actually, “yeah you’re right” saves a LOT of time in the adult world
This would save so many lives right now.
Delicious Taffy
Are the people refusing to admit they’re wrong and literally dying from it really worth saving? They obviously don’t value their own lives (much less the lives of the people they’re harming along the way), so why should we?
Delicious Taffy
(if we’re not talking about COVID-deniers, I apologise for the outburst.)
A Red Balloon
Hey Delicious!
What happened to your purple Regalli costume? I was kinda liking it….
Decidedly Orthogonal
Oh absolutely, but they’re not just killing themselves, they’re taking others down with them and creating a broad exposure front for new variations to attack the vaccinated.
Ideally, with everyone(ish) vaccinated, the virus would have the fewest viable hosts to spread and would get bottled up like the Battle of Thermopylae. Instead, the battle is raging all over the world, but for no good reason at all, in the midst of a globally enlarged Battle of the Somme, USA has opted to have their own civil-war scale battle with the virus as well. ? With a front *this* broadly exposed, it’s no wonder variants are popping up. It’s even killing some fully vaccinated folks. They did their part. So since we won’t put down the anti-vax crowd, our only option is to work on convincing them or take away their right to say no, since their liberty currently *is* meaning our death.
Delicious Taffy
It’s true. I was maybe too broad in my initial post. Their victims are absolutely deserving of pity and mourning, because they didn’t sign up for that.
Decidedly Orthogonal
No no. I totally understand your position. I feel that way too. I’m just trying to think bigger, and I know you are too by your considered response.
How fucked up things are though, that I can reasonably take an anti-, anti-, anti-vaxxer stance, and defend it and make it sound reasonable? Like seriously, what timeline branches were fried, to make _this_ our universe?
Rainhat
[Insert Dickens quote about “surplus population” here.]
Clif
Surplus population is Solient Green. – Charles Dickens
eh, whatever
Soylent
Clif
eh, whatever
(thanks)
Moonie
1 – intrinsic value of life
2 – they could realize later they were wrong
3 – for this children, elderly, and sick family
That all being said, if a hospital gets to capacity, I do think they should go to the back of the line…
zee
Because they’re dragging other innocent people down with them by infecting others, including those who actually can’t get vaccinated
fridge_logic
Their idiocy has killed other people too though. Fewer now that most people can get the vaccine. But some can’t and even the vaccinated are still put at risk by Covid driven Hospital congestion. In areas where Hospitals are overbooked people with Cancer have been getting turned away from treatment. :/
We are all in this together. Much as we might like to ignore it.
Tired of It
It would at least save other people’s lives. Vaccines don’t work (or work as well) on people with immunosuppressing conditions. I got the Pfizer vaccine, but my body’s antibody response to it was less than half of typical people’s.
People with weak immune systems have a 1/10 chance of dying from breakthrough infections. That number would be different if everyone was vaccinated.
Pickman
But they are not just dying. They are killing.
Yotomoe
I wish “agree to disagree” could be more common too. There’s times were I’ll concede but I also don’t think I’m wrong. I haven’t been convinced I just don’t wanna fight anymore.
A Red Balloon
In retrospect, humans shouldn’t feel too bad about not doing it more often.
I mean, nine billion piles of proteins and lipids and nuclei resulting from billions of years of happy accidents can only do so many things right.
Clif
The trouble with people criticizing adult “NO WAY – UR RONG AN I’LL PROVE IT” is there is no way to prove them wrong without proving them right.
Moonie
Remembering this next time I f*** up
Deanatay
Unfortunately, this is often what your opponents want. They don’t want to convince you – they just want you to shut up and let them do what they want.
The cat peed on it and it doubles as a lethal throwing weapon
Clif
That …. sounds much less appetizing.
anonymsly
Dwarf bread is never appetizing. It exists to make other things more appetizing. Slugs. Tree bark. Your own shoes. Hair clippings in mud sauce. There’s delicious food everywhere when the other option is dwarf bread.
Low blow, sure, and yeah kind of accurate. But it’s also completely flawed with the entire premise being, “you are believing the wrong way.” At the end of the day, this is the problem with faith. There are dangers with it, but you can’t really tell one person that their beliefs are wrong, while someone else’s are right. There’s no internal objective moral framework that can be constructed to prove to _someone else_ that they are believing wrong.
I kinda wonder what Becky thinks her beliefs are anchored on. Certainly, “not letting daddy take her T-bird away,” ain’t a great reason to hold onto a religion either Becky.
But lastly, I don’t recall Joyce’s faith being based on who she’s better than. Her whole schtick at first was how accepting she was. The real problem for Becky now is she seems to feel Joyce’s rejection of that _faith_ includes the rejection of it’s followers. This does match sort of with some of what Joyce was yodelling, but Joyce’s efforts with Becky now, show that clearly isn’t 100% the case.
So’s Becky. I think Andy was fishing for the A-word there.
Andy
Honestly, I don’t know what the quiet part is for Joyce. All I know is that it’s not gonna be a good look for her.
Thag Simmons
But the thing is Dina was that way when Joyce met her, pretty outspokenly so. So even though Joyce now believes basically the same stuff (with a weaker understanding of it, admittedly) she still perceives Dina as believing different things.
Remember, when she met Dina, Joyce was still a hardcore creationist. Even after she became an atheist, she still sort-of kept hold of some of her false scientific ideals (e.g. micro evolution, etc.), right up until she started her Science project with Joe (just a day or 2 ago in-story).
That sort of indoctrination might have a lot of long-term side-effects, such as finding it ‘weird’ to agree with Dina (even though you have now rejected all the scientific nonsense)
Joyce is experiencing a realization that just feels weird and wrong to her. When you start throwing off the indoctrination that’s been with you since you were a child, realizing that you now believe the same things as someone who was your complete opposite only a few short months ago feels wrong regardless of how you feel about that person as an individual.
I swear the comments sections on these strips are stunningly devoid of understanding for a teenager who is dealing with the collapse of the entire way she thought the world worked.
No fuckin’ joke, there are still some days that I’m talking to/about someone and I associate them with atheism, and the conditioning sunk deep into my brain triggers and reminds me to hate/fear/redeem that person.
When Joyce came to college, Dina was (intellectually) everything she’d been raised to fear. Smart, informed, entirely non-indulgent of Creationist pseudo-logic, and militantly outspoken against it.
Even if they became good friends since then, that is STILL a tough pill to swallow.
Although I personally think that “militantly” is a rather charged word to use here, this is all totally legit.
It’s like AGONY to know and feel your brain constantly lying to you after years of conditioning.
Jon
…huh. Didn’t expect to demonstrate how deep the tendrils can go in a comment about how deep the tendrils can go.
“Militant atheist” was absolutely in the big approved list of words.
A Red Balloon
Sorry if I was being a little sensitive there. I just personally feel that “militant” has rather authoritarian undertones, when Dina was appealing to science and reason.
I wasn’t trying to call you out on anything, it’s totally OK to use “militantly”, I was just trying to say that I would have personally selected a different word, like “critically”.
726 thoughts on “Too”
Ana Chronistic
Becky breaking out the TRUTH STICKS
King Daniel
Joyce doesn’t want Becky to sell her truth sticks
Andy
Joyce wants to go home and rethink her life.
Clif
Boy that Becky. Complaining that Dina doesn’t lie to her or make fun of her behind her back. You’d think Becky would tell Dina that to her face.
Ana Chronistic
actually, “yeah you’re right” saves a LOT of time in the adult world, MUCH more than “NO WAY UR RONG AN I’LL PROVE IT”
Decidedly Orthogonal
This would save so many lives right now.
Delicious Taffy
Are the people refusing to admit they’re wrong and literally dying from it really worth saving? They obviously don’t value their own lives (much less the lives of the people they’re harming along the way), so why should we?
Delicious Taffy
(if we’re not talking about COVID-deniers, I apologise for the outburst.)
A Red Balloon
Hey Delicious!
What happened to your purple Regalli costume? I was kinda liking it….
Decidedly Orthogonal
Oh absolutely, but they’re not just killing themselves, they’re taking others down with them and creating a broad exposure front for new variations to attack the vaccinated.
Ideally, with everyone(ish) vaccinated, the virus would have the fewest viable hosts to spread and would get bottled up like the Battle of Thermopylae. Instead, the battle is raging all over the world, but for no good reason at all, in the midst of a globally enlarged Battle of the Somme, USA has opted to have their own civil-war scale battle with the virus as well. ? With a front *this* broadly exposed, it’s no wonder variants are popping up. It’s even killing some fully vaccinated folks. They did their part. So since we won’t put down the anti-vax crowd, our only option is to work on convincing them or take away their right to say no, since their liberty currently *is* meaning our death.
Delicious Taffy
It’s true. I was maybe too broad in my initial post. Their victims are absolutely deserving of pity and mourning, because they didn’t sign up for that.
Decidedly Orthogonal
No no. I totally understand your position. I feel that way too. I’m just trying to think bigger, and I know you are too by your considered response.
How fucked up things are though, that I can reasonably take an anti-, anti-, anti-vaxxer stance, and defend it and make it sound reasonable? Like seriously, what timeline branches were fried, to make _this_ our universe?
Rainhat
[Insert Dickens quote about “surplus population” here.]
Clif
Surplus population is Solient Green. – Charles Dickens
eh, whatever
Soylent
Clif
eh, whatever
(thanks)
Moonie
1 – intrinsic value of life
2 – they could realize later they were wrong
3 – for this children, elderly, and sick family
That all being said, if a hospital gets to capacity, I do think they should go to the back of the line…
zee
Because they’re dragging other innocent people down with them by infecting others, including those who actually can’t get vaccinated
fridge_logic
Their idiocy has killed other people too though. Fewer now that most people can get the vaccine. But some can’t and even the vaccinated are still put at risk by Covid driven Hospital congestion. In areas where Hospitals are overbooked people with Cancer have been getting turned away from treatment. :/
We are all in this together. Much as we might like to ignore it.
Tired of It
It would at least save other people’s lives. Vaccines don’t work (or work as well) on people with immunosuppressing conditions. I got the Pfizer vaccine, but my body’s antibody response to it was less than half of typical people’s.
People with weak immune systems have a 1/10 chance of dying from breakthrough infections. That number would be different if everyone was vaccinated.
Pickman
But they are not just dying. They are killing.
Yotomoe
I wish “agree to disagree” could be more common too. There’s times were I’ll concede but I also don’t think I’m wrong. I haven’t been convinced I just don’t wanna fight anymore.
A Red Balloon
In retrospect, humans shouldn’t feel too bad about not doing it more often.
I mean, nine billion piles of proteins and lipids and nuclei resulting from billions of years of happy accidents can only do so many things right.
Clif
The trouble with people criticizing adult “NO WAY – UR RONG AN I’LL PROVE IT” is there is no way to prove them wrong without proving them right.
Moonie
Remembering this next time I f*** up
Deanatay
Unfortunately, this is often what your opponents want. They don’t want to convince you – they just want you to shut up and let them do what they want.
Which, of course, is what gets people killed.
Ana Chronistic
I said often
For instance, “Dad said you talk too much”
Kid: “NO WAY I DON’T TALK TOO MUCH WHEN DO I TALK”
*argument ensues*
Vs.
Kid: “yeah, you’re right”
*discussion dies*
stuff where discussion is unproductive, like in almost any business meeting
Ana Chronistic
Wait, I didn’t say often
Yeah, you’re right idk
Siva
Generally true. Generally false when narcissism is involved, but even a broken clock is right twice a day, assuming analog.
Hilzabub
We have a broken analog clock with a variable number of seconds per minute. I’m not sure it’s right more than twice a week.
Ntrovert60
Not for the first time, Ana wins the Internet…
Clif
I like to believe she has a huge closet where she keeps all her spare Internets.
Thag Simmons
Truth Sticks feels like it could be either a mediocre snack brand or a bludgeoning weapon.
ThunderNight
maybe both depending on how durable the snack is
King Daniel
“The food here is…*taps*…weapons-grade.”
Doctor_Who
Like Dwarf Bread?
Thag Simmons
The cat peed on it and it doubles as a lethal throwing weapon
Clif
That …. sounds much less appetizing.
anonymsly
Dwarf bread is never appetizing. It exists to make other things more appetizing. Slugs. Tree bark. Your own shoes. Hair clippings in mud sauce. There’s delicious food everywhere when the other option is dwarf bread.
Clif
My theory is that Truth Sticks is a brand of baseball bat that Sarah uses.
Victor
In the IT business we refer to it as a LART or a clue-by-four.
James
Truth Sticks are the snack food. The bludgeoning weapon is the Chair Leg of Truth.
Sirksome
That was kind of a low blow there…and accurate…kind of.
Decidedly Orthogonal
Low blow, sure, and yeah kind of accurate. But it’s also completely flawed with the entire premise being, “you are believing the wrong way.” At the end of the day, this is the problem with faith. There are dangers with it, but you can’t really tell one person that their beliefs are wrong, while someone else’s are right. There’s no internal objective moral framework that can be constructed to prove to _someone else_ that they are believing wrong.
Clif
Empirical evidence is just an arbitrary preference.
Decidedly Orthogonal
I kinda wonder what Becky thinks her beliefs are anchored on. Certainly, “not letting daddy take her T-bird away,” ain’t a great reason to hold onto a religion either Becky.
But lastly, I don’t recall Joyce’s faith being based on who she’s better than. Her whole schtick at first was how accepting she was. The real problem for Becky now is she seems to feel Joyce’s rejection of that _faith_ includes the rejection of it’s followers. This does match sort of with some of what Joyce was yodelling, but Joyce’s efforts with Becky now, show that clearly isn’t 100% the case.
Andy
What’s wrong with Dina, Joyce? Say the quiet part loud, just this once. We’ll only judge you a lot.
Thag Simmons
She’s an ‘evilutionist‘
King Daniel
So’s Becky. I think Andy was fishing for the A-word there.
Andy
Honestly, I don’t know what the quiet part is for Joyce. All I know is that it’s not gonna be a good look for her.
Thag Simmons
But the thing is Dina was that way when Joyce met her, pretty outspokenly so. So even though Joyce now believes basically the same stuff (with a weaker understanding of it, admittedly) she still perceives Dina as believing different things.
someone
A fault indeed, everyone knows that Plutonia is of much higher quality throughout.
segnosaur
Remember, when she met Dina, Joyce was still a hardcore creationist. Even after she became an atheist, she still sort-of kept hold of some of her false scientific ideals (e.g. micro evolution, etc.), right up until she started her Science project with Joe (just a day or 2 ago in-story).
That sort of indoctrination might have a lot of long-term side-effects, such as finding it ‘weird’ to agree with Dina (even though you have now rejected all the scientific nonsense)
QuixoticMaunster
Nothing is “wrong” with Dina.
Joyce is experiencing a realization that just feels weird and wrong to her. When you start throwing off the indoctrination that’s been with you since you were a child, realizing that you now believe the same things as someone who was your complete opposite only a few short months ago feels wrong regardless of how you feel about that person as an individual.
I swear the comments sections on these strips are stunningly devoid of understanding for a teenager who is dealing with the collapse of the entire way she thought the world worked.
A Red Balloon
This is all totally lit!!!
I really wish I could upvote this!
Doctor_Who
“Dina, I believe the same things as you.”
“You believe that Lucky Charms should be considered a valid pizza topping?”
“Dina, I believe some of the same things as you.”
A Red Balloon
Certainly when she’s a carnivore, she takes the opportunity to eat more savory, meaty pizza toppings:
https://www.dumbingofage.com/2015/comic/book-5/04-walking-with-dina/sausage/
https://www.dumbingofage.com/2016/comic/book-7/01-glower-vacuum/pawing/
But I guess as long as “foods are touching”, it’s a no-go for Joyce.
Tan
Joyce simultaneously agrees and disagrees regarding sausage. https://www.dumbingofage.com/2017/comic/book-7/02-everything-youve-ever-wanted/broughtcher/
Reltzik
“Isn’t that one of those cereals with like 20 DIFFERENT types of things mixed into it?”
“But they are all just marshmallows.”
“Different shapes! And colors!”
“Yes but at their most basic they’re the sa-”
“YOUR CEREAL IS EVIL!”
powerpowerpow
And thus Joyce becomes religious again; not because she found proof in God, but because only Satan could have created Lucky Charms.
JBento
I thought leprechauns created Lucky Charms?
Clif
Yes, but they were under contract at the time.
JBento
Made a deal with the devil, did they?
Clif
A cereal company, but the difference is negligible.
Jamie
General Mills? Yes.
JBento
Could be worse, could be Nestle.
Nono
…really, panel 5 Joyce? That’s terrible timing for an epiphany.
Jon
No fuckin’ joke, there are still some days that I’m talking to/about someone and I associate them with atheism, and the conditioning sunk deep into my brain triggers and reminds me to hate/fear/redeem that person.
When Joyce came to college, Dina was (intellectually) everything she’d been raised to fear. Smart, informed, entirely non-indulgent of Creationist pseudo-logic, and militantly outspoken against it.
Even if they became good friends since then, that is STILL a tough pill to swallow.
A Red Balloon
Although I personally think that “militantly” is a rather charged word to use here, this is all totally legit.
It’s like AGONY to know and feel your brain constantly lying to you after years of conditioning.
Jon
…huh. Didn’t expect to demonstrate how deep the tendrils can go in a comment about how deep the tendrils can go.
“Militant atheist” was absolutely in the big approved list of words.
A Red Balloon
Sorry if I was being a little sensitive there. I just personally feel that “militant” has rather authoritarian undertones, when Dina was appealing to science and reason.
I wasn’t trying to call you out on anything, it’s totally OK to use “militantly”, I was just trying to say that I would have personally selected a different word, like “critically”.
anonymsly
Dina and Joyce are not good friends. I would say they’re not friends at all. They tolerate each other because they both love Becky.
Shade
I don’t think Dina has issues with Joyce to the point where she’d consider herself tolerating her presence. She’s probably indifferent.