Tomorrow’s strip is a good time for Dad to be a campus shooting victim. Just pretend the guy at Purdue is still on the loose, and picks off Amber’s dad for a getaway car.
It’s never a good time for anyone to be a campus shooting victim. Besides, if you’re going to punish the man do something a bit more permanent than death, eh?
I’d finish this up by saying all the guy needs is a little love but…frankly hard to see at this point. I just hope Amber deals with him in a way that get’s him far away.
Now THERE’s a man that is, whether or not their existence is accounted for or not being irrelevant, MUCH too preoccupied with his own balls.
(Is there such a thing as verbal overcompensation?)
Funnily enough, I’m amused by the fact that he’s just staaaaarting to catch on.
This is Blaine’s most successful impersonation of a human yet (I guess it helps that he thinks his brilliant plan to pretend Amber is still scared of him until she becomes scared of him again is totally working). And his little web of lies STILL is just barely good enough to deceive Danny.
I probably shouldn’t be this confident: Blaine could do some serious damage to Danny if he really catches on that his current tactics are out of date– and no, I don’t want to see Danny hurt, and neither does Amber. And maybe (probably) some little part of her is still afraid of him– she certainly loses control around him. But so far at least, Blaine’s hateability is rivaled only by his inability to accept any reality that means his influence might be declining. He’s running out of time to wise up.
Dorsilus
excellent points. GAH I just wish this would update more than once a day.
Noah
Yeah, so ridiculous that he ONLY gives us 7 Dumbing of Ages a week!
Dorsilus
YEAH HOW DARE HE god I sound pathetic.
Just Cheeto Dust
Compared to the two or three people this week who have admitted in the comments section that they would rip Willis off? No, you don’t.
Cholma
Return with us now to the heady days of 2004 when the It’s Walky! Angst was overflowing the boards after each update! 😀
shadowcell
yeah and that was back when characters were actually dying
Many abusers achieve their results by grinding their victim down. Doesn’t matter if they break free once, twice, a hundred times. If the abuser keeps pushing, and they finally let them back in, the abuser has won. Blaine’s tactics can be incredibly effective.
Psycho
not to mention how he’s pulling the “This was your idea” thing on Danny, trying to absolve himself of any blame or responsibility. That guy needs a heaping helping of the Flying Justice Clothesline™.
Dave
Effective as they may be, ALL tactics have a chance of failure, and Amber seems dead set on slamming the door right on Blaine’s face, lock it up, and throw him down to the bottom of the ocean.
…
Too graphic?
Volkai
A little extreme.
The door slamming is right on, but Amber doesn’t seem the ‘throw into ocean’ type.
cmd1095
is there an ocean conveniently located nearby?
Safgaftsa
No, but there is a lake with freshwater sharks.
xKiv
Maps point to .. roughly 600 miles away?
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership
Assuming, of course, he doesn’t default to taking Amber down with him via pressing assault charges, playing Danny and/or her Mother against her or whatever it takes to get her arrested or at least expelled, when they lock his ass up again…Next logical step for trash who use their nuclear families to achieve power validation that’s otherwise out of their league, no?
Pat
He might think that would work, but it can’t. He committed a few too many crimes to go to the police, even if the witnesses were cooperative.
Danny’s only cooperating because he’s being deceived, and he’s already figured out that something is off. He certainly wouldn’t back Blaine up in court, and he wasn’t a witness when they fought anyway. Everybody else is definitely on Amber’s side.
Pat
Oh hey, you said he’d do that after he gets arrested himself, which means his own crimes are already out there and the reason not to go to the police is gone.
Still, there’s a limit to how much he can manipulate Danny here. In person, Danny may be useful, but certainly not as a witness.
I think we’re long due for a new poll. Perhaps something about Walky Performs a Sex…? I’d like to know what readers think about it before I get my credit card out.
Okay, I shouldn’t get sucked into this, but that’s a really odd place to draw the line. Are you saying you’ll look at porn if it’s free?
Ugakicka
There’s so much free porn (good free porn too) out there that I haven’t looked at. My cheap self thinks it a disservice to myself and my wallet to pay for something I could easily get for free.
David Willis
Every artist’s dream is to be told his work isn’t worth money.
I mean… no. Sorry, ugakicka, that’s really quite rude, think what you like but why would you do it HERE? WPaS is terrific and I’m thrilled to finally have an AMAZING reason to pay for the slipshine service.
Ugakicka
You have a nasty habit of twisting people’s words the wrong way. My cheap ass could have found a way around your Joyce and Walky payment thing, but I thought you deserved the money and paid for it. Just because I don’t pay for your porn doesn’t mean your work isn’t worth paying for.
Also their prices are quite high. Especially since I’d only use it for one thing.
Baker
I think it’s also worth noting that if you choose to create a form of art that competes in a crowded and free marketplace that your work is actually not worth much by virtue of where it competes, regardless of skill put in or resulting quality. It’s just basic supply and demand and smut happens to be as common as sand on the beach.
Personally I place zero value on smut because it seems to do me harm. I do view it from time to time, but I wish I didn’t since it worsens my social anxiety.
David Willis
I’m trying to think of a form of art that doesn’t exist in a crowded and free marketplace and I’m kind of coming up short. I feel like that’s more of a convenient excuse to scapegoat smut than anything profound “worth noting.”
Likewise, I’m pretty sure my smut work IS worth much because I sold it for hojillions of dollars and it did so well that I was commissioned for more within a few hours. There’s clearly some fuckin’ value. So to speak.
Doom Shepherd
That argument is so invalid, it doesn’t even require a mashup picture of two cool things to demonstrate the fact.
Roomba Ron
Quite honeslty I find your art is great for a webcomic series and I buy your books, but, well, I do not find it quite worth my money with regards to smut. I simply dont find the art style either arousing or the content interesting enough to justify the cost and Ive seen some of the stuff that is otherwise offered on that website and im not impressed. I hope you do make money on it but really I think the smut was a mistake.
I’m wracking my brain trying to understand the purpose of these posts (well, maybe not, but still, I am confused). If I logged onto every webcomic page from which I was not buying something just to tell the person making the art that I didn’t want to buy it, I’d be spending all my time doing that. And be an a##hole.
People have been drawing other people performing a sex since the first cave men figured out they could draw on cave walls. Get over it people!
Pat
I’m not really interested in it and I’m not buying it, but my lack of interest doesn’t seem like a reason why making it was a mistake. I’m also not sure why anybody would care what I didn’t buy. If I bought it and it disappointed me, sure, but not that I didn’t buy it in the first place.
There are lots of things that I haven’t bought.
David Willis
Pat: i like you
Roomba Ron
Im sorry if I wasnt clear, I wasnt trying to say is that the content wasnt enough to make up for the disconnect between the art style and the content. Really if you had used a different art style that worked better for smut I might of bought still bought it. Im not saying change it for me but that if you were to make another comic like it that you might consider a different art style for it. Im sorry if this seems stupid to you but I figured I might as well make my poitn and you ignore it rather than not make a my point at all.
Ugakicka
Now that I’m fully awake and can think clearly, let me clarify. Willis’s work is wonderful, but as I work for Walmart and am trying to get through college on my own dime, I cannot justify making that significant an investment on anything, no matter how good. I bought the Joyce and Walky subscription after doing an odd job I took on just for that purpose (which was amazing, btw).
Willis, don’t assume I meant ill. I most certainly didn’t. Not everyone on the internet is a jerk.
Reepicheep-chan
I am mostly confused over your choice of the word “morals” in this context. I mean, my budget is too tight for smut ATM as well, but that does not make not spending money on porn a moral concern :\
Badeyes
Don’t worry I’m sure it will be worth tons once you kick the bucket.
So with that in mind I’ve made this handy laminated symptom card, let me know if any of these start troubling you….
I’m still looking for the SMUT WITHOUT WARNING label.
Tikitori
Yeah, but there’s free porn from artists you can’t choose (mainly live-action, which is okay) and porn you pay for from fantastic artists (which can be amazing!). Some examples are from the creator of Red String-where I have two of her ‘mature’ books, and Rosalarian. I’m also female so I might be a bit biased on this, but if that’s your policy then you are missing out on some amazing stuff.
My policy is if the free stuff is good? The paid must be amazing. And it is.
Pat
I don’t see how morals are really relevant to that reasoning.
scabbert
Are you implyint that this is a controversial or alien idea? I assure you it’s quite a common sentiment.
I have never paid for porn either, but then again, I don’t even watch free porn; not because of any anti-porn moral stance, but simply because I’m rather prudish by nature. What interests me with WPaS, however, is that it involves characters I’m emotionally invested in, not just some nobodies who got paid to show their private parts.
MM
…Where’s a “like” button when you need one?
Matthew Davis
It’s the emotional investiture in the characters that makes me want to consider buying it, for the same reason I bought the paid Joyce and Walky content. If Slipshine offered it as a one-off charge without access to the rest of the site, I’d do it in a heartbeat.
Willis, do you have any plans to include this story with the print collections?
David Willis
I do not. Reprint rights belong to Slipshine, plus I wouldn’t put it in a collection anyway. Many places I bring my books to sell are skittish about, y’know, hardcore pornography.
It does not take much to make 4chan hate a thing so I’d say that’s not exactly a hard endorsement (anti-endorsement?) to get.
Matthew Davis
Yeah, but the specific nature of their complaints seems to bode well. I have to figure “not worth it” means it’s not just 17 pages of hardcore banging.
Well written, well drawn, good character interaction, and sexy. Willis is good at cartoons and it turns out this extends to porn. I found it well worth the price by itself, and who knows, you may find some other stuff on there interesting.
299 thoughts on “Ballsy”
Ugakicka
Balls, Danny. You have none.
AgentKeen
That’s the first sign that there’s something wrong here.
Ahighfunctioningsociopath
Hey, he has to see out of something
JA
Commence ‘Dannying It Up’ sequence in 3…2…
Icalasari
Hopefully in Amber’s favour
Ivan
Tomorrow’s strip is a good time for Dad to be a campus shooting victim. Just pretend the guy at Purdue is still on the loose, and picks off Amber’s dad for a getaway car.
I hate that guy.
Jay Carr
It’s never a good time for anyone to be a campus shooting victim. Besides, if you’re going to punish the man do something a bit more permanent than death, eh?
I’d finish this up by saying all the guy needs is a little love but…frankly hard to see at this point. I just hope Amber deals with him in a way that get’s him far away.
Yotomoe
Danny, stop implying that you have balls.
Sageress
He’s got marbles.
Keroshino
He lost them a long time ago!
Bill
You have no …MARBLES!
Jen Aside
You mean had?
Shadow12000
Or ever will.
Paul Indrome
Now THERE’s a man that is, whether or not their existence is accounted for or not being irrelevant, MUCH too preoccupied with his own balls.
(Is there such a thing as verbal overcompensation?)
Dorsilus
I know there’s a lot at stake here, but I can’t help laughing at how oblivious Danny is here.
T Campbell
Funnily enough, I’m amused by the fact that he’s just staaaaarting to catch on.
This is Blaine’s most successful impersonation of a human yet (I guess it helps that he thinks his brilliant plan to pretend Amber is still scared of him until she becomes scared of him again is totally working). And his little web of lies STILL is just barely good enough to deceive Danny.
DANNY.
T Campbell
I probably shouldn’t be this confident: Blaine could do some serious damage to Danny if he really catches on that his current tactics are out of date– and no, I don’t want to see Danny hurt, and neither does Amber. And maybe (probably) some little part of her is still afraid of him– she certainly loses control around him. But so far at least, Blaine’s hateability is rivaled only by his inability to accept any reality that means his influence might be declining. He’s running out of time to wise up.
Dorsilus
excellent points. GAH I just wish this would update more than once a day.
Noah
Yeah, so ridiculous that he ONLY gives us 7 Dumbing of Ages a week!
Dorsilus
YEAH HOW DARE HE god I sound pathetic.
Just Cheeto Dust
Compared to the two or three people this week who have admitted in the comments section that they would rip Willis off? No, you don’t.
Cholma
Return with us now to the heady days of 2004 when the It’s Walky! Angst was overflowing the boards after each update! 😀
shadowcell
yeah and that was back when characters were actually dying
historyman68
Many abusers achieve their results by grinding their victim down. Doesn’t matter if they break free once, twice, a hundred times. If the abuser keeps pushing, and they finally let them back in, the abuser has won. Blaine’s tactics can be incredibly effective.
Psycho
not to mention how he’s pulling the “This was your idea” thing on Danny, trying to absolve himself of any blame or responsibility. That guy needs a heaping helping of the Flying Justice Clothesline™.
Dave
Effective as they may be, ALL tactics have a chance of failure, and Amber seems dead set on slamming the door right on Blaine’s face, lock it up, and throw him down to the bottom of the ocean.
…
Too graphic?
Volkai
A little extreme.
The door slamming is right on, but Amber doesn’t seem the ‘throw into ocean’ type.
cmd1095
is there an ocean conveniently located nearby?
Safgaftsa
No, but there is a lake with freshwater sharks.
xKiv
Maps point to .. roughly 600 miles away?
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership
Assuming, of course, he doesn’t default to taking Amber down with him via pressing assault charges, playing Danny and/or her Mother against her or whatever it takes to get her arrested or at least expelled, when they lock his ass up again…Next logical step for trash who use their nuclear families to achieve power validation that’s otherwise out of their league, no?
Pat
He might think that would work, but it can’t. He committed a few too many crimes to go to the police, even if the witnesses were cooperative.
Danny’s only cooperating because he’s being deceived, and he’s already figured out that something is off. He certainly wouldn’t back Blaine up in court, and he wasn’t a witness when they fought anyway. Everybody else is definitely on Amber’s side.
Pat
Oh hey, you said he’d do that after he gets arrested himself, which means his own crimes are already out there and the reason not to go to the police is gone.
Still, there’s a limit to how much he can manipulate Danny here. In person, Danny may be useful, but certainly not as a witness.
khambatta
It’ll get worse if Amber shows up and Danny assumes she’s just into cosplay…
-Sentinel-
I think we’re long due for a new poll. Perhaps something about Walky Performs a Sex…? I’d like to know what readers think about it before I get my credit card out.
Ugakicka
I have a long standing rule. No matter how good of porn, nor who it would help, I never pay for porn. Sorry, Willis. Morals and all.
clodia
I am curious why, with no judgement intended.
Scoops
Okay, I shouldn’t get sucked into this, but that’s a really odd place to draw the line. Are you saying you’ll look at porn if it’s free?
Ugakicka
There’s so much free porn (good free porn too) out there that I haven’t looked at. My cheap self thinks it a disservice to myself and my wallet to pay for something I could easily get for free.
David Willis
Every artist’s dream is to be told his work isn’t worth money.
rachel
HOORAH, YOU’VE ARRIVED !
I mean… no. Sorry, ugakicka, that’s really quite rude, think what you like but why would you do it HERE? WPaS is terrific and I’m thrilled to finally have an AMAZING reason to pay for the slipshine service.
Ugakicka
You have a nasty habit of twisting people’s words the wrong way. My cheap ass could have found a way around your Joyce and Walky payment thing, but I thought you deserved the money and paid for it. Just because I don’t pay for your porn doesn’t mean your work isn’t worth paying for.
Also their prices are quite high. Especially since I’d only use it for one thing.
Baker
I think it’s also worth noting that if you choose to create a form of art that competes in a crowded and free marketplace that your work is actually not worth much by virtue of where it competes, regardless of skill put in or resulting quality. It’s just basic supply and demand and smut happens to be as common as sand on the beach.
Personally I place zero value on smut because it seems to do me harm. I do view it from time to time, but I wish I didn’t since it worsens my social anxiety.
David Willis
I’m trying to think of a form of art that doesn’t exist in a crowded and free marketplace and I’m kind of coming up short. I feel like that’s more of a convenient excuse to scapegoat smut than anything profound “worth noting.”
Likewise, I’m pretty sure my smut work IS worth much because I sold it for hojillions of dollars and it did so well that I was commissioned for more within a few hours. There’s clearly some fuckin’ value. So to speak.
Doom Shepherd
That argument is so invalid, it doesn’t even require a mashup picture of two cool things to demonstrate the fact.
Roomba Ron
Quite honeslty I find your art is great for a webcomic series and I buy your books, but, well, I do not find it quite worth my money with regards to smut. I simply dont find the art style either arousing or the content interesting enough to justify the cost and Ive seen some of the stuff that is otherwise offered on that website and im not impressed. I hope you do make money on it but really I think the smut was a mistake.
Xenon
I’m wracking my brain trying to understand the purpose of these posts (well, maybe not, but still, I am confused). If I logged onto every webcomic page from which I was not buying something just to tell the person making the art that I didn’t want to buy it, I’d be spending all my time doing that. And be an a##hole.
People have been drawing other people performing a sex since the first cave men figured out they could draw on cave walls. Get over it people!
Pat
I’m not really interested in it and I’m not buying it, but my lack of interest doesn’t seem like a reason why making it was a mistake. I’m also not sure why anybody would care what I didn’t buy. If I bought it and it disappointed me, sure, but not that I didn’t buy it in the first place.
There are lots of things that I haven’t bought.
David Willis
Pat: i like you
Roomba Ron
Im sorry if I wasnt clear, I wasnt trying to say is that the content wasnt enough to make up for the disconnect between the art style and the content. Really if you had used a different art style that worked better for smut I might of bought still bought it. Im not saying change it for me but that if you were to make another comic like it that you might consider a different art style for it. Im sorry if this seems stupid to you but I figured I might as well make my poitn and you ignore it rather than not make a my point at all.
Ugakicka
Now that I’m fully awake and can think clearly, let me clarify. Willis’s work is wonderful, but as I work for Walmart and am trying to get through college on my own dime, I cannot justify making that significant an investment on anything, no matter how good. I bought the Joyce and Walky subscription after doing an odd job I took on just for that purpose (which was amazing, btw).
Willis, don’t assume I meant ill. I most certainly didn’t. Not everyone on the internet is a jerk.
Reepicheep-chan
I am mostly confused over your choice of the word “morals” in this context. I mean, my budget is too tight for smut ATM as well, but that does not make not spending money on porn a moral concern :\
Badeyes
Don’t worry I’m sure it will be worth tons once you kick the bucket.
So with that in mind I’ve made this handy laminated symptom card, let me know if any of these start troubling you….
Dragon_Nataku
Damn you Willis your comment made me choke on my Goldfish crackers
*wanders off to clean monitor*
Animal
I’m still looking for the SMUT WITHOUT WARNING label.
Tikitori
Yeah, but there’s free porn from artists you can’t choose (mainly live-action, which is okay) and porn you pay for from fantastic artists (which can be amazing!). Some examples are from the creator of Red String-where I have two of her ‘mature’ books, and Rosalarian. I’m also female so I might be a bit biased on this, but if that’s your policy then you are missing out on some amazing stuff.
My policy is if the free stuff is good? The paid must be amazing. And it is.
Pat
I don’t see how morals are really relevant to that reasoning.
scabbert
Are you implyint that this is a controversial or alien idea? I assure you it’s quite a common sentiment.
Scoops
The odd part was describing this as morals.
-Sentinel-
I have never paid for porn either, but then again, I don’t even watch free porn; not because of any anti-porn moral stance, but simply because I’m rather prudish by nature. What interests me with WPaS, however, is that it involves characters I’m emotionally invested in, not just some nobodies who got paid to show their private parts.
MM
…Where’s a “like” button when you need one?
Matthew Davis
It’s the emotional investiture in the characters that makes me want to consider buying it, for the same reason I bought the paid Joyce and Walky content. If Slipshine offered it as a one-off charge without access to the rest of the site, I’d do it in a heartbeat.
Willis, do you have any plans to include this story with the print collections?
David Willis
I do not. Reprint rights belong to Slipshine, plus I wouldn’t put it in a collection anyway. Many places I bring my books to sell are skittish about, y’know, hardcore pornography.
Jackson
Well, 4chan hates it, so it must be doing something right.
Matt
It does not take much to make 4chan hate a thing so I’d say that’s not exactly a hard endorsement (anti-endorsement?) to get.
Matthew Davis
Yeah, but the specific nature of their complaints seems to bode well. I have to figure “not worth it” means it’s not just 17 pages of hardcore banging.
Rhy
Eh, it’s fine. It delivers exactly as advertised. Could use less speed lines though
derick
I love the Dorothy/Walky pairing, so I really liked WPAS. It’s very much about them.
Those are my two cents.
Kelly
Well written, well drawn, good character interaction, and sexy. Willis is good at cartoons and it turns out this extends to porn. I found it well worth the price by itself, and who knows, you may find some other stuff on there interesting.
sps48
It’s fun and sexy. And ends with funny. The pages were worth it to me, but I have more disposable income than I am used to.
GarethGillatt
This conversation reminds me of this scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKKxfeNl4uk
Vivvav
God, Willis, you must feel suicidal drawing these two together.
Yotomoe
Naw. Willis is a sadist. He gets off on it.
Shrugs
No way, if he was feeling suicidal Faz and Ethan’s mom would be here, too.
MM