Maybe Jason is out getting knighted by a king?
“In the name of my most Royal Majesty, I knight thee! (strikes Jason over the head with his sceptre) “Arise, Sir Loin of Beef!”
(strike) “Arise, Earl of Cloves!”
(strike) “Arise, Duke of Brittingham!”
(strike) “Arise, Baron of Munchausen!”
(strike) “Arise, Essence of Myrrh!”
(strike) “Milk of Magnesia”
(strike) “Quarter of Ten!”
Charles Philip Arthur George (Prince Charles)
William Arthur Philip Louis (Prince William)
Henry Charles Albert David (Prince Harry)
George Alexander Louis (Prince George)
Charlotte Elizabeth Diana (Princess Charlotte)
Sooo basically they just slap a bunch of random, generic forenames together in the most awkward, clunky sequence possible?
I mean, even going along with the theme of “a list of common forenames”, their approach is just lazy and lacking in any sense of poetry and charm. Consider alternatives such as Wilbur Peacock Davis and Marianne Kinsey Sage. Love them, hate them, at least they roll off the tongue and stick to memory better than Henry Charles Albert David and Charlotte Elizabeth Diana. -.-;
(And yes, Peacock is an actual boy’s name. It’s not even remotely common as a name, but I’m giving it a pass on grounds of being familiar as a general word. 😛)
Lamia
I’m gonna play devils advocate and point out the royal names are largely hereditary. Charles is the name of the guy next in line for the throne. Phillip is the Queen’s husband. Diana is the name of Charlotte’a grandmother. Albert is a previously king. It’s a fairly common naming convention in the U.K; my brother’a full name is [Paternal Grandfather] [Maternal Granddather] [Mother’s Maiden Name] [Surname].
SgtWadeyWilson
Yeah, but it’s still boring.
I much prefer: [The two names my Grandmother used to yell at my Father with, despite neither of them being in his full name] [One of my Mother’s favorite characters from the Shannara books] [Surname].
HeySo
I actually contemplated mentioning the historical basis myself, but it wasn’t really relevant to my point that modern nobility names are still ungaily things, and should go out the way of royal intra- and intermarriage, and other outdated concepts of lineage.
The issue isn’t the generic nature of the names, it’s that they flow together poorly and thus lack both appeal and ease of recognition. Tradition can be referenced to death, but if we’re contemplating impressions of regality, such a naming scheme doesn’t lend itself to such things. It does, however, readily lend itself to less favorable recollections of past royal intramarriages..
After all, if the royal family was marrying out more, then following that naming scheme, their names should inherently become a lot more interesting and distinct and diverse over time.
More relevant is that another notable naming consideration of the past is the adjustment of names to fit flow- ie, Davis instead of David is clearly still a tribute, but may make for better naming flow.
Charlotte Lizbeth Diane, for example, could have made for an alternative to Charlotte Elizabeth Diana. In that vein, to emphasize the point, Charlotte is itself a feminine form of Charlot, which in turn is a variation of Charles.
It really does feel awkward in its current implementation, in any case. 😛
Want to sympathize with Walky for going through troubles, but actually annoyed with him for forgetting the name of the guy who is actually willing to help
He does want to help Walky, but it’s not entirely altruistic. It’s his job, it’s for pride after the other T.A. and Sal have called his work into question, and Jason hasn’t exactly done an excellent job of helping Walky just yet to bring in a lot of gratitude.
That being said, Walky’s Walky, and their relationship started with him drawing Jason being devoured by a dinosaur. I think Jason knows what to expect to where Babar’s not going to be the dealbreaker.
In something like fairness, from what we’ve seen Walky hasn’t put a single shred of effort into being helped, either. It doesn’t seem fair to blame Jason for Walky’s absolute refusal to do anything but yammer insults and doodle insulting dino pics.
Inahc
we don’t know that it’s lack of effort or ADHD, but he *is* being a complete ass about it.
To be fair Walky doesn’t owe him gratitude but he Does owe him some common human decency and respect as a human being. But he has given him none of that, I would honestly applaud Jason telling him to get lost.
Give him a break! The Duke of Thingley has more important things to remember than a foreign dignitary’s name! (namely, how to remove chicken nugget grease stains from clothing)
I hope they find a way to sneak him into the new movie somewhere, even if it’s just “Old Man Making Chalk Drawings in the Background”, or “old bank owner”.
*plays the theme to the Jeeves & Wooster series (that wound up on Masterpiece Theater) on the hacked Muzak*
Again, it was because of that and Blackadder that I never could take House seriously.
I shouldn’t feel sympathy for Jason. However, I work in academia and I’ve seen the desperate need of many students for attention from teachers. Even one as bad as Jason. The fact Walky wastes his time and Jason’s with mockery when other people need help really ticks me off. It’s worse than doing nothing at all.
I note what makes it even more insane is Jason didn’t even realize he was preying on a desperate girl trying not to flunk but assumed she really liked him.
HeySo
As noted below, Jason clearly wasn’t “preying” on anyone. He failed in the responsibilities of his position, but he never abused his power in any way, nor engaged in any manipulation. In fact, he seemed shocked after the fact that the sex was intended to manipulate grading; it seems he was under the impression that their long time together in study efforts had turned into a different type of connection.
Being clueless and inept doesn’t make him a villain. It doesn’t make him likable, but he’s not inherently bad, as all his efforts to look after students indicates (note also the fact that he didn’t take advantage of Sal when she was drunk, as a villain presumably would).
HeySo
*actively abused, I should say. Ie, manipulating someone to sleep with him.
the final pam
I know you’re using it as proof of Jason not being a monster, but “didn’t take advantage of a drunk girl” is a low fucking bar to set for being a decent human
HeySo
Thankfully, that point wasn’t meant as a bar, or even as a testament of character- rather, it was meant to match to “preying on a desperate girl” and invalidate that claim by providing an actual example where that phrase would apply.
Also, the bar for humans is pretty abysmally low to begin with, so do try and appreciate every minor moment of an individual not doing something horrific.
HeySo
Thankfully, that point wasn’t meant as a bar, or even as a testament of character- rather, it was meant to match to “preying on a desperate girl” and invalidate that claim by providing an actual example where that phrase would apply.
Also, the bar for humans is pretty abysmally low to begin with, so do try and appreciate every minor moment of an individual not doing something horrific.
the final pam
Yeah, no, I’m not going to give a guy props for not raping someone. By that logic, we should be praising every member of the cast every time they don’t assault someone.
HeySo
I’m not sure if your reading comprehension is flawed, or if you’re so busy pushing an agenda that you’re not making an attempt, but you’re arguing a topic that- while meritous in its own right- isn’t at all relevant to the current discussion.
I’m mechanically invalidating one point, while you seem to think I’m emotionally validating another. Your interpretation is completely off-base, since “props” doesn’t factor into this discussion, which is focused on linguistic application of terms such as “prey” and “evil”. If you browse through the page, you’ll easily note that I don’t in any way condone Jason’s behavior, but it’s most certainly not what it’s being described as.
You’re comparing what is essentially statutory rape between an 18 year old and a 16 year old (except in this case the legality and onus of responsibility is tied to a position of power rather than to the position of advanced age) to actual rape. Neither one is appropriate, but no way in hell are they directly comparable to one another. That is the discussion here, not whether someone should be given props for not raping someone. That’s just.. a twisted thing to interpret to begin with. I’m sorry for whatever circumstances have set your expectations to think such an interpretation is likely.
HeySo
Ugh.
“I’m not sure if your reading comprehension is flawed”
I meant that to be in reference to your comprehension of those specific comments, not as an insult to your overall reading comprehension. Sorry for the misleading phrasing.
the final pam
Could you be any more condescending?
I already noted before that you are using the situation as an example of Jason not being a villain preying on innocent young girls, but I’m pointing out that using “didn’t rape someone” as an indicator of someone’s moral standards is shaky. Then you also said “do try and appreciate every minor moment of an individual not doing something horrific.” which reads as thought I should be, what? Grateful that the first thought to cross Jason’s mind wasn’t to take advantage of Sal? No, that’s absolute horseshit and you know it. You’re phrasing this as though Jason actively chose not to assault someone, and it’s honestly more horrifying that you think that’s something to be appreciated.
Just because Jason wasn’t aware that Sal was trying to manipulate him into adjusting her grades does not mean that an abuse of power didn’t happen. Jason was her TA. He should not have in any way considered, much less gone along with, sleeping with Sal because he is an authority figure over her. As much as you want to argue that Jason did not abuse his power in any way, him not taking advantage of Sal once does not, in any way, strengthen that argument. Just because you do not take advantage of a person one time does not mean that an abuse of power never occurred, nor will ever occur.
But please, do keep on insulting me and insist I’m pushing an agenda. After all, I’m not the one who doesn’t seem to understand how power dynamics work.
I don’t really get why everyone assumes Jason is evil. It’s kinda silly in my opinion. He had difficulty teaching two people. He might be a fine T.A. for the other students Also what kind of self-loathing wretch assumes someone slept with them without being into them?
186 thoughts on “Babar”
Ana Chronistic
“Duke Farthing Cumberbatch? Pence Worthington? Archibald Honeycutt? Lucius Mugg? Jammie Dodgers? Wallace N. Gromit?”
“…you had me at ‘sir'”
Cholma
Maybe Jason is out getting knighted by a king?
“In the name of my most Royal Majesty, I knight thee! (strikes Jason over the head with his sceptre) “Arise, Sir Loin of Beef!”
(strike) “Arise, Earl of Cloves!”
(strike) “Arise, Duke of Brittingham!”
(strike) “Arise, Baron of Munchausen!”
(strike) “Arise, Essence of Myrrh!”
(strike) “Milk of Magnesia”
(strike) “Quarter of Ten!”
Wizard
Duke of Earl.
Screwball
Bugs Bunny?
Cholma
Yep. 1949’s “Rabbit Hood”. You can find it on YouTube.
Needfuldoer
It’s weird, I had that one on VHS but never caught it on TV.
Screwball
Rabbit Hood? Hmmm, Daniel the Human taught me some Google-Fu…….. Found it!
https://youtu.be/8Qtgm5g5Gyo
Slipdance
And now I’m imagining Jason singing a shaky version of ‘London Bridge’
Bicycle Bill
Sir Cumference (the fattest member of King Arthur’s Round Table)
Paul
So, apparently this is an actual thing. Although he’s not exceptionally fat. I had no idea.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cumference-Knights-First-Round-Adventure/dp/1570911525
Sort of a Phantom Tollbooth thing I guess?
I was just going to do a ‘Yo Knight’ joke.
“Yo knight so fat, when he sits around the round table he sits around the round table.”
Deanatay
Sir Cuitous, the latest (and most often lost) of Arthur’s Knights.
Sir Tainly, the most confident of Arthur’s Knights.
Sir Repititious, the secret Knight.
Sir Plus, the extra Knight.
Sir Endipity, the luckiest of Arthur’s Knights.
Sir Rebral, the smartest of Arthur’s Knights.
adjudicus
Sir Cease, the knight who thinks it’d be better if it all just ended.
Sir Pass, the knight who always manages to somehow be better than the rest.
Sir Real, the knight who everyone thinks is bizarre.
Ana Chronistic
and of course, Sir Not-Appearing-in-This-Film
Clif
My favorite.
Xailenrath
Sir Osis of The Liver?
Yet_One_More_Idiot
And Sir Iosis of the Immune System, with whom he is often confused.
Kamino Neko
Different cartoon(s)…that was used in Knighty Knight Bugs and Knight-Mare Hare.
Charlie Spencer
I saw that one yesterday. I didn’t worry and I didn’t fear.
Goshii
You forgot Sir Osis of Liverpool
JessWitt
Mathy McMathface?
Chauncey Canterbury?
Potter O’Gould?
Captain Britain?
Marsh Maryrose
Actual British royal names:
Charles Philip Arthur George (Prince Charles)
William Arthur Philip Louis (Prince William)
Henry Charles Albert David (Prince Harry)
George Alexander Louis (Prince George)
Charlotte Elizabeth Diana (Princess Charlotte)
Ana Chronistic
dang, meant to add Lord British in there
Cholma
+1 for the Ultima ref
Ana Chronistic
it’s also a ship! piloted by… Lord British
Remmington Steele
Ah, the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas. What a delightful bunch.
HeySo
“Actual British royal names:”
Sooo basically they just slap a bunch of random, generic forenames together in the most awkward, clunky sequence possible?
I mean, even going along with the theme of “a list of common forenames”, their approach is just lazy and lacking in any sense of poetry and charm. Consider alternatives such as Wilbur Peacock Davis and Marianne Kinsey Sage. Love them, hate them, at least they roll off the tongue and stick to memory better than Henry Charles Albert David and Charlotte Elizabeth Diana. -.-;
(And yes, Peacock is an actual boy’s name. It’s not even remotely common as a name, but I’m giving it a pass on grounds of being familiar as a general word. 😛)
Lamia
I’m gonna play devils advocate and point out the royal names are largely hereditary. Charles is the name of the guy next in line for the throne. Phillip is the Queen’s husband. Diana is the name of Charlotte’a grandmother. Albert is a previously king. It’s a fairly common naming convention in the U.K; my brother’a full name is [Paternal Grandfather] [Maternal Granddather] [Mother’s Maiden Name] [Surname].
SgtWadeyWilson
Yeah, but it’s still boring.
I much prefer: [The two names my Grandmother used to yell at my Father with, despite neither of them being in his full name] [One of my Mother’s favorite characters from the Shannara books] [Surname].
HeySo
I actually contemplated mentioning the historical basis myself, but it wasn’t really relevant to my point that modern nobility names are still ungaily things, and should go out the way of royal intra- and intermarriage, and other outdated concepts of lineage.
The issue isn’t the generic nature of the names, it’s that they flow together poorly and thus lack both appeal and ease of recognition. Tradition can be referenced to death, but if we’re contemplating impressions of regality, such a naming scheme doesn’t lend itself to such things. It does, however, readily lend itself to less favorable recollections of past royal intramarriages..
After all, if the royal family was marrying out more, then following that naming scheme, their names should inherently become a lot more interesting and distinct and diverse over time.
More relevant is that another notable naming consideration of the past is the adjustment of names to fit flow- ie, Davis instead of David is clearly still a tribute, but may make for better naming flow.
Charlotte Lizbeth Diane, for example, could have made for an alternative to Charlotte Elizabeth Diana. In that vein, to emphasize the point, Charlotte is itself a feminine form of Charlot, which in turn is a variation of Charles.
It really does feel awkward in its current implementation, in any case. 😛
AnvilPro
Want to sympathize with Walky for going through troubles, but actually annoyed with him for forgetting the name of the guy who is actually willing to help
Yumi
I read this strip and was like, “Huh, I…I don’t remember what his name is either.”
I do now, but it took me a minute.
GoblinScribe
I was literally going to guess “Miles”.
HeySo
I do believe you mean Miles Alexander Butterworth the Third. ;P
But then, Walky’d remember that one..
..it has butt in it. :X
Viktoria
Jason has had one appearance in he last 9 months. I couldn’t remember his name until I checked the comments.
Dark
Been reading “It’s Walky” so I remembered his name easily.
Needfuldoer
Yeah, he’s much more important to the old continuity.
C.T Phipps
Walky throws more shade at Jason than I’ve thrown at my worst enemies.
DailyBrad
He does want to help Walky, but it’s not entirely altruistic. It’s his job, it’s for pride after the other T.A. and Sal have called his work into question, and Jason hasn’t exactly done an excellent job of helping Walky just yet to bring in a lot of gratitude.
That being said, Walky’s Walky, and their relationship started with him drawing Jason being devoured by a dinosaur. I think Jason knows what to expect to where Babar’s not going to be the dealbreaker.
anonymsly
In something like fairness, from what we’ve seen Walky hasn’t put a single shred of effort into being helped, either. It doesn’t seem fair to blame Jason for Walky’s absolute refusal to do anything but yammer insults and doodle insulting dino pics.
Inahc
we don’t know that it’s lack of effort or ADHD, but he *is* being a complete ass about it.
Eldritch Gentleman
To be fair Walky doesn’t owe him gratitude but he Does owe him some common human decency and respect as a human being. But he has given him none of that, I would honestly applaud Jason telling him to get lost.
Passchendaele
*actually*, the fifth. such an amateur mistake, Walky. 😛
adjudicus
Give him a break! The Duke of Thingley has more important things to remember than a foreign dignitary’s name! (namely, how to remove chicken nugget grease stains from clothing)
HeySo
“a foreign dignitary”
Actually, Thingley is in Wiltshire England, so they’d both be British. 😛
Mada
Oh c’mon Walky; go the whole nine yards and call him “Adam Blampied”.
David DeLaney
> the whole nine yards
i c wut u did thar, but how would Walky know Jason’s exact penis size?
–Dave, does he read Sal’s diary?
Nono
This comic reminded me that I actually forgot the name of Dick van Dyke’s character in Mary Poppins.
C.T Phipps
Bad Cockney Accent Chimney Sweep 1#
GoblinScribe
It’s actually just Dick Van Dyke.
C.T Phipps
I could believe it’s actually him serving as a chimney sweep and knowing a sidhe nanny.
Larkle
It’s Burt (Bert?), idk the spelling. I don’t think a last name was said, but not sure.
cbwroses
Yes! Glad I’m not the only one who immediately went to Marry Poppins!
Needfuldoer
I hope they find a way to sneak him into the new movie somewhere, even if it’s just “Old Man Making Chalk Drawings in the Background”, or “old bank owner”.
DarkoNeko
You may call him Lord Buckethead.
tim gueguen
I’ve never seen any indication Jason can play 64th note guitar arpeggios while wearing a chicken bucket on his head.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckethead
ellernock
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Buckethead Nah, this guy. Who admittedly looks like he belongs in the other universe.
sdrainbow
Anyone can play 64th note arpeggios if the tempo is slow enough.
Marsh Maryrose
Cholmondely Featherstonehaugh Beauchamps (pronounced “Chumley Fanshaw Beechum.”)
Stephen Bierce
*plays the theme to the Jeeves & Wooster series (that wound up on Masterpiece Theater) on the hacked Muzak*
Again, it was because of that and Blackadder that I never could take House seriously.
C.T Phipps
I shouldn’t feel sympathy for Jason. However, I work in academia and I’ve seen the desperate need of many students for attention from teachers. Even one as bad as Jason. The fact Walky wastes his time and Jason’s with mockery when other people need help really ticks me off. It’s worse than doing nothing at all.
John
Given Sal’s experience, I’m not sure but what wasting Jason’s time might be a public service.
C.T Phipps
I note what makes it even more insane is Jason didn’t even realize he was preying on a desperate girl trying not to flunk but assumed she really liked him.
HeySo
As noted below, Jason clearly wasn’t “preying” on anyone. He failed in the responsibilities of his position, but he never abused his power in any way, nor engaged in any manipulation. In fact, he seemed shocked after the fact that the sex was intended to manipulate grading; it seems he was under the impression that their long time together in study efforts had turned into a different type of connection.
Being clueless and inept doesn’t make him a villain. It doesn’t make him likable, but he’s not inherently bad, as all his efforts to look after students indicates (note also the fact that he didn’t take advantage of Sal when she was drunk, as a villain presumably would).
HeySo
*actively abused, I should say. Ie, manipulating someone to sleep with him.
the final pam
I know you’re using it as proof of Jason not being a monster, but “didn’t take advantage of a drunk girl” is a low fucking bar to set for being a decent human
HeySo
Thankfully, that point wasn’t meant as a bar, or even as a testament of character- rather, it was meant to match to “preying on a desperate girl” and invalidate that claim by providing an actual example where that phrase would apply.
Also, the bar for humans is pretty abysmally low to begin with, so do try and appreciate every minor moment of an individual not doing something horrific.
HeySo
Thankfully, that point wasn’t meant as a bar, or even as a testament of character- rather, it was meant to match to “preying on a desperate girl” and invalidate that claim by providing an actual example where that phrase would apply.
Also, the bar for humans is pretty abysmally low to begin with, so do try and appreciate every minor moment of an individual not doing something horrific.
the final pam
Yeah, no, I’m not going to give a guy props for not raping someone. By that logic, we should be praising every member of the cast every time they don’t assault someone.
HeySo
I’m not sure if your reading comprehension is flawed, or if you’re so busy pushing an agenda that you’re not making an attempt, but you’re arguing a topic that- while meritous in its own right- isn’t at all relevant to the current discussion.
I’m mechanically invalidating one point, while you seem to think I’m emotionally validating another. Your interpretation is completely off-base, since “props” doesn’t factor into this discussion, which is focused on linguistic application of terms such as “prey” and “evil”. If you browse through the page, you’ll easily note that I don’t in any way condone Jason’s behavior, but it’s most certainly not what it’s being described as.
You’re comparing what is essentially statutory rape between an 18 year old and a 16 year old (except in this case the legality and onus of responsibility is tied to a position of power rather than to the position of advanced age) to actual rape. Neither one is appropriate, but no way in hell are they directly comparable to one another.
That is the discussion here, not whether someone should be given props for not raping someone. That’s just.. a twisted thing to interpret to begin with. I’m sorry for whatever circumstances have set your expectations to think such an interpretation is likely.
HeySo
Ugh.
“I’m not sure if your reading comprehension is flawed”
I meant that to be in reference to your comprehension of those specific comments, not as an insult to your overall reading comprehension. Sorry for the misleading phrasing.
the final pam
Could you be any more condescending?
I already noted before that you are using the situation as an example of Jason not being a villain preying on innocent young girls, but I’m pointing out that using “didn’t rape someone” as an indicator of someone’s moral standards is shaky. Then you also said “do try and appreciate every minor moment of an individual not doing something horrific.” which reads as thought I should be, what? Grateful that the first thought to cross Jason’s mind wasn’t to take advantage of Sal? No, that’s absolute horseshit and you know it. You’re phrasing this as though Jason actively chose not to assault someone, and it’s honestly more horrifying that you think that’s something to be appreciated.
Just because Jason wasn’t aware that Sal was trying to manipulate him into adjusting her grades does not mean that an abuse of power didn’t happen. Jason was her TA. He should not have in any way considered, much less gone along with, sleeping with Sal because he is an authority figure over her. As much as you want to argue that Jason did not abuse his power in any way, him not taking advantage of Sal once does not, in any way, strengthen that argument. Just because you do not take advantage of a person one time does not mean that an abuse of power never occurred, nor will ever occur.
But please, do keep on insulting me and insist I’m pushing an agenda. After all, I’m not the one who doesn’t seem to understand how power dynamics work.
geno
I don’t really get why everyone assumes Jason is evil. It’s kinda silly in my opinion. He had difficulty teaching two people. He might be a fine T.A. for the other students Also what kind of self-loathing wretch assumes someone slept with them without being into them?
C.T Phipps