April's second bonus strip is now up at Patreon! It was SUPPOSED to be the FIRST bonus strip, about SIERRA, but JOYCE FUCKED IT UP.
the proper sierra strip will come after we regroup following this fiasco
And as always, you can pledge a little extra to see tomorrow's strip a day early, every day! Fog
April's second bonus strip is now up at Patreon! It was SUPPOSED to be the FIRST bonus strip, about SIERRA, but JOYCE FUCKED IT UP.
the proper sierra strip will come after we regroup following this fiasco
And as always, you can pledge a little extra to see tomorrow's strip a day early, every day!
150 thoughts on “Fog”
Doctor_Who
“I’ve even seen the Ewok movies, the Holiday Special, the Despecialized Edition, the theatrically released Clone Wars pilot, and The Great Heep!”
“So you actually bought a ticket for Solo?”
“For whatnow?”
King Daniel
The only reason Lucy wouldn’t have bought a ticket for Solo would be because due to the sliding timescale, it would eventually have been in theaters while she was still in kindergarten or something.
Needfuldoer
The Despecialized Edition is fantastic. I hate seeing practical effects get buried under retrofit CG. Nothing is as realistic as something that was actually on the set, in front of the camera.
Raznaak
The Holiday Special doesn’t exists…
It doesn’t. *sob*
Ana Chronistic
“and then Anakin dies”
“…I don’t like this analogy”
Doctor_Who
“No, it’s okay, his spirit survives! But instead of his spirit from when he’s learned his lesson and repented, they retconned it to the younger him from when he was a violent sociopath that murdered children!”
“What exactly is your point?”
“I don’t know!”
abysswatcher1993
Lesson here, dont tamper with old material unless you are doing restoration work. Also, retcons are bad. Homestuck and Doctor Who have suffered from that.
Doctor_Who
W-what do you mean, we don’t have any retcons!
Romana just started doing that one day and we don’t know why! Susan went back in time to invent the acronym first! The Doctor claimed to be half human that one time because it was new years on earth, just like everyone is suddenly part Irish on Saint Patrick’s Day!
clif
I always assumed Dr. Who followed sliding alternate timelines.
ScarvesandCelery
Doctor Who is literally a show built on retcons.
LiamKav
Yeah. Retcons can be good or bad, but Doctor Who really isn’t the best example to choose when you want to highlight their bad side. Unless you want remove Genesis of the Daleks from the canon and preferred it when the Time Lords were wise, all-seeing omnipotent beings rather than a bunch of lazy, squabbling petty people who the Doctor was desperate to escape from.
Tawdry Quirks
But some of the retcons have to exist because of the problems inherent in writing about ‘near-future’ events, then the show continuing well past that ‘near-future’ date.
Ambassadors of Death was difficult to reconcile with the new series even before “Waters of Mars” effectively wrote it out of canon. One principle the stories generally stick to is that the technology known to the general public should be consistent with that era in the real world (secret tech well beyond what a given time period would have is fine). And a story about the seventh manned Mars mission, which was depicted as having the same amount of media coverage as the Apollo missions, obviously violates that principle, unless you choose to date the UNIT stories much later than 1970s-1980s.
showler
The only absolute canon in Doctor Who is that they are “a mad[person] with a box”. Everything else is flexible because of that one bit of truth.
BrokenEye, the True False Prophet
My headcannon is that the ghost of Old Anakin still exists somewhere, forced to wander the galaxy without purpose after being cast out by forces beyond his comprehension, eventually being driven insane and beginning a twisted, decades-long quest for revenge on reality itself eventually resulting in the retroactive obliteration of the Expanded Universe.
Marsh Maryrose
Darth Vader murdered an entire planet full of people. This is one of the reasons I refuse to acknowledge that the supposed last third of “Return of the Jedi” exists.
Doctor_Who
That was mostly Tarkin. Not that Vader did anything about it, he just stood there. But the idea that he was basically 2nd in command in the Empire was clearly added later; in the first movie Tarkin’s in charge and Vader comes off more as some sort of enforcer.
He sure didn’t look very upset about it though, or raise any objections, so he’s still a prick.
Rabid Rabbit
Well of course he didn’t look upset. He’s only got one facial expression.
Needfuldoer
Star Wars could use some yellow meme subtitles, like the “cries in Spanish” or “stares in Klingon” ones.
Vader: [“Nooooooooooooo”-es internally]
LookingIn
Vader destroyed a planet to keep the rebellion from getting the plans for the Death Star before Tarkin destroyed Alderaan…and the vast majority of the people on that planet were Empire personnel….that alone is enough to justify the reaction
King Daniel
If you’re referring to Scarif, that was Tarkin again. Vader wasn’t even on the Death Star at the time – he was on his personal Star Destroyer.
King Daniel
And if you’re referring to Jedha, that was Tarkin again; Vader wasn’t even in the same system at the time.
Tan
So what you’re saying is that Tarkin is misunderstood and just needs a hug?
Ryek Hvek
a hug, and Two Pretzels
Ed Rhodes
“So, what you’re saying is, I destroy planets because, underneath my mean, heartless, exterior, I just want to be loved? Is that it?”
showler
At least no poetry.
Seregiel
Part of the rule of two in the Sith is that you hide it, so they often put people in positions where they look higher valued than they are.
thejeff
Except nowhere else was it hidden, even in stuff that takes place earlier. Plus the Rule of Two wasn’t even a twinkle in anyone’s eye at that point. “Sith” didn’t even appear in the movie.
The relationship between Vader and the Emperor simply wasn’t clearly defined when the original Star Wars was filmed. or wasn’t defined as it became in later movies.
Vulcanodon
‘Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will…’
ValdVin
My wife is an LCSW and has not seen all the Star Wars. Is that something which will help her help clients?
(I’m kidding, I think.)
Jon Rich
LCSW?
Yumi
Licensed clinical social worker
ValdVin
Yep. And before anyone asks, we didn’t meet that way (plus it’s really unethical). I see a totally different therapist 🙂 .
Stephen Bierce
Psychosomatic
That Boy Needs THERAPY
Purely psychosomatic
That Boy Needs THERAPY…
ValdVin
I thought my wife (and I) had heard all these songs, but I had to search that out. Good one!
Stephen Bierce
When first I heard it it was truly a WTF? moment. But I agree it’s an inspired and entertaining piece.
Stephen Bierce
Did I ever tell you the story about Cowboys?
brute
wow i actually remember that song from hearing it in high school
Hilzabub
Ok, hadn’t heard that, but I really like it. Excellent selection
Kamino Neko
Huh. A song – from Australia – that samples Wayne & Shuster…never thought I’d see that. (Little trivia…Frank Shuster was the cousin of Joe Shuster, co-creator of Superman. Johnny Wayne, on the other hand, was no relation to John Wayne – though neither of them were either John, nor Wayne, by birth!)
LookingIn
Only if they need something to focus their attention onto to do something constructive…trying to figure out hte geopolitical situation of the old republic, the empire, and the new republic/First Order should be enlightening 😀
Marisa Mockery
Only if she specializes in nerds
Yumi
But what are Ruth’s feelings on sand
Doctor_Who
Canadians don’t have any, but they have over 400 feelings for snow!
clif
But the thing is, nobody else can tell the difference.
Roborat
Just like Blue Steel and Magnum.
Catman
Two of my favorites. I hope we see more of them.
(Ruth is cool too I guess)
AnvilPro
Even the animated short one
Bagge
Lucy is knowledgable in the ways of the world.
In the way of MANY worlds, in fact.
MM
Huh. Lucy is apparently this universe’s version of Danny when it comes to Ruth.
Woomy
Thanks for spoiling Starwars
Yumi
I had a real hard time not spoiling some things when we watched A New Hope in English class during my senior year of high school… because kids who didn’t know Star Wars kept making comments about shipping Like and Leia.
Marsh Maryrose
Hey, sibling marriage worked for the Targaryens. Aegon the Conqueror married both of his sisters. Daenerys’s parents were siblings, as were her grandparents, and Dany was raised to assume she would marry her brother when she came of age.
Well…maybe it didn’t work out so well for Dany’s father, aka “The Mad King.”
3oranges
Thanks for spoiling The Magician’s Nephew
Marsh Maryrose
I never thought about this before, but it is true that Frank and Helen were the first King and Queen of Narnia, and they were the only humans in Narnia, so subsequent Kings and Queens of their line were…?
Man, the Bible allegory was even sharper than I imagined.
Jean Cabot
It’s canon that their children married nymphs and river gods.
Andy
Also, the Calormenes came from somewhere across the sea, so there had to be people somewhere.
Needfuldoer
On the other hand, Charles II of Spain.
Ntrovert60
The original poster child for the dangers of inbreeding…
Deanatay
Or, basically, Joffrey.
Marsh Maryrose
Also, King Tut, the last of the Thutmosids. I suspect that GRRM might have used the Thutmosids as one of the models for the Targaryen family tree.
CJ
The Leia Luke Han triangle was a nice moving force of the original three movies. I really don’t get why anyone can get hung up on siblings that haven’t grown up together and are both of age crushing on each other.
Incest taboo is around to keep kids safe from older relatives. Out of that context, it’s just a guilt trip trap that makes religions happy. (When it comes to having kids together, there is a slightly higher probability of both having the same recessive gene than with couplings of people living in the same area for centuries and no one sees this as a reason to not fall for the girl next door).
thejeff
In fact, assuming Force-sensitivity is genetically linked, such pairings would likely result in more and stronger Force users. Anyone who’s worked with animal selective breeding should know it’s a great way to reinforce desired traits. You just have to kill your culls – or at least keep them from breeding.
It would be kind of surprising if no one had ever tried a breeding program.
Assuming they are genetically linked, which the movies both imply and try to move away at various points.
hof1991
Breeding for super mind powers is one of the plot lines of Dune.
CJ
Marion Zimmer Bradley went down that way in the Darkover novels, too. especially Storm Queen.
MatthewTheLucky
Actually, in the E.U., the ancient Dark Jedi were known to practice that with the Sith species.
Delicious Taffy
Species? What’s going on over in that EU?
BBCC
The Sith stole their name from a species that the Lords of the Sith once enslaved.
Roborat
After Disney fucked it up, I no longer care.
Jean Cabot
No, this is weird.
Delicious Taffy
Okay, I see your point and understand what you’re saying. On the other hand, have you considered not promoting incest as Good, Actually?
CJ
I am promoting that crushes, love and sex between consenting adults is a normal thing and people who drag out hitherto unknown genetic connections to shame that need to quit it.
drs
The ingrained incest taboo, Westermarck effect and all, is to keep close relatives from having kids, period, age doesn’t matter. If there’s a lethal recessive in the family then the odds of two carriers having a dead kid is 25%. Beyond that, if you let incest happen it won’t just happen once, and the odds of inbreeding problems shoot way up. A lot different from the girl next door. Plus societies often have mechanism to encourage you to go find boys from another band or village and *not* the one next door.
Broader incest taboos are socially constructed for various reasons. Many Americans find any degree of ‘cousin’ off-putting while Victorians often married their first cousins. Some cultures rule out children of your mother’s sister but not those of your father’s brother, or such… neither of which can be described as “keeping older people from younger ones”.
Charlotte
Umm… I hope this isn’t a serious comment. If you have children with a close relative (parent or sibling in particular) the chances of serious genetic defects are *significantly* increased, even if there was no previous incest in the family. It is thus a really bad idea.
(Obviously over several generations, first or second cousins having children will eventually compound the problem, too.
To avoid this, e.g. Iceland has a data base where couples can check how closely they’re related before having children, because the population is so small. It makes sense for society to ensure that genetic material gets nicely mixed.)
Viktor
Depends on how you define “significant risks”. Brother-sister relationships have lower increase in risk for genetic disorders than a woman over 40’s increased chances of having a child with Down Syndrome.
Charlotte
(This is a reply to CJ’s comment btw)
I’ll add something for illustration just in case people think that the child of close relatives having a genetic defect is still low: In Germany there was a case a while ago where two siblings had four children together, *three of which* were disabled from birth (two mentally and physically, one had a genetic heart defect that could be operated).
I don’t think it should be illegal for any two consenting adults to have a sexual relationship per se, but they shouldn’t have their own children if they are closely related (adoption still works).