Beautiful work DyW! Love the “God doesn’t cancel anyone,” followed immediately by his biggest cancellation of humanity ever. ? It’s probably only second to cancelling Lucifer and the hosts that aligned with him.
No, a train crash would be horrific. This is just puzzling with a side order of nonsense. If they don’t know what exactly pre-flood mankind did that was so evil Lord Vengeance had to destroy most of them, then how are we supposed to avoid the kind of evil that made him decide an apocalypse was his only option?
Nope a person can be a Bloomin’ Idjit for other reasons, like being murderously anti-bike lane.
Clif
Y’all have anti-bike lanes up where you are?
All those anti-bikers must be so pleased.
They finally have a safe space to ride their anti-bikes.
Taellosse
I’m trying to visualize what an “anti-bike” would look like, and the only thing that makes sense to me is a construct affixed to the head and shoulders that features 2 large wheels which are designed to somehow spin only when the person wearing them is holding still – walking or running locks the wheels in place.
Shadowsnail
If you crash a bike into an anti-bike, what color are the emitted photons?
If that’s what she means, she’s doing a terrible job of expressing it. I mean, saying “they used pronouns” is either meaningless or incredibly ironic, and without more context there’s no way to tell which.
thejeff
It is a terrible way, but if you follow terf discourse, you’ll see it constantly. It’s one of those things that likely started off with more explanation, but now it’s just an in-group attack. Everyone who’s going to agree knows what you mean as do the people you’re trying to hurt, so why say more.
Some Ed
Because pretty much any time you talk about what everybody knows, even if it’s just limited to “everyone who x will know”, unless somehow the x quality fundamentally ensures knowledge, you’ll be wrong.
“Everyone who is good at math knows that 1 + 1 = 2”. Maybe this one is right. *Maybe*. I mean, it’s kind of the definition of 2. But what if there’s someone out there who does a lot of math and is good at what they do, but only does base 2, so to them, it’s 1 + 1 = 10, and they read “1 + 1 = 2” as “1 + 1 = undefined symbol”?
Even if, somehow, at some point in time, we managed to actually educate *everybody* on some topic, a second later, somebody new is born, and now not everyone knows again.
Yes, I’m on spectrum, but this is more about being willing to see the bigger picture and caring about what the words actually mean, because we need them to mean something to communicate effectively and if you keep limiting your definition based on whatever context you’re aware of that happens to work for you that not everyone will know, then communication doesn’t happen as smoothly as it could.
…
I’m being overly optimistic again, aren’t I? Communication can’t actually happen that smoothly, because we don’t all use Spectate Swamp’s Swamp Search. (Not bothering to cite that reference, since everybody knows it already.)
BlackJacques
It’s humor! You should look into this humor stuff, it’s great!
I’ve no doubt that she has no objection to the existence of gendered words, or, indeed, traditional pronoun usage in English. Her problem, of a certainty, is with people who wish to adopt a gender identity – and the corresponding gendered pronouns – other than what they were assigned at birth. Undoubtedly she also takes issue with anyone wishing to adopt pronouns that are expressly designed to avoid alignment with one or the other side of the traditional gender binary.
With respect to languages which assign a gender to most nouns, Mary presumably opposes the efforts of some native speakers to de-gender their languages, since she likely believes those languages are already “as God intended”.
thejeff
Or even with people who do use the pronouns one might expect at a glance, but choose to announce theirs to normalize people whose preferred pronouns aren’t so obvious.
Wizard
Has anyone told her that some languages have three genders?
Some Ed
I’m pretty sure her problem is also the existence of people who, regardless of their personal preference, have a, um, complicated situation down there. Also, that’s a bit more than 0.1% of the population and it’s spread pretty evenly, so chances are really good she’s met at least one of them.
(I say more than 0.1%, because I’m aware that there are multiple causes for said complicated situations, and one particular one has an official frequency of about 1 in 1000. I don’t know how common any of the others are, and there probably are more of them than I know about.)
@Wizard: Like, um, English? Admittedly, we tend to not use one of them to refer to people, because it’s picked up a bad case of connotations. Some languages have four genders, and I don’t think English is among those.
Love that! Reminds me of the boobquake thing a few years back… (Divinity punishing mankind with earthquakes because of the shameless hussies displaying their cleavage… Inspiring many women to wear low-cut “boobquake” tops because having boobs powerful to cause earthquakes is pretty darned cool TYVM!)
Mary doesn’t realize she’s talking in jargon. And this is a spectacularly nonsensical piece of scaremongering christofascist jargon because it’s just using the regular word “pronouns” while attaching a big, vague, threatening (to the religious Right) concept of changing times and progressing social values and shifting power balances and gender nonconformism to it.
The frightening thing here I think is seeing how deep in her bubble of conservative extremism Mary lives, if she has lost sight of the idea there could be people who aren’t scared of the things that scare her or even follow the convolutions of her specialized language. Talking to Dina and Becky would probably be very good for her, if she cared about what they’re saying.
345 thoughts on “Despair”
darkoneko
This “haunted house” is like watching a train crash in real time and you can’t look away.
Reltzik
“Real time” meaning a few sentences per day.
JepMZ
It’s so bad, Ana Chronistic doesn’t want to be first in line
Decidedly Orthogonal
Beautiful work DyW! Love the “God doesn’t cancel anyone,” followed immediately by his biggest cancellation of humanity ever. ? It’s probably only second to cancelling Lucifer and the hosts that aligned with him.
Clif
Changing the subject abruptly because I can…
Hey alt-text, I appreciated the classic horror reference even if no one else did.
Wizard
I love the smell of irony in the morning! (Or evening, whatever.)
Concolor44
Yes. The absence of self-awareness is simply breathtaking.
Felian
LOL nice, very true!
Ragingagnostic
No, a train crash would be horrific. This is just puzzling with a side order of nonsense. If they don’t know what exactly pre-flood mankind did that was so evil Lord Vengeance had to destroy most of them, then how are we supposed to avoid the kind of evil that made him decide an apocalypse was his only option?
Clif
It’s actually explained.
Ana Chronistic
“Me, I only use AMATEURnouns”
ThunderNight
I’m more of a NoviceNoun person myself.
True Survivor
They aren’t as good, but you don’t have to pay them.
Dara
Except, of course, in exposure.
Chris M.
Coincidentally, how Peter is paid as well.
The Oracle
And charged also.
Dara
I didn’t realise until right now that Peter’s peter is, shall we say, the pickled pepper of this particular presentation.
Casi
excellent alliteration friend
Rognik
Paid by Mary exposing herself?
Thanatos
That’s what he thought, but it turned out that he is paid by exposing himself. Read the fine print, people.
Slartibeast Button, BIA
Are there Connouns?
Kitschensyngk
I think they’re called “anti-nouns.”
Slartibeast Button, BIA
Maybe Connouns are how you talk about people who are in prison.
Clif
Not in prison, just uncouth. Haven’t you heard of Connouns the Barbarians?
Kaiyalai
No, only adverbs.
Jungle Dwayne
We call them noobnouns
The Oracle
When they act up, they get hit with the Pwnouns.
Clif
So, how many Pwnouns have you owned?
The Oracle
Not sure how to answer this, but to be succinct: At least 7.
Clif
Clif
Well that didn’t work. Assume a thumbs up.
Shade
I prefer QualifiedExpertNouns.
Clif
Too expensive and there’s always a wait list.
Ty34er
Oh no, Mary’s one of those
alongcameaspider
Are you really surprised at this?
Thag Simmons
it is her defining character trait
Jenniffniff
I fact which she takes pride in.
Opus the Poet
Transphobes? Or Bloomin’ Idjits?
Renadt
Yes. And then some.
Shade
Those are the same thing.
Opus the Poet
Nope a person can be a Bloomin’ Idjit for other reasons, like being murderously anti-bike lane.
Clif
Y’all have anti-bike lanes up where you are?
All those anti-bikers must be so pleased.
They finally have a safe space to ride their anti-bikes.
Taellosse
I’m trying to visualize what an “anti-bike” would look like, and the only thing that makes sense to me is a construct affixed to the head and shoulders that features 2 large wheels which are designed to somehow spin only when the person wearing them is holding still – walking or running locks the wheels in place.
Shadowsnail
If you crash a bike into an anti-bike, what color are the emitted photons?
Clif
Blood red.
Otherwise you’re not doing it fast enough.
Jess
GREAT mental image here, thank you.
Proxiehunter
We already knew that.
Bryy
Why would you think Mary would draw the line there?
Sirksome
I mean pronouns are just part of speech. Is Mary claiming god flooded the Earth because people talked?
Shitbird
Mary is Mary. So yes.
Fart Captor
No, Mary is saying God flooded the Earth because of trans people doing gender fuckery. “Pronouns” is just a dog whistle
Wizard
If that’s what she means, she’s doing a terrible job of expressing it. I mean, saying “they used pronouns” is either meaningless or incredibly ironic, and without more context there’s no way to tell which.
thejeff
It is a terrible way, but if you follow terf discourse, you’ll see it constantly. It’s one of those things that likely started off with more explanation, but now it’s just an in-group attack. Everyone who’s going to agree knows what you mean as do the people you’re trying to hurt, so why say more.
Some Ed
Because pretty much any time you talk about what everybody knows, even if it’s just limited to “everyone who x will know”, unless somehow the x quality fundamentally ensures knowledge, you’ll be wrong.
“Everyone who is good at math knows that 1 + 1 = 2”. Maybe this one is right. *Maybe*. I mean, it’s kind of the definition of 2. But what if there’s someone out there who does a lot of math and is good at what they do, but only does base 2, so to them, it’s 1 + 1 = 10, and they read “1 + 1 = 2” as “1 + 1 = undefined symbol”?
Even if, somehow, at some point in time, we managed to actually educate *everybody* on some topic, a second later, somebody new is born, and now not everyone knows again.
Yes, I’m on spectrum, but this is more about being willing to see the bigger picture and caring about what the words actually mean, because we need them to mean something to communicate effectively and if you keep limiting your definition based on whatever context you’re aware of that happens to work for you that not everyone will know, then communication doesn’t happen as smoothly as it could.
…
I’m being overly optimistic again, aren’t I? Communication can’t actually happen that smoothly, because we don’t all use Spectate Swamp’s Swamp Search. (Not bothering to cite that reference, since everybody knows it already.)
BlackJacques
It’s humor! You should look into this humor stuff, it’s great!
Nono
I wonder what she thinks about gendered words in a large number of languages.
Taellosse
I’ve no doubt that she has no objection to the existence of gendered words, or, indeed, traditional pronoun usage in English. Her problem, of a certainty, is with people who wish to adopt a gender identity – and the corresponding gendered pronouns – other than what they were assigned at birth. Undoubtedly she also takes issue with anyone wishing to adopt pronouns that are expressly designed to avoid alignment with one or the other side of the traditional gender binary.
With respect to languages which assign a gender to most nouns, Mary presumably opposes the efforts of some native speakers to de-gender their languages, since she likely believes those languages are already “as God intended”.
thejeff
Or even with people who do use the pronouns one might expect at a glance, but choose to announce theirs to normalize people whose preferred pronouns aren’t so obvious.
Wizard
Has anyone told her that some languages have three genders?
Some Ed
I’m pretty sure her problem is also the existence of people who, regardless of their personal preference, have a, um, complicated situation down there. Also, that’s a bit more than 0.1% of the population and it’s spread pretty evenly, so chances are really good she’s met at least one of them.
(I say more than 0.1%, because I’m aware that there are multiple causes for said complicated situations, and one particular one has an official frequency of about 1 in 1000. I don’t know how common any of the others are, and there probably are more of them than I know about.)
@Wizard: Like, um, English? Admittedly, we tend to not use one of them to refer to people, because it’s picked up a bad case of connotations. Some languages have four genders, and I don’t think English is among those.
The Oracle
Honestly, God’s kind of a bongo in a lot of those stories, so it’s not outside the realm of possibility.
Thag Simmons
The way reactionaries understand pronouns is not the way reasonable people understand pronouns
Slartibeast Button, BIA
Maybe they didn’t get pronouns until The Tower Of Babel…
easrng
That would certainly be something…
also whoops, hit the flag link by accident, sorry :/
The Wellerman
Hey this is actually pretty neat! ?
Say did you make this? Who voiced Becky?
Miri
Love that! Reminds me of the boobquake thing a few years back… (Divinity punishing mankind with earthquakes because of the shameless hussies displaying their cleavage… Inspiring many women to wear low-cut “boobquake” tops because having boobs powerful to cause earthquakes is pretty darned cool TYVM!)
a/snow/mous/e
owo what’s this?
Nipottaja
We must not use pronouns, say Mary.
Passive voice must not be used, say Strunk and White.
What’s left? Yoda-speak?
A way there always is.
Michael Chandra
Let he who is without sin throw the first stone. Gasp! And let’s not get started on how God is He. O_O
Amelie Wikström
Mary doesn’t realize she’s talking in jargon. And this is a spectacularly nonsensical piece of scaremongering christofascist jargon because it’s just using the regular word “pronouns” while attaching a big, vague, threatening (to the religious Right) concept of changing times and progressing social values and shifting power balances and gender nonconformism to it.
The frightening thing here I think is seeing how deep in her bubble of conservative extremism Mary lives, if she has lost sight of the idea there could be people who aren’t scared of the things that scare her or even follow the convolutions of her specialized language. Talking to Dina and Becky would probably be very good for her, if she cared about what they’re saying.
Twitcher
So, the initial assertion about Mary and her parents is that they have no idea why she’s like this. Is that still the case, or shall we see?
Bryy
All I’ve ever heard is that, via Word of God, Nary’s parents are nice.
easrng