Not exactly. Dexter is a Latin adjective meaning “on the right hand side, skillful, handy, proper, favorable.” The positive connotation arising as most people (being right handed) see the right hand as the more useful, hand while the left hand is clumsy and therefore unfavorable.
Squall
Oh yeah. Thanks for correcting me. My information sub-space storage area gets messy at night, and I maek mistacks. I am glad I did not cause great confusion in the minds of the children of tomorrow! Now remember kids: southpaws are evil, because Latin is always right. (Warning: Latin is not always right)
Ziaheart
Dude… you were the one who brought etymology into the equation. The point wasn’t that Latin meaning was A therefore B; it was that just because Latin for A means alpha doesn’t mean Latin for B means beta.
Toad
Yeah, he… just conceded that point.
Squall
I’m sorry for having a sarcastic gravatar. It makes it difficult to sound sincere.
Tan
Can’t… Tell… If… Actually… Sorry…
Curse you, gravatars!
ALLxISxGONE
So many smart people… my brain hurts xP
das-g
It does in Greek.
Luzahn
It is worth noting that we lefties are plotting to take over the world, though.
Lamachine
You clumsy people will never succeed… !
Flushmaster
Watch out for southpaws because until you see them eat or write or throw something you’ll never know their true nature. They’re sneaky like that.
Here’s some interesting tidbits. It seems that it’s uncertain if the left = bad association originates with lefthanded people or augury, and it’s all screwed up to begin with because it’s based on stuff the Romans mixed up when they stole it from the Greeks anyway.
Rufus Saltus
And with discussion of augury, this comment thread just got far more pagan than Joyce’s mom would be comfortable with!
1) Happiness is a warm gun.
2) The Iron Man armours in their various incarnations are made of weapons which obey the laws of thermodynamics unless otherwise noted (See: Repulsors being used to weld crap together, the Avengers )
QED Tony Stark has happiness.
My parents were like this when I was ten, but not when I was in college.
I think it’s perfectly fine when your kids are ten to micromanage what goes into their minds. Responsible, even! You don’t want them murdering hookers in GTA.
Some parents never really want to admit that their kids aren’t ten any more though. “Do you want me to go in with you? Are you okay to go in by yourself?” “Mom, I am 23 years old, I don’t need you to come in with me for a job interview.” “Are you sure? I’ll be right outside.”
Why so? Joyce´s mom respects her daugther´s decision to watch a show which she herself sees as “bad”. Expressing your opinion and forbidding your daugther to do this and that cause of your beliefs are two different pairs of shoes.
If anything this strip made me like Joyce´s family more. They might be a bit or alot jesus-crazy but they´re good people and love their children enough to let them do their own things.
No, she only respects the decision as long as it’s not what she sees as “bad”. That’s the issue. I don’t find them particularly annoying myself, but it’s a bit like parents who say they’re fine with their children exploring religion on their own… as long as they accept Christ as their Lord and Savior in the end. And only if they accept him the right way, not in a different sect or with a different/more liberal interpretation of the Bible.
It’s not that bad — I’m not being literal, here — but it’s reminiscent of that kind of behavior. That doesn’t necessarily mean they’d disown her for it, but I do find it irritating when people make a big deal out of being accepting over other beliefs (even within their own sect) only to basically end it with, “Well, that’s nice, dear… but you know that means you’re going to Hell, right?”
I don’t think you really know what those words mean.
Undrave
It’s an hyperbole but I think it’s about as cruel as giving your children a stupid name that will get them teased forever.
VZG
It’s a bit more like sharing your religion with your child. While I’d prefer that kids get to choose on their own, it’s not inherently cruel; kids grow up and learn to think for themselves, eventually.
It’s more on par with telling one’s children about the toothfairy, except in this case the parents believe in the toothfairy, too.
I’d also really rather people not use stuff like child abuse for their extreme and prejudiced exaggerations. One thing is maybe mildly irritating. The other is fucking child abuse. Let’s not downplay the fact that abusing a child is pretty goddamn monstrous.
Shilo
The Westboro Baptist Church homeschool their children.
They indoctrinate, keep them from other people, tell them God hates everyone, threaten them with an afterlife of eternal fire, and force them to hold vulgar hateful signs on street corners. They force them to protest funerals of soldiers and innocent children. They force a hatred into their hearts and minds. They mentally cripple and warp them.
That is psychological child abuse. Not all abuse is physical. And it’s true that not all homeschooling is abusive.
But shit like the WBC and other extremist cults are abusive to their children. Just because the scars and bruises aren’t visible doesn’t mean they’re not there.
geomease
That’s likely a case of an exception, not a rule. There are many different reasons for homescooling, not all of them religious. I myself was homeschooling my mother for a year or so after a particularly viscous bullying incident in which a couple of guys thought it’d be funny to tell one of the black girls in my class I called her the N word. After she slapped me and started to try and press charges I had a nervous mental breakdown and was basically a sobbing quivering wreck, bullying had been a huge problem for me since elementary school and this was a situation where it was th straw that broke the camel back. Our schools out east had a “zero tolerance poliy” towards violence, meaning anyone involved ina fight was equally responsible. This meant hat if someone attacked you you couldn’t so much as defend yourself without getting expelled, it was irreverent anyway because even if you didn’t fight back your attacks friends would claim you instigated the fight and fought back and you’d be expelled anyway. After that mom withdrew m from the school system and I was home schooled with the assistance of my teachers providing text books lesson plans and the like for the rest of the year. I came back next year but it was just as bad if not worse. So yeah posting an extreme example won’t work when trying tp rpove your point, after all, only a sith deals in absolutes
VZG
And you’re entirely missing the point. Those religions aren’t just abusing their children, they’re abusing pretty much everyone they come into contact with, and they are NOT even remotely the same as believing in creationism. It’s offensive to anyone with a lick of intelligence to imply as much. It’s even more fucking offensive to even BEGIN to imply that that’s what homeschooling is generally like; homeschooling isn’t even religious by nature. You’re making wild leaps of logic to imply that homescholing is USUALLY religious and USUALLY abusive.
I’m not an idiot; I’m well fucking aware that not all abuse is physical. That doesn’t mean that people teaching their children things you don’t personally believe in or even think of as ridiculous is the same as emotional abuse, and, again, it waters down the importance of rooting out REAL emotional abuse (including, but not limited to, the type perpetrated by the WBC). Nobody’s going to take you very seriously if you bring up emotional abuse and then use teaching children creationism as an example; they’ll just think you’re an egotistical idiot.
Somebody
Creationists pull the same “no true scotsman” nonsense all the time. They don’t automatically wish death on people, but many are still smug about “sin” and what not. They also try to force it to be taught in science classes. Someone who went to school to become a biologist doesn’t have a debate with a glorified evangelist who promotes pseudoscience. It’s only “personal belief” for creationists; evolution has been observed many times.
You talk about “offense”, yet you put creationism in the same category as the whole of religion. Plenty of religious people accept evolution. It may not be as harmful as many other things, but teaching creationism is still harmful. It leads to ignorance and stunted scientific/intellectual growth.
They might “think” people like Shilo are “egotistical idiots”, but that’s actually creationists. That’s classic psychological projection right there.
Somebody
While we’re at it, teaching abstinence-only education is unquestionably abuse.
387 thoughts on “Rule the world”
Jen Aside
So this means… Jesus is Dexter’s archnemesis?? =o
Squall
It’s strange because Dexter means ‘good’
Kamino Neko
No, Dexter means ‘right’. The left/sinister/bad analogy doesn’t carry over to the other side.
Crimson Doom
No, Dexter is that stupid capuchin in the museum. 😛
Rufus Saltus
Not exactly. Dexter is a Latin adjective meaning “on the right hand side, skillful, handy, proper, favorable.” The positive connotation arising as most people (being right handed) see the right hand as the more useful, hand while the left hand is clumsy and therefore unfavorable.
Squall
Oh yeah. Thanks for correcting me. My information sub-space storage area gets messy at night, and I maek mistacks. I am glad I did not cause great confusion in the minds of the children of tomorrow! Now remember kids: southpaws are evil, because Latin is always right. (Warning: Latin is not always right)
Ziaheart
Dude… you were the one who brought etymology into the equation. The point wasn’t that Latin meaning was A therefore B; it was that just because Latin for A means alpha doesn’t mean Latin for B means beta.
Toad
Yeah, he… just conceded that point.
Squall
I’m sorry for having a sarcastic gravatar. It makes it difficult to sound sincere.
Tan
Can’t… Tell… If… Actually… Sorry…
Curse you, gravatars!
ALLxISxGONE
So many smart people… my brain hurts xP
das-g
It does in Greek.
Luzahn
It is worth noting that we lefties are plotting to take over the world, though.
Lamachine
You clumsy people will never succeed… !
Flushmaster
Watch out for southpaws because until you see them eat or write or throw something you’ll never know their true nature. They’re sneaky like that.
Jenny Creed
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=sinister&allowed_in_frame=0
Here’s some interesting tidbits. It seems that it’s uncertain if the left = bad association originates with lefthanded people or augury, and it’s all screwed up to begin with because it’s based on stuff the Romans mixed up when they stole it from the Greeks anyway.
Rufus Saltus
And with discussion of augury, this comment thread just got far more pagan than Joyce’s mom would be comfortable with!
Far
Same root as “dexterous”?
Rufus Saltus
Yes
Yotomoe
As well as his best friend.
VZG
“And I’m his best friend Jesus!”
GoldStarz
Jesus was in the Season 3 finale. He didn’t last very long, though.
AgentKeen
Biblical or Historical? I’m still trying to get all of the Season 1 episodes.
Plasma Mongoose
He had awesome ninja powers like walking on water and shooting nails from his palms.
The Candyman
He also knew Kung-Fu. He was pretty cool.
Somebody
SPOILER ALERT: He turns out to be a robot imposter.
Ghostforge
Was there also a teen Jesus,
A black Jesus, and an energy being Jesus?
Jack Finch
In Christopher Moore’s Lamb Jesus INVENTS Kung Fu.
Roborat
Darn, you beat me to the Moore’s Jesus comment. Loved that book.
RedScharron
Were the nails an offensive power, or non-genetic heredity one from being the son of a carpenter, like Susan Sto Helit and Death?
RedScharron
hereditary
usayasha
…so historical Jesus, then?
Geminia999
And monkey master just stares like he’s had enough of this.
Wonder Wig
It’s Jesus keeping Gilligan and everyone on that island.
Yotomoe
It’s Jesus that kept Gargamel from those Smurfs.
JBO
It’s Jesus that keeps the Starks from finding happiness.
Zap Rowsdower
Which Starks? Westeros or Marvel?
Kernanator
Either or.
Bob
1) Happiness is a warm gun.
2) The Iron Man armours in their various incarnations are made of weapons which obey the laws of thermodynamics unless otherwise noted (See: Repulsors being used to weld crap together, the Avengers )
QED Tony Stark has happiness.
Phillip Wilde
It’s Jesus that makes all those customers squeeze the Charmin, despite the warnings of poor Mr. Whipple.
AgentKeen
Wait, is that a good thing or bad thing…?
The Candyman
It’s Jesus that kept Samurai Jack from returning to his own time.
james
I thought that was Uncle Iroh?
Just for kix
No, that was in the Earth-51 timeline.
Mr. Random
52. 51 was where Iroh killed Aku, and threw Jack further ahead.
Wack'd
And it was Frederator that finally allowed him to return.
Or so they’ve been saying for half a dozen years now…
fcojose24
is it ok that i already hate joyce’s familiy?. they are exhausting too watch, heck even joyce it ‘s from time to time.
gears
They make me uncomfortable.
LockeZ
My parents were like this when I was ten, but not when I was in college.
I think it’s perfectly fine when your kids are ten to micromanage what goes into their minds. Responsible, even! You don’t want them murdering hookers in GTA.
Some parents never really want to admit that their kids aren’t ten any more though. “Do you want me to go in with you? Are you okay to go in by yourself?” “Mom, I am 23 years old, I don’t need you to come in with me for a job interview.” “Are you sure? I’ll be right outside.”
Sigurther
It doesn’t matter what age you are, to some degree, your parents will always treat you like children.
Roborat
Yup, the helicopters can get pretty thick sometimes.
KB_SBI
Joyce is annoying most of the time of corse her parents are gonna be worse.
Groove
I miss Joe’s Dad and his penis.
AsimovSideburns
But Joe’s Dad’s penis never misses you.
If you know what I mean.
MichaelHaneline
But will Mike’s penis ever miss your mom?
James Rye
Why so? Joyce´s mom respects her daugther´s decision to watch a show which she herself sees as “bad”. Expressing your opinion and forbidding your daugther to do this and that cause of your beliefs are two different pairs of shoes.
If anything this strip made me like Joyce´s family more. They might be a bit or alot jesus-crazy but they´re good people and love their children enough to let them do their own things.
VZG
No, she only respects the decision as long as it’s not what she sees as “bad”. That’s the issue. I don’t find them particularly annoying myself, but it’s a bit like parents who say they’re fine with their children exploring religion on their own… as long as they accept Christ as their Lord and Savior in the end. And only if they accept him the right way, not in a different sect or with a different/more liberal interpretation of the Bible.
It’s not that bad — I’m not being literal, here — but it’s reminiscent of that kind of behavior. That doesn’t necessarily mean they’d disown her for it, but I do find it irritating when people make a big deal out of being accepting over other beliefs (even within their own sect) only to basically end it with, “Well, that’s nice, dear… but you know that means you’re going to Hell, right?”
Somebody
The ignorance is really frustrating. They’re not intentionally malicious, but it “eastern religion” line is still offensive
Kryss LaBryn
Lol, especially considering that Christianity itself is an eastern religion. *Grin*
It’s like when British people complain about all the immigrants, lol…
BigCheese
Homeschooling children as creationists is child abuse, so I hated Joyce’s parents long before we met them.
VZG
“child abuse”
I don’t think you really know what those words mean.
Undrave
It’s an hyperbole but I think it’s about as cruel as giving your children a stupid name that will get them teased forever.
VZG
It’s a bit more like sharing your religion with your child. While I’d prefer that kids get to choose on their own, it’s not inherently cruel; kids grow up and learn to think for themselves, eventually.
It’s more on par with telling one’s children about the toothfairy, except in this case the parents believe in the toothfairy, too.
I’d also really rather people not use stuff like child abuse for their extreme and prejudiced exaggerations. One thing is maybe mildly irritating. The other is fucking child abuse. Let’s not downplay the fact that abusing a child is pretty goddamn monstrous.
Shilo
The Westboro Baptist Church homeschool their children.
They indoctrinate, keep them from other people, tell them God hates everyone, threaten them with an afterlife of eternal fire, and force them to hold vulgar hateful signs on street corners. They force them to protest funerals of soldiers and innocent children. They force a hatred into their hearts and minds. They mentally cripple and warp them.
That is psychological child abuse. Not all abuse is physical. And it’s true that not all homeschooling is abusive.
But shit like the WBC and other extremist cults are abusive to their children. Just because the scars and bruises aren’t visible doesn’t mean they’re not there.
geomease
That’s likely a case of an exception, not a rule. There are many different reasons for homescooling, not all of them religious. I myself was homeschooling my mother for a year or so after a particularly viscous bullying incident in which a couple of guys thought it’d be funny to tell one of the black girls in my class I called her the N word. After she slapped me and started to try and press charges I had a nervous mental breakdown and was basically a sobbing quivering wreck, bullying had been a huge problem for me since elementary school and this was a situation where it was th straw that broke the camel back. Our schools out east had a “zero tolerance poliy” towards violence, meaning anyone involved ina fight was equally responsible. This meant hat if someone attacked you you couldn’t so much as defend yourself without getting expelled, it was irreverent anyway because even if you didn’t fight back your attacks friends would claim you instigated the fight and fought back and you’d be expelled anyway. After that mom withdrew m from the school system and I was home schooled with the assistance of my teachers providing text books lesson plans and the like for the rest of the year. I came back next year but it was just as bad if not worse. So yeah posting an extreme example won’t work when trying tp rpove your point, after all, only a sith deals in absolutes
VZG
And you’re entirely missing the point. Those religions aren’t just abusing their children, they’re abusing pretty much everyone they come into contact with, and they are NOT even remotely the same as believing in creationism. It’s offensive to anyone with a lick of intelligence to imply as much. It’s even more fucking offensive to even BEGIN to imply that that’s what homeschooling is generally like; homeschooling isn’t even religious by nature. You’re making wild leaps of logic to imply that homescholing is USUALLY religious and USUALLY abusive.
I’m not an idiot; I’m well fucking aware that not all abuse is physical. That doesn’t mean that people teaching their children things you don’t personally believe in or even think of as ridiculous is the same as emotional abuse, and, again, it waters down the importance of rooting out REAL emotional abuse (including, but not limited to, the type perpetrated by the WBC). Nobody’s going to take you very seriously if you bring up emotional abuse and then use teaching children creationism as an example; they’ll just think you’re an egotistical idiot.
Somebody
Creationists pull the same “no true scotsman” nonsense all the time. They don’t automatically wish death on people, but many are still smug about “sin” and what not. They also try to force it to be taught in science classes. Someone who went to school to become a biologist doesn’t have a debate with a glorified evangelist who promotes pseudoscience. It’s only “personal belief” for creationists; evolution has been observed many times.
You talk about “offense”, yet you put creationism in the same category as the whole of religion. Plenty of religious people accept evolution. It may not be as harmful as many other things, but teaching creationism is still harmful. It leads to ignorance and stunted scientific/intellectual growth.
They might “think” people like Shilo are “egotistical idiots”, but that’s actually creationists. That’s classic psychological projection right there.
Somebody
While we’re at it, teaching abstinence-only education is unquestionably abuse.
Gram91
She forgot to mention that the robot gorilla fires monkeys XD
Mr. Random
Wet and irritable monkeys.
Now that I think about it, the two are probably connected.
David
This version does not. He’s much too small, and no longer has cannons.
Farmer_10
RUINED FOREVER!
The Candyman
I honestly have to agree with this. For shame, Willis, for shame.