I’m 100% behind Joyce here. However good her intentions may be, Dorothy is definitely over a line by this point. As for Roz, just ugh. She’s the loud, performative type that grates on my nerves, even if I happen to agree with what they’re saying.
Joeyce currently, but basically never Joyrothy. I just don’t see the ship. I see a lot of other queer ship options as enjoyable and possible, but that one’s never been it for me.
I’m in the same boat. Love Dina and Becky and thought the Mike and Ethan was underexplored before, y’know. But Joyce and Dorothy? They’ve never clicked like that. It’s too… sexless?
Personally I’m baffled by ships that run counter to the established sexuality of the characters involved. Like, sure sometimes two characters have great chemistry and that CAN lead to them discovering their sexuality is broader than they previously thought, but also sometimes two characters can just have fantastic chemistry and also incompatible sexualities, not everything is about sex and/or romance.
As a straight man I have had phenomenal chemistry with several straight men, a couple bi men, at least one gay man, at least two lesbian women, and at least one asexual woman. At no point in any of those totally platonic relationships did anybody seriously contemplate pushing things into romantic or sexual territory (or at least, not seriously enough to have told me about it). There were of course lots and lots of jokes about such relationship evolutions made in just about all of these examples, because I and my friends tend to have a rather campy and lewd sense of humor, but everyone was always clear and open about what the lines are and when we’re joking about them. Also, for the record I’ve also had similar chemistry with straight and bi women, but they weren’t mentioned since the reason those relationships remained platonic wasn’t due to incompatible sexualities and thus has nothing to do with elephants.
thejeff
I get it historically. People made queer ships out of canonically straight characters because straight characters were all they had in media to work with. Sometimes they were even teased intentionally by the creators, often below the radar of the company owning the product.
Old habits live on, but it seems much weirder to me in a strip that does actually explore such representation.
Taffy
People will also do weird crossover ships, like Cloud Strife with George Lopez. There’s no rules here.
Casi
Ugh, Cloud and George would be a horrible couple. If you’re going to ship Cloud with any comedian, it would be Steve Harvey
Taffy
Steve Harvey’s name is too close to Steve Burton, Cloud’s English VA. It’s bordering on tangential selfcest, which is good, but not quite the vibe I was after.
Also I’m pretty sure Steve Harvey is a soulless predator who doesn’t believe it’s possible for humans to have basic morality if they’re not Christian. Then again, I guess if we’re going for crackships…
Lori
Having been a “straight” person who needed some time and distance from my former religion to safely realize I was gay, I think people are just reflecting real life! Especially when engaging with fiction, you can explore a lot of different options that don’t necessarily have to conflict each other. It’d be interesting if she was straight, and just as interesting if she discovered she was gay or bi!
Yumi
There are a number of factors… sometimes non-canon ships, whether or not they go against the established sexuality of the characters, are based on “I think this would be more interesting/a more enjoyable story.” Sometimes, too, actual love interests don’t actually have good chemistry with the characters in question, or just aren’t that interesting. And yet the story insists on having them, because romance has been made overly important in a lot of media (imo).
This can leave it like, “Am I more interested in seeing this character make out with this bland, underdeveloped, who maybe we’ve been told they have a whole history with, but who came into the show three seasons in, or do I want to see them make out with this other character, who’s complex and with whom I’ve watched their relationship develop for years now?”
When straight is the societal default, a lot of characters are “established straight” by things that don’t actually fully establish that, and sometimes if it is established, it’s not unrealistic for it to change.
There’s also just people like what they like; it becomes a problem if they harass creators or other fans in the name of their ship (which has happened with a lot of media and ships, regardless of orientation; I got death threats on YouTube videos about ATLA characters when I was twelve, some people really need to chill).
Axel
Yeah this, all of your paragraphs. What you said about it making things more interesting dynamics or better matches, and re: straight being considered default.
Regarding last bit, there’s also shit like when Shelby Rabara (voice of Peridot) basically got ran off twitter by people harassing her about who Peridot should be shipped with.
Psychie
I am aware that sometimes “established straight” characters are only established as such by default rather than anything actually stated in canon, and I try not to fall into that pitfall when considering a character’s sexuality, to varying degrees of success. My confusion comes in when a character has explicitly stated and demonstrated clear attraction to the opposite sex and NOT the same sex, it is a work that has a history of exploring LGBT stuff and has LGBT characters in the main cast, and yet people insist that a same sex ship with said character is OTP.
I developed a bit of a distaste for it when the CW Supergirl fandom canceled an actor for joking about how Kara/Lena “wasn’t gonna happen” in a season recap video, claiming it was homophobic. Up to that point Kara had been consistently shown to be attracted to men, had never demonstrated more than platonic or familial feelings for women, and there were openly gay and openly trans characters in the main cast, suggesting that if Kara were gonna figure out she was bi, it probably would have already been explored or at least hinted at, and if they did decide to do it without any foreshadowing or hinting, it probably would have played as forced unless they spent several seasons developing that subplot, and they didn’t really have several seasons left to do that.
I don’t take issue with people making fanworks featuring characters acting against their canon sexuality, as I am aware of the history and frankly don’t really care what people do with their fanworks, so long as they don’t try to impose their fanon onto the canon. I kinda view the Joyce/Dorothy shipping that goes on in the comments as that, especially when asking people what their preferred/predicted ship is, since this is the actual strip and not a fanwork. IMO, discussions regarding predictions of the direction the strip is going should be based only upon the established canon.
Given what’s established I could maybe see predicting that Joyce or Dorothy might discover their sexuality is broader than they previously thought, but I genuinely cannot fathom how people can take the tiny hints that may or may not even be hints about that and extrapolate it into “Joyce and Dorothy are gonna get together”. I’m not mad about it, mostly just confused how people can come to that conclusion, and despite all of the thoughtful answers that I very much appreciate, I don’t think I was told anything I didn’t already know.
I suppose some of the confusion might come from the fact that in my head there are two entirely distinct things being referenced in regard to “shipping”, one is predicting relationships that you think might become canon or that you want to become canon, which is what I’m talking about, and the other is fanworks depicting non-canon relationships, which really don’t need to be based on anything. I suppose if other people don’t make a distinction between these two things then that must be where the disconnect lies.
Yumi
…Yeah, based on this comment, I don’t think this is something we’ll see eye t eye on. I felt uncomfortable reading this, honestly, so I probably won’t engage further if it comes up again with you in the future.
Axel
I don’t really have a problem with ones that are against canon sexuality (unless they’re insisting queer characters are/should be straight) or canon ships. That (particularly the latter) is the fun of shipping, that it can be something other than what the source media gives you
But sometimes they’re insisting it’s absolutely true and just about to actually happen in canon. Eventually? maybe, people learn things about themselves. But not anytime soon, and not definitely.
But for Dorothy/Joyce in particular I’ve never seen any romantic chemistry, personally. Joyce has acted a little like she had a crush in the past, but Dotty hasn’t, and I don’t think they’d make a good couple.
Yumi
Yeah, I’d enjoy either one (or both) of them learning they’re queer, but I don’t ship them. I even think said realization could come from their relationship– I could see that especially for Joyce, but Dorothy too- but that wouldn’t have to mean their relationship develops into anything romantic.
I don’t really think that’s likely to happen in the comic, and I’m fine with that, but I do see the appeal.
Axel
I don’t think Dorothy has actually even commented on her own sexuality, though we know she likes men and probably doesn’t identify as any gay-umbrella since there have been times it would have made sense to mention it. She could already be bi. Just, not bi with Joyce.
(note, I know sexualities are consistent between canons, but I have no idea what’s confirmed outside of DOA).
I’ve been shipping Joe and Joyce since the rerun of Roomies where Willis pointed out they’ve always had a weird amount of chemistry and I’ve never been unable to see it. I’ve shipped them for years.
Definitely team Joece. He’s the only one who actually listens to her, instead of brushing off what she has to say while they shove her into the box they think she belongs in.
It’s just that Joyce is a fictional character to us, no one is harmed by our shipping.
To Joyce’s friends, Joyce is a real person and should be treated as such.
thejeff
I guess, but no one else even commented and just went right to talking about the shipping.
Yumi
It was the question asked, even as a joke, so…yeah? That’s generally how people are going to respond; it sets up a much more direct route for engagement.
Axel
What moon said, but I was just in a hurry to assert that I don’t get Joyrothy (because I feel like a couple pages back people were acting like it was canon), and also “answer question” kind of overrided the “respond to main comment” in my brain
Joyce and Dorothy don’t even have a healthy friendship. Adding romance and physical stuff doesn’t fix a friendship problem, just makes a toxic relationship more toxic.
Joyce having sex with Dorothy would a MUCH bigger mistake than with Joe. Like, comic-breaking mistake, until it turned out to be a dream sequence or something. Like, I might honestly have to drop the strip if something so character-breaking happens without major repercussions. I’m having flashbacks to 9CL and Seth suddenly turning straight at even the possiblity.
I’m guessing it’s so self-evident to her she doesn’t think it needs to be said.
BigDogLittleCat
Or she doesn’t think it’s her place to tell the others that Joyce likes Joe.
James
Probably part that, maybe partially an aversion to badmouthing someone publicly, even if they deserve it.
thejeff
She had a chance talking to Joyce alone after lunch, but the conversation might just have moved too fast and she couldn’t get back to it before the others showed up.
She’s definitely not doing this well.
It would be the most respectful way to approach this, but I guess she’s assuming joyce is either too horny or too naive to really hear such a statement about joe.
Also it would end the storyline way too fast.
Yotomoe
“Joe? But he’s a pure innocent saint. When he’s not helping orphaned children learn maths he’s assisting at the soup kitchen. Also he told me he has never once been horny before in his life, so we’re all fine there.”
thejeff
If Joyce is too horny/naive to hear that, she’s too horny/naive for this approach to work either.
I am kind of getting the “If they just talk the plot will fall apart” vibes from this arc though.
Yep, She’s trying to get Joyce to do what she wants by bringing to mind her shame on sex because both Joe and Joyce have already made clear they aren’t dropping their ship to appease her. It’d really frustrating that Dorothy would stoop to this level to get her way.
The closest she’s come is saying “he’s bad news” and “he’s a bad match”. Nothing about why. Nothing that could lead Joyce to talking about why she thinks he’s changed.
It really is weird she’s putting on some kind of pretense here when she’s flat out told Joyce this is about her interest in Joe. My guess is for whatever reason she doesn’t want Roz and the others to know.
like Joyce: “Your (penis) has already been around everywhere”
Joe: “Leslie! Slut shaming!” so she knows what joes about and has been around for joe to offer support through the texting that dorothy doesn’t know about and all that
He literally left a conversation with Joyce to go get laid because he didn’t want to talk about feelings.
She knows Joe enough for a college relationship. Lol
smolgrlboi
yeah this is what I don’t get re:Dorothy’s treatment of Joyce or even some reader’s opinion of the situation – isn’t Joyce already perfectly aware of Joe’s usual behavior (which I don’t think is bad btw he doesn’t coerce anyone, he just likes casual sex OMG)? Idk I feel like I’ve even seen her express some of that conflict between her initial impression of him v her feelings for him now. She’s not nearly as ignorant as some ppl think.
She just says “He’s bad news” and expresses she hates being around him. That could mean anything.
thejeff
Yeah. Spelling out more about why he’s bad news would open up a space for Joyce to defend him and say why she thinks he’s not. Let Dorothy know about the changes he’s been through.
StClair
and that would be communication, which (as noted elsewhere) is poison to a lot of plots. :/
dorothy knows that joyve is completely aware of joe’s past behavior. joyve has been on the receiving end of joe’s past behavior. while i dont think it would hurt to be abundantly clear about her isses the idea that dorothy is being vague is ??? everyone knows what joe is like. everyone knows what joe’s problems are. joyce knows what dorothy thinks of joe.
Dorothy: I’m not in any way infantalizing, Joyce. I just think she can’t be trusted to make an objective decision about having sex with Joe because I think she’s unable to be trusted with her hormones and that sex with someone I don’t like is traumatizing.
Joyce: None of your business!
Dorothy: Of course it’s my business! I must make all of your decisions! I AM THE PREDESTINY OF JOYCE!
359 thoughts on “Slut-shamey”
Axel
go off Joyce
foamy
Preach.
WizardPantaloon
I accidentally flagged your comment, my bad
Wizard
I’m 100% behind Joyce here. However good her intentions may be, Dorothy is definitely over a line by this point. As for Roz, just ugh. She’s the loud, performative type that grates on my nerves, even if I happen to agree with what they’re saying.
Twitcher
Fuck yeah, Joyce! Fight back against infantilization!
Inahc
another thing she has in common with dina…
Doctor_Who
Yeah, these people discussing Joyce’s sex life are totally out of line.
So anyway, are you Team Joe-yce or Team Joyothy?
Axel
Joeyce currently, but basically never Joyrothy. I just don’t see the ship. I see a lot of other queer ship options as enjoyable and possible, but that one’s never been it for me.
Abdomino
I’m in the same boat. Love Dina and Becky and thought the Mike and Ethan was underexplored before, y’know. But Joyce and Dorothy? They’ve never clicked like that. It’s too… sexless?
Psychie
Personally I’m baffled by ships that run counter to the established sexuality of the characters involved. Like, sure sometimes two characters have great chemistry and that CAN lead to them discovering their sexuality is broader than they previously thought, but also sometimes two characters can just have fantastic chemistry and also incompatible sexualities, not everything is about sex and/or romance.
As a straight man I have had phenomenal chemistry with several straight men, a couple bi men, at least one gay man, at least two lesbian women, and at least one asexual woman. At no point in any of those totally platonic relationships did anybody seriously contemplate pushing things into romantic or sexual territory (or at least, not seriously enough to have told me about it). There were of course lots and lots of jokes about such relationship evolutions made in just about all of these examples, because I and my friends tend to have a rather campy and lewd sense of humor, but everyone was always clear and open about what the lines are and when we’re joking about them. Also, for the record I’ve also had similar chemistry with straight and bi women, but they weren’t mentioned since the reason those relationships remained platonic wasn’t due to incompatible sexualities and thus has nothing to do with elephants.
thejeff
I get it historically. People made queer ships out of canonically straight characters because straight characters were all they had in media to work with. Sometimes they were even teased intentionally by the creators, often below the radar of the company owning the product.
Old habits live on, but it seems much weirder to me in a strip that does actually explore such representation.
Taffy
People will also do weird crossover ships, like Cloud Strife with George Lopez. There’s no rules here.
Casi
Ugh, Cloud and George would be a horrible couple. If you’re going to ship Cloud with any comedian, it would be Steve Harvey
Taffy
Steve Harvey’s name is too close to Steve Burton, Cloud’s English VA. It’s bordering on tangential selfcest, which is good, but not quite the vibe I was after.
Also I’m pretty sure Steve Harvey is a soulless predator who doesn’t believe it’s possible for humans to have basic morality if they’re not Christian. Then again, I guess if we’re going for crackships…
Lori
Having been a “straight” person who needed some time and distance from my former religion to safely realize I was gay, I think people are just reflecting real life! Especially when engaging with fiction, you can explore a lot of different options that don’t necessarily have to conflict each other. It’d be interesting if she was straight, and just as interesting if she discovered she was gay or bi!
Yumi
There are a number of factors… sometimes non-canon ships, whether or not they go against the established sexuality of the characters, are based on “I think this would be more interesting/a more enjoyable story.” Sometimes, too, actual love interests don’t actually have good chemistry with the characters in question, or just aren’t that interesting. And yet the story insists on having them, because romance has been made overly important in a lot of media (imo).
This can leave it like, “Am I more interested in seeing this character make out with this bland, underdeveloped, who maybe we’ve been told they have a whole history with, but who came into the show three seasons in, or do I want to see them make out with this other character, who’s complex and with whom I’ve watched their relationship develop for years now?”
When straight is the societal default, a lot of characters are “established straight” by things that don’t actually fully establish that, and sometimes if it is established, it’s not unrealistic for it to change.
There’s also just people like what they like; it becomes a problem if they harass creators or other fans in the name of their ship (which has happened with a lot of media and ships, regardless of orientation; I got death threats on YouTube videos about ATLA characters when I was twelve, some people really need to chill).
Axel
Yeah this, all of your paragraphs. What you said about it making things more interesting dynamics or better matches, and re: straight being considered default.
Regarding last bit, there’s also shit like when Shelby Rabara (voice of Peridot) basically got ran off twitter by people harassing her about who Peridot should be shipped with.
Psychie
I am aware that sometimes “established straight” characters are only established as such by default rather than anything actually stated in canon, and I try not to fall into that pitfall when considering a character’s sexuality, to varying degrees of success. My confusion comes in when a character has explicitly stated and demonstrated clear attraction to the opposite sex and NOT the same sex, it is a work that has a history of exploring LGBT stuff and has LGBT characters in the main cast, and yet people insist that a same sex ship with said character is OTP.
I developed a bit of a distaste for it when the CW Supergirl fandom canceled an actor for joking about how Kara/Lena “wasn’t gonna happen” in a season recap video, claiming it was homophobic. Up to that point Kara had been consistently shown to be attracted to men, had never demonstrated more than platonic or familial feelings for women, and there were openly gay and openly trans characters in the main cast, suggesting that if Kara were gonna figure out she was bi, it probably would have already been explored or at least hinted at, and if they did decide to do it without any foreshadowing or hinting, it probably would have played as forced unless they spent several seasons developing that subplot, and they didn’t really have several seasons left to do that.
I don’t take issue with people making fanworks featuring characters acting against their canon sexuality, as I am aware of the history and frankly don’t really care what people do with their fanworks, so long as they don’t try to impose their fanon onto the canon. I kinda view the Joyce/Dorothy shipping that goes on in the comments as that, especially when asking people what their preferred/predicted ship is, since this is the actual strip and not a fanwork. IMO, discussions regarding predictions of the direction the strip is going should be based only upon the established canon.
Given what’s established I could maybe see predicting that Joyce or Dorothy might discover their sexuality is broader than they previously thought, but I genuinely cannot fathom how people can take the tiny hints that may or may not even be hints about that and extrapolate it into “Joyce and Dorothy are gonna get together”. I’m not mad about it, mostly just confused how people can come to that conclusion, and despite all of the thoughtful answers that I very much appreciate, I don’t think I was told anything I didn’t already know.
I suppose some of the confusion might come from the fact that in my head there are two entirely distinct things being referenced in regard to “shipping”, one is predicting relationships that you think might become canon or that you want to become canon, which is what I’m talking about, and the other is fanworks depicting non-canon relationships, which really don’t need to be based on anything. I suppose if other people don’t make a distinction between these two things then that must be where the disconnect lies.
Yumi
…Yeah, based on this comment, I don’t think this is something we’ll see eye t eye on. I felt uncomfortable reading this, honestly, so I probably won’t engage further if it comes up again with you in the future.
Axel
I don’t really have a problem with ones that are against canon sexuality (unless they’re insisting queer characters are/should be straight) or canon ships. That (particularly the latter) is the fun of shipping, that it can be something other than what the source media gives you
But sometimes they’re insisting it’s absolutely true and just about to actually happen in canon. Eventually? maybe, people learn things about themselves. But not anytime soon, and not definitely.
But for Dorothy/Joyce in particular I’ve never seen any romantic chemistry, personally. Joyce has acted a little like she had a crush in the past, but Dotty hasn’t, and I don’t think they’d make a good couple.
Yumi
Yeah, I’d enjoy either one (or both) of them learning they’re queer, but I don’t ship them. I even think said realization could come from their relationship– I could see that especially for Joyce, but Dorothy too- but that wouldn’t have to mean their relationship develops into anything romantic.
I don’t really think that’s likely to happen in the comic, and I’m fine with that, but I do see the appeal.
Axel
I don’t think Dorothy has actually even commented on her own sexuality, though we know she likes men and probably doesn’t identify as any gay-umbrella since there have been times it would have made sense to mention it. She could already be bi. Just, not bi with Joyce.
(note, I know sexualities are consistent between canons, but I have no idea what’s confirmed outside of DOA).
Yumi
https://www.dumbingofage.com/2015/comic/book-5/03-the-butterflies-fly-away/kinsey/
Aware that estimate could change, but last we heard, places herself at a 0 on the Kinsey Scale.
Axel
For some reason I didn’t think it was a Dorothy line
Yotomoe
I’ve been shipping Joe and Joyce since the rerun of Roomies where Willis pointed out they’ve always had a weird amount of chemistry and I’ve never been unable to see it. I’ve shipped them for years.
Nono
Team Joycelia Gray-Brown.
Sirksome
“JoJo”ship seems more likely and I don’t hate it, but I’ll always hold a small fool’s for the “really good friends” ship.
RassilonTDavros
I’m on Team Two-Hands, personally.
anon
Team Joyce x Successful Art Career to the point where she can have her pick of a dozen Joes and Dorothy’s
Rose by Any Other Name
My personal fav ship with Joyce doesn’t work in DoA because of character ages being changed between Walkyverse and Dumbverse.
That aside, I’m team Joeyce both because I think they balance one another and because of the historical reference.
Clif
So Joyeagan then?
Needfuldoer
Definitely team Joece. He’s the only one who actually listens to her, instead of brushing off what she has to say while they shove her into the box they think she belongs in.
Amós Batista
Team Joyothy, of course. Tired to see default couple in everywhere.
RedCat
JJ or DJ?
thejeff
Did everyone really miss the point of this post?
Or just ignore it?
Moon
No we got the joke.
It’s just that Joyce is a fictional character to us, no one is harmed by our shipping.
To Joyce’s friends, Joyce is a real person and should be treated as such.
thejeff
I guess, but no one else even commented and just went right to talking about the shipping.
Yumi
It was the question asked, even as a joke, so…yeah? That’s generally how people are going to respond; it sets up a much more direct route for engagement.
Axel
What moon said, but I was just in a hurry to assert that I don’t get Joyrothy (because I feel like a couple pages back people were acting like it was canon), and also “answer question” kind of overrided the “respond to main comment” in my brain
Nicoleandmaggie
Joyce and Dorothy don’t even have a healthy friendship. Adding romance and physical stuff doesn’t fix a friendship problem, just makes a toxic relationship more toxic.
The Quirk
Joyce having sex with Dorothy would a MUCH bigger mistake than with Joe. Like, comic-breaking mistake, until it turned out to be a dream sequence or something. Like, I might honestly have to drop the strip if something so character-breaking happens without major repercussions. I’m having flashbacks to 9CL and Seth suddenly turning straight at even the possiblity.
khn0
You know that kind of comment sounds like an appeal to do it?
The false equivalence is just bonus!
Decidedly Orthogonal
I’m gonna toss Joe-rothy out there, just for the odds.
Yeet
Y’know dorothy if you just said “I think Joe specifically is bad because of X behaviour I’ve observed for Y years” this could have gone much better
Yotomoe
It almost feels weird how hesitant she has been to say that directly up until now. She’s really been mincing her words.
Andy
I’m guessing it’s so self-evident to her she doesn’t think it needs to be said.
BigDogLittleCat
Or she doesn’t think it’s her place to tell the others that Joyce likes Joe.
James
Probably part that, maybe partially an aversion to badmouthing someone publicly, even if they deserve it.
thejeff
She had a chance talking to Joyce alone after lunch, but the conversation might just have moved too fast and she couldn’t get back to it before the others showed up.
She’s definitely not doing this well.
Yeet
It would be the most respectful way to approach this, but I guess she’s assuming joyce is either too horny or too naive to really hear such a statement about joe.
Also it would end the storyline way too fast.
Yotomoe
“Joe? But he’s a pure innocent saint. When he’s not helping orphaned children learn maths he’s assisting at the soup kitchen. Also he told me he has never once been horny before in his life, so we’re all fine there.”
thejeff
If Joyce is too horny/naive to hear that, she’s too horny/naive for this approach to work either.
I am kind of getting the “If they just talk the plot will fall apart” vibes from this arc though.
Needfuldoer
She’s a born politician.
thakoru
I feel like she was actually fairly clear about her objections. She’s being passive-aggressive now because the direct angle didn’t work.
Archieve
Yep, She’s trying to get Joyce to do what she wants by bringing to mind her shame on sex because both Joe and Joyce have already made clear they aren’t dropping their ship to appease her. It’d really frustrating that Dorothy would stoop to this level to get her way.
thejeff
The closest she’s come is saying “he’s bad news” and “he’s a bad match”. Nothing about why. Nothing that could lead Joyce to talking about why she thinks he’s changed.
Sirksome
It really is weird she’s putting on some kind of pretense here when she’s flat out told Joyce this is about her interest in Joe. My guess is for whatever reason she doesn’t want Roz and the others to know.
Steelbright
Yeah, that’s much more valid than this kind of mother hen deal.
anon
Nothing joyce doesn’t already know
like Joyce: “Your (penis) has already been around everywhere”
Joe: “Leslie! Slut shaming!” so she knows what joes about and has been around for joe to offer support through the texting that dorothy doesn’t know about and all that
Johan
He literally left a conversation with Joyce to go get laid because he didn’t want to talk about feelings.
She knows Joe enough for a college relationship. Lol
smolgrlboi
yeah this is what I don’t get re:Dorothy’s treatment of Joyce or even some reader’s opinion of the situation – isn’t Joyce already perfectly aware of Joe’s usual behavior (which I don’t think is bad btw he doesn’t coerce anyone, he just likes casual sex OMG)? Idk I feel like I’ve even seen her express some of that conflict between her initial impression of him v her feelings for him now. She’s not nearly as ignorant as some ppl think.
RedCat
Apparently she did: https://www.dumbingofage.com/2022/comic/book-13/02-turning-saints-into-the-sea/calmyourself/
Yotomoe
She just says “He’s bad news” and expresses she hates being around him. That could mean anything.
thejeff
Yeah. Spelling out more about why he’s bad news would open up a space for Joyce to defend him and say why she thinks he’s not. Let Dorothy know about the changes he’s been through.
StClair
and that would be communication, which (as noted elsewhere) is poison to a lot of plots. :/
Chromatic Roses
dorothy knows that joyve is completely aware of joe’s past behavior. joyve has been on the receiving end of joe’s past behavior. while i dont think it would hurt to be abundantly clear about her isses the idea that dorothy is being vague is ??? everyone knows what joe is like. everyone knows what joe’s problems are. joyce knows what dorothy thinks of joe.
C.T. Phipps
Dorothy: I’m not in any way infantalizing, Joyce. I just think she can’t be trusted to make an objective decision about having sex with Joe because I think she’s unable to be trusted with her hormones and that sex with someone I don’t like is traumatizing.
Joyce: None of your business!
Dorothy: Of course it’s my business! I must make all of your decisions! I AM THE PREDESTINY OF JOYCE!
C.T. Phipps
Weird typo for President.
Axel
I am the Presidenty of Joyce
Doctor_Who
She lives in Indiana. Vowing to control a woman’s body for her is sure to win her votes.
Lan
And yet, still somewhat appropriate for Dorothy’s mindset that she needs to make Joyce’s decisions for her
William Leonard Reese Jr.
Entirely Valid Joyce.
Johan
Quit judging me!
*Immediately judges*
MisterJinKC