It doesn’t matter if you’re Muslim, Christian, or Way-Of-Devotion Hindu who worships one of the male deities, it’s just… urgh.
But then, it looks like it’s on purpose, if Mary and Roz turn out to both be insanely extremist stereotypes, just in different ways.
Ancestral Hamster
Hey, it’s the Odd Couple, updated for the 21st Century!
Ridureyu
I remember one set of roommates from my college days, where one roomie was clean and the other was messy. You could divide the room in half with a straight edge, it was that exact – one half spotless, dusted, and vacuumed, and the other half ankle-deep in dirty laundry (He never washed his clothes, he just sprayed them with febreze and went onward). And then one day I noticed that somebody had taped a line down the middle of the room…
Ancestral Hamster
That was the situation with my roommate my senior year of college. I was the neat one (though I didn’t dust or vacuum), but I did tape a line down the middle of the room.
Horerczy
Technically Christianity has an asexual diety. The use of he is simply because we don’t want to refer to God as it.
CW
Asexual doesn’t mean no specific gender or sex it means no sexual orientation. Though to be fair, there’s nothing in the bible to that says He isn’t asexual either.
It works. Single sexless being capable of giving birth to new life independently.
bramblepatch
When referring to intelligent entities, though, “genderless” is more commonly used.
Swissaboo
No it really doesn’t. Asexual means, “doesn’t have sex” not “doesn’t have a sex.” Asexual reproduction means “reproduction without sex”
Bramblepatch is right, though I have more often heard “sexless”
Pandademic
Actually, it works in both contexts:
a·sex·u·al
–adjective
1.
Biology .
a.
having no sex or sexual organs.
b.
independent of sexual processes, especially not involving the union of male and female germ cells.
2.
free from or unaffected by sexuality: an asexual friendship.
gangler
Reproduction without sex, which as I stated God is a solid case of. Unless I’m mistaken, in the standard christian mythos we are all children of God, made in his image, without a second being. Reproduction without sex.
Though Pandademic provided a much better and more applicable set of definitions than my own. At the end of the day though it looks like just about every definition fits.
Unless you’re considering God to be creating new gods through this creation, it isn’t reproduction at all. It’s just production, and doesn’t have anything to do with sexuality.
Of course, if you DO think the creations of God have the capacity to develop into gods themselves, then there isn’t anything wrong with believing that God’s got a gender. There are a few Christian faiths that take that tack.
gangler
Right, right. That makes sense. Fair enough.
Andy
I would also point out that Jesus refers to God as his Father, and was incarnated as a man, thus ascribing a male identity to the deity.
lord of dance
yeah, but that was more because he was plopped out of a woman so dad was the only thing left. as far as i understand it, most of the original hebrew text from which christianity evolved mostly referred to god using non-destinct pronouns
gangler
Personally I was raised mormon. Taught that God has a wife that doesn’t get talked about a lot, who he has had enough sex with to create every one of our immortal souls. We interpret the whole “Children of God” thing very literally.
An eternity of marital sex looking after an ever growing family is kind of the driving motivation to get into heaven.
So yeah, we tend to view God as an entirely gendered and sexual being. As you state though, not the case in vanilla christianity. Iirc it was actually considered profane back then to refer to God directly, and so they’d often talk around actually naming him/her. Verses like “I am that I am” refer to that practice. Been a long time since I was extensively read on that though so feel free to correct me if I got that wrong.
Jade Margery
So… how do Mormons view the whole impregnating Mary thing? Was God cheating on his wife? Or did that not count as sex? Or is God a polygamist and Mary is/was/would be a wife too?
I never knew this about Mormons before.
gangler
I’m also chuckling now at the difficulties that would have arisen from talking about Mary and the Heavenly Mother in that day and age.
That would have required Joe to refer to something negatively. Since the only subjects at hands were Joe, Roz and Joe’s penis, the combinations are limited.
Stupidity IS one of the few acceptable discriminations that are still popular. I do realize that dumb may refer to mutes, but I felt compelled to point that out.
It’s Mandy. She has only shown up once in DoA so far thou.
Ancestral Hamster
o/`
Well you came and you gave without taking
but I sent you away, oh Mandy
well you kissed me and stopped me from shaking
I need you today, oh Mandy
o/`
214 thoughts on “Dumb”
Kurai_Seraphim
Honestly, it doesn’t get much more socialist than free sex videos for the masses of have-nots… namely the ten or so women who have not had a Joe-ing.
Plasma Mongoose
So Joe is a commie who spreads legs and propaganda as he joes girls with his ‘pinko’?
I KNEW IT!
David Herbert
He’ll bring back the cold war. With his penis.
Jamal K.
If it’s a cold war, he won’t be able to do much for long :\
I’d pay a quarter to see him panic >XD
Kernanator
I’d pay a nickel. Like the one I paid to fuck your mom.
yeap.
seems like PROGRESS.
LaPlace's Demon
Does this mean the song “Joe Hill” is really just a big penis joke?
Jen Aside
Starving… for attention?
This “roommate agreement” thing sounds painfully complicated =|
Plasma Mongoose
That or she is a Pro-Ana.
ALostProphet
She’s a thinspiration to us all.
Gnoka
I was thinking more along the lines of starving artist. Since she was an artist in Roomies.
Gnoka
Oh I just mentioned the old canon didn’t I? Damnit.
Kurai_Seraphim
And now I’m apparently Walky. I miss my Leslie already, as all advice is funnier coming from her.
Joe
Upbeat comments coming from Mike’s scowling face are funnier.
I wonder who I got this time…
Cha
You’re Billie. With the name Joe.
Should I be as amused as I am?
Semysane
And yet I am still Pinkie Pie! LET’S PARTY!
Lady Ray
PARTY YEAH!
Kernanator
That is DISTURBING coming from a scowling Jason.
Undrhil
And *that* is disturbing (and funny) coming from Roz with a pop-up condom on her head….
Rowen Morland
But if you are me then who am I?
Aizat
Pop tarts?
Tempo
It’s not Pop tarts!
Melizza
YES SIR THEY ARE. GOOD DAY NOW!
Kaj
I…can’t…look… who am I?
Plasma Mongoose
Roz is a tree-hugging, free-loving commie cam-whore?
Fox News has just found their new straw-leftie target.
Stephen
That’s the best kind of camwhore!
Reiku189
This reply is ten times more hilarious with Joe’s girl getter face
Ridureyu
Isn’t it… kind of bad to try to make your roommate sign an agreement that says, “you must refer to your god only in ways I want?”
Just saying.
Plasma Mongoose
That agreement could become much more disturbing if it turns out that Mary is a muslim.
Mkvenner
That is an idea that is going to fester.
Ridureyu
It doesn’t matter if you’re Muslim, Christian, or Way-Of-Devotion Hindu who worships one of the male deities, it’s just… urgh.
But then, it looks like it’s on purpose, if Mary and Roz turn out to both be insanely extremist stereotypes, just in different ways.
Ancestral Hamster
Hey, it’s the Odd Couple, updated for the 21st Century!
Ridureyu
I remember one set of roommates from my college days, where one roomie was clean and the other was messy. You could divide the room in half with a straight edge, it was that exact – one half spotless, dusted, and vacuumed, and the other half ankle-deep in dirty laundry (He never washed his clothes, he just sprayed them with febreze and went onward). And then one day I noticed that somebody had taped a line down the middle of the room…
Ancestral Hamster
That was the situation with my roommate my senior year of college. I was the neat one (though I didn’t dust or vacuum), but I did tape a line down the middle of the room.
Horerczy
Technically Christianity has an asexual diety. The use of he is simply because we don’t want to refer to God as it.
CW
Asexual doesn’t mean no specific gender or sex it means no sexual orientation. Though to be fair, there’s nothing in the bible to that says He isn’t asexual either.
gangler
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction
It works. Single sexless being capable of giving birth to new life independently.
bramblepatch
When referring to intelligent entities, though, “genderless” is more commonly used.
Swissaboo
No it really doesn’t. Asexual means, “doesn’t have sex” not “doesn’t have a sex.” Asexual reproduction means “reproduction without sex”
Bramblepatch is right, though I have more often heard “sexless”
Pandademic
Actually, it works in both contexts:
a·sex·u·al
–adjective
1.
Biology .
a.
having no sex or sexual organs.
b.
independent of sexual processes, especially not involving the union of male and female germ cells.
2.
free from or unaffected by sexuality: an asexual friendship.
gangler
Reproduction without sex, which as I stated God is a solid case of. Unless I’m mistaken, in the standard christian mythos we are all children of God, made in his image, without a second being. Reproduction without sex.
Though Pandademic provided a much better and more applicable set of definitions than my own. At the end of the day though it looks like just about every definition fits.
Gonna throw the wiktionary up while I’m in here.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/asexual
CP
Unless you’re considering God to be creating new gods through this creation, it isn’t reproduction at all. It’s just production, and doesn’t have anything to do with sexuality.
Of course, if you DO think the creations of God have the capacity to develop into gods themselves, then there isn’t anything wrong with believing that God’s got a gender. There are a few Christian faiths that take that tack.
gangler
Right, right. That makes sense. Fair enough.
Andy
I would also point out that Jesus refers to God as his Father, and was incarnated as a man, thus ascribing a male identity to the deity.
lord of dance
yeah, but that was more because he was plopped out of a woman so dad was the only thing left. as far as i understand it, most of the original hebrew text from which christianity evolved mostly referred to god using non-destinct pronouns
gangler
Personally I was raised mormon. Taught that God has a wife that doesn’t get talked about a lot, who he has had enough sex with to create every one of our immortal souls. We interpret the whole “Children of God” thing very literally.
An eternity of marital sex looking after an ever growing family is kind of the driving motivation to get into heaven.
So yeah, we tend to view God as an entirely gendered and sexual being. As you state though, not the case in vanilla christianity. Iirc it was actually considered profane back then to refer to God directly, and so they’d often talk around actually naming him/her. Verses like “I am that I am” refer to that practice. Been a long time since I was extensively read on that though so feel free to correct me if I got that wrong.
Jade Margery
So… how do Mormons view the whole impregnating Mary thing? Was God cheating on his wife? Or did that not count as sex? Or is God a polygamist and Mary is/was/would be a wife too?
I never knew this about Mormons before.
gangler
I’m also chuckling now at the difficulties that would have arisen from talking about Mary and the Heavenly Mother in that day and age.
TARDIS with a hat
same with Judaism
Digidestined of Trust (Tim)
Wow, my brain just did a complete 360 with each of the different conversation bubbles. They went through 5 different topics in the span of 30 seconds!
JayStrang
Um, no. No they didn’t.
Melizza
World peace, unicorns, capitalism, zombie attacks, and aliens.
das-g
Now it all fits together!
Mkvenner
So much for no child left behind.
Merco
I seriously keep thinking the new comic is going to be about them leaving school, then I remember that it’s still the beginning of the year.
MM
Wow, there really wasn’t a whole lot of conversation involved in Joe and Roz’s hookup, was there?
Kernanator
And this surprises you?
MM
That Joe didn’t unwittingly let an ableist term slip during the few sentences that were exchanged? Yeah, a little.
gangler
Somehow I doubt she demands strict adherence to her sociopolitical and ethical views from everyone she fucks.
Zaratustra
That would have required Joe to refer to something negatively. Since the only subjects at hands were Joe, Roz and Joe’s penis, the combinations are limited.
Tristan J
But sexy.
Rognik
Stupidity IS one of the few acceptable discriminations that are still popular. I do realize that dumb may refer to mutes, but I felt compelled to point that out.
Plasma Mongoose
So Dumbing Of Age actually refers to idea that everyone in college will lose their voices then?
Holy Crap!
Kisai
If they’re in a band they might.
Rognik
In other news, Gravatar shuffle! Sadly, I have no idea who my face is now.
Mkvenner
Human Ultracar?
Plasma Mongoose
It’s Mandy. She has only shown up once in DoA so far thou.
Ancestral Hamster
o/`
Well you came and you gave without taking
but I sent you away, oh Mandy
well you kissed me and stopped me from shaking
I need you today, oh Mandy
o/`
Wait, not that Mandy?
Plasma Mongoose
Personally, I liked Barry Manilow’s ‘I Write the Songs’ better.
Ian
Of course, Manilow didn’t write that song. It was Bruce Johnston.
Plasma Mongoose
Details details! 😛
Ancestral Hamster
If we’re stating preferences for Manilow songs, I prefer “Copacabana.”
Speaking of songs that have women’s names as titles, I’m pretty sure there’s no Cherie in DoA or IW!, but not sure about Michelle.