Oh my gosh! What a milestone! Been wanting this for a decade! Dumbing of Age had been part of my childhood and good portion of my life. I thank Willis for making a fun comic. I went thru heart break, car crash, comma, travelled out of state, made the best friends I ever had, panick attacks, my true coming of Age. What an honor to get a first in a sweet page too.
Getting effed well on the regular can be quite an efficient treatment for the hateful mental condition, though
I mean – how many haters do you personally know who you feel are driven by being frustrated and unloved?
they really do complete each other in a beautiful way, with how their respective strengths make up for what the other is sometimes lacking in… and yet they’re still both colossal idiots lmao
Not sold on it being a healthy couple, but I’ll admit that this is the first comic since the kiss where I can actually enjoy the affection.
Still bothered by the way Walky and Joe were treated, but I can appreciate a simple little bit of affection without Joyce going whole hog “Tear my clothing off”.
Well, it’s too early to say if they’re a healthy couple or not. They’re healthier than most of the other relationships we’ve seen so far – but given the toxicity of many of the relationships, that’s not exactly saying much.
It’s that several times, she’s been unable to stay on-task for things that she, herself, regards as important, because she’s been too interested in diving further in.
One could argue that they might be doing better at things like covering for Jocelyn and communicating with the boys if they just ducked into a broom closet for 20 minutes, honestly.
None of that’s what I’m talking about! This cute, non-sexual moment is just as “distracting” as any sexual moment would be! I’m asking what the difference is that makes this okay and something else not okay
Also, even if what you were saying was what I asked, they were trying to cover for Jocelyne in the *previous strip to this one* and they communicated with the men three weeks ago. What are you talking about?
*Im* not sold on it being an interesting couple but I’m also not a killjoy so I’ll keep the essay on why in my notes app (hint it’s like mostly my personal feels around dotty. Or lack thereof)
I don’t know. I reread the whole comic in the past few days, and not only has this been teased since forever, but the last few arcs very obviously built up to the kiss, and Joe’s reaction to it. In hindsight, there are several Joe moments that are obviously pointing to a poly angle.
Personally, I found the big protest scene absolutely beautiful. There’s so many callbacks to things these two have said to each other, and the kiss is great, and the whole situation is dramatic as fuck. It’s really good romance. I’m looking forward to Joyce and Dorothy being cute and gay together as usual.
I do agree that Walky’s reaction is undersold, but Joyce swooping in and laughing was hilarious; plus I think we’re going to see how this affects him more as we go along.
Overall I think the people who are focusing on the cheating are kinda looking for things to hate honestly. It’s grasping at straws. So I think that if it wasn’t that, it’d be something else.
Lumino
Saying “People who are upset at cheating are just looking for a reason to complain” is a pretty bold claim.
Jon
There’s a huge difference between “upset at cheating” and “focusing on the cheating”. Some folks have had a reasonable (imo) reaction where they just don’t like that the girls didn’t go talk to their respective boyfriends as soon as they got back to the dorm (well, Joyce tried to, but she got sidetracked by penis). Others are acting as if Joyce and Dorothy have been carrying on in secret for decades, betraying the men they took some sacred oath to. Speaking as someone who’s been on the receiving end of both, there’s a big gap between “girlfriend cheating” and “wife cheating”, and some folks just don’t seem to get that.
thejeff
I’m sure some folks feel that way, but a lot of us would be satisfied by some reaction to the cheating. Yeah, there’s a difference when it’s not a marriage or a long relationship, but there’s usually something. This is minimal reaction by even college girlfriend standards.
Jon
This “cheating” started yesterday afternoon. Joe and Walky learned about it less than an hour ago. Give it a minute.
As I said in another thread, this is partially down to the strip’s glacial pace. What works for high-antics comedy and action-drama–both of which have a lot of internal momentum to carry from one strip to the next–is a less suitable fit for low-key emotional drama. I’m not surprised it works better on an archive trawl, actually–that brings the pacing back up a bit. (Hell, with a site redesign that put the archives into a week-a-page format, something that used to be quite common in webcomics, the pushback would probably be vastly reduced.)
thejeff
Not relevant. We’ve had Joe’s reaction. We don’t need to wait for it. We know what it is.
Walky’s reacting the same way Walky reacts to everything: Concealing his emotional vulnerability behind dumb jokes and eating his angst. Joe, again, has been completely clear that he is not only okay with this, but was actively working towards this outcome. Both of these reactions are entirely consistent with their characterization and actions throughout this storyline and this comic, and, hell, clear back into the previous universe.
You’re not mad because they’re not reacting to the cheating. You’re mad because they’re not reacting to the cheating the way you want them to.
John Campbell
There’s “being upset at cheating”, and then there’s “continuing to harp on how the girls need to face CoNsEqUeNcEs from Joe long after Joe has said outright that he not only fully supports it, but was actively encouraging it”.
thejeff
And then there’s refusing to understand that from some people’s point of view, Joe fully supporting it is part of the problem. It feels like things are just being handwaved into place to get the desired ship with anyone being hurt.
seems to be a lot complaints about Willis doing something lazily or in bad faith when the things in question have been foreshadowed for 15 years
thejeff
@Jacob: Not even necessarily “in the best interest of Joe as a character” or to avoid a particular scene, but to downplay the significance of the cheating even more that it already was.
@Megan: No. Just no. Whatever it is you’re implying. No. Neither the cheating nor Joe’s reaction have been forshadowed for 15 years. Joyce’s attraction to Dorothy has been, but not how it turned into a relationship
Joe’s affection for Joyce, Joyce’s affection for both Dorothy and Joe being very different from one another, Joe and Dorothy’s rivalrous friendship, several mentions of polyamory, Joe’s entire character arc centering around finding more respect for women and wanting whats best for them instead of just for him, and Joyce’s entire character arc being learning how queer she is and coming to accept gay and poly people so she could become one have all been major story elements for, if not since the start of the comic, then at the very least for a long fucking time.
So yes. Just yes. Whatever it is you’re whining about. Yes.
Amara
I’ve seen a lot of pushback about some of the phrasing used in the Patreon posts than any individual component of the comic. That’s a large part of what’s got the reddits all riled up. People are subscribing to Patreon and enjoying the comic less than they used to because of the commentary lmao.
Li
I absolutely think the comic by itself would probably be winning more people over if its defenders didn’t keep… y’know, saying stuff like “fuck the haters”.
We’re anticipating negativity so hard that we’re literally creating more of it.
Serendipity
I fully stand by what I said.
Li
Wasn’t really meant to be a pot shot at you, sorry that it felt that way. I’ve certainly either said or been very tempted to say similar things myself.
not boring enough for you to leave the rest of us in peace, I guess. engaging enough for you to come back and make everyone’s day worse. hip hip hooray for that.
Big Z
I have been reading these comics since Willis started making comics, and a couple weeks of meh storytelling has not stopped me from reading to this point.
What I don’t understand is the idea that someone disliking a ship is going to make your day worse in some meaningful way.
going to the website for people who like a thing and like talking about the thing they like and going “Well I think this sucks ass and you’re all lame!” makes you a bit of a little shit, is the idea.
Big Z
As I said, I mostly keep my “this couple sucks ass” to myself unless I’m specifically responding to “ha ha fuck you for thinking this couple sucks ass”.
And again: I’m talking about a thing I like 99.99%+ of but dislike one specific part of, and saying “this one specific part is bad”. Not whatever it is you are randomly accusing me of.
okay, so “Anyone who likes this should shut up and leave the haters alone” is NOT what you said, thank god. I’m allergic to scrolling up, so I have no choice but to believe you.
why does everyone on this site try to fucking gaslight me so hard when I can read??? your words are right there, I can see them! Yes you did! You said that! hello??? do you think i’m illiterate????????
Big Z
IF you don’t think there’s a difference between “anyone who likes this” (not what I said) and “all the people gloating” (what I actually said), that would explain a great deal about this conversation to ME, at least.
Kintrex
It is, in fact, possible to say “don’t be bad and annoying” in a bad and annoying way.
Li
I mean, you, Megan, are definitely one of the most aggro defenders of the strip. I know some people have been assholes and some of them have been assholes to you specifically but you paint with a really broad brush that just kind of lumps “everyone who has any kind of complaint about this storyline at all” with “the few people making violently queerphobic comments”, and it sucks.
Hey, that’s entirely unfair, I haven’t accused an innocent person of being homophobic in, like, at least a week. Now I’m just aggro at whiny jerks and *actual* homophobes!
Big Z
I will 100% cop to only posting a hater post because I saw this specific post, but in general the comic’s trajectory would have to change a fair bit to change me from a hater to a non-hater (as opposed to from a vocal hater to a let-it-ride hater).
Donovan
Hail, comrade
Li
I did say more! Not all. 🙂
I also think the discussion would have died down a lot on both sides if we didn’t keep poking each other’s metaphorical bears. Even the milder comments like “these two are so [boring/cute]” are getting made more than they would be if not for both sides knowing that the other one’s gonna say stuff.
Like, there have been strips where I really had nothing to say, but I still felt compelled to say “I really like Joyce and Dorothy as a couple”, because I think the general human impulse is to go to the effort of leaving a comment when you have a complaint, but not when your mood is “totally okay”?
And that gets passive-aggressive…
And then someone’ll post something less passive, more aggressive, and more people will chime in, either directly or in their own top-levels.
SOME of which, I’m sure, Willis is grateful for, because it’s engagement for sure…….
But yeah. I think we’re all sometimes guilty of creating arguments where there could’ve just been quiet, if not peace. 😉
Big Z
I’ve seriously been consciously trying to avoid “Oh god so boring” posts, and I just won’t do them as a top level anymore with rare exceptions (and I thought my one on this comic was pretty funny and anodyne, honestly).
Ludaire
I don’t think people are looking for something to hate. I think it’s more that some people are so offended at the very concept of cheating that even something that’s basically as benign as it possibly can be while still meeting the definition is so upsetting to them that they expect horrible punishment and karma, which they just aren’t getting.
It’s honestly a really good demonstration of what happens when one’s ethics are based on simplistic rules and draconian punishments rather than a recognition of the full context of an action and its consequences. It’s also a good demonstration of what happens when people view ethics as a way of determining who the bad people are and who the good people are rather than a method for determining what the best action to take is in a given situation.
It’s also interesting to see whether people are judging Dorothy and Joyce entirely by the one mistake or by the actions they take in response to their mistake. Are they heinous, awful cheaters who deserve everything bad coming their way or are they teenagers who fucked up and are admirable for working to rectify the mistake, even if they make some missteps along the way?
All in all, I keep coming back to people complaining that Willis wrote a poor cheating arc because it didn’t go how most expect. I think he wrote a brilliant one because peoples’ reactions are so varied and so much of how the characters are reacting challenges traditional notions of cheating as a singular, unforgivable sin deserving of hate rather than a range of behaviors which warrant different responses based on the context and people involved.
thejeff
You know, it’s this kind of post that keeps me firmly in the hater camp. It’s such a twisted distortion of what most haters here want. I’m sure there are exceptions, mostly in the deleted comments and on other forums, but almost no one here is calling for draconian or horrible punishments. I’ve got no problem with characters fucking up and working to rectify their mistakes, but so far they haven’t even had to do that.
Neither Joyce nor Dorothy even had to confess. Joe had already seen the news and immediately offered poly. Problem solved. Joyce doesn’t have to do anything accept decide if she wants to keep them both. Dorothy stalled and her attempt got hijacked by Joyce rushing in to laugh at Walky and claim she’d won.
I certainly don’t think they’re forever damned by cheating, but I would have liked to see someone actually care about it. I’d like to see them have to do something to make up for it. No draconian punishments or anything, just something to earn back the trust they should have burned.
But no. I just have bad ethics, based on simplistic rules and draconian punishments, that I just use to identify bad people.
Yeah, I concur that the psychoanalyzing being indulged in has invariably kept me out of the sickos camp–the notion that someone, somewhere, could have a different take on events is so unthinkable to some of them that they must invent entire new psychoses in order to account for that.
Obviously, not all the sickos have taken that approach, but some of the most vocal ones absolutely do.
Ludaire
As I acknowledged below, the hyperbolic language was too much, but how is acknowledging how peoples’ response to this situation might indicate something about their ethical views “inventing entire new psychoses?”
Ludaire
I apologize for the hyperbolic language. I can see how you’d take what I said as a simple accusation of “bad ethics” and understand why that would be upsetting. Even if I disagree with the ethical foundation of the views, that’s too much, and I should be more respectful.
Donovan
Also getting tired of being — it feelss at this point willfully — misrepresented no matter jow plainly i try nktmo articulate kmmky actual feelings.
Fucking sucks comrade
Donovan
Fucking KEYBOARD
thejeff
and I thought the text breaking down in the middle “how plainly I try” was deliberate. 🙂
Donovan
No i’m not that clever
Ludaire
Inflammatory rhetoric I’ve already apologized for aside, is the “They’re just looking for something to hate” comment I was disagreeing really preferable to my response of “No, they likely see morality through a somewhat different lens?”
Donovan
Its not even about morals i just think its been fucking DULL
Big Z
That’s the part that annoys me — the constant accusations of somehow being morally miswired for not liking one ship and one storyline in a comic whose author I’ve been reading longer than some fans have been alive.
thejeff
Only in the way it again completely misunderstood what most of the “haters” actually want.
347 thoughts on “Hit up”
JepMZ
Am I first???
Clif
Who cares. We got kissing more. That’s what’s important.
anon
And then hank turns around for .5 seconds and saw that
Clif
See Doxkid’s comment below. It’s the sixth top-level comment.
JepMZ
Oh my gosh! What a milestone! Been wanting this for a decade! Dumbing of Age had been part of my childhood and good portion of my life. I thank Willis for making a fun comic. I went thru heart break, car crash, comma, travelled out of state, made the best friends I ever had, panick attacks, my true coming of Age. What an honor to get a first in a sweet page too.
Yet_One_More_Idiot
That final panel-and-a-half were adorable af. <3
NGPZ
aaaawwweee ^-^
Reaver
Aw…
Serendipity
This is a good couple, fuck the haters.
Pocky
I am not volunteering to fuck the haters.
Amós Batista
It’s for the people, comrade!
clif
And Science. Don’t forget about Science.
ResRam
Getting effed well on the regular can be quite an efficient treatment for the hateful mental condition, though
I mean – how many haters do you personally know who you feel are driven by being frustrated and unloved?
Not that I´d be volunteering either, mind.
QueenofSodor
they really do complete each other in a beautiful way, with how their respective strengths make up for what the other is sometimes lacking in… and yet they’re still both colossal idiots lmao
Effie
Colossal Idioting Of Age
Tan
They complete each other, and sometimes that means completing each other’s colossal idiocy. Other times it’s cute shit like this.
NGPZ
ooops my mouse slipped and a meme happened XD
Sickos Vs Paladins in a nutshell:
[CW: brief, censored cartoon nudity]
Taffy
I wish more people ran around with random buckets of porn they found on tables.
Donovan
I’m a hater who doesn’t fuck, so no thanks
Lumino
Not sold on it being a healthy couple, but I’ll admit that this is the first comic since the kiss where I can actually enjoy the affection.
Still bothered by the way Walky and Joe were treated, but I can appreciate a simple little bit of affection without Joyce going whole hog “Tear my clothing off”.
Akane
They’re a healthy couple, and Joe is still there.
Myra V
Well, it’s too early to say if they’re a healthy couple or not. They’re healthier than most of the other relationships we’ve seen so far – but given the toxicity of many of the relationships, that’s not exactly saying much.
Megan
Oh PLEASE elaborate on why “tear my vlothes off” is a bad thing, I’m dying to hear that line of thinking
Freemage
It’s that several times, she’s been unable to stay on-task for things that she, herself, regards as important, because she’s been too interested in diving further in.
One could argue that they might be doing better at things like covering for Jocelyn and communicating with the boys if they just ducked into a broom closet for 20 minutes, honestly.
Megan
None of that’s what I’m talking about! This cute, non-sexual moment is just as “distracting” as any sexual moment would be! I’m asking what the difference is that makes this okay and something else not okay
Also, even if what you were saying was what I asked, they were trying to cover for Jocelyne in the *previous strip to this one* and they communicated with the men three weeks ago. What are you talking about?
zee
*Im* not sold on it being an interesting couple but I’m also not a killjoy so I’ll keep the essay on why in my notes app (hint it’s like mostly my personal feels around dotty. Or lack thereof)
Ludaire
I’m normally more diplomatic than this, but seeing this comic, I think you sum it up well.
anon
becky drama aside i imagine there’d be ‘less haters’ without the cheating aspect or so
TheMormegil
I don’t know. I reread the whole comic in the past few days, and not only has this been teased since forever, but the last few arcs very obviously built up to the kiss, and Joe’s reaction to it. In hindsight, there are several Joe moments that are obviously pointing to a poly angle.
Personally, I found the big protest scene absolutely beautiful. There’s so many callbacks to things these two have said to each other, and the kiss is great, and the whole situation is dramatic as fuck. It’s really good romance. I’m looking forward to Joyce and Dorothy being cute and gay together as usual.
I do agree that Walky’s reaction is undersold, but Joyce swooping in and laughing was hilarious; plus I think we’re going to see how this affects him more as we go along.
Overall I think the people who are focusing on the cheating are kinda looking for things to hate honestly. It’s grasping at straws. So I think that if it wasn’t that, it’d be something else.
Lumino
Saying “People who are upset at cheating are just looking for a reason to complain” is a pretty bold claim.
Jon
There’s a huge difference between “upset at cheating” and “focusing on the cheating”. Some folks have had a reasonable (imo) reaction where they just don’t like that the girls didn’t go talk to their respective boyfriends as soon as they got back to the dorm (well, Joyce tried to, but she got sidetracked by penis). Others are acting as if Joyce and Dorothy have been carrying on in secret for decades, betraying the men they took some sacred oath to. Speaking as someone who’s been on the receiving end of both, there’s a big gap between “girlfriend cheating” and “wife cheating”, and some folks just don’t seem to get that.
thejeff
I’m sure some folks feel that way, but a lot of us would be satisfied by some reaction to the cheating. Yeah, there’s a difference when it’s not a marriage or a long relationship, but there’s usually something. This is minimal reaction by even college girlfriend standards.
Jon
This “cheating” started yesterday afternoon. Joe and Walky learned about it less than an hour ago. Give it a minute.
Freemage
As I said in another thread, this is partially down to the strip’s glacial pace. What works for high-antics comedy and action-drama–both of which have a lot of internal momentum to carry from one strip to the next–is a less suitable fit for low-key emotional drama. I’m not surprised it works better on an archive trawl, actually–that brings the pacing back up a bit. (Hell, with a site redesign that put the archives into a week-a-page format, something that used to be quite common in webcomics, the pushback would probably be vastly reduced.)
thejeff
Not relevant. We’ve had Joe’s reaction. We don’t need to wait for it. We know what it is.
John Campbell
Walky’s reacting the same way Walky reacts to everything: Concealing his emotional vulnerability behind dumb jokes and eating his angst. Joe, again, has been completely clear that he is not only okay with this, but was actively working towards this outcome. Both of these reactions are entirely consistent with their characterization and actions throughout this storyline and this comic, and, hell, clear back into the previous universe.
You’re not mad because they’re not reacting to the cheating. You’re mad because they’re not reacting to the cheating the way you want them to.
John Campbell
There’s “being upset at cheating”, and then there’s “continuing to harp on how the girls need to face CoNsEqUeNcEs from Joe long after Joe has said outright that he not only fully supports it, but was actively encouraging it”.
thejeff
And then there’s refusing to understand that from some people’s point of view, Joe fully supporting it is part of the problem. It feels like things are just being handwaved into place to get the desired ship with anyone being hurt.
Megan
why is Joe supporting it a problem
Megan
seems to be a lot complaints about Willis doing something lazily or in bad faith when the things in question have been foreshadowed for 15 years
thejeff
@Jacob: Not even necessarily “in the best interest of Joe as a character” or to avoid a particular scene, but to downplay the significance of the cheating even more that it already was.
@Megan: No. Just no. Whatever it is you’re implying. No. Neither the cheating nor Joe’s reaction have been forshadowed for 15 years. Joyce’s attraction to Dorothy has been, but not how it turned into a relationship
Megan
Joe’s affection for Joyce, Joyce’s affection for both Dorothy and Joe being very different from one another, Joe and Dorothy’s rivalrous friendship, several mentions of polyamory, Joe’s entire character arc centering around finding more respect for women and wanting whats best for them instead of just for him, and Joyce’s entire character arc being learning how queer she is and coming to accept gay and poly people so she could become one have all been major story elements for, if not since the start of the comic, then at the very least for a long fucking time.
So yes. Just yes. Whatever it is you’re whining about. Yes.
Amara
I’ve seen a lot of pushback about some of the phrasing used in the Patreon posts than any individual component of the comic. That’s a large part of what’s got the reddits all riled up. People are subscribing to Patreon and enjoying the comic less than they used to because of the commentary lmao.
Li
I absolutely think the comic by itself would probably be winning more people over if its defenders didn’t keep… y’know, saying stuff like “fuck the haters”.
We’re anticipating negativity so hard that we’re literally creating more of it.
Serendipity
I fully stand by what I said.
Li
Wasn’t really meant to be a pot shot at you, sorry that it felt that way. I’ve certainly either said or been very tempted to say similar things myself.
Megan
people who are bad and annoying and those who say “dont be bad and annoying” are actually the same. there’s no difference. we’re all geniuses.
Big Z
You are correct, all the people gloating about this milquetoast and boring relationship SHOULD stop and leave the haters in peace.
Megan
not boring enough for you to leave the rest of us in peace, I guess. engaging enough for you to come back and make everyone’s day worse. hip hip hooray for that.
Big Z
I have been reading these comics since Willis started making comics, and a couple weeks of meh storytelling has not stopped me from reading to this point.
What I don’t understand is the idea that someone disliking a ship is going to make your day worse in some meaningful way.
Megan
going to the website for people who like a thing and like talking about the thing they like and going “Well I think this sucks ass and you’re all lame!” makes you a bit of a little shit, is the idea.
Big Z
As I said, I mostly keep my “this couple sucks ass” to myself unless I’m specifically responding to “ha ha fuck you for thinking this couple sucks ass”.
And again: I’m talking about a thing I like 99.99%+ of but dislike one specific part of, and saying “this one specific part is bad”. Not whatever it is you are randomly accusing me of.
Donovan
Great thing he doesn’t say that then
Megan
okay, so “Anyone who likes this should shut up and leave the haters alone” is NOT what you said, thank god. I’m allergic to scrolling up, so I have no choice but to believe you.
Megan
why does everyone on this site try to fucking gaslight me so hard when I can read??? your words are right there, I can see them! Yes you did! You said that! hello??? do you think i’m illiterate????????
Big Z
IF you don’t think there’s a difference between “anyone who likes this” (not what I said) and “all the people gloating” (what I actually said), that would explain a great deal about this conversation to ME, at least.
Kintrex
It is, in fact, possible to say “don’t be bad and annoying” in a bad and annoying way.
Li
I mean, you, Megan, are definitely one of the most aggro defenders of the strip. I know some people have been assholes and some of them have been assholes to you specifically but you paint with a really broad brush that just kind of lumps “everyone who has any kind of complaint about this storyline at all” with “the few people making violently queerphobic comments”, and it sucks.
Megan
Hey, that’s entirely unfair, I haven’t accused an innocent person of being homophobic in, like, at least a week. Now I’m just aggro at whiny jerks and *actual* homophobes!
Big Z
I will 100% cop to only posting a hater post because I saw this specific post, but in general the comic’s trajectory would have to change a fair bit to change me from a hater to a non-hater (as opposed to from a vocal hater to a let-it-ride hater).
Donovan
Hail, comrade
Li
I did say more! Not all. 🙂
I also think the discussion would have died down a lot on both sides if we didn’t keep poking each other’s metaphorical bears. Even the milder comments like “these two are so [boring/cute]” are getting made more than they would be if not for both sides knowing that the other one’s gonna say stuff.
Like, there have been strips where I really had nothing to say, but I still felt compelled to say “I really like Joyce and Dorothy as a couple”, because I think the general human impulse is to go to the effort of leaving a comment when you have a complaint, but not when your mood is “totally okay”?
And that gets passive-aggressive…
And then someone’ll post something less passive, more aggressive, and more people will chime in, either directly or in their own top-levels.
SOME of which, I’m sure, Willis is grateful for, because it’s engagement for sure…….
But yeah. I think we’re all sometimes guilty of creating arguments where there could’ve just been quiet, if not peace. 😉
Big Z
I’ve seriously been consciously trying to avoid “Oh god so boring” posts, and I just won’t do them as a top level anymore with rare exceptions (and I thought my one on this comic was pretty funny and anodyne, honestly).
Ludaire
I don’t think people are looking for something to hate. I think it’s more that some people are so offended at the very concept of cheating that even something that’s basically as benign as it possibly can be while still meeting the definition is so upsetting to them that they expect horrible punishment and karma, which they just aren’t getting.
It’s honestly a really good demonstration of what happens when one’s ethics are based on simplistic rules and draconian punishments rather than a recognition of the full context of an action and its consequences. It’s also a good demonstration of what happens when people view ethics as a way of determining who the bad people are and who the good people are rather than a method for determining what the best action to take is in a given situation.
It’s also interesting to see whether people are judging Dorothy and Joyce entirely by the one mistake or by the actions they take in response to their mistake. Are they heinous, awful cheaters who deserve everything bad coming their way or are they teenagers who fucked up and are admirable for working to rectify the mistake, even if they make some missteps along the way?
All in all, I keep coming back to people complaining that Willis wrote a poor cheating arc because it didn’t go how most expect. I think he wrote a brilliant one because peoples’ reactions are so varied and so much of how the characters are reacting challenges traditional notions of cheating as a singular, unforgivable sin deserving of hate rather than a range of behaviors which warrant different responses based on the context and people involved.
thejeff
You know, it’s this kind of post that keeps me firmly in the hater camp. It’s such a twisted distortion of what most haters here want. I’m sure there are exceptions, mostly in the deleted comments and on other forums, but almost no one here is calling for draconian or horrible punishments. I’ve got no problem with characters fucking up and working to rectify their mistakes, but so far they haven’t even had to do that.
Neither Joyce nor Dorothy even had to confess. Joe had already seen the news and immediately offered poly. Problem solved. Joyce doesn’t have to do anything accept decide if she wants to keep them both. Dorothy stalled and her attempt got hijacked by Joyce rushing in to laugh at Walky and claim she’d won.
I certainly don’t think they’re forever damned by cheating, but I would have liked to see someone actually care about it. I’d like to see them have to do something to make up for it. No draconian punishments or anything, just something to earn back the trust they should have burned.
But no. I just have bad ethics, based on simplistic rules and draconian punishments, that I just use to identify bad people.
Freemage
Yeah, I concur that the psychoanalyzing being indulged in has invariably kept me out of the sickos camp–the notion that someone, somewhere, could have a different take on events is so unthinkable to some of them that they must invent entire new psychoses in order to account for that.
Obviously, not all the sickos have taken that approach, but some of the most vocal ones absolutely do.
Ludaire
As I acknowledged below, the hyperbolic language was too much, but how is acknowledging how peoples’ response to this situation might indicate something about their ethical views “inventing entire new psychoses?”
Ludaire
I apologize for the hyperbolic language. I can see how you’d take what I said as a simple accusation of “bad ethics” and understand why that would be upsetting. Even if I disagree with the ethical foundation of the views, that’s too much, and I should be more respectful.
Donovan
Also getting tired of being — it feelss at this point willfully — misrepresented no matter jow plainly i try nktmo articulate kmmky actual feelings.
Fucking sucks comrade
Donovan
Fucking KEYBOARD
thejeff
and I thought the text breaking down in the middle “how plainly I try” was deliberate. 🙂
Donovan
No i’m not that clever
Ludaire
Inflammatory rhetoric I’ve already apologized for aside, is the “They’re just looking for something to hate” comment I was disagreeing really preferable to my response of “No, they likely see morality through a somewhat different lens?”
Donovan
Its not even about morals i just think its been fucking DULL
Big Z
That’s the part that annoys me — the constant accusations of somehow being morally miswired for not liking one ship and one storyline in a comic whose author I’ve been reading longer than some fans have been alive.
thejeff
Only in the way it again completely misunderstood what most of the “haters” actually want.