I hate that bloody song with the white-hot intensity of a thousand suns, but I can’t articulate why. The rest of Breakfast in America is fine. (Plus it gave us the “Supertramp did 9/11” joke.)
After someone has repeatedly and consistently sexually harassed me in nearly every interaction we’ve ever had, the onus is not fucking on me to accept them just because they say they’ve changed this time, honest. In fact, even if they HAVE changed, I am not required to ever forgive them or want to be around them in the future. That’s just how it is. Sometimes you don’t get a second chance.
CJ
From Sarah’s point of view, there was no change, just a slight variation in method.
Emily
If you’re trying to be a better person so people will like you and not because you want to stop hurting those around you then you have in fact missed the entire point of being a good person.
Hana
Eh, teleological vs deontological ethics. I’d prefer somebody was nice to me for selfish reasons, rather than mistreat me for well-meaning reasons.
The entire point of being a good person is so that other people are better off. If other people are better off, why should we care what started that chain of events, assuming it doesn’t have any negative externalities associated?
boop
because circumstances change all. the. time.
someone on a different website mentioned that they didn’t have mirroring empathy, but after hitting adulthood they decided that even though tearing people down could be fun, it was much more pleasant overall to build them up and keep them around as friends. this person gave excellent advice and wasn’t prey to a lot of the knee-jerk responses to emotional signaling, so they were pretty immune to some narcissist-type shit and could give really good help to people, but i couldn’t shake the fear that they might turn on me if it ever became more entertaining than building me up or ignoring me.
which really wasn’t fair to them, i’m 95% sure. but. when someone’s rationale for doing helpful or not-harmful things is blatantly ‘i like the way the results benefit me personally’ i’m always gonna be worried that someday they won’t get the feedback they want, or harming people will offer a greater reward, so they’ll stop doing those nice things. basically i’m worried their behaviour could change at any moment, and then i’ll have left myself vulnerable to a close predator :I
and i guess any other motive for ‘being a good person’ could also be nullified by changing circumstances, but i guess i’m unusually anxious about my humanity no longer being in someone else’s best interests, and that being enough reason to drop the ‘enlightened’ part of enlightened self-interest
Jhon
Be nice to everybody.
So you’re better than they are.
What exactly is failing to work here, Shiro? Sarah’s first response wasn’t “No Joe, don’t you dare talk to me”, nor anything like it.
She got upset because he revealed how much he knew about PUA tricks, and lashed out. His evidence, while kinda repugnant, was valid evidence for him telling the truth about knowing her name.
Sarah didn’t try anything in this interaction, and if this was trying from a previous interaction, it wouldn’t have started as non-aggressively as it did.
Sarah was reminded that Joe is a shitty person, but he was no shittier to her at the end of the conversation than the start.
Honestly, revealing PUA tricks is the kind of move that, unless done specifically to get someone’s guard lowered, is a reasonably respectable move, since it effectively disarms him. Punishing that behavior is counterproductive.
I’m chalking this one up as Sarah being angry moreso than Joe being a horrible person. (That said, Sarah has plenty of reason to be angry, as a woman of color, and Joe is still mostly a horrible person, but nonetheless, it doesn’t change the specifics of this interaction.)
Hana
Having read more of your comments lower down in the thread, I will say that I agree their past interactions make it understandable why Sarah responded as she did. I still feel like her negative response was triggered by the wrong part of the conversation to be strictly validated as part of her previous dislike of him, but it’s not a big enough point to get into an argument with you about.
That’s an awfully nitpicky concession, but I will accept it nonetheless. History matters, context matters, and if some dude has (like I said above) repeatedly and consistently sexually harassed me nearly every time we’ve ever interacted, I am going to do my damnedest to make sure that doesn’t happen again.
if not most of them to some extent, because of the “can you squeak us a little song?” line. But *yes,* I will happily adopt this into my headcanon, it makes perfect sense.
Could be. On the other hand, he has ridiculous ideas about manliness, and some men who can pull off the whole falsetto thing don’t because they feel it’s effeminate…
Songbird
Really? That’s weird to me. Some of the rock stars that I like the most are super manly, and they have CRAZY high singing voices.
I have been hearing a snippet of that song multiple times a day for weeks because the show Wheeler Dealers is coming back with a new cast member to replace long-time mechanic Edd China.
245 thoughts on “Existence”
Ana Chronistic
“can’t crush my face… allll by mysellllf”
Happy Triskaidecaphobia Day!
Arawn
A-actually… you can crush your face all by yourself… you just have to want it hard enough.
Egg
Why October?
Kryss LaBryn
Because October is awesome. 😀
Deanatay
And when it’s Friday the 13th… IN OCTOBER… it’s something special.
Deanatay
NO NO NO NO!!
You either CRUSH THE HEAD *pinches fingers vertically*
Or you SQUISH THE FACE *pinches fingers horizontally*
Get it right!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EBlPy0byK8
Doctor_Who
Walky will talk about feelings with you, Joe.
Right now he feels like he needs to poop. And he’ll gladly talk about it! At length!
Roborat
And in excruciating detail.
GreatContagion
Extrudiating detail, huh?
He’s bound by deep deut(er)y to let it all out about this feeling.
butts
Walky— 🙂
Joe— >:(
King Daniel
Next comic: the truck driver makes his return
http://www.dumbingofage.com/tag/definitely-that-same-truck-driver-dude-as-in-roomies/
Tacos
Truck-kun goes everywhere.
Jon Rich
Act with integrity….no regrets.
Durandal_1707
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21z-K5ChWbE
K the Nerd
Walky seems to have a knack for singing songs about and to lonely people who then retaliate physically.
JessWitt
What were these previous instances by which Sir Reginald graced us with his dulcet tones?
Kamino Neko
He sang Desperado to Sal. Which is why she inwardly facepalmed when Danny did.
JessWitt
Now I get that bit with Danny’s uke and Sal.
I just wish I could find that first strip with Walky.
ValdVin
Sal took even greater exception, shown here. Walky is fully committed to the bit, which I love.
http://www.dumbingofage.com/2016/comic/book-6/03-when-god-closes-the-door/eagles/
Cattleprod
I know that song, and trying to hum it to myself is impossible because that first line immediately puts The Logical Song in my head.
Cholma
Now watch what you say or they’ll be calling you a radical,
Liberal, fanatical, criminal.
Marsh Maryrose
Well, I am feeling like a criminal. Anyone know of a good defense?
HeatherJean
The questions run too deep….
Roborat
How about a good offence?
Needfuldoer
I hate that bloody song with the white-hot intensity of a thousand suns, but I can’t articulate why. The rest of Breakfast in America is fine. (Plus it gave us the “Supertramp did 9/11” joke.)
Charlie Spencer
When YOU were young, and your heart was an open book…
Y’all are welcome.
Irredentist
That was a little excessive, Sarah. But I understand.
Shiro
Hey, when nothing else works, you sometimes get a little dramatic.
Unusually Angry Hippie
Reactions like that convince people that it’s not worth even trying to change because you’ll be hated anyway.
Shiro
After someone has repeatedly and consistently sexually harassed me in nearly every interaction we’ve ever had, the onus is not fucking on me to accept them just because they say they’ve changed this time, honest. In fact, even if they HAVE changed, I am not required to ever forgive them or want to be around them in the future. That’s just how it is. Sometimes you don’t get a second chance.
CJ
From Sarah’s point of view, there was no change, just a slight variation in method.
Emily
If you’re trying to be a better person so people will like you and not because you want to stop hurting those around you then you have in fact missed the entire point of being a good person.
Hana
Eh, teleological vs deontological ethics. I’d prefer somebody was nice to me for selfish reasons, rather than mistreat me for well-meaning reasons.
The entire point of being a good person is so that other people are better off. If other people are better off, why should we care what started that chain of events, assuming it doesn’t have any negative externalities associated?
boop
because circumstances change all. the. time.
someone on a different website mentioned that they didn’t have mirroring empathy, but after hitting adulthood they decided that even though tearing people down could be fun, it was much more pleasant overall to build them up and keep them around as friends. this person gave excellent advice and wasn’t prey to a lot of the knee-jerk responses to emotional signaling, so they were pretty immune to some narcissist-type shit and could give really good help to people, but i couldn’t shake the fear that they might turn on me if it ever became more entertaining than building me up or ignoring me.
which really wasn’t fair to them, i’m 95% sure. but. when someone’s rationale for doing helpful or not-harmful things is blatantly ‘i like the way the results benefit me personally’ i’m always gonna be worried that someday they won’t get the feedback they want, or harming people will offer a greater reward, so they’ll stop doing those nice things. basically i’m worried their behaviour could change at any moment, and then i’ll have left myself vulnerable to a close predator :I
and i guess any other motive for ‘being a good person’ could also be nullified by changing circumstances, but i guess i’m unusually anxious about my humanity no longer being in someone else’s best interests, and that being enough reason to drop the ‘enlightened’ part of enlightened self-interest
Jhon
Be nice to everybody.
So you’re better than they are.
Hana
What exactly is failing to work here, Shiro? Sarah’s first response wasn’t “No Joe, don’t you dare talk to me”, nor anything like it.
She got upset because he revealed how much he knew about PUA tricks, and lashed out. His evidence, while kinda repugnant, was valid evidence for him telling the truth about knowing her name.
Sarah didn’t try anything in this interaction, and if this was trying from a previous interaction, it wouldn’t have started as non-aggressively as it did.
Sarah was reminded that Joe is a shitty person, but he was no shittier to her at the end of the conversation than the start.
Honestly, revealing PUA tricks is the kind of move that, unless done specifically to get someone’s guard lowered, is a reasonably respectable move, since it effectively disarms him. Punishing that behavior is counterproductive.
I’m chalking this one up as Sarah being angry moreso than Joe being a horrible person. (That said, Sarah has plenty of reason to be angry, as a woman of color, and Joe is still mostly a horrible person, but nonetheless, it doesn’t change the specifics of this interaction.)
Hana
Having read more of your comments lower down in the thread, I will say that I agree their past interactions make it understandable why Sarah responded as she did. I still feel like her negative response was triggered by the wrong part of the conversation to be strictly validated as part of her previous dislike of him, but it’s not a big enough point to get into an argument with you about.
Shiro
That’s an awfully nitpicky concession, but I will accept it nonetheless. History matters, context matters, and if some dude has (like I said above) repeatedly and consistently sexually harassed me nearly every time we’ve ever interacted, I am going to do my damnedest to make sure that doesn’t happen again.
Passchendaele
I have to imagine his singing is fantastic, just because. :p
MM
The music notes aren’t malformed, so it’s plausible.
Bagge
That WOULD make it even funnier.
My headcanon is that Linda made him take singing lessons because it would help in his career as a child actor.
Ooooh, ooooh. And weren’t some of the hymmel episodes musicals?
Passchendaele
if not most of them to some extent, because of the “can you squeak us a little song?” line. But *yes,* I will happily adopt this into my headcanon, it makes perfect sense.
Reltzik
YES. And my headcanon has Walky singing falsetto.
Minotaur
Could be. On the other hand, he has ridiculous ideas about manliness, and some men who can pull off the whole falsetto thing don’t because they feel it’s effeminate…
Songbird
Really? That’s weird to me. Some of the rock stars that I like the most are super manly, and they have CRAZY high singing voices.
ValdVin
Me too, and he is pretty outgoing when he wants to be. Which is almost all the time. So of course he drops “theme songs” in people.
(Introvert envy on my part.)
Passchendaele
I just remembered seeing part of this song in the older Shortpacked! comics. How old is the song, anyways?
3oranges
1975 by Eric Carmen, apparently with melodies taken from older works.
ValdVin
It goes back to the mid 1970s. I’m not googling it to find out for certain.
The main piano theme is from Beethoven or Bach.
ValdVin
From the 2nd movement, Piano Concerto 2 in Cmin, by Sergei Rachmaninoff.
And I’m sure Danny knows the chords.
Durandal_1707
I posted a link to it waaaaay up, fifth post on the page. 😉
CoMa
Info dump: Wikipedia says it was first released in 1975, so that makes it 42 years old.
Passchendaele
*adds to long list of songs that I’ve listened to on the radio lately and are older than I thought*
Durandal_1707
Rachmaninoff wrote the melody in 1901, so it’s even older than that. 😉
Stephen Bierce
*takes the day off*
Geneseepaws
Hey! If you sit down at your desk and someone has already finished your work for the day, why not take the day off?
Deanatay
It IS nice when the characters provide their own theme muzak!
Yumi
Man, I really hope the situation never arises where Sarah’s literally dying in the street and Joe’s the only one around.
Ryek Hvek
Joe will take a page from Walky’s (comic)book and declare that he’s Aloysious, Earl of Murgatroyd.
zoelogical
………..how are these situations even remotely the same? o.O
Yumi
…the same…as…what Sarah said…in the first panel…?
thejeff
It does kind of have that foreshadowy kind of feeling to it, doesn’t it?
Confuzor
Obama’s Elf!
darkoneko
God damn someone beat me to it
Yumi
I looked this up, so I get it now, but at first all I could think of was a remake of Will Ferrell’s Elf staring Obama.
Yumi
*starring
Delicious Taffy
First one’s funnier.
butting
* Will Ferrell in Elf costume, stares at Obama
* Obama, staring back, sips 7-Up through a straw
Opus the Poet
I have been hearing a snippet of that song multiple times a day for weeks because the show Wheeler Dealers is coming back with a new cast member to replace long-time mechanic Edd China.
bucket
I’m not sure who’s funnier singing it though – Walky or Mike Brewer…
MM