That is the worst Ylvis song. Gimme the one about knots instead. Or season 1 of Kongen Befaler.
zims
“When there’s war and all is hell, send in Jan Egeland!”
Decidedly Orthogonal
Over-played maybe, but personally I maintain there is no “worst” Ylvis song.
Skorpeyon
If it’s the worst, but the most viral and the one that made them well-known, maybe that’s just, like, your opinion. 😉 I enjoy it. I haven’t listened to any of their other songs. I realize I probably should based on this recommendation. If I like their “worst” song, I’d probably like their other work.
Decidedly Orthogonal
It all tends to be tongue-in-cheek, but mad brilliant. Check out Someone like me for a great example. They are insanely talented.
Felian
And of course:
WHAT’S THE MEANING OF STONEHENGE?!? 😀
Lilith Rose
Honestly, not one of their worst songs. It was their chart-topper for a reason. What made it so great though wasn’t the music. It was the fact it was probably the most epic troll they ever concocted.
Talk Show Host: “So what inspired you to make the song?”
Ylvis: “We wanted to teach kids about the sounds animal makes.
Song: Literally titled “What does the fox say”
Google in response to “What sound does the fox make”: “Yiff”
Google in response to “Yiff”: “Enable 18+ content?”
Furries: “Yay it’s a furry song!”
Ylvis: “No it’s not.”
Music video: Literally has Ylvis wearing fur-suits.
Song: Made in hip-hop genre
Song: Has fox singing nonsense lines from various Hip-hop artists.
Song: “Will you speak in morse?”
Song: Has Morse code that says, “Quality Control… Quality Control? Is this thing even on?”
Song: Has Fox singing gibberish while people get drunk
Media: Has Fox news spouting gibberish to people who can only be drunk
And that’s just some of it.
For those who don’t know, a long tradition going back before the Vikings is entendres. In Norse myth, Odin’s greatest gift to humanity was literally literacy, literally. This resulted in a Viking-era belief that entendres were divine in nature, and the more entendres something had, the more important it was. (For example, the word “Viking” has more than 5 meanings, including Kings of the Sea, Death to Kings, Commoner Kings, waterway finder, village-founders, and more… side note, this creates a real headache for Etymologists who seem to insist on only one or two origins for every word, used to natural evolution of language instead of OCD viking linguists word-building construction of language who, too this day, can’t seem to wrap their heads around the complexity of Norse words and are obsessed with seeing them as “dumb barbarians” and keep trying to find dumb reasons for clever words)
By blending so many messages and concepts and ideas and critiques and criticisms and their joys into a single song, Ylvis epitomizes the Norse tradition of multiple entendres.
In that regard, “What does the Fox say” is a head-alien-damned masterpiece.
To be fair, I’ve always strictly defined “sex” as “uncovered genital-to-genital interaction”, so by my definition, what Joe & Joyce have done isn’t sex, and whether Dina & Becky have had sex depends on whether or not they have scissored, which I do not know, because I have not accessed that consent.
Other ‘sex’ (like oral sex or finger sex or phone sex) under my understanding, are modifying adjectives, that make it so the target word is no longer what it was, but adjacent to that thing, like how ‘republican Jesus’ isn’t Jesus and ‘taco salad’ isn’t exactly a taco or a salad but something in-between.
Genesis 19:8: “Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.”
So clearly, virginity is having known man; and lesbian sex does not change your virginity status. Also Lot’s daughters were not under the shadow of Lot’s roof for some reason. Biblical morality!
That Joy answered “no, you’ve had sex with Dina” to Becky’s question shows either that she’s outgrown that part of her bible indoctrination; or that this part of Genesis had been edited out of the bibles she had.
(Probably the later; I’ve long suspected American bibles to only contain the bit from the Leviticus where it says it’s okay to hate gays ‘cuz I’ve never seen American Christian political groups care about anything else.)
It’s definitely in there, but I’m not convinced many Christians have read the whole thing. If they have, they can get some pretty arbitrary ideas about which parts of Leviticus should still be enforced.
Obviously not the part about mixed fabrics, or about eating shellfish. Or the part about women menstruating being put away from everyone else not menstruating.
drs
“not the part about mixed fabrics…”
All those rules mentioned, and most of the others, are part of the Jewish covenant, not general laws for humanity. So most (at least; arguable gray area if you’re converted from Judaism) Christians don’t have to abide by them. This isn’t Christian special pleading: Jews would say the same thing. Christians do tend to think the Ten Commandments are still binding; Jews think gentiles should obey the Noahide laws; neither set of laws abjures mixed fabric or shellfish.
Of course, Christians have “love your neighbor as yourself”, “sell all you have and give it to the poor”, and “don’t get divorced” as laws that _should_ be binding on them.
thejeff
Those distinctions are difficult to pull out of the text of the Bible itself. They’re more clearly defined in the Talmud.
So it’s kind of special pleading, it’s just old special pleading. 🙂
But in this context, it’s even more special pleading. Christians do not rely on the Noahide laws, the Talmud or other ancient Jewish distinctions. Those Christians who are obsessed with sexual rules, like women’s virginity and homosexuality, go back to the parts of the Jewish covenant that forbid them, while ignoring other parts they’re not concerned with, like the mixed fabrics and shellfish.
Wereg
Having spent most of my teenage years as an edgy pre-reddit athiest growing up in the deep south: Most Christians down there only know the parts of the bible that someone has read aloud to them. Most folks don’t know about the passages that would conflict with their ways of life and thinking.
Maybe even more sadly, most folks don’t know about the crabsolutely hilarious bits from the bible. You can’t read about the two bears or the time God popped out of a bush to put a dude in a headlock without chuckling.
thakoru
Or the time the apostle Paul gave a sermon so long and boring someone fell out a window and died. (He got better.) (Acts 20:7–12)
Alina
I’m particularly fond of the part in Exodus when Aaron makes the golden calf, and when Moses questions him about it, says, “Well, I just threw some gold in the kiln, and out came this golden calf…um.” ??️??
What if you both stare at each other so intensely you get off without touching or speaking? Not saying it’s not sex just want to know what kind it would be.
I assume you’re on about the spaghetti scene, so I’ll be the brave one and say the breakfast scene with the donut and suspiciously clear coffee is sexier. Breakfast bongoes got more pins on their strap.
Slartibeast Button, BIA
For the spaghetti scene and a different webcomic, that’s sort of how Marten’s parents met:
“You know that scene in Lady and the Tramp where they’re slurping up both ends of a noodle and end up kissing?”
“It was like that, but with a line of cocaine instead of pasta.”
I can’t believe that strip is already twelve years old. It’s older than the comic was when it went up!
Laura
Also, Hot Shots! (1991)
Steamweed
When Harry Met Sally
Miri
There’s a new advert for something where the actors from that go back to the same place and she has something really good again, and another woman wants to have what she’s having.
I have no idea what it’s an advert for.
Laura
There’s an advertisement for shampoo like that. Something something “botanicals”. Takes place in a supermarket aisle.
346 thoughts on “Salacious sex goss”
Ana Chronistic
does Joyce or does Joyce not know about foxes
particularly the yiffy ones
Laura
Plays *What Does the Fox Say?” on the hacked dorm-room boombox…
Formedras
That is the worst Ylvis song. Gimme the one about knots instead. Or season 1 of Kongen Befaler.
zims
“When there’s war and all is hell, send in Jan Egeland!”
Decidedly Orthogonal
Over-played maybe, but personally I maintain there is no “worst” Ylvis song.
Skorpeyon
If it’s the worst, but the most viral and the one that made them well-known, maybe that’s just, like, your opinion. 😉 I enjoy it. I haven’t listened to any of their other songs. I realize I probably should based on this recommendation. If I like their “worst” song, I’d probably like their other work.
Decidedly Orthogonal
It all tends to be tongue-in-cheek, but mad brilliant. Check out Someone like me for a great example. They are insanely talented.
Felian
And of course:
WHAT’S THE MEANING OF STONEHENGE?!? 😀
Lilith Rose
Honestly, not one of their worst songs. It was their chart-topper for a reason. What made it so great though wasn’t the music. It was the fact it was probably the most epic troll they ever concocted.
Talk Show Host: “So what inspired you to make the song?”
Ylvis: “We wanted to teach kids about the sounds animal makes.
Song: Literally titled “What does the fox say”
Google in response to “What sound does the fox make”: “Yiff”
Google in response to “Yiff”: “Enable 18+ content?”
Furries: “Yay it’s a furry song!”
Ylvis: “No it’s not.”
Music video: Literally has Ylvis wearing fur-suits.
Song: Made in hip-hop genre
Song: Has fox singing nonsense lines from various Hip-hop artists.
Song: “Will you speak in morse?”
Song: Has Morse code that says, “Quality Control… Quality Control? Is this thing even on?”
Song: Has Fox singing gibberish while people get drunk
Media: Has Fox news spouting gibberish to people who can only be drunk
And that’s just some of it.
For those who don’t know, a long tradition going back before the Vikings is entendres. In Norse myth, Odin’s greatest gift to humanity was literally literacy, literally. This resulted in a Viking-era belief that entendres were divine in nature, and the more entendres something had, the more important it was. (For example, the word “Viking” has more than 5 meanings, including Kings of the Sea, Death to Kings, Commoner Kings, waterway finder, village-founders, and more… side note, this creates a real headache for Etymologists who seem to insist on only one or two origins for every word, used to natural evolution of language instead of OCD viking linguists word-building construction of language who, too this day, can’t seem to wrap their heads around the complexity of Norse words and are obsessed with seeing them as “dumb barbarians” and keep trying to find dumb reasons for clever words)
By blending so many messages and concepts and ideas and critiques and criticisms and their joys into a single song, Ylvis epitomizes the Norse tradition of multiple entendres.
In that regard, “What does the Fox say” is a head-alien-damned masterpiece.
Felian
I enjoy your infodump!!
IntangibleMatter
Ayy Ana’s back! She’s okay!
True Survivor
All hail! Her majesty returns!
Clif
As always there was great relief as the universe returned to it’s proper shape.
Opus the Poet
Ain’t it wonderful?
Nono
Well Zootopia 2 is going to come out so
Pocky
She’s just starting out on the horny training
yiffing is like; chapter 12 or something.
Steamweed
Long has it been since I’ve seen “yiff” in print. :O
Laura
Nobody tell Randall Munroe!
https://m.xkcd.com/919/
Steamweed
Ahh, an ancient horror. Long has it been since I’ve thought of that.
Carystas
I’ve been worried about you ? hadn’t seen you in a while and you hadn’t popped up as first comment lol
Thag Simmons
That’s a good Joyce face right there.
Benjamin Geiger
That’s
joyce.exe has stopped responding.zagreus
Also: Joyce imagining lesbian sex, but it’s just her and Dorothy doing totally normal bestie things, and … gosh darn it — Becky can never know,,,
showler
Perhaps Joyce is imagining but with herself and Dorothy substituted in?
Opus the Poet
Yeppers, the face of “I need to apologize to so many people. But I don’t know how.”
shadowcell
the retrograde wheelbarrow?
Steamweed
“Triple reverse Cow-Girl-Friday” position.
ValdVin
Is that on the balance beam or the vault?
Steamweed
The uneven bars.
Eric
Something involving a cloaca?
Sajuuk-Khar
Becky: *Fist of the North Star voice* YOUR HANKY WAS ALREADY PANKIED
Joyce: OHHHH NOOOOOOO *head explodes*
jeffepp
That’s not usually the part that explodes when you use fisting like that.
Decidedly Orthogonal
Feels the same though… just in a good way.
RassilonTDavros
Was gonna make the same reference but your version is better
Kim
Omae wa mou Fucked-eiru! ✨
DJTsurugi
my favorite thing is once again, Becky was underestimated. god I want to be her when I grow up. ~<3
GholaHalleck
Becky’s fast becoming my favorite. a nice patina of nuance and personal honesty over the goof troopin’..
Lilith Rose
To be fair, I’ve always strictly defined “sex” as “uncovered genital-to-genital interaction”, so by my definition, what Joe & Joyce have done isn’t sex, and whether Dina & Becky have had sex depends on whether or not they have scissored, which I do not know, because I have not accessed that consent.
Other ‘sex’ (like oral sex or finger sex or phone sex) under my understanding, are modifying adjectives, that make it so the target word is no longer what it was, but adjacent to that thing, like how ‘republican Jesus’ isn’t Jesus and ‘taco salad’ isn’t exactly a taco or a salad but something in-between.
Wereg
Heteronormative concept of virginity: Shattered.
someone
Genesis 19:8: “Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.”
So clearly, virginity is having known man; and lesbian sex does not change your virginity status. Also Lot’s daughters were not under the shadow of Lot’s roof for some reason. Biblical morality!
That Joy answered “no, you’ve had sex with Dina” to Becky’s question shows either that she’s outgrown that part of her bible indoctrination; or that this part of Genesis had been edited out of the bibles she had.
(Probably the later; I’ve long suspected American bibles to only contain the bit from the Leviticus where it says it’s okay to hate gays ‘cuz I’ve never seen American Christian political groups care about anything else.)
BadRoad
It’s definitely in there, but I’m not convinced many Christians have read the whole thing. If they have, they can get some pretty arbitrary ideas about which parts of Leviticus should still be enforced.
Opus the Poet
Obviously not the part about mixed fabrics, or about eating shellfish. Or the part about women menstruating being put away from everyone else not menstruating.
drs
“not the part about mixed fabrics…”
All those rules mentioned, and most of the others, are part of the Jewish covenant, not general laws for humanity. So most (at least; arguable gray area if you’re converted from Judaism) Christians don’t have to abide by them. This isn’t Christian special pleading: Jews would say the same thing. Christians do tend to think the Ten Commandments are still binding; Jews think gentiles should obey the Noahide laws; neither set of laws abjures mixed fabric or shellfish.
Of course, Christians have “love your neighbor as yourself”, “sell all you have and give it to the poor”, and “don’t get divorced” as laws that _should_ be binding on them.
thejeff
Those distinctions are difficult to pull out of the text of the Bible itself. They’re more clearly defined in the Talmud.
So it’s kind of special pleading, it’s just old special pleading. 🙂
But in this context, it’s even more special pleading. Christians do not rely on the Noahide laws, the Talmud or other ancient Jewish distinctions. Those Christians who are obsessed with sexual rules, like women’s virginity and homosexuality, go back to the parts of the Jewish covenant that forbid them, while ignoring other parts they’re not concerned with, like the mixed fabrics and shellfish.
Wereg
Having spent most of my teenage years as an edgy pre-reddit athiest growing up in the deep south: Most Christians down there only know the parts of the bible that someone has read aloud to them. Most folks don’t know about the passages that would conflict with their ways of life and thinking.
Maybe even more sadly, most folks don’t know about the crabsolutely hilarious bits from the bible. You can’t read about the two bears or the time God popped out of a bush to put a dude in a headlock without chuckling.
thakoru
Or the time the apostle Paul gave a sermon so long and boring someone fell out a window and died. (He got better.) (Acts 20:7–12)
Alina
I’m particularly fond of the part in Exodus when Aaron makes the golden calf, and when Moses questions him about it, says, “Well, I just threw some gold in the kiln, and out came this golden calf…um.” ??️??
staszu13
Joyce Face
Steamweed
How long before we see it as a Gravatar?
Ryan
Not long, I should think.
Steamweed
Well played!
mindbleach
Kneejobs?
mindbleach
God I hope I correctly remembered that weird nonsense Joyce printed out for Dorothy to sort.
Steamweed
Elbowjobs. As shown in the historical documentary The Rocky Horror Picture Show.
Slartibeast Button, BIA
Not that anyone asked me, but if two or more people engage in activity intended to cause at least one of them to have an orgasm, it is sex.
Sirksome
What if you both stare at each other so intensely you get off without touching or speaking? Not saying it’s not sex just want to know what kind it would be.
Slartibeast Button, BIA
Psychicsex, a lower-tech version of phonesex* or cybersex.
(Now I recall that sexy eating scene in, umm, some movie.)
*Is that still a thing?
Taffy
Could you find it in your heart to remember which movie this was?
M!a
“9½ Weeks”, I think.
Taffy
It’s been
Sajuuk-Khar
9 1/2 WEEKS SINCE YA LOOKED AT ME
COCKED YOUR HEAD TO THE SIDE AND SAID “HE FINGERED ME”
Steamweed
+1 point for you
and painted shark women
dammit why are your comments always so cultured *cries*
Tawnee
Lady And The Tramp maybe.
Taffy
I assume you’re on about the spaghetti scene, so I’ll be the brave one and say the breakfast scene with the donut and suspiciously clear coffee is sexier. Breakfast bongoes got more pins on their strap.
Slartibeast Button, BIA
For the spaghetti scene and a different webcomic, that’s sort of how Marten’s parents met:
“You know that scene in Lady and the Tramp where they’re slurping up both ends of a noodle and end up kissing?”
“It was like that, but with a line of cocaine instead of pasta.”
“It was the ’70s! We didn’t know any better!”
https://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2386
Needfuldoer
I can’t believe that strip is already twelve years old. It’s older than the comic was when it went up!
Laura
Also, Hot Shots! (1991)
Steamweed
When Harry Met Sally
Miri
There’s a new advert for something where the actors from that go back to the same place and she has something really good again, and another woman wants to have what she’s having.
I have no idea what it’s an advert for.
Laura
There’s an advertisement for shampoo like that. Something something “botanicals”. Takes place in a supermarket aisle.
Slartibeast Button, BIA
I was thinking of “Tom Jones”* from 1963:
* No relation to the singer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NLhWVLiF68
Meagan