I’m in favor of Carly (Carla + Sally). It seems to be the cutest pair name we can get from those two, and the alternatives (Sarla, Salra, Cal, Cally) are kinda.. iffy.
Ah, okay, so Carla’s there. Also, looks like Malaya may not have been nearby for the “Amber” mentions. Not that it’d make a big difference either way, I don’t see who she’d even mention it to.
I am an atheist/agnostic, so god’s existence in relationtion to gender and sexuality seems pointless.
However, in the topic of she ra, it’s more like lesbianism is a form of magic that can defy reality like some gurren lagann will power drill, though this time the main couple doesn’t suffer what Simon and Mia suffered.
sharktrs
>lesbianism is a form of magic that can defy reality like some gurren lagann will power drill
I suddenly feel an incredible urge to watch She-Ra
Well sure Malaya if you really want to be arrested by the cops then have at it but since hes posing no threat and is tied up you could just drop him to ground instead
I’m not a legal expert but if you were in court could you justify why Malaya punched the guy to the ground instead of tripping/throwing/dragging etc etc him down given that his arms and legs are tied up and hes blindfolded
Not saying he doesn’t deserve a good hiding but if he was to fall to the ground and sustain something serious like a broken nose or fractured skull or something then Malaya could find herself having to face charges
It’s easily justifiable. He’s under arrest (having committed a felony in the presence of a citizen, and attempting to commit another felony (escape) in Malaya’s presence), she can use reasonable force to stop him.
Shooting him would be excessive force, a punch would not be. A curbstomping once he’s on the ground would be excessive force.
Keep in mind that this guy is now on the hook for kidnapping and felony murder. Nobody is going to prosecute Malaya for stopping him.
Technically an over-eager or misguided prosecutor might try to have Malaya if she hits the guy. But I don’t think she would have problems defending herself…
1) the man she was hitting was a violent criminal 2) one of his co-conspirators had already escaped and taken a hostage 3) the former kidnap victims had escaped by faking that they were still tied up so it’s possible that this guy is doing the same. All that might give her a “worried for my safety” defense.
I guess the real issue for me is the idea that it’s ok to beat up on the guy thats basically helpless, that can’t defend himself (and yeah I’d want to smack him around as well) yet when the police assault a criminal (or alleged criminal) its considered police brutality (and rightfully so)
I just think its kind of telling what we’d do if there weren’t any consequences for our actions…
Sam
If there weren’t any consequences for our actions (legally speaking), then most people would still opt to be moral and wouldn’t turn into violent people or murderers overnight. It’s the already violent, immoral and uncaring, who only hold themselves back because going to jail would be inconvenient, or that don’t have the power to get away with it, that would be the problem.
Malaya already has a violent disposition and a lack of care about the law, I don’t feel surprised that she would think beating up a defenseless person with more force than necessary to stop them is fine (we know he is 100% guilty which makes it seem more understandable to us too but if we weren’t sure, we’d likely see that as too far regardless). Malaya is already not the most moral, kind or pleasant person.
If the law was removed from the equation though, people like Dorothy and Walky still wouldn’t be going around starting fights or anything though. Because they’re not fighty people and have no desire to get into them. It wouldn’t radically change good people into bad people if there were no consequences. It would just give the people that were already inclined to act out in bad ways the freedom to.
Which wouldn’t necessarily be people with murderous ideation (which no one who suffers from it asks for) or anger problems (which comes with many mental illnesses) or impulse control problems (again, comes with many mental illnesses). It’d be people with loose or no morals that would give themselves permission to act out. Because like, if there was no law right now, would you go out and just start a fight? Probably not. For pretty much all the same reasons you wouldn’t with the law in place.
What ‘we’ would do is stay pretty much the same though maybe be more lax on things we thought were stupid as a society in the first place and already pretty much disregarded. What Malaya would do is probably deck a few extra people that she doesn’t like. What someone like Blaine obsessed with control and maintaining power would do would be incomprehendable, because he already wants to do bad things and get away with it (even if normally he is too stupid to guarantee his getting away with it).
Puckish Rogue
Its why I like games like skyrim and fallout new vegas, because there are no consequences yet I still find myself playing in a moral way
thejeff
Police are heavily armed and hold authority. They need to be held to higher standards than regular citizens because of that.
anonymousethatscurriesinthedarkness
Yet they now have this new thing called “Qualified Immunity”.
Also they don’t actually have to know the law, just think they know the law.
It is how imaginary charges like “recording me doing bad stuff” are dropped yet “resisting arrest” will still be prosecuted.
thejeff
Well, I’m speaking more in terms of how they should be treated, rather than our current reality.
I don’t know why but I assumed they were all gonna go after Blaine somehow. I guess I kinda forgot that they only have Sal’s motorcycle to chase his van with.
I sort of thought that Carla might hang on to the back of the bike with her skates and get towed along, which would be hella stupid and dangerous, of course
159 thoughts on “Fistfight”
Ana Chronistic
dude is just LOOKING for trouble by doing that instead of staying put
SuperZero
On the one hand, it’s what they good guys did. On the other, why didn’t he do something about his bonds first?
Chaucer59
You’re expecting someone who assisted Blaine in a kidnapping scheme to engage in rational thought?
UncolaMan
He’s doing what worked for the boss: ditch everyone else when things go bad.
DudeMyDadOwnsaDealership
Same goes for most people who make prisons a necessity to society. It also doesn’t hurt for Malaya that he’s the ugliest one in the bunch, either.
Librain
I’m not sure how private prison owning corporations are relevant here?
Opus the Poet
Because the kidnappees had recent experience on how to not be bound with duct tape while the kidnappers had no such experience.
a/snow/mous/e
This is an allegory for how we should stay at home lest the Marcievirus infect us.
a/snow/mous/e
*Malayavirus gdi, i need to get my M’s straight
a/snow/mous/e
(except they’re queer oops)
MIB4u
I lol’d. XD
Deanatay
The Malayavirus, or GDAMNIT-19, has a higher rate of mortality than most other girlviruses of its kind.
Needfuldoer
And an asymptomatic dwell time of… *checks buffer watch* three months.
Wack'd
Sal/Carla OTP
jez2718
Beat me to it
Doctor_Who
Shall we call it Sarla or Cal?
HeySo
I’m in favor of Carly (Carla + Sally). It seems to be the cutest pair name we can get from those two, and the alternatives (Sarla, Salra, Cal, Cally) are kinda.. iffy.
greatcontagion
I vote for Cal. So when you’re talking about it or see it in canon, it’s the Cal Zone.
anonymousethatscurriesinthedarkness
That pun is just so cheesy – Boooooo
😉
HeySo
Cheesy is fine. Desirable, even.
It’s when you realize there’s sausage involved that it gets.. weird.
Leadsynth
I like to think that even tho Carla is ace af, she was still into touching Sal’s hips/butt during the motorcycle ride.
DailyBrad
Ah, okay, so Carla’s there. Also, looks like Malaya may not have been nearby for the “Amber” mentions. Not that it’d make a big difference either way, I don’t see who she’d even mention it to.
He Who Abides
I doubt she’d care, honestly.
Tarnagh
It could be a good thing that Carla is there, considering who her parents are. Specifically how wealthy and influential they probably are.
Stephen Bierce
MALAYA SMASH!
Reltzik
Godammit Malay–… actually, no, I’m okay with this.
anonymousethatscurriesinthedarkness
Why not both?
This is Malaya we are talking about after all.
Deanatay
GODDAMNIT, MALAYA! KICK HIS ASS!!
ReFlex76
“God answers lesbian prayers.”
As proven by the finale of She-ra and the Princesses of Power.
Yumi
God’s a lesbian
Opus the Poet
I find it highly probable She is.
Zaxares
They say God loves everyone, so I’m more of the belief she’s a Pansexual. 😉
Caspar Mulders
Also, God is said to be all-seeing, which opens up a whole new can of creepy voyeurist theology.
anonymousethatscurriesinthedarkness
Where do you think mom powers originate when it comes to her kids?
Rabid Rabbit
Uncle Randy’s got you covered: https://somethingpositive.net/sp04262010.shtml
Strangeshapes
Your avatar makes this comment.
abysswatcher1993
I am an atheist/agnostic, so god’s existence in relationtion to gender and sexuality seems pointless.
However, in the topic of she ra, it’s more like lesbianism is a form of magic that can defy reality like some gurren lagann will power drill, though this time the main couple doesn’t suffer what Simon and Mia suffered.
sharktrs
>lesbianism is a form of magic that can defy reality like some gurren lagann will power drill
I suddenly feel an incredible urge to watch She-Ra
Pope William T Wodium
Screw you I haven’t seen it yet.
ReFlex76
I didn’t reveal anything specific.
CMasta
Serious Ghostbuster vibes from Carla’s line.
Doctor_Who
Carla never needs to question whether she’s a deity, she was born knowing.
The awesomeness of Sal’s motorbike however, is something that must be experienced firsthand.
Lawzlo
But don’t feed your Malaya after midnight or get water on her.
Doctor_Who
My favorite Malaya from Malaya 2 was the Bat-Malaya, but the Vegetable-Malaya was cool too.
He Who Abides
The Brain-Malaya was the best! How could you forget about her!?
AntJ
or else… https://www.dumbingofage.com/2014/comic/book-4/03-up-all-night-to-get-vengeance/beforesunrise/
Bunny
It’s nice to see Malaya’s good for something.
Makkabee
She’s responsible for bringing Fuckface to campus.
Puckish Rogue
Well sure Malaya if you really want to be arrested by the cops then have at it but since hes posing no threat and is tied up you could just drop him to ground instead
BBCC
She can’t drop him to the ground with a punch? 😛
Puckish Rogue
I’m not a legal expert but if you were in court could you justify why Malaya punched the guy to the ground instead of tripping/throwing/dragging etc etc him down given that his arms and legs are tied up and hes blindfolded
Not saying he doesn’t deserve a good hiding but if he was to fall to the ground and sustain something serious like a broken nose or fractured skull or something then Malaya could find herself having to face charges
Ophidiophile
Well, he is blindfolded, and with Sal gone, who is going to identify her as his attacker?
Plus, this is Malaya; she’s as likely to lay him out as she is to just lay him.
Caspar Mulders
Or both. In that order. With equal malice.
Roborat
He isn’t blindfolded, he is still wearing his bad guy mask.
Needfuldoer
‘”I know you’re an accomplice to murder and kidnapping, but you’re not fakey, right?”
Victor
It’s easily justifiable. He’s under arrest (having committed a felony in the presence of a citizen, and attempting to commit another felony (escape) in Malaya’s presence), she can use reasonable force to stop him.
Shooting him would be excessive force, a punch would not be. A curbstomping once he’s on the ground would be excessive force.
Keep in mind that this guy is now on the hook for kidnapping and felony murder. Nobody is going to prosecute Malaya for stopping him.
Segnosaur
Technically an over-eager or misguided prosecutor might try to have Malaya if she hits the guy. But I don’t think she would have problems defending herself…
1) the man she was hitting was a violent criminal 2) one of his co-conspirators had already escaped and taken a hostage 3) the former kidnap victims had escaped by faking that they were still tied up so it’s possible that this guy is doing the same. All that might give her a “worried for my safety” defense.
Puckish Rogue
I guess the real issue for me is the idea that it’s ok to beat up on the guy thats basically helpless, that can’t defend himself (and yeah I’d want to smack him around as well) yet when the police assault a criminal (or alleged criminal) its considered police brutality (and rightfully so)
I just think its kind of telling what we’d do if there weren’t any consequences for our actions…
Sam
If there weren’t any consequences for our actions (legally speaking), then most people would still opt to be moral and wouldn’t turn into violent people or murderers overnight. It’s the already violent, immoral and uncaring, who only hold themselves back because going to jail would be inconvenient, or that don’t have the power to get away with it, that would be the problem.
Malaya already has a violent disposition and a lack of care about the law, I don’t feel surprised that she would think beating up a defenseless person with more force than necessary to stop them is fine (we know he is 100% guilty which makes it seem more understandable to us too but if we weren’t sure, we’d likely see that as too far regardless). Malaya is already not the most moral, kind or pleasant person.
If the law was removed from the equation though, people like Dorothy and Walky still wouldn’t be going around starting fights or anything though. Because they’re not fighty people and have no desire to get into them. It wouldn’t radically change good people into bad people if there were no consequences. It would just give the people that were already inclined to act out in bad ways the freedom to.
Which wouldn’t necessarily be people with murderous ideation (which no one who suffers from it asks for) or anger problems (which comes with many mental illnesses) or impulse control problems (again, comes with many mental illnesses). It’d be people with loose or no morals that would give themselves permission to act out. Because like, if there was no law right now, would you go out and just start a fight? Probably not. For pretty much all the same reasons you wouldn’t with the law in place.
What ‘we’ would do is stay pretty much the same though maybe be more lax on things we thought were stupid as a society in the first place and already pretty much disregarded. What Malaya would do is probably deck a few extra people that she doesn’t like. What someone like Blaine obsessed with control and maintaining power would do would be incomprehendable, because he already wants to do bad things and get away with it (even if normally he is too stupid to guarantee his getting away with it).
Puckish Rogue
Its why I like games like skyrim and fallout new vegas, because there are no consequences yet I still find myself playing in a moral way
thejeff
Police are heavily armed and hold authority. They need to be held to higher standards than regular citizens because of that.
anonymousethatscurriesinthedarkness
Yet they now have this new thing called “Qualified Immunity”.
Also they don’t actually have to know the law, just think they know the law.
It is how imaginary charges like “recording me doing bad stuff” are dropped yet “resisting arrest” will still be prosecuted.
thejeff
Well, I’m speaking more in terms of how they should be treated, rather than our current reality.
CMasta
Malaya getting arrested for assault is the storyline I’ve been craving.
Go for it.
Miri
I thought Malaya was about to punch out Walky for a moment… I prefer this outcome ?
Puckish Rogue
I’d be ok with it
Yumi
I think Walky thought that, too.
General Tekno
Name of the next book, I see?
Keulen
I don’t know why but I assumed they were all gonna go after Blaine somehow. I guess I kinda forgot that they only have Sal’s motorcycle to chase his van with.
Ray Radlein
I sort of thought that Carla might hang on to the back of the bike with her skates and get towed along, which would be hella stupid and dangerous, of course
HeySo