Yeah, for most of the comic I haven’t particularly cared for Dorothy herself (not in a hating on her way, just didn’t find her really interesting), but I always liked these two together.
Both Dotty an Walky are characters who I am very fond of because they kind of annoy me. But I can understand why they’re like that an ultimately I feel for them.
Throwatron
nothing would make me happier than all the people who annoy me finding each other! now they have less to complain about, and they’ll all stay away from me!
Yumi
Me and my friends in high school high-fiving each other after finding out two people we disliked had started dating each other
It’s only OCD if it has a negative effect on your life otherwise it’s OCP which is totally cool and normal to have and checking your stove is off seven times a night is just being sensible.
That’s not really OCD. If it truly is a COMPULSION, it MAY be OCDPD, which is similar. Or it could be some other neurodivergence, or it could (and in her case most likely may) just be mental health related.
I mean, there’s a big reason why OCD and Autism are so commonly co-morbid, that doctors regularly confuse the diagnostic criteria for both, and diagnose one as the other all the time! There is a lot of overlap there.
“Merriam Webster defines OCD as…”
“Oxford English Dictionary defines OCD as…”
“Encyclopedia Brittanica’s article on OCD states…”
“The Mayo Clinic says the causes and symptoms of OCD…”
:NIMH reports that OCD may result in…:
Oh, I can guarantee, that just like Batman has a folder on how to take him out, Dorothy has a subfolder on herself, in that, “neurodivergent directory” of hers. It’s locked under a password, that only Joyce would think of.
Catwoman keeps the folder on how to take Batman out on a date. It starts with, “First, knock over a jewelry store,” and then after the chase over the rooftops, the fight segues into makeouts.
thejeff
Batman’s folder on how to take him out on a date has a much higher classification level than the one on how to kill him.
As a person who checks most the boxes and definitely is not Neurotypical but cannot get an appointment with a specialist so am self diagnosing, i would not be surprised if she found out she was either. I see a lot of myself in dorothy, which is why i’m happy i’ve been blessed with the Dorothy grav in this roulette
Even if she acknowledges the signs, she likely cannot go any further on account of her internalized ableism, very much getting in the way of her being happy ?
For her to confront that is much easier said than done. (speaking from experience)
Groove
I used to think self diagnosing was such an odd idea, until I had to deal with official autism diagnosis. My wife waited about 3 years for diagnosis and just this month it came through as confirmed.
Skulduggery
My experience getting an ADHD diagnosis raised my support of self-diagnosis for similar but opposite reasons. I spent years considering the possibility. By the time I went for an official diagnosis I had spent hundreds of hours chewing on the problem. Then the psychiatric nurse practitioner ran through an hour’s worth of cognitive tests that were very obviously being read and scored through a pre-printed binder with next to no independent analysis and the actual psychiatrist cut me off after 4 personal anecdotes of ADHD-type difficulties out of the several dozen I was prepared to go through and said “yeah that sounds right” and made it official.
I guess I’m happy it was easier than I thought, but also, is that all an official psychiatric diagnosis looks like? I could do that! Why do we make people go to school for 8 years before they’re allowed to do certify neurodivergencies?
As an autistic* person I wouldn’t be surprised by any of the characters being identified as autistic. Except maybe Blaine, I guess?
* note: not diagnosed, not self-diagnosed, but a secret third thing (called “obviously autistic” by over 5 autistic friends, all confirmed and diagnosed)
Daibhid C
A few years ago, my understanding of my own writing went from “Even though I’m maybe autistic myself, I wouldn’t be comfortable writing autistic characters because I’d be afraid of getting it wrong” to “Now that I know I’m autistic, I’m looking at my writing and … have I ever written a non-autistic character?”
StClair
I suspect this has also been Willis’ process.
Throwatron
I dunno if I’ve ever seen a neurotypical webcomic artist.
If I ever did, I dunno if I’d enjoy that comic at all, anyway.
Jerach
I very much feel that. I honestly think part of why I’ve gravitated towards webcomics as a medium is because it’s just so much easier to find neurodivergent or neurodivergent feeling characters than in more popular media.
I follow several comic artists-writers who are trans, at a much higher proportion than is present in the general population. I don’t know if that’s an indication of the comics I follow, or something about comics in general, or “some from column A, some from column B”, in that trans people are slightly more prevalent in comics and I’m also more likely to follow trans comic writers/artists because I’m more into the local trans scene and have that sense of humor.
I mean, “you organize things way more than is typical, particularly about relationships. Have you considered (for this and other reasons) that maybe you’re autistic” isn’t pathologizing. It’s pattern recognition.
… I take your actual point, but “view or characterize as medically or psychologically abnormal” is the actual definition of pathologize (thanks, Merriam-Webster), so yes, it’s pathologizing. Literally.
Daibhid C
I think the problem is pathologising neurodiveristy in the first place. I don’t think of myself as “abnormal”, just “different” (or occasionally “weird – in a good way”). And it took a lot of time and effort to get there,
lyzyrdwyzyrd
On the one hand, yes.
On the other hand — for some people it’s a disability which requires treatment and care.
And if it’s not a pathology, then health insurance isn’t paying for it.
Same situation applies to trans folks.
And like… we should have a better understanding of this sort of thing. Nobody thinks of people who have glasses as disabled.
Reltzik
… actually, there are some people who think that.
… they aren’t nice people.
lyzyrdwyzyrd
Well, it IS a disability. It’s just that the disability aids are affordable compared to others and it’s so commonplace that it doesn’t really clock for many people.
But by definition, glasses are a disability aid.
My point is that ‘disability’ is in some ways a social construct.
Reltzik
I’m on board with that, except I feel like “abnormal” is an umbrella term which isn’t necessarily bad and can include the concepts of “different” and “weird in a good way”. Connotations can get varied, I guess.
lyzyrdwyzyrd
Definitely agree. I have somewhat of a statistics background so I have to remind myself that ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ have different connotations in that field vs colloquial speaking.
I haven’t gotten it wrong
Psychie
Technically speaking, as far as clinical psychology and psychiatry go, the definition of a disorder is whether the differences you experience have a significant negative impact on the quality of your life. If someone is neurodivergent but for whatever reason that doesn’t negatively impact their life, they are not supposed to be diagnosable per the DSM as they do not have a disorder, even if they ARE neurodivergent.
I would argue that Dorothy’s quality of life is *starting* to be negatively impacted by her neurodivergence, and thus she likely *should* seek help before it snowballs any further, considering the nature and severity of the negative impact.
Granted, knowing what I know about the mental health services available at IU and in Bloomington in general, I actually caution *against* seeking psychiatric help outside of particularly dire circumstances, because you have a better chance of them making things worse than better based on the anecdotal evidence of my own experiences, as well as the experiences of everyone I’ve known in the area that needed treatment, plus how the various local services are discussed in the bloomington subreddit whenever they come up.
Something in that “more than is typical” rubs me the wrong way. People who do something useful “more [or more effectively] than is typical” get paid more, promoted faster and remembered longer. We like them, and many of them like themselves quite well.
I suspect that, whatever there is in Dorothy that she finds more a bother than a blessing, organization isn’t it. This seems more like an effective way of dealing with something else.
Paul
Lets replace “neuro-typical” with “neuro-boring”.
Lysbeth
I used to use neuronormie and neurospicy for fun, but then I found out about the fact that “neurospicy” is used a lot by other people whose approach to mental health, challenges, and behaviour isn’t exactly cool (with a bunch of issues really) so now I don’t have a fun term for neurodivergent/neuroatypical, but “neuronormies” has stuck with me.
My wife was semi-recently diagnosed with both ADHD and Autism (female presenting).
Walky and Dorothy’s conversation last comic was like watching two halves of my wife converse with one another.
SO yeah, like 98% sure Dorothy. Go get yourself checked and stop being a denying dotty.
This. What people call autism and ADHD are actually very broad collections of neurodivergent stripes that can occur in individuals in many many disparate combinations and causes that are all lumped together into few generic categories.
It’s worth pointing out that neurodivergents as a group actually display more diversity among their brains than that of the entirety of all humans.
Miri
Migrainey but the last sentence can’t be right? Neurodivergent people are a subset of all humans so cannot display more diversity than the wider group… Are you saying that neurospicy comes in so many different varieties of flavours that simple labels like “autism spectrum” can be wildly misleading, because they cover a wide range of behaviours, traits, experiences, expectations, etc..?
I think we’re getting there and the vast majority of people under the age of… maybe 50? Understand that e.g. ADHD and autism typically present differently in girls, boys, men and women; these are spectrums and can vary from “debilitating” to “sometimes struggles with interpersonal communication” to “find some things harder than ‘typical’ but this is at the level of ‘self-diagnosis as an adult because it helps clarify some things, and hasn’t caused significant issues that even close friends or family members would pick up on’ and their lived experiences definitely don’t make it into any official stats”…
Lysbeth
subset of all humans yourself. I reject my humanity! Jojoooo!
Daibhid C
Makes sense to me. Imagine 100 felt tip pens. 90 of them are blue. The others are red, pink, green, orange, purple, brown, turquoise … I’m running out of colours I have names for, but you get the idea,
The diversity in those last 10 pens is “every one is a different colour”.
The diversity in all 100 pens is “most of them are blue”.
the last sentence is not entirely correctly worded but it’s almost right
what ngpz meant (because we’ve discussed this before and also because i have seen that data too, even if i can’t link references off the top of my head) is that neurodivergent people are more diverse within ourselves than neurotypical people are within themselves
or in other words, neurotypical people are a more homogeneous group than neurodivergent people are
It’s interesting to me to see how many people feel this is as obvious as it seems to be to Walky. Interesting because I am trying to puzzle out my own flavours of neurodivergence, and autism never crossed my mind for Dorothy. Now that it’s been pointed out, I can certainly see the possibility. But in my mind my “obvious” armchair diagnosis for Dorothy was always anxiety (insert “why not both?” meme here).
Mostly it piques my curiosity because it makes me wonder how off-base my understanding of both autism and anxiety might be and b) how wrong I might be about myself.
She reads as anxious to me. There’s social stuff and childhood markers I feel like she isn’t matching, even for low support needs autistic folks.
I’m in a similar boat apparently.
Uly
Except… we’ve mostly seen her socialize with other people who probably are neurodivergent. That’s not exactly a point in favor of her not being autistic.
281 thoughts on “ADHD”
DailyBrad
God, I love these two’s rapport. They are basically always entertaining together.
Yumi
Yeah, for most of the comic I haven’t particularly cared for Dorothy herself (not in a hating on her way, just didn’t find her really interesting), but I always liked these two together.
Delmore Slim
Both Dotty an Walky are characters who I am very fond of because they kind of annoy me. But I can understand why they’re like that an ultimately I feel for them.
Throwatron
nothing would make me happier than all the people who annoy me finding each other! now they have less to complain about, and they’ll all stay away from me!
Yumi
Me and my friends in high school high-fiving each other after finding out two people we disliked had started dating each other
Ana Chronistic
“First of all, HOW DARE—”
Animedingo
Ok dorothy, now look up OCD
Veronica
It’s only OCD if it has a negative effect on your life otherwise it’s OCP which is totally cool and normal to have and checking your stove is off seven times a night is just being sensible.
GingerMadman
That’s not really OCD. If it truly is a COMPULSION, it MAY be OCDPD, which is similar. Or it could be some other neurodivergence, or it could (and in her case most likely may) just be mental health related.
Throwatron
I mean, there’s a big reason why OCD and Autism are so commonly co-morbid, that doctors regularly confuse the diagnostic criteria for both, and diagnose one as the other all the time! There is a lot of overlap there.
ValdVin
Dorothy:
“Merriam Webster defines OCD as…”
“Oxford English Dictionary defines OCD as…”
“Encyclopedia Brittanica’s article on OCD states…”
“The Mayo Clinic says the causes and symptoms of OCD…”
:NIMH reports that OCD may result in…:
Psychie
I feel like Dorothy would know the first place to look is the DSM
Stephen Nedland
Oh, I can guarantee, that just like Batman has a folder on how to take him out, Dorothy has a subfolder on herself, in that, “neurodivergent directory” of hers. It’s locked under a password, that only Joyce would think of.
Uly
Is that “take him out” like… on a date? Or more murdery?
Decidedly Orthogonal
The latter. Next to the similar folder for Superman. But Clark’s contains both versions. Bruce just doesn’t want to admit it.
Uly
Oooh, pic twins!
John Campbell
Catwoman keeps the folder on how to take Batman out on a date. It starts with, “First, knock over a jewelry store,” and then after the chase over the rooftops, the fight segues into makeouts.
thejeff
Batman’s folder on how to take him out on a date has a much higher classification level than the one on how to kill him.
Casi
I agree with both Walky and Dorothy here. pathologizing organization is bad, but also she does show some signs of autism.
ian livs
As an autistic person, I would not be shocked if she eventually found out she was
Casi
As a person who checks most the boxes and definitely is not Neurotypical but cannot get an appointment with a specialist so am self diagnosing, i would not be surprised if she found out she was either. I see a lot of myself in dorothy, which is why i’m happy i’ve been blessed with the Dorothy grav in this roulette
NGPZ
Even if she acknowledges the signs, she likely cannot go any further on account of her internalized ableism, very much getting in the way of her being happy ?
For her to confront that is much easier said than done. (speaking from experience)
Groove
I used to think self diagnosing was such an odd idea, until I had to deal with official autism diagnosis. My wife waited about 3 years for diagnosis and just this month it came through as confirmed.
Skulduggery
My experience getting an ADHD diagnosis raised my support of self-diagnosis for similar but opposite reasons. I spent years considering the possibility. By the time I went for an official diagnosis I had spent hundreds of hours chewing on the problem. Then the psychiatric nurse practitioner ran through an hour’s worth of cognitive tests that were very obviously being read and scored through a pre-printed binder with next to no independent analysis and the actual psychiatrist cut me off after 4 personal anecdotes of ADHD-type difficulties out of the several dozen I was prepared to go through and said “yeah that sounds right” and made it official.
I guess I’m happy it was easier than I thought, but also, is that all an official psychiatric diagnosis looks like? I could do that! Why do we make people go to school for 8 years before they’re allowed to do certify neurodivergencies?
Lysbeth
As an autistic* person I wouldn’t be surprised by any of the characters being identified as autistic. Except maybe Blaine, I guess?
* note: not diagnosed, not self-diagnosed, but a secret third thing (called “obviously autistic” by over 5 autistic friends, all confirmed and diagnosed)
Daibhid C
A few years ago, my understanding of my own writing went from “Even though I’m maybe autistic myself, I wouldn’t be comfortable writing autistic characters because I’d be afraid of getting it wrong” to “Now that I know I’m autistic, I’m looking at my writing and … have I ever written a non-autistic character?”
StClair
I suspect this has also been Willis’ process.
Throwatron
I dunno if I’ve ever seen a neurotypical webcomic artist.
If I ever did, I dunno if I’d enjoy that comic at all, anyway.
Jerach
I very much feel that. I honestly think part of why I’ve gravitated towards webcomics as a medium is because it’s just so much easier to find neurodivergent or neurodivergent feeling characters than in more popular media.
Opus the Poet
I follow several comic artists-writers who are trans, at a much higher proportion than is present in the general population. I don’t know if that’s an indication of the comics I follow, or something about comics in general, or “some from column A, some from column B”, in that trans people are slightly more prevalent in comics and I’m also more likely to follow trans comic writers/artists because I’m more into the local trans scene and have that sense of humor.
lyzyrdwyzyrd
Pretty hard to diagnose a dead guy.
S.R.
I mean, “you organize things way more than is typical, particularly about relationships. Have you considered (for this and other reasons) that maybe you’re autistic” isn’t pathologizing. It’s pattern recognition.
Reltzik
… I take your actual point, but “view or characterize as medically or psychologically abnormal” is the actual definition of pathologize (thanks, Merriam-Webster), so yes, it’s pathologizing. Literally.
Daibhid C
I think the problem is pathologising neurodiveristy in the first place. I don’t think of myself as “abnormal”, just “different” (or occasionally “weird – in a good way”). And it took a lot of time and effort to get there,
lyzyrdwyzyrd
On the one hand, yes.
On the other hand — for some people it’s a disability which requires treatment and care.
And if it’s not a pathology, then health insurance isn’t paying for it.
Same situation applies to trans folks.
And like… we should have a better understanding of this sort of thing. Nobody thinks of people who have glasses as disabled.
Reltzik
… actually, there are some people who think that.
… they aren’t nice people.
lyzyrdwyzyrd
Well, it IS a disability. It’s just that the disability aids are affordable compared to others and it’s so commonplace that it doesn’t really clock for many people.
But by definition, glasses are a disability aid.
My point is that ‘disability’ is in some ways a social construct.
Reltzik
I’m on board with that, except I feel like “abnormal” is an umbrella term which isn’t necessarily bad and can include the concepts of “different” and “weird in a good way”. Connotations can get varied, I guess.
lyzyrdwyzyrd
Definitely agree. I have somewhat of a statistics background so I have to remind myself that ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ have different connotations in that field vs colloquial speaking.
I haven’t gotten it wrong
Psychie
Technically speaking, as far as clinical psychology and psychiatry go, the definition of a disorder is whether the differences you experience have a significant negative impact on the quality of your life. If someone is neurodivergent but for whatever reason that doesn’t negatively impact their life, they are not supposed to be diagnosable per the DSM as they do not have a disorder, even if they ARE neurodivergent.
I would argue that Dorothy’s quality of life is *starting* to be negatively impacted by her neurodivergence, and thus she likely *should* seek help before it snowballs any further, considering the nature and severity of the negative impact.
Granted, knowing what I know about the mental health services available at IU and in Bloomington in general, I actually caution *against* seeking psychiatric help outside of particularly dire circumstances, because you have a better chance of them making things worse than better based on the anecdotal evidence of my own experiences, as well as the experiences of everyone I’ve known in the area that needed treatment, plus how the various local services are discussed in the bloomington subreddit whenever they come up.
Mark
Something in that “more than is typical” rubs me the wrong way. People who do something useful “more [or more effectively] than is typical” get paid more, promoted faster and remembered longer. We like them, and many of them like themselves quite well.
I suspect that, whatever there is in Dorothy that she finds more a bother than a blessing, organization isn’t it. This seems more like an effective way of dealing with something else.
Paul
Lets replace “neuro-typical” with “neuro-boring”.
Lysbeth
I used to use neuronormie and neurospicy for fun, but then I found out about the fact that “neurospicy” is used a lot by other people whose approach to mental health, challenges, and behaviour isn’t exactly cool (with a bunch of issues really) so now I don’t have a fun term for neurodivergent/neuroatypical, but “neuronormies” has stuck with me.
Rose by Any Other Name
My wife was semi-recently diagnosed with both ADHD and Autism (female presenting).
Walky and Dorothy’s conversation last comic was like watching two halves of my wife converse with one another.
SO yeah, like 98% sure Dorothy. Go get yourself checked and stop being a denying dotty.
NGPZ
Denying Dotty? That’s a thing? 😮
Regret
All alliterative affirmations are accurate.
clif
Awesome!
StClair
Agreed.
Reltzik
And all assertions are anti-factual.
StClair
“This! Sentence! Is! False! donthinkaboutit don’tthinkaboutit”
“Um… true. I’ll go true. There, that was easy.”
lyzyrdwyzyrd
I know what you meant but when you said ‘Autism female presenting’ was that somehow autism is a gender identity. I need another Coke.
NGPZ
Well, sometimes it can be part of gender identity?
Autism can sometimes affect the way we experience gender, which gender itself by definition.
Auti-gender,neurogender and neurofluid are identities in which one views their gender as being influenced by their neurodivergence. ^^
Taffy
It is a gender. It’s mine. You can’t have it.
Ophidiophile
Organizing your friends pathologies, on the other hand…
Steamweed
I think Booster could accomplish this.
lur
funny how she understands pathologizing organization is bad but doesn’t understand autism and adhd are not actual pathologies
NGPZ
This. What people call autism and ADHD are actually very broad collections of neurodivergent stripes that can occur in individuals in many many disparate combinations and causes that are all lumped together into few generic categories.
It’s worth pointing out that neurodivergents as a group actually display more diversity among their brains than that of the entirety of all humans.
Miri
Migrainey but the last sentence can’t be right? Neurodivergent people are a subset of all humans so cannot display more diversity than the wider group… Are you saying that neurospicy comes in so many different varieties of flavours that simple labels like “autism spectrum” can be wildly misleading, because they cover a wide range of behaviours, traits, experiences, expectations, etc..?
I think we’re getting there and the vast majority of people under the age of… maybe 50? Understand that e.g. ADHD and autism typically present differently in girls, boys, men and women; these are spectrums and can vary from “debilitating” to “sometimes struggles with interpersonal communication” to “find some things harder than ‘typical’ but this is at the level of ‘self-diagnosis as an adult because it helps clarify some things, and hasn’t caused significant issues that even close friends or family members would pick up on’ and their lived experiences definitely don’t make it into any official stats”…
Lysbeth
subset of all humans yourself. I reject my humanity! Jojoooo!
Daibhid C
Makes sense to me. Imagine 100 felt tip pens. 90 of them are blue. The others are red, pink, green, orange, purple, brown, turquoise … I’m running out of colours I have names for, but you get the idea,
The diversity in those last 10 pens is “every one is a different colour”.
The diversity in all 100 pens is “most of them are blue”.
NGPZ
Basically this, only with countless more individual characteristics like color
lur
the last sentence is not entirely correctly worded but it’s almost right
what ngpz meant (because we’ve discussed this before and also because i have seen that data too, even if i can’t link references off the top of my head) is that neurodivergent people are more diverse within ourselves than neurotypical people are within themselves
or in other words, neurotypical people are a more homogeneous group than neurodivergent people are
Chris Phoenix
I came here to say this: What about not pathologizing autism?
Tatterhood
Cosigned
Tatterhood
It’s interesting to me to see how many people feel this is as obvious as it seems to be to Walky. Interesting because I am trying to puzzle out my own flavours of neurodivergence, and autism never crossed my mind for Dorothy. Now that it’s been pointed out, I can certainly see the possibility. But in my mind my “obvious” armchair diagnosis for Dorothy was always anxiety (insert “why not both?” meme here).
Mostly it piques my curiosity because it makes me wonder how off-base my understanding of both autism and anxiety might be and b) how wrong I might be about myself.
StClair
Dorothy is completely normal. Just like Jennifer!
Random832
She is, if anything, completely normal in the exact opposite way from Jennifer.
lyzyrdwyzyrd
She reads as anxious to me. There’s social stuff and childhood markers I feel like she isn’t matching, even for low support needs autistic folks.
I’m in a similar boat apparently.
Uly
Except… we’ve mostly seen her socialize with other people who probably are neurodivergent. That’s not exactly a point in favor of her not being autistic.
shadowcell
Dumbing of Age Book 14: Go Back to Arranging Your Friends’ Issues Into Subfolders
Red
That’s a pretty good one
shrub