immensively enjoyed it. However, he only confides this to his friend since it did save his life.
Amber’s not yet gone but she is afraid, and so far nobody’s being helpful.
Everyone is glad to have somebody around who will do what nobody else dares to do, never mind the motivation.
Hopefully Dorothy is able to grow to the situation.
I didn’t know anyone else liked Durenmatt around these parts. I’ll have to read those.
David
Uh, liking Dürrenmatt and not knowing “Der Richter und sein Henker” (The Judge and His Hangman) is a curious combination. It’s a cornerpiece of his creative output (and has seen a whole bunch of movie adaptations). “Der Verdacht”, not so much. Even though the Amber motive reminded me of the latter.
On late-late-night low-rent TV I saw the early 60s film of The Visit, then read the play, and sought out Hyenas, a remake from sometime in the 90s.
VeryCreativeUsername
I think this might work out, in the end, though.
Maybe if Amber gives in and tries to go full-villain, she will notice that she is ultimately different from her father, because she fails to be a villain.
I mean Blaine definitely would’ve praised her for this.
But yea definitely an issue with how she’s processing evidence. She’s implementing flawed logic.
Blaine adulates abusive behaviour
Blaine would approve of this
therefore this is abusive behaviour.
Rain makes things wet
I am wet
therefore it is raining.
Also: no matter what, anything they say about her actions is evidence that Amber is violent and terrible.
If they are upset that she was violent, they’re right, being violent is terrible and she’s terrible. If they don’t react, it’s because they knew all along that she’s terrible so they weren’t surprised. If they admire her bravery or selflessness, they have terrible values like her dad, and by aligning with those values, Amber is terrible.
I’m noticing a pattern, yo.
StClair
Broken brains (like mine) are very good at twisting any input or supposed “facts” to fit the established narrative. 🙁
Leorale
All brains do that — humans are really, really good at making new evidence fit the worldview instead of the other way around. Our atypical brains aren’t broken in that regard (at least, no moreso than a typical brain would be). It’s the narrative that’s broken.
Blaine would have likely found something to disparage, because that’s what he is. Amber probably knows this deep down but refuses to allow herself to acknowledge it, even though that’s what she needs to come back from this “ledge”. Because the fact she is most definitely not her father also means there is no way her father will ever genuinely praise her…
Neeks
Not hard to “find something to disparage”: not-ryan is still alive, after all.
Just to be clear, Ryan died from the stabbing (or slashing, or a combination of the two), yes? Because while Willis said there wouldn’t be death in this comic, everything so far points at a death, here. Like the way Dorothy says “and any potential future lives he may have attempted.”
EvilMidnightLurker
No, he’s in the hospital. Someone said so a while back. But it’s an open and shut case against him so he’s going to jail and not coming back for a long time.
Carms
you’re forgetting his promising swimming career =/
I have a hard time believing Blaine would praise Amber for this, because I don’t think he can praise her: he needs her to be weak and ineffectual so he can dominate her. I think he’d be threatened and intimidated if he realized how strong she is and how savage she can be.
I think he’d berate her for being a violent psycho.
I’m sure, Blaine would have found fault with her. Abusive people’s abuse doesn’t stop just because you manage to do what they berated you for not doing last time.
No. Blaine would have criticized her for not killing him. Not because Blaine would have killed him (though maybe), but because “It’s never good enough” is true for people like him. Finding fault in success is how an abuser like him keeps power, and keeps someone down.
Trolldrool
Essentially; “You didn’t really protect your friends because the bongo is still alive to come back with a vengeance. Next time, maybe you could actually ‘try’ to finish the job.”
Roborat
I suspect he would have faulted her for not carving him up more before killing him.
This isn’t 100% related to today’s strip, but I just noticed that both Becky and Joyce referred to themselves as “Lesbian Love Sleuths” in this chapter:
Nah, pretty sure Nancy Drew believes in archaeology past 6000 years.
Needfuldoer
Maybe Scooby-Doo (might slide due to parental childhood nostalgia) or Murder She Wrote (a Hallmark Channel staple) then?
King Daniel
Joyce specifically mentioned Scooby-Doo as one of those things she wasn’t allowed to watch because it “promoted witchcraft”.
Which was also why I wasn’t allowed to watch it as a kid.
Needfuldoer
Even though literally every episode ended showing that all the supernatural phenomena were just smoke-and-mirrors parlor tricks put on by grumpy landowners?
Jeez.
King Daniel
Yep.
Mr.Morningstar
Sometimes I have hope in humanity. Then I hear people had parents like that and I throw it back out the window
While your overall understanding of Scooby-Doo! is passable, I’ll nitpick that there have definitely been episodes in which the villain was something other than a land-owner.
I feel justified in this nitpicking, because I can do a spot-on Casey Kasem impression, which means I’m the real-life Shaggy.
That’s OG Shaggy, by the way. Not the exaggerated, raspy-voiced version everyone on Earth does (which, by the way, just makes you sound like you’re being strangled by an octopus, so don’t do it).
The original Scooby-Doo cartoons always showed the kids debunking the supernatural phenomenon at the end. My fundamentalist parents had no problem with it. However, there were apparently some later Scooby-Doo cartoons, maybe contemporaneous with Joyce’s childhood?, which apparently had real supernatural villains. I was in my late teens or early twenties when some speaker at our church talked about that and how bad it was. I never saw those later Scooby-Doo cartoons except in an excerpt shown by said speaker, so I may have been lied to with video clips taken out of context.
CJ
Can’t remember the topic ever being mentioned. As long as their case wasn’t on an archeological dig it wouldn’t be.
Stella
I dunno. My cousin and a few of my friends grew up pretty fundie (very akin to Joyce, or in some cases moreso [for instance, in quiverful or cult-like churches]). It would be easier to list the approved secular books than all of the banned ones, but Nancy Drew was fundie-approved.
Other approved secular books were American Girl, Dear America, and Cam Jansen (another girl detective, who has a photographic memory), as well as chaste romances (often Amish in setting). I’d categorize the chaste romances as secular because they weren’t published by Zondervan or marketed as Christian Fiction, although usually the characters were chaste for religious reasons.
The big no-nos were fantasy (in some cases, this included even Narnia, Wrinkle In Time, and Lord of the Rings), science fiction, non-chaste romance (or even YA novels with a romantic sub-plot), anything with gangsters / spies / con-artists…er, so, pretty much all books.
I’m a little surprised that Joyce was allowed to read Twilight, honestly. I mean, sure, technically it’s a chaste romance (sex is culminated off-screen after marriage, after three books full of unresolved sexual tension). But many of the characters have magical powers and abilities that don’t explicitly come from God, which could theoretically make them demons.
Likely a Girls with Slingshots reference. They just need the derrstalker hat and a pipe (to blow bubbles with). No, not that Bubbles, but soap bubbles.
I’m a little put-off that when she got what she preferred (being ‘attacked’) she relished in the opportunity to have a monologue and talk down to someone. It’s kinda scary.
I mean… that’s accurate, at least for me. when you nurse a particular kind of self-loathing, a kind where you believe you’re evil and will taint everyone around with that evil, being showered with praise is frustrating. after a certain amount of praise, you give up trying to explain that what they’re praising was actually bad. you bottle it up.
so when someone actually has an issue with you, it does two things: it feeds into your belief that you are evil, and it provides you with an opportunity to release the self-hatred you’ve had to keep hidden.
230 thoughts on “Details”
Ana Chronistic
“he sounds like a real cut up LOLOLOLOL”
>8C
“…going that-a-way now” o.o;
Mada
Well that was a 180 from the last strip
Dana
Dotty has this annoying habit of returning to reason when she leaves it, doesn’t she?
Clif
Meh. She uses reality as a crutch.
Mr. Mendo
Yeesh, I’d hate to think what giving Amber a birthday present must be like…
“This DVD boxset of Cheers just reaffirms the darkness in my soul!”
MissFortune
Any Cheers for this just sounds like praise from her father.
Mr. Mendo
“You know who else knew my name? MY FATHER!”
C.
That dead scientist who’s actually alive and a retired cop.
Arawn
Y’know, Amber is right; praising her for gutting someone is odd. I mean, the guy was an evil creep and that’s beyond doubt. He raped or attempted to rape and psychologically traumatize what appears to be multiple women. If we were all removed from society and set up as a judge most of us would condemn him if not to death then severe punishment.
But, Amber enjoyed it and that’s dangerous. She’s dealing with sadistic urges and a desire to resort to violence. She’s so disturbed by this and how it relates to her father that she’s compartmentalizing herself. She indulges in violence but she only does it as her alter-ego, a ‘superhero.’ In this sense, maybe Willis is using the societal stereotype that ‘heroes’ are allowed to be violent and they’re justified to hide the struggle with Amber. Sal noticed that she doesn’t seem to value her own safety but I don’t think Sal realizes that part of this is to preserve a sense of her self. I think that she may have had to become a hero so she could deal with her violence.
Of course, this is all my opinion. With all that aside, it’s probably one of the deepest psychological profiles I’ve seen in a comic character. I love it.
Needfuldoer
She’s not articulating that she enjoyed it, though. All everyone else sees is her selflessly fighting a sexual predator.
Today is about as close to telling someone “I’m afraid of becoming my abusive father because I didn’t hate doing what I did” as Amber’s gotten so far.
David
I got reminded of Friedrich Dürrenmatt’s “Der Verdacht”, a weak reprise of his Kommissär Bärlach from “Der Richter und sein Henker”. Bärlach suspects that a doctor doing vivisection on KZ inhabitants has not committed suicide but changed identity after the war.
A friend of his tells him a story from his youth as MD student (I think) where one of them fell from a ladder injuring his larynx such that without a rather immediate tracheal incision he would have suffocated, and said suspect is the only one with the guts to perform that operation with a knife.
Due to the swift and decisive operation, their costudent survives but never speaks a word again with the person rescuing him because he notices that his rescuer immensively enjoyed it. However, he only confides this to his friend since it did save his life.
Amber’s not yet gone but she is afraid, and so far nobody’s being helpful.
Everyone is glad to have somebody around who will do what nobody else dares to do, never mind the motivation.
Hopefully Dorothy is able to grow to the situation.
ValdVin
I didn’t know anyone else liked Durenmatt around these parts. I’ll have to read those.
David
Uh, liking Dürrenmatt and not knowing “Der Richter und sein Henker” (The Judge and His Hangman) is a curious combination. It’s a cornerpiece of his creative output (and has seen a whole bunch of movie adaptations). “Der Verdacht”, not so much. Even though the Amber motive reminded me of the latter.
StoneyB
A lot of folks know Dürrenmatt only as dramatist.
ValdVin
@StoneyB
On late-late-night low-rent TV I saw the early 60s film of The Visit, then read the play, and sought out Hyenas, a remake from sometime in the 90s.
VeryCreativeUsername
I think this might work out, in the end, though.
Maybe if Amber gives in and tries to go full-villain, she will notice that she is ultimately different from her father, because she fails to be a villain.
vacantVisionary
yo can we not mock an obvious survivor of parental abuse for having complicated and illogical c-ptsd triggers
Sam Smith
Alt-text is a Beast Wars reference. Thank you, Google.
(I was guessing Nausicaa. Though Beast Wars is far more in keeping with DW.)
Stephen Bierce
Does that make Amber the Beast mode and Amazi the Bot mode?
Fart Captor
I dunno, can you have both of those and a vehicle mode?
Reltzik
Optimal Optimus did. Bonus points for banana affinity.
N0083rp00F
I am thinking, personality wise, she is the Beast Wars Dinobot
Felgraf
Well, that does seem to be what the Alt Text is implying, and it fits SO WELL.
/Also Dinobot was the best character, so.
Cattleprod
I honestly read it as ‘you saved the alley’ as if he were adapting the line to better fit the setting, even though the fight wasn’t in an alley.
Vincent
Thought it was a Shane (Logan) reference for some reason.
Yumi
“What if I praise you but in a helium voice?”
Cephalo the Pod
Is the alt-text a reference to something?
Cephalo the Pod
Damnit, Ninja’d by Sam Smith.
Synnerman
Whew!
William Leonard Reese Jr.
Well shit. I can’t say anything because I agreed with Ghost Blaine on the whole “putting his knife where it belonged” thing.
Jess
Oh, so her father praised her for saving people’s lives, did he?
I think Amber is having some problems separating intent from deed. Often there’s no excusing the deed no matter what the intent, but…not here.
Carms
I mean Blaine definitely would’ve praised her for this.
But yea definitely an issue with how she’s processing evidence. She’s implementing flawed logic.
Blaine adulates abusive behaviour
Blaine would approve of this
therefore this is abusive behaviour.
Rain makes things wet
I am wet
therefore it is raining.
I mean naw.
tyersome
… I think you should shower us with a few more examples …
Jess
Water you talking about?
VeryCreativeUsername
About dropping more examples.
Reltzik
If the lot of you were trying for a torrent of stealth puns, you’re not sprinkling them out there fast enough. You have to up your hide-rate.
… hydrate?
….. I’ll just be hiding over here.
TheGrammarLegionary
Of course this would precipitate a pun thread…
Joe Covenant
I’d join in, but would feel a bit of a drip.
Carms
H2O no, what have I wrought- can everyone rain themselves in a little?
tyersome
So sad this turned out to just be a trickle …
Jess
My thirst isn’t quenched yet!
Leorale
Also: no matter what, anything they say about her actions is evidence that Amber is violent and terrible.
If they are upset that she was violent, they’re right, being violent is terrible and she’s terrible. If they don’t react, it’s because they knew all along that she’s terrible so they weren’t surprised. If they admire her bravery or selflessness, they have terrible values like her dad, and by aligning with those values, Amber is terrible.
I’m noticing a pattern, yo.
StClair
Broken brains (like mine) are very good at twisting any input or supposed “facts” to fit the established narrative. 🙁
Leorale
All brains do that — humans are really, really good at making new evidence fit the worldview instead of the other way around. Our atypical brains aren’t broken in that regard (at least, no moreso than a typical brain would be). It’s the narrative that’s broken.
Iforgetwhatiputhere
Blaine would have likely found something to disparage, because that’s what he is. Amber probably knows this deep down but refuses to allow herself to acknowledge it, even though that’s what she needs to come back from this “ledge”. Because the fact she is most definitely not her father also means there is no way her father will ever genuinely praise her…
Neeks
Not hard to “find something to disparage”: not-ryan is still alive, after all.
Jon Rich
Just to be clear, Ryan died from the stabbing (or slashing, or a combination of the two), yes? Because while Willis said there wouldn’t be death in this comic, everything so far points at a death, here. Like the way Dorothy says “and any potential future lives he may have attempted.”
EvilMidnightLurker
No, he’s in the hospital. Someone said so a while back. But it’s an open and shut case against him so he’s going to jail and not coming back for a long time.
Carms
you’re forgetting his promising swimming career =/
BigDogLittleCat
I have a hard time believing Blaine would praise Amber for this, because I don’t think he can praise her: he needs her to be weak and ineffectual so he can dominate her. I think he’d be threatened and intimidated if he realized how strong she is and how savage she can be.
I think he’d berate her for being a violent psycho.
CJ
I’m sure, Blaine would have found fault with her. Abusive people’s abuse doesn’t stop just because you manage to do what they berated you for not doing last time.
Averien
No. Blaine would have criticized her for not killing him. Not because Blaine would have killed him (though maybe), but because “It’s never good enough” is true for people like him. Finding fault in success is how an abuser like him keeps power, and keeps someone down.
Trolldrool
Essentially; “You didn’t really protect your friends because the bongo is still alive to come back with a vengeance. Next time, maybe you could actually ‘try’ to finish the job.”
Roborat
I suspect he would have faulted her for not carving him up more before killing him.
Stella
Oh that’s an excellent example. I want to use that sometime.
King Daniel
This isn’t 100% related to today’s strip, but I just noticed that both Becky and Joyce referred to themselves as “Lesbian Love Sleuths” in this chapter:
Becky – http://www.dumbingofage.com/2017/comic/book-7/04-the-do-list/lovesleuth/
Joyce – http://www.dumbingofage.com/2017/comic/book-7/04-the-do-list/plottwist/
And yes, I did a ctrl+F on both strips first just to make sure no one else had mentioned it first.
Regina Phalange
They probably both read Nancy Drew as kids. Would explain the word “sleuth” given how much that series repeated it.
BBCC
Nah, pretty sure Nancy Drew believes in archaeology past 6000 years.
Needfuldoer
Maybe Scooby-Doo (might slide due to parental childhood nostalgia) or Murder She Wrote (a Hallmark Channel staple) then?
King Daniel
Joyce specifically mentioned Scooby-Doo as one of those things she wasn’t allowed to watch because it “promoted witchcraft”.
Which was also why I wasn’t allowed to watch it as a kid.
Needfuldoer
Even though literally every episode ended showing that all the supernatural phenomena were just smoke-and-mirrors parlor tricks put on by grumpy landowners?
Jeez.
King Daniel
Yep.
Mr.Morningstar
Sometimes I have hope in humanity. Then I hear people had parents like that and I throw it back out the window
Delicious Taffy
While your overall understanding of Scooby-Doo! is passable, I’ll nitpick that there have definitely been episodes in which the villain was something other than a land-owner.
I feel justified in this nitpicking, because I can do a spot-on Casey Kasem impression, which means I’m the real-life Shaggy.
Delicious Taffy
That’s OG Shaggy, by the way. Not the exaggerated, raspy-voiced version everyone on Earth does (which, by the way, just makes you sound like you’re being strangled by an octopus, so don’t do it).
Jim Henry
The original Scooby-Doo cartoons always showed the kids debunking the supernatural phenomenon at the end. My fundamentalist parents had no problem with it. However, there were apparently some later Scooby-Doo cartoons, maybe contemporaneous with Joyce’s childhood?, which apparently had real supernatural villains. I was in my late teens or early twenties when some speaker at our church talked about that and how bad it was. I never saw those later Scooby-Doo cartoons except in an excerpt shown by said speaker, so I may have been lied to with video clips taken out of context.
CJ
Can’t remember the topic ever being mentioned. As long as their case wasn’t on an archeological dig it wouldn’t be.
Stella
I dunno. My cousin and a few of my friends grew up pretty fundie (very akin to Joyce, or in some cases moreso [for instance, in quiverful or cult-like churches]). It would be easier to list the approved secular books than all of the banned ones, but Nancy Drew was fundie-approved.
Other approved secular books were American Girl, Dear America, and Cam Jansen (another girl detective, who has a photographic memory), as well as chaste romances (often Amish in setting). I’d categorize the chaste romances as secular because they weren’t published by Zondervan or marketed as Christian Fiction, although usually the characters were chaste for religious reasons.
The big no-nos were fantasy (in some cases, this included even Narnia, Wrinkle In Time, and Lord of the Rings), science fiction, non-chaste romance (or even YA novels with a romantic sub-plot), anything with gangsters / spies / con-artists…er, so, pretty much all books.
I’m a little surprised that Joyce was allowed to read Twilight, honestly. I mean, sure, technically it’s a chaste romance (sex is culminated off-screen after marriage, after three books full of unresolved sexual tension). But many of the characters have magical powers and abilities that don’t explicitly come from God, which could theoretically make them demons.
hof1991
Likely a Girls with Slingshots reference. They just need the derrstalker hat and a pipe (to blow bubbles with). No, not that Bubbles, but soap bubbles.
Roborat
Yea, they are probably students of Jamie’s technique.
Doopyboop
I’m a little put-off that when she got what she preferred (being ‘attacked’) she relished in the opportunity to have a monologue and talk down to someone. It’s kinda scary.
Vivid Grim
I mean… that’s accurate, at least for me. when you nurse a particular kind of self-loathing, a kind where you believe you’re evil and will taint everyone around with that evil, being showered with praise is frustrating. after a certain amount of praise, you give up trying to explain that what they’re praising was actually bad. you bottle it up.
so when someone actually has an issue with you, it does two things: it feeds into your belief that you are evil, and it provides you with an opportunity to release the self-hatred you’ve had to keep hidden.
Regina Phalange